Vol 74, No 2 (2016)
Original articles
Published online: 2015-11-20

open access

Page views 964
Article views/downloads 958
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Kardiologia Polska 2016 nr 2-23

ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY / ORYGINAL ARTICLE

The efficacy of an education-based secondary outpatient prevention programme after acute coronary syndrome hospitalisations and treatment in Poland. The Patient Club initiative

Zbigniew Siudak1, Michał Pers1, Karolina Dusza2, Iwona Franczak3, Agata Zegzda4, Monika Bechta5, Anna Kwiatkowska6, Anna Knutelska7, Bernardyna Zemla8, Agnieszka Kubiak9, Mirosława Zarzycka10, Nina Kudelko-Blacha3, Patrycja Koźmińska11, Małgorzata Oleksy12, Dariusz Dudek1

1Department of Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland
2Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute Ltd, Krakow, Poland
3Department of Interventional Cardiology, Intercard, Pinczow, Poland
4Cardiovascular Centre Foundation, Krakow, Poland
5Department of Interventional Cardiology, GVM Carint, Sanok, Poland
6Department of Interventional Cardiology, Intercard, Krosno, Poland
7Department of Interventional Cardiology, Intercard, Nowy Targ, Poland
8Department of Interventional Cardiology, GVM Carint, Oswiecim, Poland
9Department of Interventional Cardiology, Radomsko, Poland
10Department of Interventional Cardiology, GVM Carint, Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski, Poland
11Department of Interventional Cardiology, Carint-Scanmed, Krakow, Poland
12Department of Interventional Cardiology, Intercard, Nowy Sacz, Poland

Address for correspondence:
Zbigniew Siudak, MD, PhD, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital, ul. Kopernika 17, 31–501 Kraków, Poland, tel: +48 12 424 71 81,
fax: +48 12 424 71 84, e-mail: zbigniew.siudak@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Guidelines on cardiovascular prevention from the European Society of Cardiology advocate sustained educational measures to be undertaken by both doctors and nurses to ensure lifestyle changes for patients after acute coronary syndromes (ACS). A planned programme of a series of educational meetings for patients after ACS was initiated in form of the Patient Club.

Aim: To assess the efficacy of the Patient Club initiative in terms of increased knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors as well as utilisation of healthy lifestyle in patents who attend the programme.

Methods: Patients in nine cardiology centres in Poland, who were treated for ACS between October and December 2014, were included. A dedicated questionnaire on healthy lifestyle and knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors was filled in by patients at hospital discharge. In January 2015 the same questionnaire was filled in by the same group of patients before their local Patient Club meeting.

Results: There were 1273 patients hospitalised for ACS who were invited to join the Patient Club initiative. Of them, 372 (29%) filled in the questionnaire both at discharge and at the Patient Club meeting. The percentage of patients who smoked cigarettes decreased from 14% to 5% (p < 0.001), and the number of those who had at least 30 min of physical activity daily increased from 50% to 58% (p = 0.015).

Conclusions: Patients who attended Patient Club meetings usually four weeks after ACS showed significant benefit in terms of healthy lifestyle changes and more guideline-recommended management of cardiovascular risk factors.

Key words: secondary prevention, acute coronary syndrome, registry

Kardiol Pol 2016; 74, 2: 185–191

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines on cardiovascular prevention from the European Society of Cardiology strongly advocate sustained educational measures to be undertaken by doctors and nurses to ensure lifestyle changes for patients after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in order to reduce cardiovascular risk burden [1]. At the same time, the authors of the guidelines noticed that non-governmental organisations (NGO) are important partners for healthcare providers in a joint effort to promote prevention programmes. The Polish model of optimal and comprehensive rehabilitation and prevention in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) was issued in 2013 [2]. According to this statement the education programme should be started immediately after early rehabilitation, and the patient’s first ambulatory control visit should be performed four weeks after ACS. In the meantime, alarming data have been published for Poland, which suggest only modest improvement in the implementation of secondary prevention guidelines in everyday clinical practice for CVD as well as substantial long-term mortality for patients after myocardial infarction [3, 4]. Based on these recommendations and worrisome results of poor adherence to secondary prevention measures, a planned programme of a series of educational meetings for patients after ACS was initiated in the form of the Patient Club in nine invasive cardiology centres in Southern and Eastern Poland by the local NGO (Cardiovascular Centre Foundation, Krakow, Poland) independently from rehabilitation schemes that were applied by default. Previous studies have shown that patient education in the form of patient meetings in groups in a combination with a rehabilitation programme is an effective way to maintain regular physical activity and be a part of successful therapeutic education [5, 6]. However, there are also studies that have discarded the role of educational materials handed out to patients, and an increased role of face-to-face interaction has been underlined [7, 8].

The aim of this registry study was to assess the efficacy of the voluntary Patient Club initiative as a part of a rehabilitation and prevention programme for patients after ACS in terms of attendance by patients, increased knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors, as well as utilisation of healthy diet, recommended time devoted to physical activity, and compliance to prescribed pharmacotherapy.

METHODS

The Cardiovascular Centre Foundation (Krakow, Poland) initiated the Patient Club educational programme (for secondary prevention) as part of standard of care in nine cooperating invasive cardiology centres (Krakow, Nowy Sacz, Nowy Targ, Oswiecim, Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski, Pinczow, Radomsko, Sanok, Krosno). Each patient in these centres, who underwent invasive coronary procedure, received during their hospital stay an educational kit, which included: printed materials on secondary prevention measures and smoking cessation, access to two educational websites (www.klub-pacjenta.pl and www.sercebezdymu.pl), and an invitation to a Patient Club meeting at each local centre, which would take place usually within 1–2 months (most often four weeks) from index hospitalisation in accordance with Polish recommendations [2]. Each patient was advised on smoking cessation and lifestyle changes required for better adherence to secondary prevention measures by trained nurses at hospital discharge in each centre. During Patient Club meetings lectures were held on “Life after myocardial infarction”, “Proper diet”, “Physical activity”, and “Smoking cessation” by cardiologists and nurses. There were also cardiopulmonary resuscitation trainings provided by certified paramedics cooperating with the Foundation. Club meetings usually last ca. 2–3 h and are always free of charge since they have become a part of standard of care for the prevention programme in these hospitals.

For the purpose of this study, we included patients in nine invasive cardiology centres, who were treated for ACS in between October and December 2014. A dedicated questionnaire with 20 closed-ended questions on healthy lifestyle and knowledge on cardiovascular risk factors was filled in by patients at hospital discharge after nurse advice and an invitation to the Patient Club. In January 2015 the same questionnaire was filled in by the same group of patients at their local Patient Club meeting. Only patients who filled in both questionnaires were included in the analysis. Attendance at the Patient Club meeting was voluntary. Patients were invited during hospital discharge, and mail and phone invitations were repeated before the planned meeting in each centre. A subgroup analysis was performed, and patients were stratified by sex (males vs. females) and by age (young vs. old). The cut-off point for age groups was defined as 65 years of age.

This was a registry study that analysed data gathered routinely in these centres as part of the standard of care and complied according to the Declaration of Helsinki (with later amendments), and patients provided additional informed consent for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed according to statistical standards. Categorical variables were presented as percentages (%) and continuous variables as means (with standard deviation). The independence of two categorical variables was determined by the Pearson χ2 test or in the case of small counts by the Fisher exact test. No correction for multiple testing was applied. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data processing and statistical calculations were performed using Statistica 10.0 software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK, USA).

RESULTS

There were 1273 patients hospitalised for ACS in the nine participating invasive cardiology centres during October–December 2014, who were invited to join Patient Club initiative. Of these 372 (29%) filled in the questionnaire both at discharge and while attending a Patient Club meeting in January 2015. The main reason for absence from the Patient Club meeting was: no time to attend the meeting (25%), no means of transport to get to the meeting place (15%), and still fragile condition after hospital discharge (10%). The mean age in this group was 64.2 ± 9.9 years and 33% were women. Changes in dietary and cooking habits are presented in Table 1a, management of modifiable risk factors in Table 2a, and knowledge on CVD in Table 3a. Subgroup analysis by age and gender are presented in Table 1b, 1c, 2b, 2c, 3b, and 3c, respectively.

Table 1a. Dietary habits and modes of cooking and preparing food by patients

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

Use of high-fat products (e.g. milk, cheese)

36%

25%

< 0.001

Use of vegetables and fruit

69%

72%

< 0.001

Frying in oil

28%

16%

< 0.001

Steam cooking

56%

68%

< 0.001

Salting for taste

35%

26%

0.006

Using herbs for taste

42%

48%

0.019

Table 1b. Dietary habits and modes of cooking and preparing food by patients according to age groups

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

p

Use of high-fat products (e.g. milk, cheese)

Young

Old

43%

30%

26%

23%

0.02

< 0.001

Use of vegetables and fruit

Young

Old

59%

76%

71%

72%

0.155

< 0.001

Frying in oil

Young

Old

33%

17%

15%

15%

0.02

0.014

Steam cooking

Young

Old

45%

61%

68%

72%

0.005

0.01

Salting for taste

Young

Old

38%

31%

22%

30%

0.02

0.236

Using herbs for taste

Young

Old

43%

40%

43%

48%

0.956

0.09

Table 1c. Dietary habits and modes of cooking and preparing food by patients according to sex

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

Use of high-fat products (e.g. milk, cheese)

Women

Men

35%

39%

25%

22%

0.016

0.014

Use of vegetables and fruit

Women

Men

71%

64%

72%

75%

0.06

0.025

Frying in oil

Women

Men

33%

29%

15%

16%

0.029

0.005

Steam cooking

Women

Men

47%

55%

60%

75%

0.159

< 0.001

Salting for taste

Women

Men

35%

37%

30%

29%

0.715

0.058

Using herbs for taste

Women

Men

37%

42%

50%

46%

0.214

0.079

Table 2a. Risk factor management by patients

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

I smoke cigarettes regularly

14%

5%

< 0.001

I have > 30 min of physical activity daily

50%

58%

0.015

I ride a bike regularly

22%

30%

0.005

I never stop taking medicines without the doctor’s advice

76%

79%

0.208

Table 2b. Risk factor management by patients according to age group

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

I smoke cigarettes regularly

Young

Old

24%

6%

6%

2%

0.004

0.003

I have > 30 min of physical activity daily

Young

Old

46%

53%

58%

61%

0.212

0.04

I ride a bike regularly

Young

Old

24%

20%

32%

28%

0.149

0.01

I never stop taking medicines without the doctor’s advice

Young

Old

73%

80%

88%

74%

0.03

0.052

Table 2c. Risk factor management by patients according to sex

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

I smoke cigarettes regularly

Women

Men

8%

19%

6%

2%

0.01

0.001

I have > 30 min of physical activity daily

Women

Men

48%

51%

55%

64%

0.294

0.048

I ride a bike regularly

Women

Men

15%

27%

30%

28%

0.01

0.968

I never stop taking medicines without the doctor’s advice

Women

Men

75%

77%

78%

82%

0.04

0.529

Table 3a. Patients’ knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

Proper hypercholesterolaemia definition

44%

44%

0.800

Identification of modifiable risk factors

79%

76%

0.126

Proper description of chest pain during myocardial infarction

71%

72%

0.047

Knowledge on recommended physical activity

77%

77%

0.858

Proper high blood pressure definition

24%

24%

0.985

Table 3b. Patients’ knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors according to age group

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

Proper hypercholesterolaemia definition

Young

Old

42%

39%

43%

39%

0.552

0.976

Identification of modifiable risk factors

Young

Old

83%

78%

89%

64%

0.365

0.012

Proper description of chest pain during myocardial infarction

Young

Old

73%

71%

79%

64%

0.505

0.044

Knowledge on recommended physical activity

Young

Old

77%

79%

83%

70%

0.550

0.121

Proper high blood pressure definition

Young

Old

23%

27%

28%

19%

0.477

0.117

Table 3c. Patients’ knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors according to sex

Baseline approach status (at hospital discharge)

Follow up at Patient Club meetings

P

Proper hypercholesterolaemia definition

Women

Men

37%

42%

42%

38%

0.797

0.751

Identification of modifiable risk factors

Women

Men

82%

83%

68%

81%

0.110

0.667

Proper description of chest pain during myocardial infarction

Women

Men

76%

70%

68%

75%

0.08

0.417

Knowledge on recommended physical activity

Women

Men

81%

78%

73%

78%

0.297

0.787

Proper high blood pressure definition

Women

Men

24%

24%

20%

25%

0.06

0.702

DISCUSSION

The Patient Club established by the Cardiovascular Centre Foundation (Krakow, Poland) in cooperation with cardiovascular hospital centres in southern Poland is, to our knowledge, only one of several secondary prevention initiatives that have provided data on its efficacy in Poland. The prevention programme dedicated for a pre-defined patient group (after ACS) consisted of both passive (printed educational materials, websites) and active face-to-face social interaction between patients during Patient Club meetings and professional advice given by trained nurses at discharge from hospital. This is in line with the results from previous studies that have shown success only if these prevention measures combine all of the above [5–8]. The main results of the Patient Club study have shown a significant benefit for patients in terms of healthy lifestyle changes and more guideline-recommended management of cardiovascular risk factors. One might of course argue that, even though statistically significant, the changes in absolute numbers and percentages were only moderate. It seems also that the prevention programme had no impact on the knowledge of CVD in patients; however, in terms of proper identification of lipid disorders, chest pain responsible for myocardial infarction, and recommendations on modifiable risk factors, it still exceeded 70% before and after the Patient Club meeting, which seems acceptable. Maybe the reasonable explanation here is the fact that nurses and printed materials plus websites provided to patients focused entirely on diet, medications, and physical exercise rather than explaining definitions of elevated blood pressure or hyperlipidaemia. This might be an indication of the need to focus more on these issues in future Patient Club meetings for new patients. Nevertheless, the beneficial changes in lifestyle, such as dietary habits and ways of food preparation, are clearly visible and might translate into clinical benefit if sustained in long-term observation. When analysing subgroups of patients it seems that younger ones (less than 65 years old) are more prone to add salt to their meals less and would not stop taking medicines without physician’s approval, but at the same time they did not increase physical activity to a minimum of 30 min daily when comparing baseline and follow-up declarations. Younger patients, although less likely to question their physicians recommendations, do not feel the necessity to increase physical activity. There were also some differences regarding gender. Men significantly changed their dietary habits in terms of more frequent steam cooking and less salt, but also significantly increased physical activity. It is also worth noticing that smoking cessation was more pronounced in men (19% to 2%) than in women (8% to 6%).

The most striking finding, however, is the fact that only 29% of patients attended the Patient Club meeting, usually four weeks after ACS. Even if we take into consideration patients who die, are unable to attend due to comorbidities, or live in a different city and would find it hard to attend, still there are ca. 50% of patients who seem not to respond to the invitation for no clear reason. That is why the results of our study might be biased due to the fact that only patients aware of the disease and willing to change their lifestyle joined the Patient Club and were eventually included in the study. The authors also believe that the cause may be due to the fact that the Patient Club takes place too long after hospital discharge, when patients have already become less prone to education and changing their everyday bad habits. It may be that the educational meeting should be performed earlier, ca. one week after hospital discharge for index event [9].

