Vol 13, No 5 (2024)
Research paper
Published online: 2024-09-25

open access

Page views 103
Article views/downloads 54
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Association between Elevated Liver Enzymes and Microvascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study

Zahra Abbasi Ranjbar1, Farahnaz Joukar2, Bardia Fakhrnia2, Saman Maroufizadeh3, Amirhomayoun Atefi24, Yousef Alizadeh5, Yalda Haghdar Saheli1, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei2
DOI: 10.5603/cd.100479
Clin Diabetol 2024;13(5):260-267.

Abstract

Objective: The present study investigated the association between increased serum levels of liver enzymes and the risk of diabetic microvascular complications among Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in IRAN (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS) population. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 403 patients with T2D from PGCS were included. Patients’ demographic, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics were assessed using a questionnaire. Urine analysis and blood laboratory tests were conducted to assess diabetic nephropathy and serum liver enzyme levels. Fundus photometry and the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) were used to assess retinopathy and neuropathy, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0, and the significant level was p < 0.05. Results: Of 403 patients with diabetes, 202 (50.1%) were male, and the mean age of participants was 59.67 ± 6.33 years. No statistically significant association between the increased level of liver enzymes and developing retinopathy or neuropathy in patients with diabetes was observed (p > 0.05). However, increased levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were significantly associated with the development of diabetic nephropathy (OR = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.28–6.00, p = 0.014). No statistically significant association was observed between increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and diabetic nephropathy (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The results of the study suggested increased levels of GGT as an independent risk factor for the development of nephropathy in patients with diabetes.

04_HTML_CD_2024_5_Ranjbar_100479

RESEARCH PAPER

Zahra Abbasi Ranjbar1, Farahnaz Joukar2, Bardia Fakhrnia2, Saman Maroufizadeh3, Amirhomayoun Atefi2, 4, Yousef Alizadeh5, Yalda Haghdar Saheli1, Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei2

1Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

2Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

3Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

4Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

5Eye Research Center, Department of Eye, Amiralmomenin Hospital, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

Association between Elevated Liver Enzymes and Microvascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study

Address for correspondence:

Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei, MD, AGAF

Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran Razi Hospital, Sardar-Jangle Ave., P.O. Box: 41448-95655, Rasht, Iran

Phone: + 98-1315535116

Fax: + 98-1315534951

E-mail: fmansourghanaei@gmail.com

Clinical Diabetology 2024, 13; 5: 260–267

DOI: 10.5603/cd.100479

Received: 29.04.2024 Accepted: 11.07.2024

Early publication date: 25.09.2024

ABSTRACT

Objective: The present study investigated the association between increased serum levels of liver enzymes and the risk of diabetic microvascular complications among Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in IRAN (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS) population.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 403 patients with T2D from PGCS were included. Patients’ demographic, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics were assessed using a questionnaire. Urine analysis and blood laboratory tests were conducted to assess diabetic nephropathy and serum liver enzyme levels. Fundus photometry and the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) were used to assess retinopathy and neuropathy, respectively. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0, and the significant level was p < 0.05.

Results: Of 403 patients with diabetes, 202 (50.1%) were male, and the mean age of participants was 59.67 ± 6.33 years. No statistically significant association between the increased level of liver enzymes and developing retinopathy or neuropathy in patients with diabetes was observed (p > 0.05). However, increased levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) were significantly associated with the development of diabetic nephropathy (OR = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.28–6.00, p = 0.014). No statistically significant association was observed between increased levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and diabetic nephropathy (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The results of the study suggested increased levels of GGT as an independent risk factor for the development of nephropathy in patients with diabetes. (Clin Diabetol 2024; 13, 5: 260–267)

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, liver enzyme, retinopathy, neuropathy, nephropathy

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is closely associated with development of microvascular complications. One of the most common microvascular complications of diabetes is retinopathy, which can result in irreversible blindness [1]. Increased pericyte loss, retinal capillary leakage, endothelial cell apoptosis, advanced glycation end-product accumulation, and thickening of the endothelial basement membrane occur early in diabetic retinopathy [2].

