Vol 81, No 12 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-07-31

open access

Page views 992
Article views/downloads 251
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Clinical vignette

Septal branch in heart failure: Significant implications of an insignificant branch

Marin Pavlov12Irzal Hadžibegović1Nikola Pavlović1Šime Manola1
1Department of Cardiology, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
2University North, Koprivnica, Croatia

Correspondence to:

Marin Pavlov, MD, PhD,

Department of Cardiology,

Dubrava University Hospital,

Avenija Gojka Šuška 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,

phone: +38 59 923 602 86,

e-mail: mpavlov@kbd.hr

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0169

Received: June 19, 2023

Accepted: July 30, 2023

Early publication date: August 4, 2023

A 71-year-old male with a history of stroke and diabetes was admitted for left-sided heart failure and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Echocardiography revealed a dilated left ventricle with reduced ejection fraction (20%), inferobasal and apical scar, and anteroseptal akinesia with preserved myocardial wall thickness. Later was confirmed on a single-photon emission computed tomo­graphy. Coronary angiography showed chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery, subocclusive non-calcified stenosis of the ostial/proximal and mid segments of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and significant circumflex artery (Cx) stenosis (Figure 1). The Heart Team opted for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the PulseCath iVAC 2L support. This was achieved through the left femoral approach while PCI was performed through right femoral access. Following predilaton, the Cx was stented with an Orsiro 2.75/26 mm (Biotronik) drug-eluting stent (DES). Subsequently, after predilation, the 2.75/26 mm (Biotronik) DES and Ultimaster 3.0/30 mm (Terumo) DES were implanted in the left main and the LAD, followed by the proximal optimization technique (POT)/kissing/POT sequence. A good result was achieved at the left main and LAD level; however, occlusion of a strong first septal branch (SB) occurred. The newly developed right bundle branch block progressed to a complete atrioventricular (AV) block, requiring temporary transvenous electrostimulation.

Figure 1. Right anterior oblique view of the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries. A. Initial finding. B. After stent delivery; optimal results at the level of the left main and proximal left anterior descending artery; however, occlusion of the septal branch occurred. C. After septal branch recanalization

Negotiating the SB proved to be challenging but was eventually achieved with a Fielder XTA (Asahi) wire over the Sasuke dual lumen microcatheter (Asahi). Recanalization was achieved with semi-compliant 1.5/10 mm balloon dilatation, which was immediately followed by resolution of conduction abnormalities. The POT proximal to the SB led to SB occlusion, but the procedure was finished after additional SB balloon dilatation (Supplementary material, Video S1). The further course was uneventful.

During LAD PCI, SBs are usually neglected [1]. Preferable take-off angle, large collateral network, and small calibers render SB intervention unnecessary. Nevertheless, clinically silent and structurally insignificant SB occlusions do occur [2]. Conversely, experiences from alcohol septal ablation of the first SB suggest that as many as 9%–20% of patients need pacemaker implantation due to a new heart block [2]. This is because both the right bundle branch and the left anterior fascicle of the heart conduction system are supplied exclusively by the first SB [3]. In 2019, Nojima et al. [3] reported a case with a complete AV block developing 3 days following LAD PCI, which resulted in occlusion of the first SB. In a literature review, the authors found only 8 similar cases, rendering such events reasonably rare. Similarly, the SB was reopened with 1.5 mm semi-compliant balloon dilatation over a poly­mer jacket wire; wiring was achieved with a microcatheter. Negotiation of the SB proved much more challenging in our case. In such a scenario, a double-lumen catheter may provide a crucial aid in achieving optimal angulation for the secondary wire.

Preserving both adequate AV conduction and avoiding a complete bundle branch block in our patient were of vital interest to “do no harm”. Otherwise, resynchronization therapy would have to be considered. This was avoided by successful recanalization of the presumably “insignificant” LAD branch. Strategies to prevent SB occlusion during LAD PCI in heart failure patients should be implemented.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Dorfman TA, Resar JR. Thrombotic occlusion of a large septal perforator presenting as ST-segment elevation in V1-V2 and treated with aspiration thrombectomy: a brief review of the literature. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011; 23(1): E255E259, indexed in Pubmed: 21183777.
  2. Gao F, Khalid U. Inadvertent septal ablation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Cureus. 2021; 13(11): e19227, doi: 10.7759/cureus.19227, indexed in Pubmed: 34877205.
  3. Zimetbaum PJ, Josephson ME. Use of the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(10): 933940, doi: 10.1056/NEJMra022700, indexed in Pubmed: 12621138.
  4. Nojima Y, Ihara M, Adachi H, et al. Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for a lethal “jailed” septal perforator branch to resolve delayed complete atrioventricular block. Int Heart J. 2019; 60(2): 457461, doi: 10.1536/ihj.18-280, indexed in Pubmed: 30799381.