open access

Ahead of print
Original Article
Submitted: 2022-01-24
Accepted: 2022-07-17
Published online: 2022-08-11
Get Citation

Heart rate control and its predictors in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Data from the European Society of Cardiology Long-Term Registry

Agata Tymińska1, Krzysztof Ozierański1, Marek Wawrzacz1, Paweł Balsam1, Cezary Maciejewski1, Magdalena Kleszczewska1, Magdalena Zawadzka1, Michał Marchel1, Maria G. Crespo-Leiro2, Aldo P. Maggioni3, Jarosław Drożdż4, Grzegorz Opolski1, Marcin Grabowski1, Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka1
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0076
·
Pubmed: 35975794
Affiliations
  1. 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
  2. Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC)-CIBERCV, La Coruña, Spain
  3. Centro Studi ANMCO (Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri), Florence, Italy
  4. Department of Cardiology, 1st Chair of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

open access

Ahead of print
Original articles
Submitted: 2022-01-24
Accepted: 2022-07-17
Published online: 2022-08-11

Abstract

Background: Higher resting heart rate (HR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and sinus rhythm (SR) is associated with increased mortality. In patients hospitalized for HF, the aim herein, was to assess the use and dosage of guideline-recommended HR lowering medications, HR control at discharge and predictors of HR control. Methods: In the present study, were Polish participants of the European Society of Cardiology HF Long-Term (ESC-HF-LT) Registry. Those selected were hospitalized for HF,  with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR at discharge (n = 236). The patients were divided in two groups ( < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm). Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of HR ≥ 70 bpm. Results: Of patients with HFrEF and SR, 59% had HR ≥ 70 bpm at hospital discharge. At discharge, 96% and only 0.5% of the patients with HFrEF and SR received beta-blocker and ivabradine, respectively. In the HF groups < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm, only 11% and 4% of patients received beta-blocker target doses, respectively. There was no difference in the use of other guideline-recommended medications. Age, New York Heart Association class, HR on admission and lack of HR lowering medications were predictors of discharge HR ≥ 70 bpm. Conclusions: Heart rate control after hospitalization for HFrEF is unsatisfactory, which may be attributed to suboptimal doses of beta-blockers, and negligence in use other HR lowering drugs (including ivabradine).

Abstract

Background: Higher resting heart rate (HR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and sinus rhythm (SR) is associated with increased mortality. In patients hospitalized for HF, the aim herein, was to assess the use and dosage of guideline-recommended HR lowering medications, HR control at discharge and predictors of HR control. Methods: In the present study, were Polish participants of the European Society of Cardiology HF Long-Term (ESC-HF-LT) Registry. Those selected were hospitalized for HF,  with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and SR at discharge (n = 236). The patients were divided in two groups ( < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm). Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of HR ≥ 70 bpm. Results: Of patients with HFrEF and SR, 59% had HR ≥ 70 bpm at hospital discharge. At discharge, 96% and only 0.5% of the patients with HFrEF and SR received beta-blocker and ivabradine, respectively. In the HF groups < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm, only 11% and 4% of patients received beta-blocker target doses, respectively. There was no difference in the use of other guideline-recommended medications. Age, New York Heart Association class, HR on admission and lack of HR lowering medications were predictors of discharge HR ≥ 70 bpm. Conclusions: Heart rate control after hospitalization for HFrEF is unsatisfactory, which may be attributed to suboptimal doses of beta-blockers, and negligence in use other HR lowering drugs (including ivabradine).

Get Citation

Keywords

acute heart failure, hospitalization, sinus rhythm, target heart rate, beta blocker, ivabradine

Supp./Additional Files (2)
Suppl. Table S1. Baseline characteristics, clinical course of index hospitalization and pharmacotherapy in hospitalized HFmrEF patients in SR stratified by heart rate at discharge < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm (from the Polish cohort of the ESC-HF-LT registry).
Download
27KB
Suppl. Table S2. Baseline characteristics, clinical course of index hospitalization and pharmacotherapy in hospitalized HFpEF patients in SR stratified by heart rate at discharge < 70 and ≥ 70 bpm (from the Polish cohort of the ESC-HF-LT registry).
Download
26KB
About this article
Title

Heart rate control and its predictors in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. Data from the European Society of Cardiology Long-Term Registry

Journal

Cardiology Journal

Issue

Ahead of print

Article type

Original Article

Published online

2022-08-11

Page views

915

Article views/downloads

345

DOI

10.5603/CJ.a2022.0076

Pubmed

35975794

Keywords

acute heart failure
hospitalization
sinus rhythm
target heart rate
beta blocker
ivabradine

Authors

Agata Tymińska
Krzysztof Ozierański
Marek Wawrzacz
Paweł Balsam
Cezary Maciejewski
Magdalena Kleszczewska
Magdalena Zawadzka
Michał Marchel
Maria G. Crespo-Leiro
Aldo P. Maggioni
Jarosław Drożdż
Grzegorz Opolski
Marcin Grabowski
Agnieszka Kapłon-Cieślicka