Another microvascular complication is diabetic nephropathy that is the main cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) globally leads to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide [1, 3]. Moreover, diabetic neuropathy consists of various clinical conditions that could involve both the autonomic and peripheral nervous systems. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most prevalent form that results in pain, gait disturbances, depressive symptoms, and reduced quality of life, in nearly one-third of patients with T2D [4].

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is suggested to be a risk factor for the development and progression of diabetes mellitus [5]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that MASLD increases the risk of diabetic microvascular complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy [6]. MASLD commonly causes mild to moderate increases in the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as well as a slight increase in the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT). However, ALT and AST are suggested to be more specific for MASLD [7–9]. Also, controversial evidence is available on the relationship between the increased serum levels of liver enzymes, e.g., ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT, and the risk of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus [10, 11].

A study among an Iranian population suggested an inverse association between serum levels of ALT and the risk of diabetic retinopathy [12], while another one showed that increased ALT levels are associated with the remission of diabetic nephropathy [13]. Due to the discrepancy in results of different studies on the association between elevated liver enzymes and the chance of development microvascular complications in patients with T2D, we aimed to investigate the association between increased serum levels of liver enzymes and the risk of diabetic microvascular complications among patients with T2D.

Materials and methods

Study design and patients

This cross-sectional study was conducted based on the data obtained during the Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in IRAN (PERSIAN) Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS) [14] as a part of the PERSIAN study [15]. The overall number of participants in the PGCS is 10,520 males and females aged between 35 and 70 years from Sowme’e Sara, Guilan, Iran. In the PGCS, diabetes is defined as fasting blood sugar (FBS) >126 mg/dL, a history of diagnosis by a physician, or consuming glucose-lowering agents. Among all participants of the study, 2531 (24.1%) had diabetes. The protocol, sampling methods, laboratory measurements, and physical examinations of the PGCS are available online: https://irancohorts.ir. The systemic random sampling method was applied to select study participants. Patients with a history of chronic liver diseases, systemic diseases, autoimmune or viral hepatitis, consuming hepatotoxic or nephrotoxic agents, consuming fenofibrate, consuming alcohol, and glomerular filtration rate below 60 mL/h were excluded from the study.

Data collection and measurements

Data collection was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics including gender, age, habitat, marital status, educational level, wealth score index (SES), cigarette smoking, hookah smoking, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and physical activity during a face-to-face interview.

Blood pressure (mmHg) was measured after a 10 minutes rest period twice in the right arm with participants in a seated position, back supported, and legs uncrossed in a quiet room after 10-min intervals, using Richter auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometers (MTM Munich, Germany) [15]. The mean of the 2 measurements was used in the analyses. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or a prior diagnosis of hypertension by a health professional or current use of antihypertensive drugs [14]. Anthropometric characteristics including weight (kg), height (cm), and body mass index (BMI) were measured using US National Institutes of Health protocols, and they have been previously described in detail [15].

Biochemical analysis was performed on the serum sample of participants using FBS, ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, and HbA1c evaluation kits (Parsazmun®, Iran) via a BT-1500 (Biotecnica®, Italy) auto-analyzer. Laboratory overall CV was < 5%, and all tests were performed after confirmed accuracy and precision. In randomly selected urine samples, the measure of urinary albumin excretion was performed using the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. FBS levels 80–110 mg/dL, HbA1c < 5.4%, ALT levels < 30 U/L for females and < 45 IU/L for males, AST levels < 31 U/L, ALP levels < 306.0 IU/L, and GGT levels < 50 IU/L were considered as normal range. The normal range of urinary albumin concentrations (microalbumin) was set at < 30 mg/d [14, 15].

Microvascular complications

Diabetic retinopathy was assessed by a trained optometrist and defined as the presence of exudation, neovascularization, micro hemangioma, or retinal hemorrhage in the fundus photography (non-mydriatic retinal camera, TRC-NW400, Topcon). Patients with an albumin/creatinine ratio higher than 30 mg/g in a spot urine sample were considered to have diabetic nephropathy [16]. Diabetic neuropathy was diagnosed using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) during a face-to-face interview. This questionnaire consists of 2 separate assessments: a 15-item self-administered questionnaire that is scored by summing abnormal responses and an examination of the lower extremity, which includes inspection and assessment of ankle reflexes and vibratory sensation and is scored by assigning points for abnormal findings. Patients who received high scores on the questionnaire as well as those who had absent/reduced ankle reflexes, absent/reduced vibration sense, and absent/reduced sensation to the monofilament test were all considered to have developed diabetic neuropathy. Also, patients who scored greater than 2 out of 10 points on the clinical portion of the MNSI were considered neuropathic [17].

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated according to the rule of thumb for a logistic regression analysis recommended by Peduzzi et al. [18], whereby 10 events per independent variable were considered for analysis (i.e., n = 10 k/p, where k is the number of independent variables and p is the smallest proportion of positive or negative cases in the population). With a prevalence of 41.9 for nephropathy [19] and 14 independent variables, at least 314 subjects would be necessary for the study. The continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range) and categorical variables as numbers (percentage). The normality of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and descriptive analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare the levels of ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT between the groups of patients who developed or did not develop diabetic microvascular complications. The relationship between increased liver enzymes and diabetic microvascular complications was assessed using the chi-square test. Also, simple and multiple logistic regression was used to identify the relationship between increased levels of liver enzymes and microvascular complications of diabetes. Results are represented as crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 403 patients with T2D with a mean age of 59.67 ± 6.33 years were included in the study. Among all the participants, 203 (50.4%) were aged between 55 and 65 years, and 202 (50.1%) were male. The medians of ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT among the studied population were 18.0 (IQR: 13.0–25.0), 17.0 (IQR: 14.0–22.0), 209.0 (IQR: 177.0–246.0), and 24.0 (IQR: 18.0–32.5), respectively. The demographic characteristics of the patients are represented in Table 1. The overall frequency of microvascular complications of diabetes among participants was 75.5% (305 out of 403). Among them, diabetic retinopathy (n = 267, 66.3%) followed by neuropathy (n = 134, 33.3%) and nephropathy (n = 26, 6.5%) were the most prevalent (Tab. 2).

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of the Patients

Variables

n (%)

Mean (SD) or median (IQR)

Age [y]

59.67 (6.33)

< 55

98 (24.3)

55–65

203 (50.4)

≥ 65

102 (25.3)

Male sex

202 (50.1)

Marital status

Married

377 (93.5)

Widowed

26 (6.5)

Habitat

Urban

137 (34.0)

Rural

266 (66.0)

Education [y]

7.14 (4.61)

Illiterate

51 (12.7)

1–5 years

124 (30.8)

6–12 years

191 (47.4)

University

37 (9.2)

Wealth score

Tertile 1 (poor)

134 (33.3)

Tertile 2 (intermediate)

135 (33.5)

Tertile 3 (rich)

134 (33.3)

BMI [kg/m]

28.95 (5.19)

Normal

87 (21.6)

Overweight

170 (42.2)

Obese

146 (36.2)

Physical activity

39.34 7.73

39.34 (7.73)

Tertile 1 (low)

134 (33.3)

Tertile 2 (intermediate)

135 (33.5)

Tertile 3 (high)

134 (33.3)

Smoking

96 (23.8)

Hookah

50 (12.4)

Substance use

20 (5.0)

Alcohol

42 (10.4)

Hypertension

243 (60.3)

Liver enzymes [IU/L]

ALT

18.0 (13.025.0)

AST

17.0 (14.022.0)

ALP

209.0 (177.0246.0)

GGT

24.0 (18.0–32.5)

ALP — alkaline phosphatase; ALT — alanine aminotransferase; AST — aspartate aminotransferase; BMI — body mass index; GGT — gamma-glutamyl transferase; IQR — interquartile range; SD — standard deviation

Table 2. Prevalence of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes Among the Studied Population

Microvascular complications

Males (n = 202)

Females (n = 201)

Total (n = 403)

n

Prevalence (%)

n

Prevalence (%)

n

Prevalence (%)

Diabetic neuropathy

47

23.3

87

43.3

134

33.3

Diabetic nephropathy

12

5.9

14

7.0

26

6.5

Diabetic retinopathy

125

61.9

142

70.6

267

66.3

Microvascular

139

68.8

166

82.6

305

75.7

There was a significant difference between the levels of AST in patients with diabetes with or without retinopathy (p = 0.039). There was no significant relationship between the level of ALT, ALP, and GGT and developing retinopathy in patients with diabetes (p = 0.669, 0.255, and 0.971, respectively). Also, no significant differences were found between developing neuropathy and levels of ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT (p = 0.679, 0.281, 0.230, and 0.301, respectively) in patients with diabetes. There was a significant relationship between the levels of GGT and nephropathy in patients with diabetes (p = 0.003). However, this relationship was not detected with the levels of ALT, AST, and ALP (p = 0.109, 0.844, and 0.351, respectively) (Tab. 3).

Table 3. Level of ALT, AST, ALP, and GGT in patients with diabetes with or without neuropathy, nephropathy, or retinopathy

Variables

Without microvascular complication

With microvascular complication

P-value

Diabetic retinopathy

n = 136

n = 267

ALT (IU/L)

18.0 (13.0–25.8)

18.0 (13.0–24.0)

0.669

AST

18.0 (15.0–22.8)

17.0 (14.0–21.0)

0.039

ALP

199.5 (174.2–244.0)

211.0 (178.0–247.0)

0.255

GGT

24.0 (18.2–34.7)

24.0 (18.0–32.0)

0.971

Diabetic neuropathy

n = 269

n = 134

ALT (IU/L)

18.0 (13.0–25.0)

18.0 (13.0–24.2)

0.679

AST

17.0 (13.8–22.0)

17.0 (13.8–20.2)

0.281

ALP

206.0 (176.5–241.5)

213.5 (178.8–252.0)

0.230

GGT

23.5 (18.0–32.0)

24.8 (18.2–36.2)

0.301

Diabetic nephropathy

n = 378

n = 26

ALT (IU/L)

18.0 (13.0–24.0)

20.5 (14.0–29.2)

0.109

AST

17.0 (14.0–22.0)

15.5 (14.0–22.5)

0.844

ALP

208.0 (176.0–245.0)

215.5 (185.0–262.0)

0.351

GGT

23.0 (18.0–32.0)

28.2 (24.7–43.4)

0.003

Values are presented as median (interquartile range); P-values are based on the Mann-Whitney test

ALP alkaline phosphatase; ALT — alanine aminotransferase; AST — aspartate aminotransferase; GGT — gamma-glutamyl transferase

Further analysis using multiple logistic regression found no significant association between the increased level of liver enzymes and developing retinopathy or neuropathy in patients with diabetes. However, increased levels of GGT were significantly associated with the development of diabetic nephropathy (OR = 3.42, 95% CI, 1.28–6.00, p = 0.014). This significant association was not detected between increased levels of ALT, AST, or ALP and diabetic nephropathy (Tab. 4).

Table 4. Relationship Between Increased Serum Level of Liver Enzymes and Diabetic Neuropathy, Nephropathy, or Retinopathy

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Diabetic retinopathy

Increased ALT

1.00 (0.61 – 1.65)

0.993

1.03 (0.62 – 1.71)

0.901

1.05 (0.63 – 1.77)

0.849

Increased AST

1.23 (0.43 – 3.57)

0.700

1.30 (0.44 – 3.78)

0.636

1.33 (0.43 – 4.06)

0.620

Increased ALP

1.37 (0.59 – 3.17)

0.468

1.24 (0.53 – 2.91)

0.626

1.19 (0.50 – 2.86)

0.689

Increased GGT

1.18 (0.66 – 2.212)

0.575

1.10 (0.60 – 2.00)

0.767

1.13 (0.60 – 2.12)

0.697

Increased liver enzyme

1.28 (0.82 – 2.01)

0.274

1.26 (0.80 – 1.98)

0.317

1.27 (0.80 – 2.02)

0.307

Diabetic neuropathy

Increased ALT

1.17 (0.71 – 1.91)

0.540

1.18 (0.71 – 1.97)

0.517

1.39 (0.82 – 2.36)

0.221

Increased AST

1.10 (0.40 – 3.04)

0.855

1.21 (0.43 – 3.44)

0.719

1.37 (0.46 – 4.11)

0.570

Increased ALP

0.75 (0.32 – 1.74)

0.503

0.65 (0.27 – 1.55)

0.327

0.63 (0.26 – 1.55)

0.315

Increased GGT

1.44 (0.82 – 2.51)

0.200

1.15 (0.64 – 2.06)

0.635

1.21 (0.66 – 2.24)

0.536

Increased liver enzyme

1.09 (0.71 – 1.70)

0.690

1.02 (0.65 – 1.60)

0.941

1.10 (0.69 – 1.75)

0.701

Diabetic nephropathy

Increased ALT

1.62 (0.68 – 3.87)

0.274

1.62 (0.68 – 3.88)

0.280

1.66 (0.68 – 4.06)

0.262

Increased AST

0.90 (0.11 – 7.08)

0.922

0.91 (0.12 – 7.19)

0.932

1.27 (0.75 – 8.60)

0.826

Increased ALP

2.56 (0.82 – 8.00)

0.106

2.65 (0.82 – 8.52)

0.102

2.54 (0.75 – 8.60)

0.133

Increased GGT

2.66 (1.10 – 6.42)

0.030

2.69 (1.07 – 6.75)

0.035

3.42 (1.28 – 9.10)

0.014

Increased liver enzyme

2.53 (1.14 – 5.64)

0.023

2.51 (1.12 – 5.60)

0.025

2.64 (1.16 – 6.00)

0.020

ALP — alkaline phosphatase; ALT — alanine aminotransferase; AST — aspartate aminotransferase; BMI — body mass index; CI — confidence interval; GGT — gamma-glutamyl transferase; OR — odds ratio

Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age and sex; Model 3: adjusted for age, sex, marital status, habitat, educational level, wealth score, BMI, level of physical activity, smoking, hookah, substance misuse, alcohol, and hypertension

Discussion

Overall, our results showed that most of the patients with diabetes suffered from at least one of the microvascular complications of the disease. The most prevalent microvascular complication was diabetic retinopathy followed by neuropathy and nephropathy. In addition, our findings showed a significant association between increased GGT levels and developing nephropathy in patients with diabetes. In contrast, no significant association was found between the level of liver enzymes, including ALT, AST, ALP, or GGT, and diabetic neuropathy or retinopathy.

Our analysis suggested retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy as the most prevalent microvascular complications of diabetes. Based on our results, the frequency of retinopathy (66.3%) was much higher than the frequency of neuropathy (33.3%) and nephropathy (6.5%) in patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of the Iranian population suggested nephropathy as the most prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes, followed by neuropathy and retinopathy [20]. Also, the frequency of retinopathy in our study was much higher than in global reports [21]. A meta-analysis found a prevalence of 30.6% for diabetic nephropathy among Iranian patients with diabetes. This prevalence ranged from 14.4% to 57.3% in different provinces around the country [22]. Moreover, Mohammadi et al. [23] found a prevalence of 37.8% for retinopathy among patients with diabetes in Iran. There was a wide variation in this number between different provinces. This prevalence was estimated to be 56.5% for diabetic neuropathy, and it decreased significantly over the period between 2003 to 2017 [24]. These variations in the prevalence of different microvascular complications of diabetes could be attributed to the differences in demographic and genetic factors as well as applied screening methods and the date of the study.

Our findings showed no significant association between increased serum levels of ALP and liver enzymes (ALT, AST, and GGT) and the risk of retinopathy in patients with diabetes. In line with this finding, Bulum et al. [25] found no significant difference between the level of liver enzymes in patients with diabetes with or without retinopathy. Also, meta-analyses suggested no significant correlation between diabetic retinopathy and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as a main cause of increased levels of liver enzymes [26]. In contrast, a recent study on an Iranian population found an inverse but poor (OR = 0.998) association between the level of AST and ALT and the risk of diabetic retinopathy [10]. Afarideh et al. [12] found that retinopathy is associated with decreased levels of ALT and increased levels of ALP in patients with diabetes. However, they couldn’t find a significant difference between the odds of diabetic retinopathy among different quartiles of ALT levels.

