open access

Vol 74, No 3 (2023)
Original paper
Submitted: 2023-01-15
Accepted: 2023-03-30
Published online: 2023-06-21
Get Citation

Osteoporosis treatment with denosumab in routine clinical practice in Poland

Ewa Marcinowska-Suchowierska1, Tomasz Blicharski2, Ewa Wielosz3, Maria Rell-Bakalarska4, Krzysztof Duma5, Katarzyna Paradowska-Kowal5, Ewa Sewerynek6
·
Pubmed: 37695033
·
Endokrynol Pol 2023;74(3):243-253.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, School of Public Health, Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
  2. Chair and Department of Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  3. Specialist Outpatient Clinic Reumed, Lublin, Poland
  4. Interdisciplinary Academy of Practical Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  5. Amgen Biotechnology, Warsaw, Poland
  6. Department of Endocrine Disorders and Bone Metabolism, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

open access

Vol 74, No 3 (2023)
Original Paper
Submitted: 2023-01-15
Accepted: 2023-03-30
Published online: 2023-06-21

Abstract

Introduction: The receptor activator for nuclear factor k B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor denosumab is approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men at increased fracture risk. The objectives were to describe the characteristics of patients with osteoporosis initiating denosumab in Polish clinical practice and their clinical management during the first 12 months of denosumab treatment.

Material and methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled denosumab-naïve women and men in Poland with osteoporosis, who had received at least one denosumab injection in the 8 weeks prior to enrolment. Patients were enrolled from specialist osteoporosis treatment centres, and orthopaedic, rheumatological, and family doctor centres. Outcomes included patient characteristics, denosumab treatment patterns, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture; all analyses were descriptive.

Results: The study enrolled 463 patients; most (96%) were women, aged ≥ 65 years (84%), with prior fractures (88%). Approximately two-thirds of the women had received prior osteoporosis therapy, with the main reasons for discontinuation being adverse events (75%) and lack of effect (73%). Across all patients, the most common reasons for prescribing denosumab were low bone mineral density (BMD/T-score) (93%) and history of osteoporotic fracture (78%). Mean BMD at denosumab initiation ranged from T-score –3.00 (lumbar spine) to T-score –2.6 (total hip), and BMD increased by 2.8–6.2% at month 12. Most patients completed follow-up (86%) and were due to receive a third denosumab injection (81%).

Conclusion: The article presents detailed sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics of patients who routinely implemented denosumab therapy. Most of them continued denosumab for at least 12 months, with increased BMD T-scores.

Abstract

Introduction: The receptor activator for nuclear factor k B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor denosumab is approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men at increased fracture risk. The objectives were to describe the characteristics of patients with osteoporosis initiating denosumab in Polish clinical practice and their clinical management during the first 12 months of denosumab treatment.

Material and methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled denosumab-naïve women and men in Poland with osteoporosis, who had received at least one denosumab injection in the 8 weeks prior to enrolment. Patients were enrolled from specialist osteoporosis treatment centres, and orthopaedic, rheumatological, and family doctor centres. Outcomes included patient characteristics, denosumab treatment patterns, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture; all analyses were descriptive.

Results: The study enrolled 463 patients; most (96%) were women, aged ≥ 65 years (84%), with prior fractures (88%). Approximately two-thirds of the women had received prior osteoporosis therapy, with the main reasons for discontinuation being adverse events (75%) and lack of effect (73%). Across all patients, the most common reasons for prescribing denosumab were low bone mineral density (BMD/T-score) (93%) and history of osteoporotic fracture (78%). Mean BMD at denosumab initiation ranged from T-score –3.00 (lumbar spine) to T-score –2.6 (total hip), and BMD increased by 2.8–6.2% at month 12. Most patients completed follow-up (86%) and were due to receive a third denosumab injection (81%).

Conclusion: The article presents detailed sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics of patients who routinely implemented denosumab therapy. Most of them continued denosumab for at least 12 months, with increased BMD T-scores.

Get Citation

Keywords

denosumab; osteoporosis; postmenopausal osteoporosis; therapy

About this article
Title

Osteoporosis treatment with denosumab in routine clinical practice in Poland

Journal

Endokrynologia Polska

Issue

Vol 74, No 3 (2023)

Article type

Original paper

Pages

243-253

Published online

2023-06-21

Page views

1635

Article views/downloads

565

DOI

10.5603/EP.a2023.0037

Pubmed

37695033

Bibliographic record

Endokrynol Pol 2023;74(3):243-253.

Keywords

denosumab
osteoporosis
postmenopausal osteoporosis
therapy

Authors

Ewa Marcinowska-Suchowierska
Tomasz Blicharski
Ewa Wielosz
Maria Rell-Bakalarska
Krzysztof Duma
Katarzyna Paradowska-Kowal
Ewa Sewerynek

References (28)
  1. Głuszko P, Tłustochowicz W, Korkosz M. Metabolic bone diseases. In: Korkosz M. ed. Szczeklik’s internal medicine. Medycyna Praktyczna: Polski Instytut Evidence Based Medicine, Kraków 2021.
  2. Salari N, Ghasemi H, Mohammadi L, et al. The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1): 609.
  3. NFZ o zdrowiu. Osteoporoza. https://ezdrowie.gov.pl/pobierz/1911_nfz_o_zdrowiu_osteoporoza (14 February 2022).
  4. Lorenc R, Głuszko P, Franek E, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Poland : Update 2017. Endokrynol Pol. 2017; 68(5): 604–609.
  5. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, et al. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(10): 2359–2381.
  6. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2018; 30(1): 3–44.
  7. Lems WF, Dreinhöfer KE, Bischoff-Ferrari H, et al. EULAR/EFORT recommendations for management of patients older than 50 years with a fragility fracture and prevention of subsequent fractures. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(5): 802–810.
  8. AACE/ACE 2020 Postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment algorithm. https://pro.aace.com/pdfs/AACE_Postmenopausal_Osteoporosis_Treatment_Algorithm_Update_022020.pdf (12 March 2022).
  9. Prolia: EPAR — Product Information. Annex I — Summary of Product Characteristics. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/prolia (14 February 2022).
  10. Moran CP, English S, Beringer T, et al. Real World Experience of Denosumab Treatment in the Belfast Osteoporosis Service. Ulster Med J. 2019; 88(3): 150–156.
  11. Pedersen AB, Heide-Jørgensen U, Sørensen HT, et al. Comparison of Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture in Denosumab vs Alendronate Treatment Within 3 Years of Initiation. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(4): e192416.
  12. Silverman SL, Siris E, Belazi D, et al. Persistence at 24 months with denosumab among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a prospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos. 2018; 13(1): 85.
  13. Obwieszczenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 22 sierpnia 2014 r. w sprawie wykazu refundowanych leków, środków spożywczych specjalnego przeznaczenia żywieniowego oraz wyrobów medycznych. http://dziennikmz.mz.gov.pl/DUM_MZ/2014/64/akt.pdf (8 April 2022).
  14. Obwieszczenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 23 października 2019 r. w sprawie wykazu refundowanych leków, środków spożywczych specjalnego przeznaczenia żywieniowego oraz wyrobów medycznych na 1 listopada 2019. https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/obwieszczenie-ministra-zdrowia-z-dnia-23-pazdziernika-2019-r-w-sprawie-wykazu-refundowanych-lekow-srodkow-spozywczych-specjalnego-przeznaczenia-zywieniowego-oraz-wyrobow-medycznych-na-1-listopada-2019-r (8 April 2022).
  15. Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Papaioannou N, Gielen E, et al. Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium. Arch Osteoporos. 2017; 12(1): 58.
  16. Boschitsch E, Naegele O, Klinger A, et al. Long-term persistence with denosumab: real-world data from the Austrian Osteoporosis Clinic (AOC). A retrospective data analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2022; 33(1): 263–272.
  17. Růžičková O, Killinger Z, Kasalický P, et al. Real-world Management of Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treated with Denosumab: A Prospective Observational Study in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Adv Ther. 2018; 35(10): 1713–1728.
  18. Monov S, Nestorova R, Velkova M, et al. Persistence with Denosumab in Women at High Risk of Fracture in Bulgaria. Rheumatol Ther. 2021; 8(1): 443–455.
  19. Yusuf AA, Cummings SR, Watts NB, et al. Real-world effectiveness of osteoporosis therapies for fracture reduction in post-menopausal women. Arch Osteoporos. 2018; 13(1): 33.
  20. Briot K, Schott AM, Sanchez JP, et al. High persistence over two years with denosumab among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in France: A prospective cohort study. Bone. 2021; 146: 115890.
  21. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, et al. Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy--additional results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20(5): 811–817.
  22. International Osteoporosis Foundation. https://www osteoporosis foundation (18 March 2022).
  23. Fardellone P, Lello S, Cano A, et al. Real-world Adherence and Persistence with Bisphosphonate Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review. Clin Ther. 2019; 41(8): 1576–1588.
  24. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al. FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(8): 756–765.
  25. Austin M, Yang YC, Vittinghoff E, et al. FREEDOM Trial. Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27(3): 687–693.
  26. Farlay D, Rizzo S, Dempster DW, et al. Bone Mineral and Organic Properties in Postmenopausal Women Treated With Denosumab for Up to 10 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2022; 37(5): 856–864.
  27. Benjamin B, Benjamin MA, Swe M, et al. Review on the comparison of effectiveness between denosumab and bisphosphonates in post-menopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2016; 2(2): 77–81.
  28. Lin T, Wang C, Cai XZ, et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between denosumab and alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pract. 2012; 66(4): 399–408.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Via MedicaWydawcą jest  VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl