open access
Bone mineral density and bone turnover in hyperprolactinaemia of various origins
open access
Abstract
Material and methods: The study was carried out in 75 women (aged 30.53 ± 7.8): Group I - 32 women with prolactinoma and Group II - 43 women with functional hyperprolactinaemia. Both groups of patients were subdivided into those with hypogonadism and those with normal gonadal function. The control group consisted of 29 healthy women aged (33.59 ± 4.7). In all subjects PRL and bone turnover markers (BAP, OC, ICTP) were studied. BMD measurements (lumbar spine, forearm, proximal femur and total body) were carried out using DXA.
Results: Higher PRL concentrations were observed in patients than in controls. The values of bone turnover markers (BAP, ICTP) were shown to be higher in patient groups and subgroups than in controls. In patients with prolactinoma lumbar spine BMD was lower than in patients with functional hyperprolactinaemia and controls. Total body BMD was also lower, albeit to a lesser extent.
Conclusions: Hyperprolactinaemia caused by prolactinoma in women influences bone metabolism unfavourably, more by the impact on the activity of bone turnover markers than on BMD. This provides an opportunity for earlier assessment of bone metabolism disturbances before the BMD changes can be observed. Functional hyperprolactinaemia does not determine such a harmful effect on bone metabolism as hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma.
Abstract
Material and methods: The study was carried out in 75 women (aged 30.53 ± 7.8): Group I - 32 women with prolactinoma and Group II - 43 women with functional hyperprolactinaemia. Both groups of patients were subdivided into those with hypogonadism and those with normal gonadal function. The control group consisted of 29 healthy women aged (33.59 ± 4.7). In all subjects PRL and bone turnover markers (BAP, OC, ICTP) were studied. BMD measurements (lumbar spine, forearm, proximal femur and total body) were carried out using DXA.
Results: Higher PRL concentrations were observed in patients than in controls. The values of bone turnover markers (BAP, ICTP) were shown to be higher in patient groups and subgroups than in controls. In patients with prolactinoma lumbar spine BMD was lower than in patients with functional hyperprolactinaemia and controls. Total body BMD was also lower, albeit to a lesser extent.
Conclusions: Hyperprolactinaemia caused by prolactinoma in women influences bone metabolism unfavourably, more by the impact on the activity of bone turnover markers than on BMD. This provides an opportunity for earlier assessment of bone metabolism disturbances before the BMD changes can be observed. Functional hyperprolactinaemia does not determine such a harmful effect on bone metabolism as hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma.
Keywords
prolactinoma; functional hyperprolactinaemia; bone mineral density; bone turnover
Title
Bone mineral density and bone turnover in hyperprolactinaemia of various origins
Journal
Issue
Article type
Original paper
Pages
116-122
Published online
2007-03-13
Page views
697
Article views/downloads
1181
Bibliographic record
Endokrynol Pol 2007;58(2):116-122.
Keywords
prolactinoma
functional hyperprolactinaemia
bone mineral density
bone turnover
Authors
Beata Zadrożna-Śliwka
Marek Bolanowski
Marcin Kałużny
Joanna Syrycka