The recent study did not find any significant relationship between the level of ALT, AST, ALP, or GGT and the risk of diabetic neuropathy. In line with these findings, Afarideh et al. [12] found no significant difference regarding the levels of liver enzymes between patients with diabetes with or without neuropathy. Moreover, a recent prospective study found that increased levels of ALP but not ALT, AST, or GGT are associated with the risk of developing neuropathy in patients with diabetes [10]. In contrast, meta-analyses suggested that MASLD [27] as well as higher liver fibrosis indices [28] are associated with a higher risk of diabetic neuropathy. This controversy could be clarified by determining the exact etiologies of increased liver enzymes in the studied population. The main reasons for the increased liver enzymes among the participants of the study may be etiologies other than MASLD.

The results of the recent study suggest a positive association between increased levels of GGT but not ALT, AST, or ALP with the risk of developing nephropathy in patients with diabetes. In line with this finding, Deravi et al. [10] showed that higher levels of GGT and ALP are accompanied by an increased risk of diabetic nephropathy. They found no significant relationship between the levels of AST or ALT and the risk of diabetic nephropathy. Another case-control study showed no significant association between increased levels of ALP but not ALT, AST, or GGT and developing nephropathy in patients with diabetes. A recent cross-sectional study suggested increased serum levels of GGT as an independent risk factor for developing nephropathy among patients with T2D [29]. A positive association has been shown between GGT levels and insulin resistance [30]. In addition, GGT plays a key role in the production of free radical species through its interaction with iron, and it has been suggested to be a reliable and sensitive biomarker of oxidative stress [31]. Moreover, GGT is considered a potential predictor of inflammatory markers, like C–C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and F2-isoprostanes [32]. Oxidative stress is one of the main pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the progression of kidney injury [33], and it is also the forerunner of renal fibrosis [34], which may contribute to the relationship between serum GGT level and the incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Insulin resistance, inflammation, and increased oxidative stress contribute to hypertension, CVD, diabetes, obesity, and high serum lipids. Based on these findings, insulin resistance, inflammation, and oxidative stress may serve as a link between GGT levels and several risk factors of CKD, including hypertension, high BMI level, and high serum lipids level. In addition, previous studies suggested that Serum GGT levels have an inverse relationship with endothelial function [35]. Also, greater endothelial dysfunction is shown to be related to decreased GFR [36]. It is noteworthy that the decreased renal excretion of GGT secondary to the reduced renal function may increase the serum GGT levels.

Several studies showed a positive relationship between increased serum GGT and the risk of CKD [37]. Clinical and experimental studies showed the involvement of GGT in the pathogenesis of many disease conditions like cardiovascular diseases, lung inflammation, atherosclerosis, cancer, and neuroinflammation, because of its role in the origination of prooxidant reactions [38]. In addition, the interaction of GGT and iron is shown to be an important source of free radical species generation [39]. Also, increased GGT levels are suggested to be associated with increased levels of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and F2-isoprostanes [32]. Evidence speculated that oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and inflammation could be the link between GGT and several risk factors of CKD such as diabetes, hypertension, and high BMI level [40].

The present study has several limitations that should be noted. First, the sample was drawn from a single center and included only adults older than 35 years; thus, the generalizability of the results may be limited. Second, because of the cross-sectional nature of the present study, it is not possible to infer causality between study variables.

In summary, our study found that increased levels of GGT are an independent risk factor for the development of nephropathy in patients with diabetes. However, no significant relationship was found between the levels of ALT, AST, or ALP and any microvascular complication in patients with diabetes. Further research is needed to elucidate the exact relationship between the level of liver enzymes and the risk of microvascular complications of diabetes. Also, future studies could identify the nature of the relationship between the increased levels of GGT and kidney damage in diabetes.

Article information

Availability of data and materials

The study protocol and the datasets analyzed are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committees of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences [IR.GUMS.REC.1400.228]. Informed consent was obtained from participants, a parent, and/or legal guardians.

Authors’ contributions

F.MGH, Z.AR, and F.J. participated in the research design. B.F., S.M., A.A., Y.A., and Y.HS participated in writing the first draft. F.J., Z.AR, and S.M. participated in the performance of the research and analytic tools. S.M. and F.J. participated in data analysis. All authors reviewed and confirmed the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate the staff of the Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center and all subjects for participating in this study and the Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran. Special thanks to Niloofar Faraji, Tahereh Zeinali and Narges Eslami for their help in editing and revising manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This study was extracted from MD thesis.

