Vol 82, No 5 (2024)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2024-04-22

open access

Page views 162
Article views/downloads 94
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

First-year follow-up costs of myocardial infarction management in Poland from the payer’s perspective

Andrzej Ciszewski
Department of Cardiology and Invasive Angiology, National Insitute of Cardiology, Warszawa, Poland

Correspondence to:

Andrzej Ciszewski, MD,

Department of Cardiology and Invasive Angiology,

National Institute of Cardiology,

Alpejska 42, 04–628 Warszawa, Poland,

phone: +48 22 34 34 013,

e-mail: aciszewski@ikard.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.phj.100351

Received: April 16, 2024

Accepted: April 19, 2024

Early publication date: April 22, 2024

I have read with great interest the article “First-year follow-up costs of myocardial infarction management in Poland from the payer’s perspective” by Skowrońska et al. [1]. I would like to congratulate the authors on the accomplishment of developing the first, pioneering study determining and evaluating the costs of treating patients during the first year after myocardial infarction (MI). How complicated and difficult it was to create an accurate methodology can be imagined by reading the list of authors, representing 16 (!) different institutions. Since MI remains one of the leading causes of death and disability in developed countries, the social and economic impact of the study by Skowrońska et al. can not be overestimated [2]. Progress in modern medicine is strongly associated with cost control, reduction of unnecessary expenses, shortening of hospital stay, and development of outpatient care which is to be less expensive and more convenient for patients. However, I was surprised and slightly disappointed that in the section “Limitations” the authors declared “we could not analyze the cost of drugs utilized in the post-discharge period”. I’m afraid that the National Health Fund’s reimbursement of drugs used by patients during one year after MI is an important amount of money and cannot be ignored. Most of the prescribed drugs are reimbursed and many are now completely free of charge to patients over 65 years of age. These include antiplatelets, statins, beta-blockers, calcium blockers, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, sartans, and antidiabetics including sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, etc. I would like to hear from the authors on this topic. Do they have any plans or ideas on how to supplement these missing but important data? I can imagine that this might be difficult as I have been involved for several years in a program to reduce hospital costs of coronary interventions [3]. I would also like to congratulate the editors of the Polish Heart Journal, as I see this article in a wider context as a small contribution of our community to the discussion on transparency in the management of taxpayers’ money in Poland.

The authors of the article cited were invited to reply. They do not respond to it.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None. `

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl

REFERENCES

  1. Skowrońska A, Sinnadurai S, Teisseyre P, et al. First-year follow-up costs of myocardial infarction management in Poland from the payer’s perspective. Pol Heart J. 2024; 82(2): 183191, doi: 10.33963/v.phj.99006, indexed in Pubmed: 38348614.
  2. Thompson SC, Nedkoff L, Katzenellenbogen J, et al. Challenges in managing acute cardiovascular diseases and follow up care in rural areas: A narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(24), doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245126, indexed in Pub­med: 31847490.
  3. Ciszewski A. Safety and feasibility of singleday coronary angioplasty in low- and moderaterisk patients: candidate selection criteria, management protocol, and outcomes. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022; 132(10): 16330, doi: 10.20452/pamw.16330, indexed in Pub­med: 36026618.