Vol 72, No 5 (2021)
Original paper
Published online: 2021-08-11

open access

Page views 7437
Article views/downloads 776
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Quality of life in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide autogel: a real-world observational study

Marek Bolanowski1, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk2, Beata Kos-Kudła3, Marek Ruchała4, Przemysław Witek5, Wojciech Zgliczyński6, Aude Houchard7, Marta Bartmańska8
Pubmed: 34647602
Endokrynol Pol 2021;72(5):512-519.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with acromegaly have substantially reduced quality of life (QoL). This study evaluated QoL in patients with acromegaly treated with lanreotide autogel.

Material and methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-centre study conducted in Poland (NCT02396966). We included patients with acromegaly, who received treatment with lanreotide autogel 120 mg for ≥ 3 months and < 3 years. Patients were assessed approximately every 4–5 months for two years (six visits). QoL was measured with the Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL).

Results: Of 152 patients enrolled from November 2014 to May 2018 in 37 centres, 24 were excluded due to major protocol deviations. The results are reported for the study population (n = 128). At baseline, the median [95% confidence interval (CI)] time from diagnosis was 3.3 (2.8, 4.2) years, and the median time since lanreotide initiation was 13.4 (9.9, 17.3) months. Symptoms of acromegaly were present at baseline in 86% of patients (headache, 57%; sweating, 58%; joint symptoms, 64%); symptoms remained unchanged at two years in 82% of patients. At baseline, 27% of patients had hormonal control (growth hormone < 2.5 μg/L and insulin-like growth factor-1 within the normal range); hormonal control status did not change during the study period in over 81% of patients. At baseline, 88% of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with treatment; treatment satisfaction was unchanged in 62% of patients over the study period. Mean (95% CI) AcroQoL scores at baseline were as follows: total, 50.3 (47.3, 53.3); physical dimension, 48.8 (45.2, 52.4); psychological dimension, 51.3 (48.2, 54.4); appearance subdimension, 40.7 (37.5, 43.8); and personal relations subdimension, 62.5 (58.8, 66.2). The psychological appearance subscore improved by 3.8 points (1.2, 6.5) over the two years; scores in the remaining dimensions and subdimensions did not change substantially. The total AcroQoL score remained unchanged over the two years, regardless of prior acromegaly treatment, surgery or radiotherapy, hormonal control, or lanreotide dosing interval. No new safety findings were identified.

