Pierwotna przezskórma interwencja wieńcowa za pomocą cewnika diagnostycznego typu Tiger w przypadku nietypowego odejścia gałęzi pnia lewej tętnicy wieńcowej
Streszczenie
The use of smaller catheters for diagnostic and intervention purpose is becoming increasingly popular due to the shift towards transradial catheterisation. The use of smaller catheters permits smaller arterial punctures, which translates into early mobilisation and discharge, as it may obviate the need for closure devices, lesser contrast volume use, potential nephrotoxicity and decreased morbidity. Here, we report a case, where standard 5 F Tiger diagnostic catheters (Terumo Radifocus Optitorque, Japan) was used for primary percutaneous coronary intervention of left circumflex artery with abnormal take-off of the left main.
Słowa kluczowe: Tiger diagnostic catheterprimary percutaneous coronary interventionabnormal take-off
Referencje
- Grüntzig A. Transluminal Dilatation of Coronary Artery Stenosis — Experimental Report. Percutaneous Vascular Recanalization. 1978: 57–65.
- Kern MJ, Cohen M, Talley JD, et al. Early ambulation after 5 French diagnostic cardiac catheterization: results of a multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(7): 1475–1483.
- Davis C, VanRiper S, Longstreet J, et al. Vascular complications of coronary interventions. Heart Lung. 1997; 26(2): 118–127.
- McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, et al. Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med. 1997; 103(5): 368–375.
- Salinger MH, Kern MJ. First use of a 5 French diagnostic catheter as a guiding catheter for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989; 18(4): 276–278.
- Khattab AA, Shrestha NR, Meier B. Double-vessel coronary stenting via 5 French diagnostic catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 80(4): 630–633.
- Pande AK, Meier B, Villavicencio R, et al. Randomized evaluation of 5 French catheters for coronary angiography with or without the CO2 powered Hercules syringe. J Invasive Cardiol. 1992; 4(3): 136–138.