References

  1. Zhang L, Long J, Jiang W, et al. Trends in Chronic Kidney Disease in China. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(9): 905–906, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1602469, indexed in Pubmed: 27579659.
  2. Bhavsar AR. Diabetic retinopathy: the latest in current management. Retina. 2006; 26(6 Suppl): S71–S79, doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000236466.23640.c9, indexed in Pubmed: 16832305.
  3. Lin YC, Chang YH, Yang SY, et al. Update of pathophysiology and management of diabetic kidney disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018; 117(8): 662–675, doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.02.007, indexed in Pubmed: 29486908.
  4. Pop-Busui R, Boulton AJM, Feldman EL, et al. Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(1): 136–154, doi: 10.2337/dc16-2042, indexed in Pubmed: 27999003.
  5. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10(6): 330–344, doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.41, indexed in Pubmed: 23507799.
  6. Viswanathan V, Kadiri M, Medimpudi S, et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with diabetic microvascular and macrovascular complications in South Indian diabetic subjects. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2010; 30(4): 208, doi: 10.4103/0973-3930.70861.
  7. Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003; 37(6): 1286–1292, doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50229, indexed in Pubmed: 12774006.
  8. Pantsari MW, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease presenting with an isolated elevated alkaline phosphatase. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006; 40(7): 633–635, doi: 10.1097/00004836-200608000-00015, indexed in Pubmed: 16917408.
  9. Hossain IA, Shah MMR, Rahman MK, et al. Gamma glutamyl transferase is an independent determinant for the association of insulin resistance with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Bangladeshi adults: Association of GGT and HOMA-IR with NAFLD. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2016; 10(1 Suppl 1): S25–S29, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2015.09.005, indexed in Pubmed: 26482965.
  10. Deravi N, Dehghani Firouzabadi F, Moosaie F, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and incidence of microvascular complications of diabetes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1147458, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1147458, indexed in Pubmed: 37342261.
  11. Bi Y, Liu Y, Wang H, et al. The association of alanine aminotransferase and diabetic microvascular complications: A Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14: 1104963, doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1104963, indexed in Pubmed: 36742400.
  12. Afarideh M, Aryan Z, Ghajar A, et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2019; 13(6): 505–514, doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.03.009, indexed in Pubmed: 31054837.
  13. Yanagawa T, Koyano K, Azuma K. Retrospective study of factors associated with progression and remission/regression of diabetic kidney disease-hypomagnesemia was associated with progression and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase levels were associated with remission or regression. Diabetol Int. 2021; 12(3): 268–276, doi: 10.1007/s13340-020-00483-1, indexed in Pubmed: 34150435.
  14. Mansour-Ghanaei F, Joukar F, Naghipour MR, et al. The PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study (PGCS). Arch Iran Med. 2018; 22(1): 39–45, indexed in Pubmed: 30821159.
  15. Poustchi H, Eghtesad S, Kamangar F, et al. Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (the PERSIAN Cohort Study): Rationale, Objectives, and Design. Am J Epidemiol. 2018; 187(4): 647–655, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx314, indexed in Pubmed: 29145581.
  16. Adiga US, Malawadi BN. Association of Diabetic Nephropathy and Liver Disorders. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(10): BC05–BC07, doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21672.8728, indexed in Pubmed: 27891331.
  17. Feldman EL, Stevens MJ, Thomas PK, et al. A practical two-step quantitative clinical and electrophysiological assessment for the diagnosis and staging of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1994; 17(11): 1281–1289, doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.11.1281, indexed in Pubmed: 7821168.
  18. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(12): 1373–1379, doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3, indexed in Pubmed: 8970487.
  19. Maroufizadeh S, Almasi-Hashiani A, Hosseini M, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Iran: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10(5): 782–789, doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.05.21, indexed in Pubmed: 28546938.
  20. Moradi Y, Baradaran HR, Djalalinia S, et al. Complications of type 2 diabetes in Iranian population: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019; 13(3): 2300–2312, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.018, indexed in Pubmed: 31235172.