Conclusions: AcroQoL total scores and physical and psychological subscores remained stable but impaired among patients with long-lasting acromegaly treated with lanreotide autogel for two years. The psychological appearance subdimension improved numerically.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Melmed S. Medical progress: Acromegaly . N Engl J Med . 2006; 355(24): 2558–2573.
  2. Gurel MH, Bruening PR, Rhodes C, et al. Patient perspectives on the impact of acromegaly: results from individual and group interviews. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014; 8: 53–62.
  3. Rowles SV, Prieto L, Badia X, et al. Quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly is severely impaired: use of a novel measure of QOL: acromegaly quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 90(6): 3337–3341.
  4. Szcześniak DM, Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska A, Matusiak Ł, et al. Is there any difference in acromegaly and other chronic disease in quality of life and psychiatric morbidity? Endokrynol Pol. 2017; 68(5): 524–532.
  5. Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Sane T, Sintonen H, et al. Quality of life in treated patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(10): 3891–3896.
  6. Badia X, Webb SM, Prieto L, et al. Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 13.
  7. Giustina A, Chanson P, Kleinberg D, et al. Acromegaly Consensus Group. Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10(4): 243–248.
  8. Bolanowski M, Ruchała M, Zgliczyński W, et al. Diagnostics and treatment of acromegaly — updated recommendations of the Polish Society of Endocrinology. Endokrynol Pol. 2019; 70(1): 2–18.
  9. Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, et al. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14(9): 552–561.
  10. Crespo I, Valassi E, Webb SM. Update on quality of life in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary. 2017; 20(1): 185–188.
  11. Melmed S, Cook D, Schopohl J, et al. Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension. Pituitary. 2010; 13(1): 18–28.
  12. Bevan JS, Newell-Price J, Wass JAH, et al. Home administration of lanreotide Autogel by patients with acromegaly, or their partners, is safe and effective. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008; 68(3): 343–349.
  13. Lombardi G, Minuto F, Tamburrano G, et al. Efficacy of the new long-acting formulation of lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in somatostatin analogue-naive patients with acromegaly. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009; 32(3): 202–209.
  14. Scacchi M, Cavagnini F. Acromegaly. Pituitary. 2006; 9(4): 297–303.
  15. Szcześniak D, Jawiarczyk-Przybyłowska A, Rymaszewska J. The quality of life and psychological, social and cognitive functioning of patients with acromegaly. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015; 24(1): 167–172.
  16. Miller A, Doll H, David J, et al. Impact of musculoskeletal disease on quality of life in long-standing acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008; 158(5): 587–593.
  17. Wassenaar MJE, Biermasz NR, Kloppenburg M, et al. Clinical osteoarthritis predicts physical and psychological QoL in acromegaly patients. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2010; 20(3): 226–233.
  18. Mangupli R, Camperos P, Webb SM. Biochemical and quality of life responses to octreotide-LAR in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2014; 17(6): 495–499.
  19. Dimopoulou C, Athanasoulia AP, Hanisch E, et al. Clinical characteristics of pain in patients with pituitary adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014; 171(5): 581–591.
  20. Solomon E, Brănișteanu D, Dumbravă A, et al. Executive functioning and quality of life in acromegaly. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019; 12: 39–44.
  21. Kyriakakis N, Lynch J, Gilbey SG, et al. Impaired quality of life in patients with treated acromegaly despite long-term biochemically stable disease: Results from a 5-years prospective study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017; 86(6): 806–815.
  22. Biermasz NR, van Thiel SW, Pereira AM, et al. Decreased quality of life in patients with acromegaly despite long-term cure of growth hormone excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89(11): 5369–5376.
  23. Webb SM, Badia X, Surinach NL, et al. Spanish AcroQol Study Group. Validity and clinical applicability of the acromegaly quality of life questionnaire, AcroQoL: a 6-month prospective study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006; 155(2): 269–277.
  24. Caron PJ, Bevan JS, Petersenn S, et al. PRIMARYS Investigators Group. Effects of lanreotide Autogel primary therapy on symptoms and quality-of-life in acromegaly: data from the PRIMARYS study. Pituitary. 2016; 19(2): 149–157.
  25. Chin SO, Chung CH, Chung YS, et al. Change in quality of life in patients with acromegaly after treatment with octreotide LAR: first application of AcroQoL in Korea. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(6): e006898.
  26. Geraedts VJ, Andela CD, Stalla GK, et al. Predictors of Quality of Life in Acromegaly: No Consensus on Biochemical Parameters. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017; 8: 40.
  27. Matta MP, Couture E, Cazals L, et al. Impaired quality of life of patients with acromegaly: control of GH/IGF-I excess improves psychological subscale appearance. Eur J Endocrinol. 2008; 158(3): 305–310.
  28. Lesén E, Granfeldt D, Houchard A, et al. Comorbidities, treatment patterns and cost-of-illness of acromegaly in Sweden: a register-linkage population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017; 176(2): 203–212.
  29. Strasburger CJ, Karavitaki N, Störmann S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of parenteral somatostatin analogue injections in 195 patients with acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016; 174(3): 355–362.
  30. Jadresic A, Banks LM, Child DF, et al. The acromegaly syndrome. Relation between clinical features, growth hormone values and radiological characteristics of the pituitary tumours. Q J Med. 1982; 51(202): 189–204.
  31. Lugo G, Pena L, Cordido F. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of acromegaly. Int J Endocrinol. 2012; 2012: 540398.
  32. Caron P, Brue T, Raverot G, et al. Signs and symptoms of acromegaly at diagnosis: the physician's and the patient's perspectives in the ACRO-POLIS study. Endocrine. 2019; 63(1): 120–129.
  33. Gasperi M, Martino E, Manetti L, et al. Acromegaly Study Group of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. Prevalence of thyroid diseases in patients with acromegaly: results of an Italian multi-center study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002; 25(3): 240–245.
  34. Caron P, Brue T, Raverot G, et al. Signs and symptoms of acromegaly at diagnosis: the physician's and the patient's perspectives in the ACRO-POLIS study. Endocrine. 2019; 63(1): 120–129.
  35. Adelman DT, Liebert KJp, Nachtigall LB, et al. Acromegaly: the disease, its impact on patients, and managing the burden of long-term treatment. Int J Gen Med. 2013; 6: 31–38.
  36. Plunkett C, Barkan AL. The care continuum in acromegaly: how patients, nurses, and physicians can collaborate for successful treatment experiences. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015; 9: 1093–1099.
  37. Giustina A, Barkan A, Beckers A, et al. A Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly Comorbidities: An Update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(4).