References (35)
  1. Greene S, Vaduganathan M, Wilcox J, et al. The prognostic significance of heart rate in patients hospitalized for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm. JACC: Heart Failure. 2013; 1(6): 488–496.
  2. Böhm M, Swedberg K, Komajda M, et al. Heart rate as a risk factor in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): the association between heart rate and outcomes in a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9744): 886–894.
  3. DeVore AD, Schulte PJ, Mentz RJ, et al. Relation of elevated heart rate in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to one-year outcomes and costs. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117(6): 946–951.
  4. Laskey WK, Alomari I, Cox M, et al. Heart rate at hospital discharge in patients with heart failure is associated with mortality and rehospitalization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4(4).
  5. Vollmert T, Hellmich M, Gassanov N, et al. Heart rate at discharge in patients with acute decompensated heart failure is a predictor of mortality. Eur J Med Res. 2020; 25(1): 47.
  6. Cierpka-Kmieć K, Hering D. Tachycardia: The hidden cardiovascular risk factor in uncomplicated arterial hypertension. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(6): 857–867.
  7. Yetkin E, Ozturk S, Cuglan B, et al. Golden ratio in congestive heart failure: A promising proportion for prognosis and decompensation. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(6): 904–905.
  8. Hess PL, Sheng S, Matsouaka R, et al. Strict versus lenient versus poor rate control among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure (from the Get With The Guidelines - Heart Failure Program). Am J Cardiol. 2020; 125(6): 894–900.
  9. Sartipy U, Savarese G, Dahlström U, et al. Association of heart rate with mortality in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019; 21(4): 471–479.
  10. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, et al. SHIFT Investigators. Effects on outcomes of heart rate reduction by ivabradine in patients with congestive heart failure: is there an influence of beta-blocker dose?: findings from the SHIFT (Systolic Heart failure treatment with the I(f) inhibitor ivabradine Trial) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59(22): 1938–1945.
  11. Packer M, Coats A, Fowler MB. Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(22): 1651–1658.
  12. Fowler MB, Vera-Llonch M, Oster G. Influence of carvedilol on hospitalizations in heart failure: incidence, resource utilization and costs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37(6): 1692–1699.
  13. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(21): 1349–1355.
  14. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021: 3599–3726.
  15. Borer JS, Böhm M, Ford I, et al. Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: the SHIFT Study. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33(22): 2813–2820.
  16. Ramgobin D, Vo M, Golamari R, et al. Congestive heart failure clinics and telemedicine: The key to reducing hospital readmissions in the United States. Cardiol J. 2021 [Epub ahead of print].
  17. Maggioni AP, Dahlström U, Filippatos G, et al. EURObservational Research Programme: the Heart Failure Pilot Survey (ESC-HF Pilot). Eur J Heart Fail. 2010; 12(10): 1076–1084.
  18. Crespo-Leiro MG, Anker SD, Maggioni AP, et al. European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry (ESC-HF-LT): 1-year follow-up outcomes and differences across regions. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016; 18(6): 613–625.
  19. Desai AS, Stevenson LW. Rehospitalization for heart failure: predict or prevent? Circulation. 2012; 126(4): 501–506.
  20. Kapłon-Cieślicka A, Balsam P, Ozierański K, et al. Resting heart rate at hospital admission and its relation to hospital outcome in patients with heart failure. Cardiol J. 2014; 21(4): 425–433.
  21. Ozierański K, Kapłon-Cieślicka A, Balsam P, et al. Effect of beta-blockers on 1-year survival and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation: results from ESC-HF Pilot and ESC-HF Long-Term Registry. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2018; 128(11): 649–657.
  22. Simpson J, Castagno D, Doughty RN, et al. Is heart rate a risk marker in patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant atrial fibrillation? Results from the MAGGIC meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17(11): 1182–1191.
  23. Tymińska A, Ozierański K, Balsam P, et al. The prevalence and association of major ECG abnormalities with clinical characteristics and the outcomes of real-life heart failure patients - Heart Failure Registries of the Eu ropean Society of Cardiology. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(9): 980–987.
  24. Hori M, Okamoto H. Heart rate as a target of treatment of chronic heart failure. J Cardiol. 2012; 60(2): 86–90.
  25. Opolski G, Ozierański K, Lelonek M, et al. Adherence to the guidelines on the management of systolic heart failure in ambulatory care in Poland. Data from the international QUALIFY survey. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2017; 127(10): 657–665.
  26. Crespo-Leiro M, Segovia-Cubero J, González-Costello J, et al. Adherence to the ESC Heart Failure Treatment Guidelines in Spain: ESC Heart Failure Long-term Registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015; 68(9): 785–793.
  27. Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, et al. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2010; 376(9744): 875–885.
  28. Moran D, Buckley A, Daly K, et al. Heart rate awareness in patients with chronic stable heart failure. A multi-center observational study. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 177(2): 380–384.
  29. Balsam P, Ozierański K, Kapłon-Cieślicka A, et al. Differences in clinical characteristics and one-year outcomes of hospitalized heart failure patients in succeeding European Society of Cardiology-Heart Failure Registries – Pilot and Long-Term. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2019; 129(2): 106–116.
  30. McAlister FA, Wiebe N, Ezekowitz JA, et al. Meta-analysis: beta-blocker dose, heart rate reduction, and death in patients with heart failure. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150(11): 784–794.
  31. Franke J, Wolter JS, Meme L, et al. Optimization of pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure: is heart rate adequately addressed? Clin Res Cardiol. 2013; 102(1): 23–31.
  32. Villalobos RE, Tan IR, Divinagracia RM. Safety and benefits of beta-blockers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of current evidence and meta-analysis. . Eur Resp J. 2018; 52 (suppl 62): PA742.
  33. Yang YL, Xiang ZJ, Yang JH, et al. Association of β-blocker use with survival and pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(46): 4415–4422.
  34. Prabhavathi K, Selvi KT, Poornima KN, et al. Role of biological sex in normal cardiac function and in its disease outcome - a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 8(8): BE01–BE04.
  35. Anand IS, Gupta P. Anemia and iron deficiency in heart failure: current concepts and emerging therapies. Circulation. 2018; 138(1): 80–98.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl