English Polski
Vol 18, No 2 (2021)
Review paper
Published online: 2021-02-18
Page views 798
Article views/downloads 1258
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Psychotherapy: method of treatment conducted by women for women? Feminization of psychotherapy

Anna Maria Sterna1, Władysław Sterna2
Psychiatria 2021;18(2):152-158.


There has occurred a significant change in psychotherapy for recent decades. Previously psychotherapy was mostly
defined and conducted by men, nowadays in Poland, nearly 80% of psychotherapists are women. It can be seen
as an indication of the ongoing feminization process. The authors are considering a possible impact of this change
on the image of psychotherapy as well as on the way it is conducted. The „good patient” profile is analyzed to
answer the question of whether it is becoming to be a women’s profile. Several reasons for this to occur are
discussed — differences within the socialization process, defense mechanisms, and preferences for psychotherapy
between men and women. In conclusion, a few clues for psychotherapists to consider were recommended.

Article available in PDF format

Add to basket: 49.00 PLN

Aready have access?


  1. Ostertag P, McNamara J. “Feminization” of psychology: the changing sex ratio and its implications for the profession. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2016; 15(3): 349–369.
  2. Norcross JC, Prochaska JO, Farber JA. Psychologists cunducting psychotherapy: findings and historical comparisons on the psychotherapy division membership. Psychotherapy. 1993; 30(3): 692–697.
  3. Broverman IK, Broverman DM, Clarkson FE, et al. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1970; 34(1): 1–7.
  4. Brown LS. Subversive dialogues: theory in feminist therapy. Basic Books 1994.
  5. https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2011/01/cover-men (6.12.2020).
  6. Suszek H, Grzesiuk L, Styła R, et al. Kto i w jaki sposób prowadzi psychoterapię w Polsce. Część II. Wyniki ogólnopolskiego badania. Psychiatria. 2017; 14(2): 90–100.
  7. Frąckowiak-Sochańska M. Społeczne konstruowanie kategorii zdrowia, choroby i zaburzenia psychicznego w społeczeństwie późnej nowoczesności. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań 2019: 583–584.
  8. Diamond S.A. End of Men: The "Feminization" of psychotherapy. https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/evil-deeds/201210/end-men-the-feminization-psychotherapy (12.12.2020).
  9. Reskin BF. Bringing the men back. Sex differentiation and the devaluation of women's work. Gender an Society. 1981; 2: 58–81.
  10. Englar-Carlson M. Masculine norms and the therapy process. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232501251_Masculine_norms_and_the_therapy_process (30.12.2020).
  11. Fischer A, Good G. Men and psychotherapy: An investigation of alexithymia, intimacy, and masculine gender roles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1997; 34(2): 160–170.
  12. Murawiec S, Iwaszkiewicz A. Kobieta w psychoterapii. In: Dudek D, Rymaszewska J. ed. Psychiatria na obcasach. Medical Education, Warszawa 2014: 251–275.
  13. Murawiec S, Srebrny K. Mężczyzna w psychoterapii. Mężczyzna jako psychoterapeuta. In: Dudek D, Rymaszewska J. ed. Psychiatria pod krawatem. Medical Education, Warszawa 2016: 285–305.
  14. Józefik B, Janusz B. Rozpoznawanie znaczenia problematyki płci biologicznej i kulturowej wśród polskich psychoterapeutów. Psychoterapia. 2017; 3(182): 15–30.
  15. Kaplan A. Reflections on Gender and Psychotherapy. Women & Therapy. 1987; 6(1-2): 11–24.
  16. Ogrodniczuk J. Men, women, and their outcome in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. 2006; 16(4): 453–462.
  17. Szymańska A, Dobrenko K, Grzesiuk L. Cechy pacjenta, jego doświadczenia z przebiegu psychoterapii i skuteczność psychoterapii. Roczniki Psychologiczne. 2016; 19(3): 583–603.
  18. Grzesiuk L. Psychoterapia. Teoria. Eneteia Wydawnictwo Psychologii i Kultury, Warszawa 2005.
  19. Szymańska A, Grzesiuk L, Suszek H, et al. Badania polskich psychoterapeutów – z jakimi pacjentami pracują i jakie stosują metody psychoterapii. Psychiatria Polska. 2018; 52(4): 731–751.
  20. Klatkiewicz A. Kobieta i mężczyzna w procesie pomocy psychologicznej i psychoterapeutycznej – czy płeć ma znaczenie? Nowiny Lekarskie. 2010; 79(1): 39–46.
  21. Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003; 58(1): 5–14.
  22. Frąckowiak-Sochańska M. Psychoterapeuci o klientkach i klientach – płeć społeczno-kulturowa jako kategoria analizy wzorów funkcjonowania kobiet i mężczyzn w procesie psychoterapii. Rocznik Lubuski. 2016; 42(1): 193–211.
  23. Cramer P. Anger and the use of defense mechanisms in college students. J Pers. 1991; 59(1): 39–55.
  24. Petraglia J, Thygesen KL, Lecours S, et al. Gender differences in self-reported defense mechanisms: a study using the new Defense Style Questionnaire-60. Am J Psychother. 2009; 63(1): 87–99.
  25. Schofield W. Psychotherapy. The purchase of Friendship. Englewood Cliffs, New York 1964.
  26. Goldstein A. Maximizing the initial psychotherapeutic relationship. American Journal of Psychotherapy. 1969; 23(3): 430–451.
  27. Parloff MB. Some factors affecting the quality of therapeutic relationships. J Abnorm Psychol. 1956; 52(1): 5–10.
  28. Heatherington L, Stets J, Mazzarella S. Whither the bias: The female client's "edge" in psychotherapy? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. 1986; 23(2): 252–256.
  29. Stearns B, Penner L, Kimmel E. Sexism among psychotherapists: A case not yet proven. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1980; 48(4): 548–550.
  30. Gomes B, Abramowitz S. Sex-related patient and therapist effects on clinical judgment. Sex Roles. 1976; 2(1): 1–13.
  31. Phillips E, Fagan P. Attrition: Focus on the intake and therapy interviews. Paper presented at the 90th annual convention of the American Psychological Association. Washington DC. Rabin AS, Kaslow NJ,Rehm LP Factors influencing continuation in behavioural therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1985; 23(6): 695–698.
  32. Józefik B. Płeć w psychoterapii i psychiatrii. In: Barbaro B. ed. Konteksty psychiatrii. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego , Kraków 2014: 209–222.