Vol 73, No 6 (2022)
Review paper
Published online: 2022-09-20

open access

Page views 4680
Article views/downloads 1318
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Hyperprolactinemia and insulin resistance

Marcin Gierach1, Malwina Bruska-Sikorska1, Magdalena Rojek1, Roman Junik1
Pubmed: 36621922
Endokrynol Pol 2022;73(6):959-967.

Abstract

Hyperprolactinaemia is the most common dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and occurs more commonly in women. The prevalence of hyperprolactinaemia ranges from 0.4% in the general adult population to as high as 9–17% in women with reproductive diseases. It is accompanied by the phenomenon of insulin resistance (IR), which is also a significant clinical problem nowadays. The prevalence of IR is increasing, particularly in developing countries and in younger populations, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 20 to 40% in different populations.

The aim of our review is to summarize recent data on the possible association between IR and hyperprolactinaemia. This review is based on an electronic search of the literature in the PubMed database published from 2000 to 2022 using combinations of the following keywords: IR, hyperprolactinemia or IR and hyperprolactinemia. The references included in previously published review articles were also checked, and any relevant papers were also included.

Numerous scientific studies have shown a relationship between IR and hyperprolactinaemia. Increased plasma prolactin (PRL) levels are often associated with an increase in tissue resistance to insulin. There are many scientific theories explaining the probable mechanisms of this phenomenon. One is the finding that glucose and PRL act synergistically in inducing the transcription of insulin genes. It is also suggested that PRL may act as a regulator of insulin sensitivity and metabolic homeostasis in adipose tissue. The topic of the mutual correlation of hyperprolactinaemia and IR is important, and it certainly requires further research and observation.

Review

Endokrynologia Polska

DOI: 10.5603/EP.a2022.0075

ISSN 0423–104X, e-ISSN 2299–8306

Volume/Tom 73; Number/Numer 6/2022

Submitted: 08.01.2022

Accepted: 28.03.2022

Early publication date: 20.09.2022

Hyperprolactinaemia and insulin resistance

Marcin GierachMalwina Bruska-SikorskaMagdalena RojekRoman Junik
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurasz University Hospital 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland

Marcin Gierach, Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Jurasz University Hospital 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland; e-mail: marcin_gierach@wp.pl

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially

Abstract
Hyperprolactinaemia is the most common dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and occurs more commonly in women. The prevalence of hyperprolactinaemia ranges from 0.4% in the general adult population to as high as 9–17% in women with reproductive diseases. It is accompanied by the phenomenon of insulin resistance (IR), which is also a significant clinical problem nowadays. The prevalence of IR is increasing, particularly in developing countries and in younger populations, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 20 to 40% in different populations.
The aim of our review is to summarize recent data on the possible association between IR and hyperprolactinaemia.
This review is based on an electronic search of the literature in the PubMed database published from 2000 to 2022 using combinations of the following keywords: IR, hyperprolactinemia or IR and hyperprolactinemia. The references included in previously published review articles were also checked, and any relevant papers were also included.
Numerous scientific studies have shown a relationship between IR and hyperprolactinaemia. Increased plasma prolactin (PRL) levels are often associated with an increase in tissue resistance to insulin. There are many scientific theories explaining the probable mechanisms of this phenomenon. One is the finding that glucose and PRL act synergistically in inducing the transcription of insulin genes. It is also suggested that PRL may act as a regulator of insulin sensitivity and metabolic homeostasis in adipose tissue. The topic of the mutual correlation of hyperprolactinaemia and IR is important, and it certainly requires further research and observation. (Endokrynol Pol 2022; 73 (6): 959–967)
Key words: hyperprolactinaemia; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome

Introduction

Hyperprolactinaemia is one of the most common problems in clinical endocrinology. It is the most common dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis and occurs more commonly in women. The prevalence of hyperprolactinaemia ranges from 0.4% in the general adult population to as high as 9–17% in women with reproductive diseases [1, 2].

It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity and glucose metabolism abnormalities. It is accompanied by the phenomenon of insulin resistance (IR), which is also a significant clinical problem nowadays. The prevalence of IR is increasing, particularly in developing countries and in younger populations, with estimates of prevalence ranging from 20% to 40% in different populations [3, 4].

The aim of our review is to summarize recent data on the possible association between IR and hyperprolactinaemia.

This review is based on an electronic search of biomedical literature in the PubMed database published from 2000 to 2022 using combinations of the following keywords: IR, hyperprolactinemia or IR and hyperprolactinemia, and then combinations with other phrases: pathology, prevalence, and other diseases: metabolic syndrome, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The references included in previously published review articles were also checked, and any relevant papers were included.

Insulin resistance

Insulin metabolically affects excretion and regulates the metabolism of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins through a specific low-membrane receptor, which is present on the surface of hepatocytes, adipocytes, and striated muscle cells [5–7]. Insulin stimulates the reduction of glucose, free fatty acids, and ketone levels [8]. The activity of insulin is also influenced by many hormones; (e.g. the growth hormone, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormones, catecholamines, androgens, parathyroid hormone, aldosterone, glucagon, or somatostatin, which acting antagonistically and reduce the activity of insulin) [9, 10]. This leads to disturbances in the carbohydrate metabolism and an increase in IR in the pre-receptor, receptor, and post-receptor mechanisms [11]. In addition to the genetically determined defect of the insulin receptor, IR may be caused by genes encoding post-receptor proteins, such as glucose transporters or insulin receptor substrates [12].

The hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp is considered the gold standard method for assessing insulin sensitivity [9, 13–15]. The test consists of an intravenous infusion with insulin, which allows its concentration in the serum to be maintained at about 100 mIU/L, and an intravenous infusion with glucose to provide specific blood glucose levels [5, 9, 14, 16]. Exogenous hyperinsulinaemia allows for complete blockage of insulin production by pancreatic b cells and glucose production by the liver. This test allows the diagnosis of IR, which plays an important role in the development of the metabolic syndrome. It is a significant risk factor for the development of diabetes and cardiovascular complications but may also be secondary to the presence of many other metabolic disorders, such as in the case of a patient with ROHHAD syndrome [17–20]. It is limited because it is relatively invasive, as well as cost- and labour-intensive, requiring 6 or more hours of continuous bedside monitoring and infusion adjustments. Simpler measures of insulin sensitivity such as fasting insulin concentrations and leptin/adiponectin ratios [21] are often used as a surrogate marker for insulin sensitivity. Fasting insulin and glucose levels can also be used for homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). HOMA-IR is used as a measure of insulin sensitivity and has the advantage of being simple to obtain, but it is not directly comparable to the clamp measure [22]. It is calculated by the formula (insulinemia [µU/mL] × glycaemia [mmol/L])/22.5 [23]. The most commonly used oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-based measure of whole-body insulin sensitivity is the Matsuda index [24].

There are also many examples of the relationship between thyroid function and IR described in the literature. Studies have shown that the reduction of tissue sensitivity to insulin among obese men is significantly associated with impaired thyroid function [25]. On the other hand, another study showed that thyroid function in euthyroid people is associated with components of metabolic syndrome, mainly serum lipids and IR. Additionally, it has been shown that low normal free thyroxine (FT4) levels are significantly associated with increased IR in tissues [26]. The initiation of levothyroxine treatment in a patient with previously untreated hypothyroidism and secondary obesity as well as with unregulated diabetes and diagnosed IR resulted in an improvement in the parameters of peripheral insulin sensitivity [27].

IR is also significantly associated with polycystic ovary syndrome [28–30], acromegaly [31], hypercortisolism [32], hypopituitarism [33], primary hyperparathyroidism [34], and disorders of the adrenal gland [35, 36].

Hyperprolactinemia

Prolactin (PRL) is produced by the anterior pituitary gland, more specifically by lactotrophic cells. Its main function in women is the regulation of milk production after childbirth and the growth of the mammary glands during pregnancy. It also affects the reproductive organs [37]. Prolactin levels are highest during sleep [38]. It has been proven that the pituitary gland is not the only structure in the human body that is responsible for the production of prolactin. The second such structure is human adipose tissue. PRL inhibits the storage of lipids as well as adipokines (adiponectin, interleukin 6, and leptin) and has been implicated in the regulation of adipogenesis. It also affects energy homeostasis through its action as an adipokine and is involved in the manifestation of IR [39].

Hyperprolactinaemia is a common disease that interferes with fertility and causes hypogonadism in both genders and galactorrhoea in women, rarely in men. Hyperprolactinaemia impairs the pulsatile secretion of hypothalamic gonadoliberin (GnRH) and thus the secretion of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH). In this way, the maturation of the Graaf follicle is inhibited and there is no ovulation. A correlation between elevated PRL levels and PCOS has not been noted [40]. There are also cases of asymptomatic hyperprolactinaemia. The most common cause of this condition is adenomas called prolactinomas. They constitute as much as 40% of all pituitary tumours [37, 41]. The pathogenesis of the prolactin tumour is not fully understood. The likely mechanism is suppression of dopaminergic activity in the hypothalamus neurons. The prolactinoma tumour, as well as other pituitary tumours, are monoclonal tumours. The participation of the pituary tumor-transforming gene (PTTG), expression of which is modulated by oestrogens and the heparin-binding secretory transforming gene (HST), is likely. Both genes promote angiogenesis through fibroblast growth factors.

It also happens that hyperprolactinaemia may be induced secondarily to pharmacological treatment and pathological disruption of the dopaminergic, hypothalamic-pituitary, or idiopathic pathways. Other factors that can trigger this state are stress in patients, renal failure, or hypothyroidism [37]. When assessing the cause of hyperprolactinaemia, pregnancy, primary hypothyroidism, and medications should be taken into account.

The laboratory test used to differentiate the types of hyperprolactinaemia is the metoclopramide test. This consists of determining the baseline PRL, then administering 10 mg of metoclopramide orally and re-measuring PRL 1 h and 2 h after the start of the study. Excessive stimulation of prolactin secretion after the use of metoclopramide means functional hyperprolactinaemia (a 6-fold increase in PRL after administration of metoclopramide). However, when such an increase is not observed but the concentration of prolactin before the test is high, prolactinoma should be suspected. As part of the diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia, it is necessary to perform a head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a later stage, after excluding other causes. Depending on the result of the head MRI, further steps are taken. In other cases, treatment will mainly be conservative therapy.

Pharmacological treatment should be considered when a patient has a tumour larger than 1 cm, has hypogonadism, infertility, troublesome galactorrhoea, acne, hirsutism, or headaches. The treatment of choice is dopamine agonists mainly bromocriptine or cabergoline. In patients in whom pharmacological treatment is ineffective, resection should be considered, especially when this change is large [41].

A prolactinoma tumour is also found in multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1). In this case it due to a menin inactivating mutation. As a result, adenomas are generally larger and more invasive than other prolactin-producing adenomas. In the case of MEN 1 and prolactinoma, cabergoline is the treatment of choice [42].

Experimental evidence of the relationship between hyperprolactinaemia and IR

Many studies have shown a relationship between elevated serum prolactin (PRL) levels and the resistance of peripheral tissues to insulin [43–46]. Pancreatic ß cells, adipocytes, type 2 dopaminergic receptors, and dopamine play key roles as modulators of insulin action. Excess prolactin may contribute to the development of disorders in the metabolism of glucose and insulin, thus reducing the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to glucose in both obese and non-obese people. In vitro studies on rats showed that by acting on isolated pancreatic islets prolactin stimulates insulin secretion and influences the proliferation of pancreatic ß cells. The physiological increase in PRL concentration in rodents during pregnancy increases insulin secretion in ß cells. Both in rodents and humans, PRL increases b-cell proliferation, insulin gene transcription, and glucose-induced insulin secretion [47]. The results of studies from the United States suggest that glucose and prolactin act synergistically to induce transcription of the insulin gene. The conducted observations indicate that PRL exerts both a glucose-independent and glucose-dependent influence on the expression of insulin genes [44]. It has been suggested that PRL may act as a regulator of insulin sensitivity and metabolic homeostasis in adipose tissue. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies in patients with normal body weight, overweight, and obesity showed a correlation between serum PRL concentration and adipose tissue fitness markers such as peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARG), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), and glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) [47]. Among women with hyperprolactinaemia the tissue sensitivity to insulin is lower than in women with normoprolactinaemia [48]. Correction of elevated PRL concentration is associated with an improvement in endothelial function and insulin sensitivity [49].

According to other studies, IR in patients with hyperprolactinaemia is not associated with obesity nor with anthropometric parameters such as fat content, waist circumference, and bod mass index (BMI) [50]. Among humans the mechanism responsible for tissue IR in severe hyperprolactinaemia seems to be, at least in part, downregulation of insulin receptors [51]. The results of various studies suggest that in humans the effects of PRL may be complex or may vary depending on different conditions. In addition to the effect of PRL on the growth of pancreatic ß cells there are reports of a decrease in the threshold of glucose-stimulated insulin, which may indicate that PRL has a protective effect against type 2 diabetes [52]. Scientists from China, examining a population of men and women without diagnosed hyperprolactinaemia, showed that prolactin freely circulating in the blood at physiological concentrations is associated with a lower incidence of diabetes and IR [53]. Subsequent studies also found a positive association between serum prolactin levels and metabolic parameters such as hypertension, waist circumference, aortic stiffness, and mortality. Studies in humans with high serum PRL levels induced by antipsychotics suggest that increased PRL levels may adversely affect the metabolism, leading to type 2 diabetes. Since the serum PRL concentration is regulated differently depending on sex, the correlations between the serum PRL concentration and any other factors should be assessed separately for each gender. The release of prolactin from the pituitary gland is regulated by the dopaminergic pathway through the type 2 dopaminergic receptor (D2R), activation of which inhibits the release of PRL. An experimental study in which a genetic disorder of D2R function was assessed showed that the studied patients developed glucose intolerance with impaired insulin secretion. Prolactin is a hormone produced by adipose tissue, among others. As the amount of this tissue increases in obese women, the amount of the hormone increases proportionally, and weight loss reduces the release of PRL. Kok et al. [54] showed that PRL secretion was significantly enhanced in obese women (total daily release, 137 ± 8; lean controls, 92 ± 8 μg/L·24 h; p = 0.001) in proportion to their BMI (r2 = 0.55; p < 0.001). Interestingly, PRL release was particularly associated with the size of the visceral fat mass (total PRL secretion vs. visceral fat area, r2 = 0.64; p = 0.006). In addition, adipose tissue macrophages have been shown to synthesize PRL in response to inflammation and high glucose levels. Therefore, obesity and/or higher glucose (glycemia) levels seem to affect the observed relationship between serum PRL and HOMA-IR [52]. Another study looked closely at the relationship between body weight, prolactin levels, and IR. It was shown that prolactin in the population of healthy young men is secreted cyclically and shows a certain circadian rhythm (the so-called bimodal secretion profile of PRL both during the day and at night). In obese men a change in the rhythm of prolactin secretion was noted in relation to the healthy group, which returned to normal after 12 days of an adequate, low-calorie diet. Also, in obese women a correlation was noticed between the BMI value, the amount of insulin released, and the related increase in the concentration of prolactin secretion. Data found in the literature seems to confirm that it is the reduction in caloric content and the reduction in the number of meals rich in fat, and not the loss of body weight itself, that normalize the concentration and secretion of prolactin [55]. Scientists from the University of Chicago also tried to explain the aetiology of obesity associated with hyperprolactinaemia in humans, as well as the role of PRL as a regulator of metabolism in adipose tissue. One of the forms of the receptor for prolactin (PRL-RL) has been studied, and it has been shown that this receptor is located on the surface of adipocytes. Its activation by prolactin stimulates the deposition of lipids in adipose tissue. Moreover, it has been proven that the expression of GLUT4 (the main glucose transporter in adipose tissue) does not change in the adipose tissue of mice (in which PRL-RL receptors are also present), which indicates that insulin resistance is not caused by a defect in GLUT4 expression in this tissue [56] (Fig. 1).

178578.png
Figure 1. The mechanism of the relationship between hyperprolactinaemia and insulin resistance (IR) [56]. *Arrows indicate the increase or decrease of the variable. PRL prolactin

Clinical evidence of the relationship between hyperprolactinaemia and IR

Metformin is one of the key drugs used in the treatment of diabetes. The use of metformin affects the levels of some hormones in the pituitary gland. It reduces the concentration of PRL, but mainly in patients who had an increased level of PRL before treatment [57].

Patients who develop prolactinoma are sometimes refractory to treatment with a dopamine agonist. In this case metformin can be used, because in the studied patients it lowered the level of prolactin to 12 ng/mL and significantly reduced the size of the tumour after one year of treatment. For example, in a patient who was refractory to treatment with bromocriptine alone the level of PRL increased, but in combination with metformin the concentration of PRL decreased significantly [57, 58] (Tab. 1).

Table 1. The effect of metformin therapy in patients with hyperprolactinaemia and impaired glucose tolerance [57, 58]

No.

Feature

Conclusions

1

PRL level

Lowering the level of PRL1

2

Lipid metabolism

Lowering the level of triglycerides

3

Insulin resistance

Decrease (lowering HOMA-IR)

4

Plasma glucose concentration

Reduction in plasma glucose concentration

For patients who cannot use metformin in combination with statins to lower lipids, glucose, and cardiometabolic risk factors, bromocriptine or cabergoline can be used instead of metformin. The effect of the therapy is very similar [59]. Bromocriptine/cabergoline are agonists of dopamine D2 receptors and are used primarily in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia. It is known that it significantly reduces hyperglycaemia and improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes [60]. Bromocriptine-QR and cabergoline have been officially approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with type 2 diabetes [47]. Studies in rodents have shown that dopaminergic transmission is reduced in insulin resistance. Administration of bromocriptine/cabergoline within 2 hours of waking is believed to increase low levels of dopamine in the hypothalamus and inhibit central nervous system (CNS) sympathetic tone, which results in a reduction in postprandial plasma glucose due to increased hepatic suppression of glucose production [61]. (Fig. 2).

178590.png
Figure 2. Proposed mechanism of action of bromocriptine to improve glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity [61]. SNS sympathetic nervous system; HGP hepatic glucose production; FFA free fatty acids; TG triglycerides

Patients suffering from hyperprolactinaemia also suffer from insulin resistance; therefore, effective treatment of hyperprolactinaemia has a positive effect on glucose tolerance [48]. In patients with type 2 diabetes who showed poor glycaemic control with one or two oral medications, the use of fast-release bromocriptine (bromocriptine QR) significantly improved glycaemic control [62, 63]. Treatment with bromocriptine must be longer than 6 months to observe an improvement in metabolic parameters in patients [46]. Bromocriptine tested in mice with disturbed and undisturbed circadian rhythms has the same effect on glucose metabolism [60]. Another drug that can be used to treat hyperprolactinaemia and thus also IR is cabergoline [64]. Cabergoline therapy may improve glucose tolerance not related with weight loss in obese individuals. However, this impact must be confirmed in long-term studies [65].

The table below summarizes the positive and negative aspects of the use of dopamine agonists (cabergoline, bromocriptine QR) in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia, for the improvement of insulin resistance or metabolic profile among the respondents [47] (Tab. 2).

Table 2. The result of bromocriptine/cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia [47, 60]

No.

Variable

HyperPRL

Treatment with bromocriptine/cabergoline

1.

Fasting glucose

No impact

2.

Glucose tolerance

3.

Postprandial glucose

4.

HbA1c

5.

Body weight

6.

BMI

7.

Lipid profile

8.

Metabolic syndrome

9.

Adverse events from the cardiovascular system

Increased concentration of PRL and resistance of peripheral tissues to insulin often coexist not only with endocrine disorders. We can also observe both irregularities, e.g., while taking antipsychotics [66–69] (Tab. 3).

Table 3. The mechanisms of insulin resistance (IR) and hyperprolactinaemia in other diseases

Main disorders

Elevated prolactin secretion

IR

PCOS

Correlation has not been noted. Hyperprolactinaemia occurs at the same rate as in non-PCOS women [40]

The excess of androgens and the increased amount of adipose tissue may interfere with the mechanisms of insulin [7, 10, 70]

Prolactinomas

Suppression of dopaminergic activity in hypothalamus neurons [37, 41]

The excess PRL causes a decrease in the regulation of insulin receptors [45]

Psychiatric disease

The main mechanism of antipsychotics is antagonism of D2 receptors. Their blockade in the hypothalamus increases the release of prolactin [71]

As a result of the antagonistic effect of antipsychotics in relation to the 5-HT2A receptors, there may be a decrease in glucose uptake by muscle and adipose tissue, and a decrease in insulin sensitivity [72]

Hypothyroidism

In patients with hypothyroidism, the increase in prolactin is caused by a compensatory increase in the central hypothalamic TRH output as a result of a low thyroxine level [25]

Slowing of the intestinal absorption of glucose. Reduction of adrenergic activity leading to a reduction in muscle and liver glycogenolysis. Reduction of gluconeogenesis and resting insulin secretion. Reduced blood flow in peripheral tissues [25]

Hyperthyroidism

Correlation has not been noted

We observed:

  • an increased peripheral and hepatic insulin resistance
  • an increase in endogenous production of insulin with elevated peripheral degradation of this hormone [11]
  • thyroid hormone excess leads to enhancement of endogenous glucose production by increased gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis in the liver due to increased expression of the glucose transporter GLUT-2 protein in hepatocytes [73, 74]
  • hyperthyroidism increases the concentration of cytokines and markers of inflammation such as IL-6 and TNF-a, which also correlate with peripheral IR [75]

Goitre and thyroid cancer

Correlation has not been noted

People without diabetes with nodular goitre, despite similar age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, TSH levels, and metabolic parameters, were characterised by higher HOMA-IR [75]

Acromegaly

Mixed tumours producing GH and PRL

The pathomechanism of IR is complex. Long-term supraphysiological GH concentration interferes with both insulin action in the liver and the other peripheral tissues. This leads to enhanced production of glucose by the liver and decreased utilisation of glucose in peripheral tissues. It is probably due to disturbances in the production and action of a second messenger in the insulin receptor. In addition, GH increases lipolysis of adipose tissue, and increased concentration and oxidation of fatty acids enhances IR [76].

