Vol 81, No 7-8 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-05-07

open access

Page views 656
Article views/downloads 320
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Clinical vignette

Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy paving the way for Impella-assisted multivessel high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization

Elżbieta Paszek12Łukasz Niewiara13Piotr Szolc15Jakub Baran1Daniel Rzeźnik1Katarzyna Welgan4Ewa Kwiatkowska4Jacek Legutko15Paweł Kleczyński15
1Clinical Department of Interventional Cardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland
2Department of Thromboembolic Disorders, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
3Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
4Student Scientific Group of Modern Cardiac Therapy at the Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
5Department of Interventional Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland

Correspondence to:

Paweł Kleczyński, MD, PhD, FESC,

Jagiellonian University Medical College, Institute of Cardiology,

Department of Interventional Cardiology, John Paul II Hospital,

Prądnicka 80, 31–202 Kraków, Poland,

phone: +48 12 614 35 01,

e-mail: kleczu@interia.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0106

Received: March 31, 2023

Accepted: May 1, 2023

Early publication date: May 7, 2023

In cases of challenging percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), when the risk of cardiosurgical treatment is unacceptably high, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) increase safety by minimizing periprocedural ischemia, preventing hemodynamic instability, and allowing time for lesion preparation and optimization techniques [1]. Impella CP (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, US), which is the predominantly used LVAD in high-risk PCI cases, requires a minimum 19 French (F) access site, preferably with little tortuosity en route to the ascending aorta. Advanced peripheral atherosclerosis within the iliofemoral axis may pose a serious challenge during the introduction of an LVAD [2].

A 77-year-old male multimorbid patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF, 35%) and a symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome (class III in the Canadian Cardiology Society functional scale) was qualified by the Heart Team for multivessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty, supported with an LVAD. The initial coronary angiogram revealed multivessel coronary disease with a significant left main lesion involving the proximal segments of the left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex (LCx) arteries, a long lesion in the proximal and medial segments of the LAD (Figure 1A), and a subtotal ostial lesion in the right coronary artery (RCA) (Figure 1B). A computed tomography scan revealed severe tortuosity in the left iliofemoral axis and a significantly heavily calcified tandem lesion in the right common and external iliac arteries, with a minimum diameter of 3.4 mm (Figure 1C). The left subclavian artery was also stenosed, which excluded it as an alternative access site. Under angiographic control (using right radial access and a pigtail catheter), we obtained right femoral access with a 6 F sheath, subsequently deployed two automated mechanical sutures, and exchanged them for an 8 F sheath. We then performed intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in the right common and external iliac arteries using a Shockwave C2 7.0/60 mm IVL catheter deployed with 46 atmospheres (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, US), with eight applications (20 seconds each) and obtained optimal lesion resolution (Figure 1D). After changing to a 19 F sheath, we introduced the Impella CP System (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, US), with permanent support of 3.6 l/min. Initially, we performed RCA PCI with implantation of a 3.5/18 mm drug-eluting stent (DES) (Figure 1F). Consequently, using an extra backup 3.5, 7 F guiding catheter, we performed LM/LAD/LCx PCI using the double-kissing-crush technique with three DES (Figure 1E). All procedures were guided by intravascular ultrasound, which confirmed the optimal effect. The right femoral access site was closed using two Perclose ProStyle devices (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, US) and one AngioSeal 8 F System (AS; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, US), with the optimal angiographic result [3] (Figure 1F). The dose length product was 1289 mGy, and the contrast dose was 180 ml.

Figure 1. A. Coronary angiography of the left coronary artery showing severe diffuse disease. B. Coronary angiography of the right coronary artery showing a severe ostial lesion. C. Computed tomography angiography showing almost 360o calcification within the common and external iliac arteries. D. Peripheral intravascular lithotripsy with the optimal angiographic result. E. Final angiographic result in the left coronary artery. F. Final angiographic result in the right coronary artery

Peripheral artery disease co-exists with coronary artery disease in more than 40% of cases [4]. Calcified lesions within the iliofemoral axis pose a serious challenge to using LVADs but may be overcome by applying contemporary techniques, such as IVL. Complications related to peripheral IVL are rare and include mainly device malfunction (56.5% in a recent report) [5]. In accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines, the device is contraindicated when the lesion is uncrossable with a 0.014 guidewire as well as in cases of in-stent restenosis.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Kovacevic M, Burzotta F, Srdanovic I, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention to treat unprotected left main: Common (un-answered) challenges. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(4): 417428, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0078, indexed in Pubmed: 35545858.
  2. Zein R, Patel C, Mercado-Alamo A, et al. A Review of the Impella Devices. Interv Cardiol. 2022; 17: e05, doi: 10.15420/icr.2021.11, indexed in Pubmed: 35474971.
  3. Pawlik AK, Rzeszutko Ł, Januszek R, et al. Hybrid method of large bore arterial access closure: Single-center initial experience based on percutaneous coronary artery interventions assisted with left ventricle support device. Cardiol J. 2022; 29(6): 10401042, doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0096, indexed in Pubmed: 36200543.
  4. Poredos P, Jug B. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in high risk subjects and coronary or cerebrovascular patients. Angiology. 2007; 58(3): 309315, doi: 10.1177/0003319707302494, indexed in Pubmed: 17626985.
  5. Ranka S, Arora S, Dalia T, et al. Adverse events with shockwave intravascular lithotripsy 1 year after approval for coronary use: A report from maude database. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023; 81(8_Supplement): 981, doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(23)01425-0.