Online first
Original Article
Published online: 2025-02-20

open access

Page views 305
Article views/downloads 167
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Diagnostic and prognostic value of cystatin C in acute coronary syndrome: An up-to-date meta-analysis

Michal Pruc1, Damian Swieczkowski12, Basar Cander3, Milosz J. Jaguszewski4, Sagar Galwankar56, Salvatore Di Somma67, Fatimah Lateef68, Indrani Sardesai69, Ayman El-Menyar61011, Michal Zembala12, Jacek Kubica13, Togay Evrin14, Burak Katipoglu15, Zubaid Rafique16, Frank William Peacock16, Lukasz Szarpak1616

Abstract

Background: The role of Cystatin C (CysC) in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiovascular disease, particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is increasingly significant. The goal of this meta-analysis was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CysC in patients with ACS, as well as its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke.

Methods:  The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Using PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase, a literature review of cohort and case control studies reporting MACE and using the terms ACS and Cystatin C was conducted, excluding studies published after August 1, 2024. the meta-analysis using a random effects model.

Results: CysC concentrations were significantly higher in patients with ACS compared to controls [mean difference (MD) = 0.36, p < 0.001], and in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vs. unstable angina (MD = 0.18, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Patients with MACE had higher CysC levels than those without (MD = 0.25, p < 0.001). Hospital survivors had lower CysC levels compared to those who died (MD = −0.25, p < 0.001). Higher CysC concentrations were associated with increased risks of MACE, cardiac death, overall mortality, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, both during hospitalization and beyond.

Conclusions: CysC is a promising biomarker for both diagnosis and prognosis in patients with ACS, especially in the context of predicting MACE, mortality and heart failure risk. The use of CysC may improve risk stratification and support therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Pruc M, Gaca Z, Swieczkowski D, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of galectin-3 in acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15): 4504.
  2. Çaltekin İ, Demirtaş E. Is platelet to monocyte ratio a useful inflammatory determinant of ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Disaster Emerg Med. 2020; 5(4): 205–211.
  3. Pruc M, Kubica J, Banach M, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic performance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute coronary syndromes: A meta-analysis of 90 studies including 45 990 patients. Kardiol Pol. 2024; 82(3): 276–284.
  4. Pruc M, Jannasz I, Swieczkowski D, et al. Diagnostic value of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2024; 31(4): 564–572.
  5. Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2018; 243(3): 213–221.
  6. Stehlé T, Delanaye P. Which is the best glomerular filtration marker: Creatinine, cystatin C or both? Eur J Clin Invest. 2024; 54(10): e14278.
  7. Lees JS, Fabian J, Shlipak MG. Cystatin C should be routinely available for estimating kidney function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2024; 33(3): 337–343.
  8. Ghazi L, Farhat K, Hoenig MP, et al. Biomarkers vs machines: The race to predict acute kidney injury. Clin Chem. 2024; 70(6): 805–819.
  9. Jung E, Ro YS, Ryu HHo, et al. Cystatin C and mortality risk in the general population: systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Biomarkers. 2022; 27(3): 222–229.
  10. Chen J, Yang Y, Dai C, et al. Serum cystatin C is associated with the prognosis in acute myocardial infarction patients after coronary revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1): 156.
  11. Avendanha RA, Campos GF, Branco BC, et al. Potential urinary biomarkers in preeclampsia: a narrative review. Mol Biol Rep. 2024; 51(1): 172.
  12. Vanrusselt D, Sleurs C, Arif M, et al. Biomarkers of fatigue in oncology: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024; 194: 104245.
  13. Ding Li, Liu Z, Wang J. Role of cystatin C in urogenital malignancy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 1082871.
  14. Fan PC, Chang CH, Chen YC. Biomarkers for acute cardiorenal syndrome. Nephrology (Carlton). 2018; 23 Suppl 4: 68–71.
  15. Provenzano M, Andreucci M, De Nicola L, et al. The role of prognostic and predictive biomarkers for assessing cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease patients. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020: 2314128.
  16. Jin S, Xu J, Shen G, et al. Predictive value of circulating cystatin C level in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2021; 81(1): 1–7.
  17. Sun Y, Lu Q, Cheng B, et al. Prognostic value of cystatin C in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021; 51(3): e13440.
  18. Yang S, Song L, Zhao L, et al. Predictive value of cystatin C in people with suspected or established coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2017; 263: 60–67.
  19. Angelidis C, Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, et al. Cystatin C: An emerging biomarker in cardiovascular disease. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013; 13(2): 164–179.
  20. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372(n71).
  21. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13.
  22. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010; 25(9): 603–605.
  23. Einwoegerer CF, Domingueti CP. Association between increased levels of cystatin c and the development of cardiovascular events or mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018; 111(6): 796–807.
  24. Luo J, Wang LP, Hu HF, et al. Cystatin C and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality risk in the general population: A meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2015; 450: 39–45.
  25. Lee M, Saver JL, Huang WH, et al. Impact of elevated cystatin C level on cardiovascular disease risk in predominantly high cardiovascular risk populations: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3(6): 675–683.
  26. Chen S, Tang Y, Zhou X. Cystatin C for predicting all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis. Biosci Rep. 2019; 39(2).
  27. Pruc M, Peacock FW, Rafique Z, et al. The prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21): 6903.
  28. Shankar A, Teppala S. Relationship between body mass index and high cystatin levels among US adults. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011; 13(12): 925–930.
  29. Huo YX, Wei W, Liu Y, et al. Serum cystatin C levels are associated with obesity in adolescents aged 14-17 years. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13: 816201.
  30. Ma CC, Duan CC, Huang RC, et al. Association of circulating cystatin C levels with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2019; 16(3): 648–656.