Hypercortisolism

Correlation has not been noted

Glucocorticoids affect the activation of the liver enzyme phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, increasing proteolysis in skeletal muscle and lipolysis in adipose tissue, which ultimately provides more substrate for gluconeogenesis. Enhanced lipolysis in adipose tissue results in an increase in circulating FFAs and affects the development of the phenomenon of reduced insulin sensitivity. IR induced by hypercortisolaemia probably has a post-receptor nature [77]

Hypopituitarism

Impairment of the production or transmission of dopamine to lactotropic cells

Abnormal glucose metabolism in GH deficiency results from increasing IR.

Damage to the central nuclei of the hypothalamus is responsible for IR and leptin resistance and may also result in disinhibition of the vagus nerve impulse and thus in increased stimulation of pancreatic b-cells, hyperinsulinaemia, and obesity [78]

Primary
h
yperparathyroidism

Correlation has not been noted

Probably the long-term status of hypercalcaemia and hypophosphataemia triggers IR and hyperinsulinaemia, and reduces the number of insulin receptors [79]

Disorders of the adrenal gland

Correlation has not been noted

Pheochromocytoma produce adrenalin, which by its affinity to the b2 receptors, inhibits insulin secretion, stimulates the secretion of glucagon from the pancreatic islet cells, and decreases glucose uptake by skeletal muscles as well as increases gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis in hepatocytes [80]

Lower concentrations of adiponectin, and higher HOMA-IR in this group of patients with pheochromocytoma were shown [81]

Aldosterone alone decreases glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor results in a decrease of insulin sensitivity in fat and muscle tissue [82]

Conclusions

Numerous scientific studies have shown a relationship between insulin resistance and hyperprolactinaemia. There are many scientific theories explaining the probable mechanisms of this phenomenon. One is the finding that glucose and prolactin act synergistically in inducing the transcription of insulin genes. It has also been suggested that PRL may act as a regulator of insulin sensitivity and metabolic homeostasis in adipose tissue. Increased plasma prolactin levels are often associated with an increase in tissue resistance to insulin. The topic of the mutual correlation of hyperprolactinaemia and IR is extremely interesting, and it certainly requires further research and observation.

References

  1. Majumdar A, Mangal NS. Hyperprolactinemia. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013; 6(3): 168–175, doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.121400, indexed in Pubmed: 24347930.
  2. Biller BM, Luciano A, Crosignani PG, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia. J Reprod Med. 1999; 44(12 Suppl): 1075–1084, indexed in Pubmed: 10649814.
  3. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash AK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome in Asian Indians: A community study from urban Eastern India. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012; 3(3): 204–211, doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.98895, indexed in Pubmed: 22923938.
  4. Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adolescents using the definition from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(3): 587–589, doi: 10.2337/dc07-1030, indexed in Pubmed: 18071007.
  5. James D, Umekwe N, Edeoga C, et al. Multi-year reproducibility of hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp-derived insulin sensitivity in free-living adults: Association with incident prediabetes in the POP-ABC study. Metabolism. 2020; 109: 154263, doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154263, indexed in Pubmed: 32445642.
  6. Gastaldelli A, Gaggini M, DeFronzo RA. Role of Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance in the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the San Antonio Metabolism Study. Diabetes. 2017; 66(4): 815–822, doi: 10.2337/db16-1167, indexed in Pubmed: 28052966.
  7. Cree-Green M, Bergman BC, Coe GV, et al. Hepatic steatosis is common in adolescents with obesity and PCOS and relates to de novo lipogenesis but not insulin resistance. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016; 24(11): 2399–2406, doi: 10.1002/oby.21651, indexed in Pubmed: 27804265.
  8. Qaid M, Abdelrahman M. Role of insulin and other related hormones in energy metabolism A review. Cogent Food Agriculture. 2016; 2(1), doi: 10.1080/23311932.2016.1267691.
  9. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979; 237(3): E214–E223, doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.237.3.E214, indexed in Pubmed: 382871.
  10. Cree-Green M, Newnes L, West A, et al. Insulin resistance, but not excess liver fat, is relatedto hyperandrogenism in adolescent PCOS. Paper presented at Endocrine Society Annual Meeting; June 1, 2014; Washington, DC.
  11. Gierach M, Gierach J, Junik R. Insulin resistance and thyroid disorders. Endokrynol Pol. 2014; 65(1): 70–76, doi: 10.5603/EP.2014.0010, indexed in Pubmed: 24549605.
  12. Brown AE, Walker M. Genetics of Insulin Resistance and the Metabolic Syndrome. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016; 18(8): 75, doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0755-4, indexed in Pubmed: 27312935.
  13. Kim JK. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to assess insulin sensitivity in vivo. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 560: 221–238, doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-448-3_15, indexed in Pubmed: 19504253.
  14. Owei I, Jain N, Jones D, et al. Physiology of Glycemic Recovery and Stabilization After Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp in Healthy Subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 103(11): 4155–4162, doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01569, indexed in Pubmed: 30239760.
  15. Carreau AM, Xie D, Garcia-Reyes Y, et al. Good agreement between hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and 2 hours oral minimal model assessed insulin sensitivity in adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020; 21(7): 1159–1168, doi: 10.1111/pedi.13072, indexed in Pubmed: 32592269.
  16. Eldin AWJ. Natural history of ROHHAD syndrome: development of severe insulin resistance and fatty liver disease over time. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 5(1): 1–7, doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0082-y, indexed in Pubmed: 31333877.
  17. Cali AMG, Man CD, Cobelli C, et al. Primary defects in beta-cell function further exacerbated by worsening of insulin resistance mark the development of impaired glucose tolerance in obese adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(3): 456–461, doi: 10.2337/dc08-1274, indexed in Pubmed: 19106382.
  18. Soop M, Nygren J, Brismar K, et al. The hyperinsulinaemic‒euglycaemic glucose clamp: reproducibility and metabolic effects of prolonged insulin infusion in healthy subjects. Clinical Science. 2000; 98(4): 367–374, doi: 10.1042/cs19990268, indexed in Pubmed: 10731469.
  19. Le DS, Brookshire T, Krakoff J, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and the tracer dilution technique in a controlled inpatient setting. Metabolism. 2009; 58(3): 304–310, doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2008.09.029, indexed in Pubmed: 19217443.
  20. Bokemark L, Frödén A, Attvall S, et al. The euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp examination: variability and reproducibility. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2000; 60(1): 27–36, doi: 10.1080/00365510050185010, indexed in Pubmed: 10757451.
  21. Finucane FM, Luan J, Wareham NJ, et al. (on behalf of the European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance: Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Study Group). Correlation of the leptin:adiponectin ratio with measures of insulin resistance in non-diabetic individuals. Diabetologia. 2009; 52(11): 2345–2349, doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1508-3, indexed in Pubmed: 19756488.
  22. Pacini G, Mari A. Methods for clinical assessment of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 17(3): 305–322, doi: 10.1016/s1521-690x(03)00042-3, indexed in Pubmed: 12962688.
  23. Abdul-Ghani MA, Matsuda M, Balas B, et al. Muscle and liver insulin resistance indexes derived from the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30(1): 89–94, doi: 10.2337/dc06-1519, indexed in Pubmed: 17192339.
  24. Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(9): 1462–1470, doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462, indexed in Pubmed: 10480510.
  25. Galofré JC, Pujante P, Abreu C, et al. Relationship between thyroid-stimulating hormone and insulin in euthyroid obese men. Ann Nutr Metab. 2008; 53(3-4): 188–194, doi: 10.1159/000172981, indexed in Pubmed: 19011282.
  26. Roos A, Bakker SJL, Links TP, et al. Thyroid function is associated with components of the metabolic syndrome in euthyroid subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92(2): 491–496, doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1718, indexed in Pubmed: 17090642.
  27. Tesić D, Pantelinac P, Radosavljević J, et al. [Hashimoto’s hypothyroidism associated with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes]. Med Pregl. 2006; 59(3-4): 175–178, doi: 10.2298/mpns0604175t, indexed in Pubmed: 17066592.
  28. Pallotti S, Gasbarrone S, Franzese IT. Relationship between insulin secretion, and thyroid and ovary function in patients suffering from polycystic ovary. Minerva Endocrinol. 2005; 30(3): 193–197, indexed in Pubmed: 16208308.
