Retrospective assessment of Lung-RADS® performance in the Silesian Lung Cancer Screening Pilot Study
Abstract
Background. A high percentage of false positive results, observed in lung cancer screening studies with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), caused the modification of radiological assessment methods. According to the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (IELCAP) all non-calcified nodules with a dimension ≥ 4 mm were considered as positive. Implementation of classification the Lung CT screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS®) recommends additional testing only for nodules ≥ 6 mm, which reduced of false positive results.
Methods. We provided a retrospective analysis of 601 LDCT scans, in asymptomatic volunteers of Pilot Silesian Study of Early Lung Cancer Detection, with at least 20 pack-years of cigarette smoking. The analysis of non- and invasive interventions was done. Assessment of nodules according to the Lung-RADS® system was done. Then the percentage of interventions that could be avoided using the Lung-RADS® criteria was estimated.
Results. In total, 1016 nodules were identified in 265 participants. The positive result of screening was defined as a presence of solid or part-solid nodule ≥ 5 mm and ≥ 8 mm in the case of a nonsolid nodule in line with the IELCAP protocol. Screening based on the IELCAP protocol resulted in 200 positive results and based on Lung-RADS® in the 116 positives. The frequency of lung cancers among participants with a positive result was 7 of 200 (4.0%) (95% CI: 1.0%, 6.0%) for IELCAP and 7 of 116 (6.0%) (95% CI: 2.7%, 9.3%) for Lung-RADS®. The Lung-RADS® criteria reduced number of non- and invasive procedures by 48.8% and 24.1%, compared to IELCAP protocol.
Conclusions. Adopting the Lung-RADS® classification system may reduce harms and improve the efficiency of lung cancer screening programs.
Keywords: lung noduleslung cancer screeninglow dose computed tomography (LDCT)Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS®)
References
- Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(5): 395–409.
- International Early Lung Cancer Action Program protocol. http://www.ielcap.org/sites/default/files/ielcap.pdf.
- Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/Lung-Rads.
- Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, et al. International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators*. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(4): 246–252.
- Clark TJ, Flood TF, Maximin ST, et al. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System Speed and Accuracy Are Increased With the Use of a Semiautomated Computer Application. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12(12 Pt A): 1301–1306.
- Central Statistical Office. Health status of population in Poland in 2014. , Warsaw 2016: 98–99.
- Public Opinion Research Center (CBOS) report in Polish “Smoking Cigarettes”. 2019; 104: 1–20.
- Szablowska-Siwik S, Wachula E, Czyzewski D, et al. PUB073 Lung Cancer Screening with LDCT – Results of a Small Cohort Continual Monitoring (Pilot Silesian Study). J Thorac Oncol. 2017; 12(11): S2389–S2390.
- Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Black W, et al. Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective assessment. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(7): 485–491.
- Rzyman W, Szurowska E, Adamek M. Implementation of lung cancer screening at the national level: Polish example. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019; 8(Suppl 1): S95–S9S105.
- Horeweg N, van Rosmalen J, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(12): 1332–1341.