Vol 79, No 9 (2021)
Short communication
Published online: 2021-07-28

open access

Page views 611
Article views/downloads 587
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

_13_KP_9_2021__Wita
  • „ SHORT COMMUNICATION

Characteristics of hospital admissions and invasive cardiology procedures in the Silesian Voivodeship in 2019 and 2020

Krystian Wita1, Zbigniew Kalarus2, Wojciech Wojakowski3, Jacek Sikora4, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec1, Zbigniew Gąsior5, Ewa Nowalany-Kozielska6, Krzysztof Gołba7, Krzysztof Milewski8, Piotr Pączek9, Henryk Sobocik10, Jacek Olender11, Lucjan Szela11, Maciej Dyrbuś12, Mariusz Gąsior13

11st Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

2Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland

3Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

4Department of Cardiology, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland

5Department of Cardiology, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

62nd Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland

7Department of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

8Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Center, Center for Cardiovascular Research and Development, American Heart of Poland, BielskoBiała, Poland

9Department of Cardiology, Public Clinical Hospital, Sosnowiec, Poland

10Voivodeship Specialist Hospital No. 2, Jastrzębie-Zdrój, Poland

11Scanmed, Kraków, Poland

12Student Scientific Society, 3rd Department of Cardiology, School of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

133rd Department of Cardiology, School of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Correspondence to:

Maciej Dyrbuś, MD,

Student Scientific Society, 3rd Department of Cardiology,

School of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia,

Silesian Center for Heart Diseases,

Skłodowskiej Curie 9, 41–800 Zabrze, Poland,

phone: +48 32 373 38 60,

e-mail: mdyrbus@op.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2021

Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79 (9): 1022–1024; DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0077

Received: April 8, 2021

Revision accepted: July 26, 2021

Published online: July 28, 2021

INTRODUCTION

The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has imposed significant changes for health care systems [1]. In order to provide care for patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to reduce the risk of viral transmission, the work of many cardiology departments and outpatient clinics had to be reorganized, while many wards have been repurposed to facilitate care for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 [2, 3]. Many planned hospital admissions have been postponed or canceled, while some patients resigned from a planned admission [4].

Due to the fear of becoming infected, many patients were reluctant to present in the hospital or call for an ambulance, which often resulted in a delay in the contact with healthcare in acute cases.

The purpose of the present analysis was to summarize the causes of hospital admissions and the major procedures performed in cardiology departments in the Silesian Voivodeship in 2020, with reference to the respective data from 2019.

METHODS

The analysis was based on data acquired from the questionnaires provided annually by the cardiology wards in the Silesian Voivodeship to the provincial consultant in cardiology. The response to the questionnaires is obligatory for every unit in the Voivodeship. The questionnaires contain information regarding the number of hospital admissions with the main diagnoses, along with the data on the procedures performed during these admissions. In the present study, the data regarding the years 2019 and 2020 were analyzed. It should be noted that the study encompassed the entire years and the detailed data for specific months, as well as the short- or long-term outcomes of the treated patients, were not available for the purpose of this analysis.

The approval of the ethics committee, and patient informed consent were not required for the purpose of this study.

Statistical analysis

The results presented in the manuscript were expressed as numbers and percentages. The comparison of the analyzed variables for each year was presented as relative differences.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In 2019, there were 61 537 hospital admissions to the cardiology departments, which decreased by 22.4% to 47 734 in 2020. The major diagnoses in the respective years are summarized in Figure 1A.

5070.png

Figure 1. Data regarding the number of hospital admissions and invasive cardiology procedures in 2019 and 2020 in the Silesian Voivodeship. A. The primary causes of admissions. B. The number of invasive procedures. C. The number of coronary angiographies with regard to the indication. D. The number of percutaneous coronary interventions with regard to the indication. The percentage changes between the respective values are described in red

Abbreviations: CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy device; HF, heart failure; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; NSTEMI, non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PPM, permanent pacemaker; STEMI, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction

The primary causes of admissions in 2019 were chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) (19.8%; n = 12 165) and heart failure (HF), myocarditis, or cardiomyopathies (19.0%; n = 11 675). In 2020 the most prevalent cause of admission was HF, myocarditis or cardiomyopathies (21.2%; n = 10 120) followed by myocardial infarction (MI) (19.7%; n = 9 410).

There was a reduction in the number of all analyzed invasive procedures between 2020 and 2019, as presented in Figure 1B. The number of coronary angiography procedures decreased by 21.4%, while the number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) decreased by 14.6%. The numbers of cardiac ablations or implantations of a permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices were also reduced when compared with 2019.

As demonstrated in Figure 1C, in 2019 patients underwent coronary angiography most frequently due to CCS (35.6%; n = 11 286) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (22.9%; n = 7248), which remained the most prevalent indications in 2020 (31.2%; n = 7778 and 20.6%; n = 5138, respectively). In 2019 the majority of PCIs were performed due to NSTEMI (32.6%; n = 5827) and CCS (25.6%; n = 4574), as described in Figure 1D. In 2020 the most prevalent indications for PCI were NSTEMI (29.7%; n = 4536), followed by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (20.9%; n = 3185).

In the Silesian Voivodeship, the number of patients admitted to the cardiology departments has seen a major reduction, which has also exerted a drop in the number of invasive procedures performed from the outbreak of the pandemic. A similar trend has been observed in Europe and the United States, where in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 spread, the number of acute cardiovascular hospitalizations was reduced by almost 45% [1, 5–7].

