Vol 82, No 2 (2024)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-09-18

open access

Page views 366
Article views/downloads 253
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Clinical vignette

Insidious infective endocarditis: Should we use positron emission tomography more often?

Magdalena SitnikKatarzyna CienszkowskaMałgorzata KobyleckaPiotr Sobieraj
Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland

Correspondence to:

Piotr Sobieraj, MD, PhD,

Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases,

Medical University of Warsaw,

Banacha 1A, 02–097 Warszawa, Poland,

phone: +48 22 599 28 28,

e-mail: piotr.sobieraj@wum.edu.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.96588

Received: May 20, 2023

Accepted: July 18, 2023

Early publication date: September 18, 2023

The diagnosis of infective endocarditis on a prosthetic valve (PVE) remains a challenge even for an experienced team. Effective diagnosis of the disease is particularly important due to the high percentage of in-hospital mortality (~17%) [1]. In addition to symptoms that may have a heterogeneous clinical manifestation, blood cultures, and echocardiography play a key role in baseline diagnostic workup. In some cases, making a diagnosis requires a more sophisticated diagnostic approach.

A 35-year-old man with a history of aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Magna 23 mm bioprosthesis due to regurgitation in the course of infective endocarditis (IE) three years earlier, was admitted to the hospital for a periodic fever up to 38.5˚C appearing in the evenings over the past 1.5 months. The patient had been hospitalized one month earlier in another cardiology department, where negative blood cultures were obtained, and transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed no echocardiographic evidence of PVE. IE was excluded based on that, and the patient was discharged home.

Currently, on admission patient was in stable condition and denied any symptoms. Physical examination revealed low-grade fever and a loud systolic murmur over the whole heart, radiating to the carotid arteries. Laboratory tests demonstrated elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein 69 mg/dl, white blood cell count 11 × 103/µl), normocytic anemia (hemoglobin 11.5 g/dl), and slightly elevated levels of fibrinogen (484 mg/dl), D-dimer concentration (586 ng/ml) and N-terminal pro-B- type natriuretic peptide (163 pg/ml). Chest X-ray showed no consolidations. Again, TTE and TEE showed no echocardiographic evidence of IE. Due to the fever of unknown origin, it was decided to perform [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET)], which showed a moderately increased uptake of [18F]FDG in the area of the aortic valve, with the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) = 3.4, most likely due to inflammation [2]. Furthermore, a positive blood culture with Streptococcus mitans and a positive urine culture with Enterococcus faecalis were obtained. Urinalysis was negative for urinary tract infection. This led to the diagnosis of PVE.

According to current guidelines, PVE patients should receive intravenous antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks [3]. In our case, antibiotic therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone (2 g once a day) for 28 days and gentamicin (240 mg once a day) for 21 days was applied, resulting in clinical improvement, resolution of fever, normalization of inflammatory markers, and negative blood cultures. After 28 days, it was decided to switch the patient to an oral antibiotic treatment with amoxicillin (1 g three times a day) for 14 days. The patient was discharged home in good condition with the recommendation to discontinue amoxicillin after 14 days [4]. During follow-up visits at 1 and 6 months, no signs, symptoms, laboratory, or echocardiographic findings (in TTE) of IE were found; there was no evidence of bioprosthesis degeneration.

Figure 1. Fusion images of PET/CT performed to diagnose infective endocarditis. Images were acquired with a Biograph 64 PET/CT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc.) 60 minutes after injection of 330 mBq [18F]FDG. Presented image shows a transversal, fused PET/CT image, corrected for attenuation. Yellow arrow shows increased radiotracer uptake in the aortic annulus consistent with infection. The semiquantitative PET/CT analysis was performed using the SYNGOVIA application. Standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for valve area was 3.4; reference (myocardial blood pool [MBP] was 2.1, liver SUVmax 2.9)

The purpose of reporting this case is to underline clinical utility of [18F]FDG PET in the management of patients with suspected PVE. [18F]FDG PET has high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (84%) for IE diagnosis [5]. We were able to show the clinical course of IE treated partially with oral antibiotics following the results of a randomized trial in a selected group of IE subjects, which showed that replacing intravenous antibiotics with oral treatment was safe and shortened the patient’s hospital stay [4].

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B, et al. Clinical presentation, aetiology and outcome of infective endocarditis. Results of the ESC-EORP EURO-ENDO (European infective endocarditis) registry: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(39): 32223232, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz620, indexed in Pubmed: 31504413.
  2. Roy SG, Akhtar T, Bandyopadhyay D, et al. The Emerging Role of FDG PET/CT in diagnosing endocarditis and cardiac device infection. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023; 48(2): 101510, doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101510, indexed in Pubmed: 36402219.
  3. Habib G, Erba PA, Iung B, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(44): 30753128, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319, indexed in Pubmed: 26320109.
  4. Iversen K, Ihlemann N, Gill SU et al. Partial oral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment of endocarditis. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(5): 415424, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808312, indexed in Pubmed: 30152252.
  5. Ten Hove D, Slart RH, Sinha B, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in infective endocarditis: indications and approaches for standardization. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021; 23(9): 130, doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01542-y, indexed in Pubmed: 34363148.