  29. Diamanti‐Kandarakis E, Alexandraki K, Piperi C, et al. Inflammatory and endothelial markers in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006; 36(10): 691–697, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01712.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16968464.
  30. Bahceci M, Tuzcu A, Bahceci S, et al. Is hyperprolactinemia associated with insulin resistance in non-obese patients with polycystic ovary syndrome? J Endocrinol Invest. 2003; 26(7): 655–659, doi: 10.1007/BF03347025, indexed in Pubmed: 14594118.
  31. Barkan AL, Burman P, Clemmons DR, et al. Glucose homeostasis and safety in patients with acromegaly converted from long-acting octreotide to pegvisomant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90(10): 5684–5691, doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-0331, indexed in Pubmed: 16076947.
  32. Geer EB, Shen W, Strohmayer E, et al. Body composition and cardiovascular risk markers after remission of Cushing’s disease: a prospective study using whole-body MRI. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 97(5): 1702–1711, doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3123, indexed in Pubmed: 22419708.
  33. Colao A, Di Somma C, Spiezia S, et al. Growth hormone treatment on atherosclerosis: results of a 5-year open, prospective, controlled study in male patients with severe growth hormone deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 93(9): 3416–3424, doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2810, indexed in Pubmed: 18593773.
  34. Taylor WH, Khaleeli AA. Prevalence of primary hyperparathyroidism in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1997; 14(5): 386–389, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199705)14:5<386::AID-DIA362>3.0.CO;2-3, indexed in Pubmed: 9171255.
  35. Elenkova A, Matrozova J, Zacharieva S, et al. Adiponectin - A possible factor in the pathogenesis of carbohydrate metabolism disturbances in patients with pheochromocytoma. Cytokine. 2010; 50(3): 306–310, doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.03.011, indexed in Pubmed: 20385503.
  36. Giacchetti G, Ronconi V, Turchi F, et al. Aldosterone as a key mediator of the cardiometabolic syndrome in primary aldosteronism: an observational study. J Hypertens. 2007; 25(1): 177–186, doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280108e6f, indexed in Pubmed: 17143190.
  37. Capozzi A, Scambia G, Pontecorvi A, et al. Hyperprolactinemia: pathophysiology and therapeutic approach. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31(7): 506–510, doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1017810, indexed in Pubmed: 26291795.
  38. Lange T, Luebber F, Grasshoff H, et al. A regulatory role of prolactin, growth hormone, and corticosteroids for human T-cell production of cytokines. Brain Behav Immun. 2004; 18(4): 368–374, doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2003.09.014, indexed in Pubmed: 15157954.
  39. Brandebourg T, Hugo E, Ben‐Jonathan N. Adipocyte prolactin: regulation of release and putative functions. Diabetes, Obes and Metab. 2007; 9(4): 464–476, doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00671.x, indexed in Pubmed: 17587388.
  40. Szosland K, Pawlowicz P, Lewiński A. Prolactin secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2015; 36(1): 53–58, indexed in Pubmed: 25789595.
  41. Biller BMK. Hyperprolactinemia. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1999; 44(2): 74–77, indexed in Pubmed: 10338264.
  42. Giusti F. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. In: Bilezikian JP, Martin TJ, Rosen CJ. ed. Principles of bone biology. Elsevier 2020: 1293–1306.
  43. Sorenson RL, Brelje TC. Adaptation of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy: beta-cell growth, enhanced insulin secretion and the role of lactogenic hormones. Horm Metab Res. 1997; 29(6): 301–307, doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979040, indexed in Pubmed: 9230352.
  44. Petryk A, Fleenor D, Driscoll P, et al. Prolactin induction of insulin gene expression: the roles of glucose and glucose transporter-2. J Endocrinol. 2000; 164(3): 277–286, doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1640277, indexed in Pubmed: 10694367.
  45. Berinder K, Nyström T, Höybye C, et al. Insulin sensitivity and lipid profile in prolactinoma patients before and after normalization of prolactin by dopamine agonist therapy. Pituitary. 2011; 14(3): 199–207, doi: 10.1007/s11102-010-0277-9, indexed in Pubmed: 21128120.
  46. Santos S, Cintia M. BMI and metabolic profile in patients with prolactinoma before and after treatment with dopamine agonists. Obesity. 2011; 19(4): 800–805, doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.150, indexed in Pubmed: 20559294.
  47. Auriemma RS, De Alcubierre D, Pirchio R, et al. Glucose Abnormalities Associated to Prolactin Secreting Pituitary Adenomas. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10: 327, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00327, indexed in Pubmed: 31191454.
  48. Tuzcu A, Yalaki S, Arikan S, et al. Insulin sensitivity and hyperprolactinemia. J Endocrinol Invest. 2003; 26(4): 341–346, doi: 10.1007/BF03345182, indexed in Pubmed: 12841542.
  49. Yavuz D, Deyneli O, Akpinar I, et al. Endothelial function, insulin sensitivity and inflammatory markers in hyperprolactinemic pre-menopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149(3): 187–193, doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1490187, indexed in Pubmed: 12943520.
  50. Tuzcu A, Yalaki S, Arikan S, et al. Evaluation of insulin sensitivity in hyperprolactinemic subjects by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique. Pituitary. 2009; 12(4): 330–334, doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0183-1, indexed in Pubmed: 19408128.
  51. Schernthaner G, Prager R, Punzengruber C, et al. Severe hyperprolactinaemia is associated with decreased insulin binding in vitro and insulin resistance in vivo. Diabetologia. 1985; 28(3): 138–142, doi: 10.1007/BF00273860, indexed in Pubmed: 3888755.
  52. Daimon M, Kamba A, Murakami H, et al. Association between serum prolactin levels and insulin resistance in non-diabetic men. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4): e0175204, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175204, indexed in Pubmed: 28384295.
  53. Wang T, Lu J, Xu Yu, et al. Circulating prolactin associates with diabetes and impaired glucose regulation: a population-based study. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(7): 1974–1980, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1893, indexed in Pubmed: 23340889.
  54. Kok P, Roelfsema F, Frölich M, et al. Prolactin release is enhanced in proportion to excess visceral fat in obese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89(9): 4445–4449, doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-032184, indexed in Pubmed: 15356045.
  55. Mingrone G, Manco M, Iaconelli A, et al. Prolactin and insulin ultradian secretion and adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase expression in severely obese women after bariatric surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008; 16(8): 1831–1837, doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.297, indexed in Pubmed: 18535540.
