Vol 81, Supp. I (2023): Zeszyty Edukacyjne 1/2023
Artykuł poglądowy
Published online: 2023-09-27
Dwukierunkowe hamowanie w miażdżycy układu sercowo-naczyniowego — ostatnie postępy
DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.95770
Abstract
Choroba układu sercowo-naczyniowego o podłożu miażdżycy (ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease), która obejmuje chorobę wieńcową (CAD, coronary artery disease), chorobę naczyń mózgowych oraz chorobę tętnic obwodowych (PAD, peripheral arterial disease), wiąże się z dużą zachorowalnością, śmiertelnością i kosztami opieki zdrowotnej. Terapia przeciwpłytkowa była od dawna podstawą leczenia przeciwzakrzepowego w profilaktyce pierwszych i ponownych incydentów ASCVD. Jednak ostatnie randomizowane badania pokazały zalety i efektywność kosztową strategii dwukierunkowego hamowania (DPI, dual pathway inhibition) w ostrej i przewlekłej ASCVD. Kwas acetylosalicylowy stosowany w skojarzeniu z małą dawką rywaroksabanu działają synergistycznie, hamując aktywację płytek krwi i generację trombiny, tym samym zapobiegając powstawaniu skrzepliny. Wśród pacjentów z niedawnym ostrym zespołem wieńcowym (ACS, acute coronary syndrome), ci z dodatnimi biomarkerami sercowymi, zawałem serca z uniesieniem odcinka ST lub historią niewydolności serca odnoszą największe bezwzględne korzyści. Wśród pacjentów z przewlekłą ASCVD, ci z zajęciem dwóch lub więcej łożysk naczyniowych, niewydolnością serca, przewlekłą chorobą nerek lub cukrzycą odnoszą największe bezwzględne korzyści. Dodatkowe badania są w trakcie realizacji, celem oceny wpływu terapii DPI w innych interesujących populacjach, w tym pacjentów z ACS z dużym ryzykiem powstania skrzepliny w lewej komorze, wewnątrzczaszkową miażdżycą tętnic po niedawno przebytym przemijającym napadzie niedokrwienia mózgu lub udarze, chorobą tętnic obwodowych z chromaniem przestankowym lub po rewaskularyzacji kończyn dolnych i zaawansowaną przewlekłą chorobą nerek z ASCVD lub czynnikami ryzyka ASCVD. Dalsze badania są potrzebne w celu oceny możliwych dodatkowych korzyści z łączenia rywaroksabanu z klopidogrelem lub tikagrelorem zamiast kwasu acetylosalicylowego.
Keywords: choroba naczyń mózgowychchoroba wieńcowachoroba tętnic obwodowychchoroba układu sercowo-naczyniowego o podłożu miażdżycyrywaroksaban
References
- Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25): 2982–3021.
- Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Ohman EM, et al. International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006; 295(2): 180–189.
- Badimon L, Padró T, Vilahur G. Atherosclerosis, platelets and thrombosis in acute ischaemic heart disease. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2012; 1(1): 60–74.
- Baigent C, Blackwell L, Collins R, et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2009; 373(9678): 1849–1860.
- Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(7): 494–502.
- Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(11): 1045–1057.
- Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(20): 2001–2015.
- Belch JJF, Dormandy J, Biasi GM, et al. Results of the randomized, placebo-controlled clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid in bypass surgery for peripheral arterial disease (CASPAR) trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010; 52(4): 825–833.e2.
- Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, et al. Clopidogrel with aspirin in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(1): 11–19.
- Johnston SC, Easton JD, Farrant M, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin in acute ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(3): 215–225.
- Bhatt DL, Fox KAA, Hacke W, et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(16): 1706–1717.
- Bhatt DL, Flather MD, Hacke W, et al. Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49(19): 1982–1988.
- Udell JA, Bonaca MP, Collet JP, et al. Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in the subgroup of patients with previous myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(4): 390–399.
- Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Simon T, et al. Ticagrelor in patients with stable coronary disease and diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381(14): 1309–1320.
- Diener HC, Bogousslavsky J, Brass LM, et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004; 364(9431): 331–337.
- Collet JP, Thiele H. The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(37): 3495–3497.
- Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021; 52(7): e364–e467.
- Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2017; 135(12): e686–e725.
- Monroe DM, Hoffman M, Roberts HR. Platelets and thrombin generation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22(9): 1381–1389.
- Andreotti F, Testa L, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, et al. Aspirin plus warfarin compared to aspirin alone after acute coronary syndromes: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 25,307 patients. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(5): 519–526.
- Anand S, Yusuf S, Xie C, et al. Oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy and peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(3): 217–227.
