Vol 3, No 1 (2018)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2018-06-12
IMPACT OF A CPRMETER FEEDBACK DEVICE ON CHEST COMPRESSION QUALITY PERFORMED BY NURSES — A RANDOMIZED CROSSOVER STUDY
Disaster Emerg Med J 2018;3(1):36-37.
Abstract
Not available
References
- Michelson KA, Hudgins JD, Monuteaux MC, et al. Cardiac Arrest Survival in Pediatric and General Emergency Departments. Pediatrics. 2018; 141(2).
- Link MS, Berkow LC, Kudenchuk PJ, et al. Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2): S444–S464.
- Szarpak L, Filipiak KJ, Ładny JR, et al. Should nurses use mechanical chest compression devices during CPR? Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(10): 2044–2045.
- Iskrzycki L, Smereka J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, et al. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3): 574–579.
- Abelairas-Gómez C, Barcala-Furelos R, Szarpak Ł, et al. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(1): 21–27.
- Sugerman NT, Edelson DP, Leary M, et al. Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2009; 80(9): 981–984.
- Wieczorek W, Kaminska H. Impact of a corpuls CPR Mechanical Chest Compression Device on chest compression quality during extended pediatric manikin resuscitation: a randomized crossover pilot study. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017; 2(2): 58–63.
- Sutton RM, Niles D, French B, et al. First quantitative analysis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during in-hospital cardiac arrests of young children. Resuscitation. 2014; 85(1): 70–74.