  56. Le JA, Wilson HM, Shehu A, et al. Prolactin activation of the long form of its cognate receptor causes increased visceral fat and obesity in males as shown in transgenic mice expressing only this receptor subtype. Horm Metab Res. 2011; 43(13): 931–937, doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291182, indexed in Pubmed: 21989556.
  57. Krysiak R, Okrzesik J, Okopien B. The effect of short-term metformin treatment on plasma prolactin levels in bromocriptine-treated patients with hyperprolactinaemia and impaired glucose tolerance: a pilot study. Endocrine. 2015; 49(1): 242–249, doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0428-2, indexed in Pubmed: 25239203.
  58. Liu X, Liu Y, Gao J, et al. Combination Treatment with Bromocriptine and Metformin in Patients with Bromocriptine-Resistant Prolactinomas: Pilot Study. World Neurosurg. 2018; 115: 94–98, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.188, indexed in Pubmed: 29530699.
  59. Krysiak R, Gilowski W, Szkrobka W, et al. The Effect of Atorvastatin on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Bromocriptine-Treated Premenopausal Women with Isolated Hypercholesterolemia. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015; 33(5): 282–287, doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12143, indexed in Pubmed: 26146893.
  60. Framnes-DeBoer S, Bakke E, Yalamanchili S, et al. Bromocriptine improves glucose tolerance independent of circadian timing, prolactin, or the melanocortin-4 receptor. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 318(1): E62–E71, doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00325.2019, indexed in Pubmed: 31794265.
  61. Defronzo RA. Bromocriptine: a sympatholytic, d2-dopamine agonist for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(4): 789–794, doi: 10.2337/dc11-0064, indexed in Pubmed: 21447659.
  62. Vinik AI, Cincotta AH, Scranton RE, et al. Effect of bromocriptine-QR on glycemic control in subjects with uncontrolled hyperglycemia on one or two oral anti-diabetes agents. Endocr Pract. 2012; 18(6): 931–943, doi: 10.4158/EP12187.OR, indexed in Pubmed: 23186965.
  63. Schwartz SS, Zangeneh F. Evidence-based practice use of quick-release bromocriptine across the natural history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Postgrad Med. 2016; 128(8): 828–838, doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1214059, indexed in Pubmed: 27458683.
  64. Serri O, Serri O, Li L, et al. The influences of hyperprolactinemia and obesity on cardiovascular risk markers: effects of cabergoline therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006; 64(4): 366–370, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02469.x, indexed in Pubmed: 16584506.
  65. Gibson CD, Karmally W, McMahon DJ, et al. Randomized pilot study of cabergoline, a dopamine receptor agonist: effects on body weight and glucose tolerance in obese adults. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012; 14(4): 335–340, doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01534.x, indexed in Pubmed: 22074059.
  66. Moghetti P, Tosi F. Insulin resistance and PCOS: chicken or egg? J Endocrinol Invest. 2021; 44(2): 233–244, doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01351-0, indexed in Pubmed: 32648001.
  67. Petruzzelli MG, Margari M, Peschechera A, et al. Hyperprolactinemia and insulin resistance in drug naive patients with early onset first episode psychosis. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1): 246, doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1827-3, indexed in Pubmed: 30068291.
  68. Duda-Sobczak A, Wierusz-Wysocka B. [Diabetes mellitus and psychiatric diseases]. Psychiatr Pol. 2011; 45(4): 589–598, indexed in Pubmed: 22232984.
  69. Aziz K, Shahbaz A, Umair M, et al. Hyperprolactinemia with Galactorrhea Due to Subclinical Hypothyroidism: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Cureus. 2018; 10(5): e2723, doi: 10.7759/cureus.2723, indexed in Pubmed: 30079289.
  70. RISE Consortium, RISE Consortium. Metabolic Contrasts Between Youth and Adults With Impaired Glucose Tolerance or Recently Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: I. Observations Using the Hyperglycemic Clamp. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(8): 1696–1706, doi: 10.2337/dc18-0244, indexed in Pubmed: 29941497.
  71. Rizzo LFL, Mana DL, Serra HA, et al. Hyperprolactinemia associated with psychiatric disorders. Medicina (B Aires). 2020; 80(6): 670–680, indexed in Pubmed: 33254112.
  72. Burghardt K, Seyoum S, Mallisho A, et al. Atypical antipsychotics, insulin resistance and weight; a meta-analysis of healthy volunteer studies. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 20: 55–63, doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.004, indexed in Pubmed: 29325867.
  73. Dimitriadis G, Maratou E, Alevizaki M, et al. Thyroid hormone excess increases basal and insulin-stimulated recruitment of GLUT3 glucose transporters on cell surface. Horm Metab Res. 2005; 37(1): 15–20, doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861026, indexed in Pubmed: 15702433.
  74. Dimitriadis G, Mitrou P, Lambadiari V, et al. Insulin action in adipose tissue and muscle in hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(12): 4930–4937, doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0478, indexed in Pubmed: 17003097.
  75. Yasar HY, Ertuğrul O, Ertuğrul B, et al. Insulin resistance in nodular thyroid disease. Endocr Res. 2011; 36(4): 167–174, doi: 10.3109/07435800.2011.593011, indexed in Pubmed: 21973236.
  76. Dal J, List EO, Jørgensen JO, et al. Glucose and Fat Metabolism in Acromegaly: From Mice Models to Patient Care. Neuroendocrinology. 2016; 103(1): 96–105, doi: 10.1159/000430819, indexed in Pubmed: 25925240.
  77. Geer EB, Islam J, Buettner C. Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance: focus on adipose tissue function and lipid metabolism. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2013; 43(1): 75–102, doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2013.10.005, indexed in Pubmed: 24582093.
  78. Roth CL. Hypothalamic obesity in patients with craniopharyngioma: profound changes of several weight regulatory circuits. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2011; 2: 49, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2011.00049, indexed in Pubmed: 22654811.
  79. Kumar S, Olukoga AO, Gordon C, et al. Impaired glucose tolerance and insulin insensitivity in primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1994; 40(1): 47–53, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02442.x, indexed in Pubmed: 8306480.
  80. Löffler J, Blanc MH. [Diabetes secondary to endocrine diseases]. Rev Med Suisse Romande. 1995; 115(9): 721–726, indexed in Pubmed: 7481361.
  81. Elenkova A, Matrozova J, Zacharieva S, et al. Adiponectin A possible factor in the pathogenesis of carbohydrate metabolism disturbances in patients with pheochromocytoma. Cytokine. 2010; 50(3): 306–310, doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.03.011, indexed in Pubmed: 20385503.
  82. Sowers JR, Whaley-Connell A, Epstein M. Narrative review: the emerging clinical implications of the role of aldosterone in the metabolic syndrome and resistant hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150(11): 776–783, doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-11-200906020-00005, indexed in Pubmed: 19487712.