Vol 81, Supp. I (2023): Zeszyty Edukacyjne 1/2023
Artykuł poglądowy
Published online: 2023-09-27

open access

Page views 817
Article views/downloads 240
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Dwukierunkowe hamowanie w miażdżycy układu sercowo-naczyniowego — ostatnie postępy

Stephanie Carlin1, Tim A.C. de Vries234, Andrzej Budaj5, John Eikelboom6
DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.95770

Abstract

Choroba układu sercowo-naczyniowego o podłożu miażdżycy (ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), która obejmuje chorobę wieńcową (CAD, coronary artery disease), chorobę naczyń mózgowych oraz chorobę tętnic obwodowych (PAD, peripheral arterial disease), wiąże się z dużą zachorowalnością, śmiertelnością i kosztami opieki zdrowotnej. Terapia przeciwpłytkowa była od dawna podstawą leczenia przeciwzakrzepowego w profilaktyce pierwszych i ponownych incydentów ASCVD. Jednak ostatnie randomizowane badania pokazały zalety i efektywność kosztową strategii dwukierunkowego hamowania (DPI, dual pathway inhibition) w ostrej i przewlekłej ASCVD. Kwas acetylosalicylowy stosowany w skojarzeniu z małą dawką rywaroksabanu działają synergistycznie, hamując aktywację płytek krwi i generację trombiny, tym samym zapobiegając powstawaniu skrzepliny. Wśród pacjentów z niedawnym ostrym zespołem wieńcowym (ACS, acute coronary syndrome), ci z dodatnimi biomarkerami sercowymi, zawałem serca z uniesieniem odcinka ST lub historią niewydolności serca odnoszą największe bezwzględne korzyści. Wśród pacjentów z przewlekłą ASCVD, ci z zajęciem dwóch lub więcej łożysk naczyniowych, niewydolnością serca, przewlekłą chorobą nerek lub cukrzycą odnoszą największe bezwzględne korzyści. Dodatkowe badania są w trakcie realizacji, celem oceny wpływu terapii DPI w innych interesujących populacjach, w tym pacjentów z ACS z dużym ryzykiem powstania skrzepliny w lewej komorze, wewnątrzczaszkową miażdżycą tętnic po niedawno przebytym przemijającym napadzie niedokrwienia mózgu lub udarze, chorobą tętnic obwodowych z chromaniem przestankowym lub po rewaskularyzacji kończyn dolnych i zaawansowaną przewlekłą chorobą nerek z ASCVD lub czynnikami ryzyka ASCVD. Dalsze badania są potrzebne w celu oceny możliwych dodatkowych korzyści z łączenia rywaroksabanu z klopidogrelem lub tikagrelorem zamiast kwasu acetylosalicylowego.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF (Polish) Download PDF file

References

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25): 2982–3021.
  2. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, et al. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006; 295(2): 180–189.
  3. Badimon L, Padró T, Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012; 1(1): 60–74.
  4. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009; 373(9678): 1849–1860.
  5. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(7): 494–502.
  6. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11): 1045–1057.
  7. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(20): 2001–2015.
  8. Belch JJF, Dormandy J, Biasi GM, et al. Results of the randomized, placebo-controlled clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in bypass surgery for peripheral arterial disease (CASPAR) trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52(4): 825–833.e2.
  9. Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(1): 11–19.
  10. Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(3): 215–225.
  11. Bhatt DL, Fox KAA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(16): 1706–1717.
  12. Bhatt DL, Flather MD, Hacke W, et al. Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(19): 1982–1988.
  13. Udell JA, Bonaca MP, Collet JP, et al. Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in the subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(4): 390–399.
  14. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Simon T, et al. Ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(14): 1309–1320.
  15. Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364(9431): 331–337.
  16. Collet JP, Thiele H. The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(37): 3495–3497.
  17. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021; 52(7): e364–e467.
  18. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017; 135(12): e686–e725.
  19. Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Roberts HR. Platelets and thrombin generation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22(9): 1381–1389.
  20. Andreotti F, Testa L, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, et al. Aspirin plus warfarin compared to aspirin alone after acute coronary syndromes: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 25,307 patients. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(5): 519–526.
  21. Anand S, Yusuf S, Xie C, et al. Oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy and peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(3): 217–227.
  22. Wallentin L, Wilcox RG, Weaver WD, et al. Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003; 362(9386): 789–797.
  23. Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB, et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(22): 2781–2789.
  24. Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(8): 699–708.
  25. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34): 3227–3337.
  26. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(14): 1289–1367.
  27. Abramson BL, Al-Omran M, Anand SS, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Peripheral Arterial Disease. Can J Cardiol. 2022; 38(5): 560–587.
  28. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S, et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9683): 29–38.
  29. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(1): 9–19.
  30. Gibson CM, Levitan B, Gibson WJ, et al. Fatal or irreversible bleeding and ischemic events with rivaroxaban in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(2): 129–136.
  31. Korjian S, Braunwald E, Daaboul Y, et al. Usefulness of rivaroxaban for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in patients with history of congestive heart failure (from the ATLAS-ACS-2 TIMI-51 trial). Am J Cardiol. 2018; 122(11): 1896–1901.
  32. Mega JL, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients stabilized after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51 trial (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(18): 1853–1859.
  33. Korjian S, Braunwald E, Daaboul Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes among biomarker-positive patients: Insights from the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019; 8(2): 186–193.
  34. Bonaca MP, Bauersachs RM, Anand SS, et al. Rivaroxaban in peripheral artery disease after revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(21): 1994–2004.
  35. Debus ES, Nehler MR, Govsyeyev N, et al. Effect of rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing surgical revascularization: insights from the VOYAGER PAD trial. Circulation. 2021; 144(14): 1104–1116.
  36. Hiatt WR, Bonaca MP, Patel MR, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin in peripheral artery disease lower extremity revascularization: impact of concomitant clopidogrel on efficacy and safety. Circulation. 2020; 142(23): 2219–2230.
  37. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(14): 1319–1330.
  38. Anand SS, Eikelboom JW, Dyal L, et al. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin in relation to vascular risk in the COMPASS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(25): 3271–3280.
  39. Vanassche T, Verhamme P, Anand SS, et al. Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity: an analysis from the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 8(5): 462–473.
  40. Kaplovitch E, Eikelboom JW, Dyal L, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a subanalysis of the COMPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(1): 21–29.
  41. Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, et al. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of participants in the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies (COMPASS) trial. Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33(8): 1027–1035.
  42. Zannad F, Anker SD, Byra WM, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure, sinus rhythm, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(14): 1332–1342.
  43. Greenberg B, Neaton JD, Anker SD, et al. Association of rivaroxaban with thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, coronary disease, and sinus rhythm: a post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019; 4(6): 515–523.
  44. Sharma M, Hart RG, Connolly SJ, et al. Stroke outcomes in the COMPASS trial. Circulation. 2019; 139(9): 1134–1145.
  45. Gurbel PA, Fox KAA, Tantry US, et al. Combination antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary and peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2019; 139(18): 2170–2185.
  46. Fox KAA, Aboyans V, Debus ES, et al. Patients selected for dual pathway inhibition in clinical practice have similar characteristics and outcomes to those included in the COMPASS randomized trial: The XATOA Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 8(8): 825–836.
  47. Kazibwe J, Gheorghe A, Wilson D, et al. The use of cost-effectiveness thresholds for evaluating health interventions in low- and middle-income countries from 2015 to 2020: a review. Value Health. 2022; 25(3): 385–389.
  48. Begum N, Stephens S, Schoeman O, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in sweden. Cardiol Ther. 2015; 4(2): 131–153.
  49. Lamy A, Eikelboom J, Tong W, et al. The cost-effectiveness of Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
  50. Armstrong EJ, Chen DC, Westin GG, et al. Adherence to guideline-recommended therapy is associated with decreased major adverse cardiovascular events and major adverse limb events among patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3(2): e000697.
  51. McClure GR, Kaplovitch E, Chan N, et al. A national Canadian survey of antithrombotic therapy after urgent and emergent limb revascularization. Can J Cardiol. 2021; 37(3): 504–507.
  52. CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996; 348(9038): 1329–1339.
  53. Koo BK, Kang J, Park KW, et al. Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2021; 397(10293): 2487–2496.