  21. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021; 128(11): 1580–1591, doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027, indexed in Pubmed: 33940045.
  22. Rabieenia E, Jalali R, Mohammadi M. Prevalence of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on geographic information system (GIS). Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020; 14(5): 1543–1550, doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.007, indexed in Pubmed: 32947753.
  23. Mohammadi M, Raiegani AA, Jalali R, et al. The prevalence of retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2019; 20(1): 79–88, doi: 10.1007/s11154-019-09490-3, indexed in Pubmed: 30887405.
  24. Aliabadi DA, Moradian N, Rahmanian E, et al. Prevalence of neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes in Iran : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021; 133(5-6): 222–228, doi: 10.1007/s00508-020-01784-w, indexed in Pubmed: 33336262.
  25. Bulum T, Tomić M, Duvnjak L. Serum bilirubin levels are negatively associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes and normal renal function. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38(3): 1095–1101, doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0565-8, indexed in Pubmed: 28523523.
  26. Zhang GH, Yuan TH, Yue ZS, et al. The presence of diabetic retinopathy closely associated with the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 9: 1019899, doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1019899, indexed in Pubmed: 36458094.
  27. Greco C, Nascimbeni F, Carubbi F, et al. Association of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) with Peripheral Diabetic Polyneuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(19), doi: 10.3390/jcm10194466, indexed in Pubmed: 34640482.
  28. Kim K, Oh TJ, Cho HC, et al. Liver fibrosis indices are related to diabetic peripheral neuropathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 24372, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03870-z, indexed in Pubmed: 34934162.
  29. Dai H, Zhu L, Pan B, et al. The relationship between serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Med. 2023; 23(7): 3619–3630, doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-00991-9, indexed in Pubmed: 36630069.
  30. Gray B, Muhlhausler BS, Davies PS, et al. Liver enzymes but not free fatty acid levels predict markers of insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese, nondiabetic adults. Nutr Res. 2013; 33(10): 781–788, doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.07.019, indexed in Pubmed: 24074735.
  31. Lee DH, Blomhoff R, Jacobs D. Is serum gamma glutamyltransferase a marker of oxidative stress? Free Radical Research. 2004; 38(6): 535–539, doi: 10.1080/10715760410001694026.
  32. Lee DH, Jacobs DR, Gross M, et al. Gamma-glutamyltransferase is a predictor of incident diabetes and hypertension: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Clin Chem. 2003; 49(8): 1358–1366, doi: 10.1373/49.8.1358, indexed in Pubmed: 12881453.
  33. Daenen K, Andries A, Mekahli D, et al. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019; 34(6): 975–991, doi: 10.1007/s00467-018-4005-4, indexed in Pubmed: 30105414.
  34. Su H, Wan C, Song A, et al. Oxidative Stress and Renal Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Therapies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1165: 585–604, doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_29, indexed in Pubmed: 31399986.
  35. Yilmaz MI, Turgut F, Kanbay M, et al. Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels are inversely related to endothelial function in chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013; 45(4): 1071–1078, doi: 10.1007/s11255-012-0354-2, indexed in Pubmed: 23242503.
  36. Khaira A, Mahajan S, Kumar A, et al. Endothelial function and oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease of varying severity and the effect of acute hemodialysis. Ren Fail. 2011; 33(4): 411–417, doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2011.568138, indexed in Pubmed: 21529270.
  37. Kunutsor SK. Gamma-glutamyltransferase-friend or foe within? Liver Int. 2016; 36(12): 1723–1734, doi: 10.1111/liv.13221, indexed in Pubmed: 27512925.
  38. Corti A, Belcastro E, Dominici S, et al. The dark side of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT): Pathogenic effects of an ‘antioxidant’ enzyme. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020; 160: 807–819, doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.09.005, indexed in Pubmed: 32916278.
  39. Lee DH, Blomhoff R, Jacobs DR. Is serum gamma glutamyltransferase a marker of oxidative stress? Free Radic Res. 2004; 38(6): 535–539, doi: 10.1080/10715760410001694026, indexed in Pubmed: 15346644.
  40. Shen ZW, Xing J, Wang QL, et al. Association between serum γ-glutamyltransferase and chronic kidney disease in urban Han Chinese: a prospective cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017; 49(2): 303–312, doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1429-2, indexed in Pubmed: 27704320.