Induced glare testing — an underutilized test in evaluating visual disability in patients presenting with symptomatic cataracts
, 21, 31, 1
Abstract
Background: Cataract increases intraocular light scatter which affects the retinal image contrast and sensitivity.
Symptomatic patients with cataract complain of a drop in the quality of vision or glare affecting daily routine even
with preserved visual acuity. This study was aimed to quantify the drop in the glare induced visual acuity (VA) and
contrast sensitivity (CS) in different morphological types of cataracts.
Material and methods: This was an observational study on a prospective cohort, conducted at a tertiary-care
centre in South-India. Patients admitted for cataract surgeries between March and September 2017 with BCVA ≥
6/60 (Snellen) and ≥ 40 years were enrolled. LogMAR VA and CS were measured pre and post-operatively, with and
without glare induction using brightness acuity tester. Patients were sub-categorised based on morphology and the
presence of glare as a symptom. Paired-t test for the pre- and post-operative values and analysis with Bonferroni’s
adjustment were the statistical methods used.
Results: Data of 78 patients were sub-categorised and analysed. Glare induction with high glare was significant in
all the studied groups. LogMAR VA was affected most in group 3 (0.20, 10 letters, p < 0.05) and the CS in group
2 (0.62, 4.1 step drop, p < 0.05). Patients who had glare as a symptom had an average greater drop in LogMAR VA
(0.30, p = 0.01) and CS (–0.29, p = 0.03) when induced with a high glare.
Conclusions: All morphological types of cataracts affect VA and CS to a greater extent in conditions of bright
lighting. Glare induced VA and CS testing is a sensitive and an adjunct tool to traditional high contrast VA testing,
in evaluating the visual dysfunction of patients presenting with symptomatic cataracts.
Keywords: brightness acuity testercataractcontrast sensitivityglarelogMAR
References
- Frisén L, Frisén M. How good is normal visual acuity?. A study of letter acuity thresholds as a function of age. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1981; 215(3): 149–157.
- Bailey IL, Jackson AJ. Changes in the clinical measurement of visual acuity. J Phys: Conference Series. 2016; 772: 012046.
- Colenbrander A. The Historical Evolution of Visual Acuity Measurement. Vis Impair Res. 2009; 10(2-3): 57–66.
- Brown B, Yap MK. Differences in visual acuity between the eyes: determination of normal limits in a clinical population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995; 15(3): 163–169.
- Pointer JS. Evaluating the visual experience: visual acuity and the visual analogue scale. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003; 23(6): 547–552.
- Cvintal V, Delvadia R, Sun Y, et al. Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Cataract: Comparing Pelli-Robson with SPARCS Testing Methods. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014; 55: 758.
- Abrahamsson M, Sjöstrand J. Impairment of contrast sensitivity function (CSF) as a measure of disability glare. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986; 27(7): 1131–1136.
- Bal T, Coeckelbergh T, Van Looveren J, et al. Influence of cataract morphology on straylight and contrast sensitivity and its relevance to fitness to drive. Ophthalmologica. 2011; 225(2): 105–111.
- Elliott DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34(1): 108–119.
- Stifter E, Sacu S, Thaler A, et al. Contrast acuity in cataracts of different morphology and association to self-reported visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(12): 5412–5422.
- Williamson TH, Strong NP, Sparrow J, et al. Contrast sensitivity and glare in cataract using the Pelli-Robson chart. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992; 76(12): 719–722.
- Shandiz JH, Derakhshan A, Daneshyar A, et al. Effect of cataract type and severity on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2011; 6(1): 26–31.
- Elliott DB, Hurst MA. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67(11): 822–825.
- Adamsons IA, Vitale S, Stark WJ, et al. The association of postoperative subjective visual function with acuity, glare, and contrast sensitivity in patients with early cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114(5): 529–536.
- Aslam TM, Haider D, Murray IJ. Principles of disability glare measurement: an ophthalmological perspective. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(4): 354–360.
- Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. A new test for the evaluation of disability glare. Optom Vis Sci. 1991; 68(12): 911–917.
- Prager TC, Urso RG, Holladay JT, et al. Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987; 13(1): 67–69.
- Wood JM, Carberry TP. Bilateral cataract surgery and driving performance. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(10): 1277–1280.
- Elliott DB, Gilchrist J, Whitaker D. Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1989; 9(1): 25–30.
- Jaffe NS. Glare and contrast: indications for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1986; 12(4): 372–375.
- Stifter E, Sacu S, Weghaupt H. Functional vision with cataracts of different morphologies: comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(9): 1883–1891.
- Chua BE, Mitchell P, Cumming RG. Effects of cataract type and location on visual function: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Eye (Lond). 2004; 18(8): 765–772.
- Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Maeda N, et al. Light scattering and optical aberrations as objective parameters to predict visual deterioration in eyes with cataracts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(6): 1198–1208.
- Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ. Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111(1): 56–61.
- Fu J, Wang J, Wang Nl, et al. [Early clinical evaluation of visual function in patients with age-related cataract]. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006; 42(3): 236–240.