Adjuvant systemic treatment in luminal breast cancer — what else apart from hormone therapy?
Abstract
The luminal subtype [hormone receptor (HR) expression and absence of HER2 overexpression] occurs in more than 70% of patients with early breast cancer. These patients are characterized with a differentiated prognosis depending on the stage and the biological aggressiveness of the tumor, which can be assessed by examining the degree of HR expression, histological malignancy (grade, G), the severity of tumor cell proliferation (Ki67 index) or gene expression in a molecular test. Besides, the young age of the patient, especially under 35 years, is associated with a worse prognosis. In all patients with HR expression, indications for adjuvant hormone therapy should be considered. However, in patients with a higher risk of relapse and death, there are additional systemic treatment options that can reduce this risk: chemotherapy and targeted drugs (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitor for patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutation). The aim of the review is to discuss indications for these forms of adjuvant therapy in HR+ HER2– patients.
Keywords: luminal breast canceradjuvant chemotherapypalbociclibabemaciclibribociclibolaparibBRCA1/2 mutationanthracyclinestaxoids
References
- Yang H, Wang R, Zeng F, et al. Impact of molecular subtypes on metastatic behavior and overall survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A single-center study combined with a large cohort study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Oncol Lett. 2020; 20(4): 87.
- Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024; 35(2): 159–182.
- Jassem J, Krzakowski M, Bobek-Billewicz B, et al. Breast cancer. Oncol Clin Pract. 2020; 16(5): 207–260.
- www.predict.nhs.uk.
- https://www.nccn.org/login?ReturnURL=https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf.
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365(9472): 1687–1717.
- Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, et al. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012; 379(9814): 432–444.
- Pan H, Gray R, Braybrooke J, et al. EBCTCG. 20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(19): 1836–1846.
- Wangchinda P, Ithimakin S. Factors that predict recurrence later than 5 years after initial treatment in operable breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2016; 14(1): 223.
- Gnant M, Harbeck N, Thomssen C. St. Gallen 2011: Summary of the Consensus Discussion. Breast Care (Basel). 2011; 6(2): 136–141.
- Perou CM, Sørlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406(6797): 747–752.
- Sørlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(19): 10869–10874.
- Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26 Suppl 5: v8–30.
- Cheang MCU, Chia SK, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(10): 736–750.
- Prat A, Cheang MC, Martín M, et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(2): 203–209.
- Brouckaert O, Laenen A, Vanderhaegen J, et al. Applying the 2011 St Gallen panel of prognostic markers on a large single hospital cohort of consecutively treated primary operable breast cancers. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(10): 2578–2584.
- van Maaren MC, de Munck L, Strobbe LJA, et al. Ten-year recurrence rates for breast cancer subtypes in the Netherlands: A large population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2019; 144(2): 263–272.
- Petric M, Martinez S, Acevedo F, et al. Correlation between Ki67 and histological grade in breast cancer patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(23): 10277–10280.
- Liang Q, Ma D, Gao RF, et al. Effect of Ki-67 Expression Levels and Histological Grade on Breast Cancer Early Relapse in Patients with Different Immunohistochemical-based Subtypes. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 7648.
- Han Y, Li Q, Xu BH, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival of patients with luminal A breast cancer and positive lymph nodes. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14(3): 8563–8573.
- Herr D, Wischnewsky M, Joukhadar R, et al. Does chemotherapy improve survival in patients with nodal positive luminal A breast cancer? A retrospective Multicenter Study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7): e0218434.
- Diessner J, Wischnewsky M, Blettner M, et al. Do Patients with Luminal A Breast Cancer Profit from Adjuvant Systemic Therapy? A Retrospective Multicenter Study. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12): e0168730.
- Park S, Lee SeK, Paik HJ, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy alone in patients with node-positive, luminal A type breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(22): e6777.
- Haque W, Verma V, Hatch S, et al. Omission of chemotherapy for low-grade, luminal A N1 breast cancer: Patterns of care and clinical outcomes. Breast. 2018; 41: 67–73.
- Li Y, Ma Li. Efficacy of chemotherapy for lymph node-positive luminal A subtype breast cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020; 18(1): 316.
- Zhao M, Zhang J, Laubacher J, et al. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in luminal B breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(26_suppl): 156–156.
- Viale G, Regan MM, Mastropasqua MG, et al. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Predictive value of tumor Ki-67 expression in two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100(3): 207–212.
- Liu Yu, Yin W, Yan T, et al. The clinical significance of Ki-67 as a marker of prognostic value and chemosensitivity prediction in hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: a meta-analysis of the published literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 29(11): 1453–1461.
- Ehinger A, Malmström P, Bendahl PO, et al. South and South-East Swedish Breast Cancer Groups. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013. Acta Oncol. 2017; 56(1): 68–74.