The decrease in the number of admissions in the analyzed period has been observed regardless of the cause and diagnosis but was numerically most prominent in patients with CCS (by 31.4%, a reduction of 3824 admissions). The necessity to reorganize the cardiology departments, the redistribution of ward employees and the division of the departments to separate the patients with regard to their infectious status could play a role in this decrease.

Moreover, similarly to the specialties, the reduction in the number of planned admissions has been recommended in order to secure hospital beds for patients with life-threatening conditions.

A major reduction has also been observed in the numbers of patients with acute coronary syndromes, which corresponds with similar observations from Europe and the United States [5–9]. It is worth mentioning that the percentage of patients with MI undergoing invasive diagnostics and treatment remained similar, as 82.0% of patients with MI in 2020 and 84.8% in 2019 underwent PCI.

Finally, despite an absolute reduction in the numbers of admissions when compared with 2019, HF, myocarditis, or cardiomyopathy became the primary cause of hospital admissions in 2020, constituting more than 20% of all hospitalizations. One of the hypotheses explaining the increase in the relative frequency of admissions due to HF could be limited access to ambulatory care, provided mostly as the telehealth visits, or the apprehension of patients of becoming infected when seeking medical advice. Moreover, although the stay-at-home campaigns aimed to substantially reduce the social risk of viral transmission, the tendency to isolate at home could potentially lead to patients deferring seeking medical contact.

An effective HF treatment is based on dynamic responses to the patients’ conditions, for instance using day-care units, which significantly reduced the risk of recurrent hospitalizations in patients with HF before the pandemic [10]. After the outbreak of COVID-19, the extensiveness of the functioning of these facilities has been reduced or even suspended.

Taking into consideration the absolute decrease in the number of hospital admissions due to HF and the previously published data on the increase of life-threatening arrhythmias in remotely monitored patients with HF, one can speculate that the fear of seeking medical care could have resulted in more pronounced development of HF, potentially leading to the death of some patients before arrival to the hospital [11, 12].

It is worth noting that an approximate 16% reduction in the number of admissions due to HF or acute coronary syndrome is lower than in the prior analyses [5–9]. However, the results of this analysis encompass the entire years, including the first months of 2020 before the pandemic, when the healthcare system has functioned similarly as in 2019.

In conclusion, in 2020 in the Silesian Voivodeship, there has been a decline in the number of hospital admissions to cardiology departments regardless of the condition, which has been followed by a reduction in the number of invasive procedures performed when compared with 2019. Unfortunately, the number of patients referred to the cardiology departments with acute coronary syndromes decreased in comparison with 2019, however, their treatment remained similar as before the pandemic.

Article information

REFERENCES

  1. 1. Sokolski M, Gajewski P, Zymliński R, et al. Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on acute admissions at the emergency and cardiology departments across Europe. Am J Med. 2021; 134(4): 482489, doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.08.043.
  2. 2. Her M. Repurposing and reshaping of hospitals during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. One Health. 2020; 10: 100137, doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100137, indexed in Pubmed: 32373705.
  3. 3. Świerad M, Dyrbuś K, Szkodziński J, et al. Telehealth visits in a tertiary cardiovascular center as a response of the healthcare system to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic in Poland. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130: 700703.
  4. 4. The number of admissions in respective months of 2020 with reference to 2019 obtained from the National Health Fund. https://zdrowedane.nfz.gov.pl/course/view.php?id=139 (March 8, 2021).
  5. 5. De Filippo O, D’Ascenzo F, Angelini F, et al. Reduced rate of hospital admissions for ACS during Covid-19 outbreak in Northern Italy. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(1): 8889, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2009166, indexed in Pubmed: 32343497.
  6. 6. Bhatt AS, Moscone A, McElrath EE, et al. Fewer hospitalizations for acute cardiovascular conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(3): 280288, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.038, indexed in Pubmed: 32470516.
  7. 7. Gąsior M, Gierlotka M, Tycińska A, et al. Effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the number of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction: regional differences. Population analysis of 7 million people. Kardiol Pol. 2020; 78(10): 10391042, doi: 10.33963/KP.15559, indexed in Pubmed: 32820878.
  8. 8. Hawranek M, Grygier M, Bujak K, et al. Characteristics of patients from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first report. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(2): 192195, doi: 10.33963/KP.15756, indexed in Pubmed: 33463992.
  9. 9. Metzler B, Siostrzonek P, Binder RK, et al. Decline of acute coronary syndrome admissions in Austria since the outbreak of COVID-19: the pandemic response causes cardiac collateral damage. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(19): 18521853, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa314, indexed in Pubmed: 32297932.
  10. 10. Gąsior M, Niedziela JT, Sikora J, et al. Improved prognosis in patients with recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure after day-care management. Kardiol Pol. 2019; 77(10): 975977, doi: 10.33963/KP.14987, indexed in Pubmed: 31553331.
  11. 11. Tajstra M, Kurek A, Pyka Ł, et al. The increased rate of life-threatening interventions in remotely monitored patients with heart failure during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020; 130(10): 913914, doi: 10.20452/pamw.15505, indexed in Pubmed: 32643914.
  12. 12. Marijon E, Karam N, Jost D, et al. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic in Paris, France: a population-based, observational study. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(8): e437e443, doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30117-1, indexed in Pubmed: 32473113.