Vol 25, No 3 (2021)
Review paper
Published online: 2021-05-18

open access

Page views 11697
Article views/downloads 581
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Arterial hypertension as a risk factor for myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)

Patryk Buller1, Szymon Rosiak2, Wojciech Rosiak3, Maciej Tyczyński4, Robert J. Gil45, Jacek Bil5
Arterial Hypertension 2021;25(3):106-111.


Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) as a relatively new disease entity distinguished from the group of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is not a rare clinical problem and it requires in-depth diagnostics. MINOCA accounts for 5–10% of all ACS cases. MINOCA is most common between the ages of 50–60 and predominates in females. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and coronary vasospasm are among the potential mechanisms. The latest guidelines for the treatment of ACS in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation emphasize the importance of searching for the causes of angina in patients with insignificant lesions in the coronary arteries by extending invasive diagnostics (e.g., acetylcholine provocation test) and using noninvasive diagnostics (e.g., CMR or SPECT). In the context of MINOCA, among the typical risk factors for coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension (HTN) seems to be the most important by inducing coronary microcirculation remodeling (mostly hypertrophy) and hence the narrowing of the lumen. Studies comparing patients with MINOCA and obstructive coronary artery disease (MI-CAD) in the context of risk factors, in particular HTN, were analyzed. In five out of nine analyzed studies, HTN occurred significantly more often in patients with MINOCA compared to patients with MI-CAD. The current pharmacotherapy recommendations focus on slowing the progression of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), i.e., adequate treatment of risk factors and comorbidities, such as HTN.

Therefore, it seems reasonable to conduct studies directly analyzing the relationship between HTN and MINOCA
in order to improve diagnostics and establish appropriate pharmacotherapy that will improve prognosis.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Pizzi C, Xhyheri B, Costa GM, et al. Nonobstructive Versus Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(12).
  2. Lindahl B, Baron T, Erlinge D, et al. Medical Therapy for Secondary Prevention and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2017; 135(16): 1481–1489.
  3. Smilowitz NR, Mahajan AM, Roe MT, et al. Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines). Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(12): e003443.
  4. Bil J, Pawlowski T, Gil RJ. Coronary spasm revascularized with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Coron Artery Dis. 2015; 26(7): 634–636.
  5. Tamis-Holland JE, Jneid H, Reynolds HR, et al. American Heart Association Interventional Cardiovascular Care Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 139(18): e891–e908.
  6. Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, et al. An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. EuroIntervention. 2021; 16(13): 1049–1069.
  7. Kern A, Górny J, Zaleska M, et al. Coronary microcirculation dysfunction in patients with arterial hypertension. Arterial Hypertension. 2018; 22(4): 151–155.
  8. Labazi H, Trask AJ. Coronary microvascular disease as an early culprit in the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Pharmacol Res. 2017; 123: 114–121.
  9. Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, et al. Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA): Developing Evidence-Based Therapies and Research Agenda for the Next Decade. Circulation. 2017; 135(11): 1075–1092.
  10. Hung MY, Hsu KH, Hung MJ, et al. Interactions among gender, age, hypertension and C-reactive protein in coronary vasospasm. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010; 40(12): 1094–1103.
  11. Sugiishi M, Takatsu F. Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for coronary spasm. Circulation. 1993; 87(1): 76–79.
  12. Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS). International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38(33): 2565–2568.
  13. Bil J, Pietraszek N, Pawlowski T, et al. Advances in Mechanisms and Treatment Options of MINOCA Caused by Vasospasm or Microcirculation Dysfunction. Curr Pharm Des. 2018; 24(4): 517–531.
  14. Pietraszek N, Możeńska O, Bil J. Invasive assessment of coronary microcirculation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiol Inwazyjna. 2017; 12(4): 18–24.
  15. Bil J, Tyczyński M, Modzelewski P, et al. Acetylcholine provocation test with resting full-cycle ratio, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance give definite answers and improve health-related quality of life. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(12): 1291–1292.
  16. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group . 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(14): 1289–1367.
  17. Bil J, MoŻeŃska O, Segiet-ŚwiĘcicka A, et al. Revisiting the use of the provocative acetylcholine test in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary arteries: A five-year follow-up of the AChPOL registry, with special focus on patients with MINOCA. Transl Res. 2021; 231: 64–75.
  18. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018; 138(20): e618–e651.
  19. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25): 2982–3021.
  20. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002; 360(9349): 1903–1913.
  21. Mizuno R, Fujimoto S, Saito Y, et al. Optimal antihypertensive level for improvement of coronary microvascular dysfunction: the lower, the better? Hypertension. 2012; 60(2): 326–332.
  22. Eggers KM, Hjort M, Baron T, et al. Morbidity and cause-specific mortality in first-time myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries. J Intern Med. 2019; 285(4): 419–428.
  23. Grodzinsky A, Arnold SV, Gosch K, et al. Angina Frequency After Acute Myocardial Infarction In Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2015; 1(2): 92–99.
  24. Jánosi A, Ferenci T, Kőszegi Z, et al. [Myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) - prevalence and prognosis]. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(45): 1791–1797.
  25. Abdu FA, Liu Lu, Mohammed AQ, et al. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in Chinese patients: Clinical features, treatment and 1 year follow-up. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 287: 27–31.
  26. Rakowski T, De Luca G, Siudak Z, et al. Characteristics of patients presenting with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in Poland: data from the ORPKI national registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019; 47(3): 462–466.
  27. Lopez-Pais J, Izquierdo Coronel B, Galán Gil D, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): A prospective single-center study. Cardiol J. 2020 [Epub ahead of print].
  28. Raparelli V, Elharram M, Shimony A, et al. Myocardial Infarction With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Angiographic and Clinical Insights in Patients With Premature Presentation. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34(4): 468–476.
  29. Vranken NPA, Pustjens TFS, Kolkman E, et al. MINOCA: The caveat of absence of coronary obstruction in myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020; 29: 100572.
  30. Carrick D, Haig C, Maznyczka AM, et al. Hypertension, Microvascular Pathology, and Prognosis After an Acute Myocardial Infarction. Hypertension. 2018; 72(3): 720–730.
  31. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group . 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(33): 3021–3104.
  32. Neglia D, Fommei E, Varela-Carver A, et al. Perindopril and indapamide reverse coronary microvascular remodelling and improve flow in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011; 29(2): 364–372.
  33. Nordenskjöld AM, Agewall S, Atar D, et al. Randomized evaluation of beta blocker and ACE-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker treatment in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA-BAT): Rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2021; 231: 96–104.