Vol 79, No 11 (2021)
Original article
Published online: 2021-09-20

open access

Page views 7161
Article views/downloads 1273
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Effect of a mobile application and smart devices on heart rate variability in diabetic patients with high cardiovascular risk: A sub-study of the LIGHT randomized clinical trial

Mert İlker Hayıroğlu1, Göksel Çinier1, Gizem Yüksel1, Levent Pay1, Furkan Durak1, Tufan Çınar2, Duygu İnan1, Kemal Emrecan Parsova1, Elif Gökçen Vatanoğlu1, Mehmet Şeker1, Yavuz Karabağ3, Selin Cilli Hayıroğlu4, Can Altundaş1, Ahmet İlker Tekkeşin1
Pubmed: 34599495
Kardiol Pol 2021;79(11):1239-1244.

Abstract

Background: This investigation aims to evaluate the effect of a mobile application and smart devices on frequency and time domains of heart rate variability (HRV) in diabetic patients in 1-year follow-up.
Methods: This is post-hoc analysis of a diabetic subgroup of “Lifestyle Intervention usinG mobile technology in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a pragmatic randomized clinical Trial” (LIGHT). One hundred and nine and 118 patients were enrolled in two arms: the intervention plus usual care and the usual care arm. The study outcome was the 1-year HRV parameters adjusted to the baseline HRV parameters. HRV measures were recorded for every patient at the randomization and final visits with 24-hour Holter monitoring.
Results: There was an improvement in the standard deviation of normal to normal (SDNN) R-R intervals 24-hour by 4.8 (adjusted treatment effect 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1–9.5; P = 0.044) in the intervention-plus-usual-care arm compared to usual care after a 1-year follow-up. The improvement was also experienced in other HRV time domains including standard deviation of the mean R-R intervals calculated over a 5-minute period, SDNN, square root of the mean squared difference of successive R-R intervals, and the percentage of the differences between adjacent normal R-R intervals exceeding 50 milliseconds. A significant enhancement was also detected in HRV frequency domains of total power low frequency and high frequency in the intervention plus usual care compared to usual care after a 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions: The mobile application and smart device technology compared to usual care alone improved HRV parameters in diabetic patients at 1-year follow-up.

References

  1. Goswami N, Abulafia C, Vigo D, et al. Falls risk, circadian rhythms and melatonin: current perspectives. Clin Interv Aging. 2020; 15: 2165–2174.
  2. Agashe S, Petak S. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018; 14(4): 251–256.
  3. Wichterle D, Simek J, La Rovere MT, et al. Prevalent low-frequency oscillation of heart rate: novel predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004; 110(10): 1183–1190.
  4. Lu HY, Huang APH, Kuo LT. Prognostic value of variables derived from heart rate variability in patients with traumatic brain injury after decompressive surgery. PLoS One. 2021; 16(2): e0245792.
  5. Huikuri HV, Stein PK. Heart rate variability in risk stratification of cardiac patients. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013; 56(2): 153–159.
  6. Valensi P, Extramiana F, Lange C, et al. DESIR Study Group. Influence of blood glucose on heart rate and cardiac autonomic function. The DESIR study. Diabet Med. 2011; 28(4): 440–449.
  7. Maser RE, Mitchell BD, Vinik AI, et al. The association between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and mortality in individuals with diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(6): 1895–1901.
  8. Valensi P, Sachs RN, Harfouche B, et al. Predictive value of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetic patients with or without silent myocardial ischemia. Diabetes Care. 2001; 24(2): 339–343.
  9. Plaza-Florido A, Sacha J, Alcantara J. Short-term heart rate variability in resting conditions: methodological considerations. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(7-8): 745–755.
  10. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011; 28(4): 455–463.
  11. Bonoto BC, de Araújo VE, Godói IP, et al. Efficacy of mobile apps to support the care of patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(3): e4.
  12. Tekkeşin Aİ, Hayıroğlu Mİ, Çinier G, et al. Lifestyle intervention using mobile technology and smart devices in patients with high cardiovascular risk: A pragmatic randomised clinical trial. Atherosclerosis. 2021; 319: 21–27.
  13. Tekkesin I, Cinier G, Hayiroglu M. Rationale and design of lifestyle intervention using mobile technology in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2020; 48(2): 149–157.
  14. Guo X, Gu X, Jiang J, et al. A hospital-community-family-based telehealth program for patients with chronic heart failure: single-arm, prospective feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(12): e13229.
  15. Guo Y, Lane DA, Wang L. Mobile health technology to improve care for patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75(13): 1523–1534.
  16. Quinn CC, Shardell MD, Terrin ML, et al. Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(9): 1934–1942.
  17. Block G, Azar KMj, Romanelli RJ, et al. Diabetes prevention and weight loss with a fully automated behavioral intervention by email, web, and mobile phone: a randomized controlled trial among persons with prediabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(10): e240.
  18. Fukuoka Y, Gay CL, Joiner KL, et al. A novel diabetes prevention intervention using a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial with overweight adults at risk. Am J Prev Med. 2015; 49(2): 223–237.
  19. Muralidharan S, Ranjani H, Mohan Anjana R, et al. Engagement and weight loss: results from the mobile health and diabetes trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019; 21(9): 507–513.
  20. Williams SM, Eleftheriadou A, Alam U, et al. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in obesity, the metabolic syndrome and prediabetes: a narrative review. Diabetes Ther. 2019; 10(6): 1995–2021.
  21. Villafaina S, Collado-Mateo D, Fuentes JP, et al. Physical exercise improves heart rate variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep. 2017; 17(11): 110.
  22. Helleputte S, De Backer T, Lapauw B, et al. The relationship between glycaemic variability and cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in patients with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36(5): e3301.
  23. Jaiswal M, McKeon K, Comment N, et al. Association between impaired cardiovascular autonomic function and hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(9): 2616–2621.