The Patient Club initiative can feasibly be performed in most invasive cardiology centres in Poland. It generates minimal costs and is thus probably very cost–efficient in comparison to other programmes [10]. Only a nationwide performance could provide sufficient data, due to a larger sample size, on its effectiveness in terms of hard endpoints in longer observation.

Limitations of the study

The major limitation of the study is the lack of a control group for comparison of the efficacy of the new educational programme. This is due to the fact that the Patient Club has become the standard of care in nine participating centres to provide every consecutive ACS patient with an educational programme. The questionnaire used in this registry was self-developed and not validated in other groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 1/3 of patients came back for voluntary, free-of-charge Patient Club educational meetings. The patients who attended the meetings, usually four weeks after ACS, showed significant benefit in terms of healthy lifestyle changes and more guideline-recommended management of cardiovascular risk factors. More studies are required on the optional timing and type of secondary prevention educational training for ACS patients.


Cardiovascular Centre Fundation, Krakow, Poland based on eductional grant from AstraZeneca.

Conflict of interest: none declared

References

  1. 1. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H et al. European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR); ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur Heart J, 2012; 33: 1635–1701.
  2. 2. Jankowski P, Niewada M, Bochenek A et al. [Optimal model of comprehensive rehabilitation and secondary prevention]. Kardiol Pol, 2013; 71: 995–1003. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0246.
  3. 3. Jankowski P, Czarnecka D, Lysek R et al. Secondary prevention in patients after hospitalisation due to coronary artery disease: what has changed since 2006? Kardiol Pol, 2014; 72: 355–362. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2013.0350.
  4. 4. Gierlotka M, Zdrojewski T, Wojtyniak B et al. Incidence, treatment, in-hospital mortality and one-year outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in Poland in 2009–2012: nationwide AMI-PL database. Kardiol Pol, 2015; 73: 142–158. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2014.0213.
  5. 5. Lambert-Kerzner A, Del Giacco EJ, Fahdi IE et al. Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Cardiac Medication Adherence and Secondary Prevention Measures (Medication) Study Investigators. Patient-centered adherence intervention after acute coronary syndrome hospitalization. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2012; 5: 571–576.
  6. 6. Pavy B, Barbet R, Carré F et al. Working Group of Exercise Rehabilitation and Sport; Therapeutic Education Commission of the French Society of Cardiology. Therapeutic education in coronary heart disease: position paper from the Working Group of Exercise Rehabilitation and Sport (GERS) and the Therapeutic Education Commission of the French Society of Cardiology. Arch Cardiovasc Dis, 2013; 106: 680–689.
  7. 7. Shah BR, Bhattacharyya O, Yu CH et al. Effect of an educational toolkit on quality of care: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. PLoS Med, 2014; 11: e1001588.
  8. 8. Esmaeili Vardanjani SA, Fanisaberi L, Alirezaee Shahraki F et al. The effect of face-to-face education and educational booklet on heart health indexes of the hospitalized patients with myocardial infarction. Nurs Res Pract, 2013; 2013: 675634. doi: 10.1155/2013/675634.
  9. 9. Dudek D, Siudak Z, Solheim S. New model of secondary cardiovascular prevention for patients after acute coronary syndromes in Poland with regard to Norwegian experiences. Kardiol Pol, 2016; 74: 101–103. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0176.
  10. 10. Zannad F, Dallongeville J, Macfadyen RJ et al. ESC Working Group on CardioVascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. Prevention of cardiovascular disease guided by total risk estimations: challenges and opportunities for practical implementation: highlights of a CardioVascular Clinical Trialists (CVCT) Workshop of the ESC Working Group on CardioVascular Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2012; 19: 1454–1464.

 

Cite this article as: Siudak Z, Pers M, Dusza K et al. The efficacy of an education-based secondary outpatient prevention programme after acute coronary syndrome hospitalisations and treatment in Poland. The Patient Club initiative. Kardiol Pol, 2016; 74: 185–191. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0225.