- Van Asten K, Slembrouck L, Olbrecht S, et al. Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2019; 24(2): 165–171.
- Liang Q, Ma D, Gao RF, et al. Effect of Ki-67 Expression Levels and Histological Grade on Breast Cancer Early Relapse in Patients with Different Immunohistochemical-based Subtypes. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 7648.
- Boland MR, Ryan ÉJ, Dunne E, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of progesterone receptor status on oncological outcomes in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2020; 107(1): 33–43.
- Lashen AG, Toss MS, Mongan NP, et al. The clinical value of progesterone receptor expression in luminal breast cancer: A study of a large cohort with long-term follow-up. Cancer. 2023; 129(8): 1183–1194.
- Criscitiello C, Disalvatore D, De Laurentiis M, et al. High Ki-67 score is indicative of a greater benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy when added to endocrine therapy in luminal B HER2 negative and node-positive breast cancer. Breast. 2014; 23(1): 69–75.
- Chen X, He C, Han D, et al. The predictive value of Ki-67 before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol. 2017; 13(9): 843–857.
- Tao M, Chen S, Zhang X, et al. Ki-67 labeling index is a predictive marker for a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(51): e9384.
- Lips EH, Mulder L, de Ronde JJ, et al. Breast cancer subtyping by immunohistochemistry and histological grade outperforms breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 140(1): 63–71.
- van Mackelenbergh MT, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, et al. Outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from ten prospectively randomized controlled neoadjuvant trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018; 167(1): 59–71.
- Liu S, Chia SK, Mehl E, et al. Progesterone receptor is a significant factor associated with clinical outcomes and effect of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 119(1): 53–61.
- Dembinski R, Prasath V, Bohnak C, et al. Estrogen Receptor Positive and Progesterone Receptor Negative Breast Cancer: the Role of Hormone Therapy. Horm Cancer. 2020; 11(3-4): 148–154.
- Andre F, Ismaila N, Allison K, et al. Biomarkers for Adjuvant Endocrine and Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(16): 1816–1837 (Erratum. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(22): 2514, doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01388).
- Groenendijk FH, Treece T, Yoder E, et al. Estrogen receptor variants in ER-positive basal-type breast cancers responding to therapy like ER-negative breast cancers. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019; 5: 15.
- Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MCU, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(8): 1160–1167.
- Gnant M, Sestak I, Filipits M, et al. Identifying clinically relevant prognostic subgroups of postmenopausal women with node-positive hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: a combined analysis of ABCSG-8 and ATAC using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score and intrinsic subtype. Ann Oncol. 2015; 26(8): 1685–1691.
- Buus R, Sestak I, Kronenwett R, et al. Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016; 108(11).
- Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, et al. Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(23): 3726–3734.
- Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S, et al. Breast Cancer Intergroup of North America. Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(1): 55–65.
- Sparano JA, Paik S. Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(5): 721–728.
- Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(2): 111–121.
- Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR, et al. 21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(25): 2336–2347.
- Knauer M, Mook S, Rutgers EJT, et al. The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 120(3): 655–661.
- Cardoso F, van't Veer LJ, Bogaerts J, et al. MINDACT Investigators. 70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(8): 717–729.
- Piccart M, van 't Veer LJ, Poncet C, et al. 70-gene signature as an aid for treatment decisions in early breast cancer: updated results of the phase 3 randomised MINDACT trial with an exploratory analysis by age. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(4): 476–488.
- https://path.upmc.edu/onlineTools/mageeequations.html.
- Bhargava R, Clark BZ, Carter GJ, et al. The healthcare value of the Magee Decision Algorithm™: use of Magee Equations™ and mitosis score to safely forgo molecular testing in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2020; 33(8): 1563–1570.
- https://breast.predict.cam/.
- Jones S, Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy J, et al. Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(8): 1177–1183.
- Ejlertsen B, Tuxen MK, Jakobsen EH, et al. Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide and Docetaxel With or Without Epirubicin for Early TOP2A-Normal Breast Cancer: DBCG 07-READ, an Open-Label, Phase III, Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(23): 2639–2646.
- Mavroudis D, Matikas A, Malamos N, et al. Breast Cancer Investigators of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG), Athens, Greece. Dose-dense FEC followed by docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with HER2-negative, axillary lymph node-positive early breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(10): 1873–1878.
- Blum JL, Flynn PJ, Yothers G, et al. Anthracyclines in Early Breast Cancer: The ABC Trials-USOR 06-090, NSABP B-46-I/USOR 07132, and NSABP B-49 (NRG Oncology). J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(23): 2647–2655.
- Harbeck N, Gluz O, Clemens M, et al. Prospective WSG phase III PlanB trial: Final analysis of adjuvant 4xEC→4x doc vs. 6x docetaxel/cyclophosphamide in patients with high clinical risk and intermediate-to-high genomic risk HER2-negative, early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(15_suppl): 504–504.