- Wallentin L, Wilcox RG, Weaver WD, et al. Oral ximelagatran for secondary prophylaxis after myocardial infarction: the ESTEEM randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003; 362(9386): 789–797.
- Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB, et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(22): 2781–2789.
- Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(8): 699–708.
- Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34): 3227–3337.
- Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(14): 1289–1367.
- Abramson BL, Al-Omran M, Anand SS, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2022 Guidelines for Peripheral Arterial Disease. Can J Cardiol. 2022; 38(5): 560–587.
- Mega JL, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S, et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet. 2009; 374(9683): 29–38.
- Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(1): 9–19.
- Gibson CM, Levitan B, Gibson WJ, et al. Fatal or irreversible bleeding and ischemic events with rivaroxaban in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(2): 129–136.
- Korjian S, Braunwald E, Daaboul Y, et al. Usefulness of rivaroxaban for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome in patients with history of congestive heart failure (from the ATLAS-ACS-2 TIMI-51 trial). Am J Cardiol. 2018; 122(11): 1896–1901.
- Mega JL, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients stabilized after a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the ATLAS ACS-2-TIMI-51 trial (Anti-Xa Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events in Addition to Standard Therapy in Subjects with Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction-51). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(18): 1853–1859.
- Korjian S, Braunwald E, Daaboul Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the secondary prevention following acute coronary syndromes among biomarker-positive patients: Insights from the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019; 8(2): 186–193.
- Bonaca MP, Bauersachs RM, Anand SS, et al. Rivaroxaban in peripheral artery disease after revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(21): 1994–2004.
- Debus ES, Nehler MR, Govsyeyev N, et al. Effect of rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing surgical revascularization: insights from the VOYAGER PAD trial. Circulation. 2021; 144(14): 1104–1116.
- Hiatt WR, Bonaca MP, Patel MR, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin in peripheral artery disease lower extremity revascularization: impact of concomitant clopidogrel on efficacy and safety. Circulation. 2020; 142(23): 2219–2230.
- Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(14): 1319–1330.
- Anand SS, Eikelboom JW, Dyal L, et al. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus aspirin in relation to vascular risk in the COMPASS trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(25): 3271–3280.
- Vanassche T, Verhamme P, Anand SS, et al. Low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity: an analysis from the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 8(5): 462–473.
- Kaplovitch E, Eikelboom JW, Dyal L, et al. Rivaroxaban and aspirin in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a subanalysis of the COMPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6(1): 21–29.
- Bosch J, Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, et al. Rationale, design and baseline characteristics of participants in the cardiovascular outcomes for people using anticoagulation strategies (COMPASS) trial. Can J Cardiol. 2017; 33(8): 1027–1035.
- Zannad F, Anker SD, Byra WM, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with heart failure, sinus rhythm, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(14): 1332–1342.
- Greenberg B, Neaton JD, Anker SD, et al. Association of rivaroxaban with thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, coronary disease, and sinus rhythm: a post hoc analysis of the COMMANDER HF trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019; 4(6): 515–523.
- Sharma M, Hart RG, Connolly SJ, et al. Stroke outcomes in the COMPASS trial. Circulation. 2019; 139(9): 1134–1145.
- Gurbel PA, Fox KAA, Tantry US, et al. Combination antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary and peripheral artery disease. Circulation. 2019; 139(18): 2170–2185.
- Fox KAA, Aboyans V, Debus ES, et al. Patients selected for dual pathway inhibition in clinical practice have similar characteristics and outcomes to those included in the COMPASS randomized trial: The XATOA Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022; 8(8): 825–836.
- Kazibwe J, Gheorghe A, Wilson D, et al. The use of cost-effectiveness thresholds for evaluating health interventions in low- and middle-income countries from 2015 to 2020: a review. Value Health. 2022; 25(3): 385–389.
- Begum N, Stephens S, Schoeman O, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in sweden. Cardiol Ther. 2015; 4(2): 131–153.
- Lamy A, Eikelboom J, Tong W, et al. The cost-effectiveness of Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
- Armstrong EJ, Chen DC, Westin GG, et al. Adherence to guideline-recommended therapy is associated with decreased major adverse cardiovascular events and major adverse limb events among patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3(2): e000697.
- McClure GR, Kaplovitch E, Chan N, et al. A national Canadian survey of antithrombotic therapy after urgent and emergent limb revascularization. Can J Cardiol. 2021; 37(3): 504–507.
- CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet. 1996; 348(9038): 1329–1339.
- Koo BK, Kang J, Park KW, et al. Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2021; 397(10293): 2487–2496.
