Vol 2, No 1 (2017)
Original paper
Published online: 2017-03-22

open access

Page views 766
Article views/downloads 1472
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Evaluation of efficacy of lens extraction for intraocular pressure reduction in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma and primary angle closure

Agnieszka Rozegnał-Madej, Agnieszka Wilkos-Kuc, Aleksandra Wlaź, Tomasz Żarnowski
Ophthalmol J 2017;2(1):6-12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of lens removal in eyes with primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) and primary angle closure (PAC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was a retrospective analysis of 114 eyes of 97 patients (83 women, 14 men; mean age 69.9 years) with PACG and PAC treated with lens extraction. Outcome measures: age, gender, visual acuity, IOP reduction over time, preoperative and postoperative number of IOP-lowering medications, axial length, intraocular lens (IOL) power, requirement for additional anti-glaucoma operations, and complications. Patients were divided into three groups: 1) patients with PAC (22 eyes) with mean follow-up 12.2 months; 2) patients with PACG with a history of previous acute angle closure (AAC) (39 eyes) with mean follow-up 15.4 months; and 3) patients with PACG without a history of previous AAC (53 eyes), with mean follow-up 13.5 months. Laser iridotomy was performed in all treated eyes prior to the surgery.

RESULTS. In the group with PAC mean IOP was reduced from 42.2 ± 15.4 mm Hg (mean ± SD) under 2.6 IOP-lowering medications to 20.2 ± 10.4 mm Hg under 1.1 IOP-lowering medications (mean IOP reduction 52.1%). In the group with PACG with a history of previous AAC mean IOP was reduced from 29.0 ± 15.7 mm Hg under 2.1 IOP-lowering medications to 17.0 ± 7.5 mm Hg under 0.7 IOP-lowering medications (mean IOP reduction 41.3%). In the group with PACG without a history of previous AAC (53 eyes) mean IOP was reduced from 22.8 ± 8.0 mm Hg under 1.75 IOP-lowering medications to 18.8 ± 7.4 mm Hg under 1.5 IOP-lowering medications (mean IOP reduction 17.5%). In all three groups statistically significant improvement of visual acuity as a result of surgery was observed. There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups with regard to AXL or IOL power. Intraoperative complications were noticed in eight cases, and postoperative complications were noticed in four cases. The number of anti-glaucoma medications was reduced, but 17 eyes needed additional anti-glaucoma procedures.

CONCLUSIONS. Lens extraction in eyes with PACG and PAC resulted in significant IOP reduction in all groups. The most pronounced IOP reduction was achieved in the group with PAC, where lens extraction was performed up to 60 days from AAC. Visual acuity was significantly improved as a result of surgery in all three study groups.

References

  1. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr JM, Cochran C, et al. Effectiveness in Angle-closure Glaucoma of Lens Extraction (EAGLE) Study Group. The effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011; 12: 133.
  2. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3): 262–267.
  3. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(2): 238–242.
  4. Patel K, Patel S. Angle-closure glaucoma. Dis Mon. 2014; 60(6): 254–262.
  5. Husain R, Gazzard G, Aung T, et al. Initial management of acute primary angle closure: a randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification with laser peripheral iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(11): 2274–2281.
  6. Aung T, Tow SL, Yap EY, et al. Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(7): 1298–1302.
  7. Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, et al. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(9): 1826–1831.
  8. He M, Friedman DS, Ge J, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy in eyes with narrow drainage angles: ultrasound biomicroscopy outcomes. The Liwan Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(8): 1513–1519.
  9. Junqueira DLM, Prado VG, Lopes FS, et al. Non-pupillary block angle-closure mechanisms: a comprehensive analysis of their prevalence and treatment outcomes. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014; 77(6): 360–363.
  10. Lowe RF. Anterior lens curvature. Comparisons between normal eyes and those with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972; 56(5): 409–413.
  11. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, et al. Effect of cataract surgery on intraocular pressure control in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27(11): 1779–1786.
  12. Poley BJ, Lindstrom RL, Samuelson TW, et al. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(11): 1946–1955.
  13. Wang N, Chintala SK, Fini ME, et al. Ultrasound activates the TM ELAM-1/IL-1/NF-kappaB response: a potential mechanism for intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44(5): 1977–1981.
  14. Lam DSC, Leung DYL, Tham CCY, et al. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(7): 1134–1140.
  15. Lachkar Y. Acute angle closure and angle closure glaucoma: Phacoemulsification as first-line treatment. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2010; 33(4): 273–278.
  16. Day AC, Donachie PHJ, Sparrow JM, et al. Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2015; 29(4): 552–560.
  17. Varma DK, Belovay GW, Tam DY, et al. Malignant glaucoma after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40(11): 1843–1849.
  18. Yu J, Sun M, Wei Y, et al. The timing of goniosynechialysis in treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma combined with cataract. Mol Vis. 2012; 18: 1074–1082.
  19. Zhang ZM, Niu Q, Nie Y, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and improvement of vision after cataract surgeries in angle closure glaucoma with concomitant cataract patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8(9): 16557–16563.
  20. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016; 388(10052): 1389–1397.
  21. Javanbakht M, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr JM, et al. Early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle closure glaucoma: an economic evaluation based on data from the EAGLE trial. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(1): e013254.
  22. Tham CCY, Kwong YYY, Baig N, et al. Phacoemulsification versus trabeculectomy in medically uncontrolled chronic angle-closure glaucoma without cataract. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(1): 62–67.