- Janni W, Nitz U, Rack B, et al. Pooled analysis of two randomized phase III trials (PlanB/SuccessC) comparing six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide to sequential anthracycline taxane chemotherapy in patients with intermediate and high risk HER2-negative early breast cancer (n=5,923). J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(15_suppl): 522–522.
- Yu KD, Liu XY, Chen Li, et al. Anthracycline-free or short-term regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: A phase III randomized non-inferiority trial. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021; 11: 100158.
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Electronic address: bc.overview@ctsu.ox.ac.uk, Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. Lancet. 2023; 401(10384): 1277–1292.
- Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, et al. Breast Cancer International Research Group 001 Investigators. Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(22): 2302–2313.
- Slamon DJ, Diéras V, Rugo HS, et al. Overall Survival With Palbociclib Plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(9): 994–1000.
- Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(10): 942–950.
- Goetz MP, Toi M, Huober J, et al. Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. Ann Oncol. 2024; 35(8): 718–727.
- Lu YS, Im SA, Colleoni M, et al. Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 28(5): 851–859.
- Cristofanilli M, Rugo HS, Im SA, et al. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Women with HR+/HER2- ABC: Updated Exploratory Analyses of PALOMA-3, a Double-blind, Phase III Randomized Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2022; 28(16): 3433–3442.
- Neven P, Fasching PA, Chia S, et al. Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. Breast Cancer Res. 2023; 25(1): 103.
- Sledge GW, Toi M, Neven P, et al. The Effect of Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant on Overall Survival in Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer That Progressed on Endocrine Therapy-MONARCH 2: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 6(1): 116–124.
- Gnant M, Dueck AC, Frantal S, et al. PALLAS groups and investigators. Adjuvant Palbociclib for Early Breast Cancer: The PALLAS Trial Results (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-03). J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(3): 282–293.
- Loibl S, Marmé F, Martin M, et al. Palbociclib for Residual High-Risk Invasive HR-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer-The Penelope-B Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(14): 1518–1530.
- Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, et al. monarchE Committee Members and Investigators. Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2-, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(34): 3987–3998.
- Rastogi P, O'Shaughnessy J, Martin M, et al. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(9): 987–993 (Erratum: Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(17): 2111, doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00711).
- Johnston SRD, Toi M, O'Shaughnessy J, et al. monarchE Committee Members. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24(1): 77–90.
- Hamilton E, Kim J, Eigeliene N, et al. Efficacy and safety results by age in monarchE: Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(16_suppl): 501–501.
- Paluch-Shimon S, Neven P, Huober J, et al. Efficacy and safety results by menopausal status in monarchE: adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy in patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023; 15: 17588359231151840.
- Slamon D, Lipatov O, Nowecki Z, et al. Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy in Early Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024; 390(12): 1080–1091.
- Fasching PA, Stroyakovskiy D, Yardley D, et al. LBA13 Adjuvant ribociclib (RIB) plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) in patients (Pts) with HR+/HER2− early breast cancer (EBC): 4-year outcomes from the NATALEE trial. Ann Oncol. 2024; 35: S1207.
- Fasching PA, Slamon D, Nowecki Z, et al. VP3-2023: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the phase III NATALEE study of adjuvant ribociclib (RIB) plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI alone in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC). Ann Oncol. 2023; 34(10): 951–953.
- Schneeweiss A, Möbus V, Tesch H, et al. Intense dose-dense epirubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide versus weekly paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin (plus carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer) for neoadjuvant treatment of high-risk early breast cancer (GeparOcto-GBG 84): A randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019; 106: 181–192.
- Geyer CE, Garber JE, Gelber RD, et al. OlympiA Clinical Trial Steering Committee and Investigators, OlympiA Clinical Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with - or -Mutated Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384(25): 2394–2405.
- Geyer CE, Garber JE, Gelber RD, et al. OlympiA Clinical Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Overall survival in the OlympiA phase III trial of adjuvant olaparib in patients with germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 and high-risk, early breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022; 33(12): 1250–1268.
- Ganz PA, Bandos H, Španić T, et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in g Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(11): 1288–1300.
- Bruno L, Ostinelli A, Waisberg F, et al. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Carrying Germline Pathogenic Variants in DNA Repair-Related Genes. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022; 6: e2100140.
- Kim JY, Oh JM, Park YH, et al. Which Clinicopathologic Parameters Suggest Primary Resistance to Palbociclib in Combination With Letrozole as the First-Line Treatment for Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer? Front Oncol. 2021; 11: 759150.
- Zadrożna-Nowak A, Dębska-Szmich S, Potemski P. Praktyczne zasady stosowania hormonoterapii uzupełniającej u chorych na raka piersi na podstawie danych z badań klinicznych. Onkol Prakt Klin Edu. 2022; 8(5): 354–373.