Online first
Case report
Published online: 2024-12-06

open access

Page views 49
Article views/downloads 28
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Advances in the therapeutic management of metastatic uveal melanoma including real-world experience with tebentafusp

Piotr Rutkowski1, Monika Dudzisz-Śledź1, Vinkas Urbonas2, Paweł Rogala1, Luka Simetic3, Kadri Putnik4, Paweł Teterycz1

Abstract

Uveal melanoma is the most common malignant neoplasm of the eyeball. It develops from melanocytes of the uveal membrane of the eye, and it significantly differs from melanoma in terms of clinical behavior and therapy compared to other localizations. The survival of patients in metastatic settings is still poor and poses significant challenges.The most important factor determining the length of survival of these patients is the presence of metastases in the liver, which is the most common site of metastasis (70–90% of cases) and the only site in about 50% of cases. Survival from the point of finding metastatic lesions in the liver is usually short, with a median of a few months. In a systematic review of approximately 800 patients, overall survival (OS) in the group treated with systemic chemotherapy was 9 to 15 months compared to operated patients with survival of 10 to 35 months. For many years, studies testing systemic therapies have not yielded any positive results . The only exception is tebentafusp (IMCgp100), which is a new bispecific molecule targeting T cells in the presence of HLA-A*02:01. Currently, it is the only drug approved for systemic therapy of metastatic uveal melanoma with confirmed improvement in OS. In the present issue of Oncology of Clinical Practice, we present an international series of interesting case reports on using tebentafusp in clinical practice outside of clinical trials in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Rutkowski P, Romanowska-Dixon B, Markiewicz A, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with ocular melanomas – recommendations of the Polish Society of Oncology. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. 2022; 72(5): 342–352.
  2. Rowcroft A, Loveday BPT, Thomson BNJ, et al. Systematic review of liver directed therapy for uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2020; 22(4): 497–505.
  3. Rodriguez-Vidal C, Fernandez-Diaz D, Fernandez-Marta B, et al. Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(9).
  4. McLaughlin CC, Wu XC, Jemal A, et al. Incidence of noncutaneous melanomas in the U.S. Cancer. 2005; 103(5): 1000–1007.
  5. Kaliki S, Shields CL. Uveal melanoma: relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye (Lond). 2017; 31(2): 241–257.
  6. Virgili G, Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, et al. EUROCARE Working Group, EUROCARE Working Group. Incidence of uveal melanoma in Europe. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(12): 2309–2315.
  7. Al-Jamal RT, Cassoux N, Desjardins L, et al. The Pediatric Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma Study: A Survey by the European Ophthalmic Oncology Group. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123(4): 898–907.
  8. Kivelä T. Prevalence and epidemiology of ocular melanoma. In: Murray T, Boldt HC. ed. Ocular Melanoma: Advances in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies. Future Science, London 2014: 21–38.
  9. Nayman T, Bostan C, Logan P, et al. Uveal Melanoma Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses. Curr Eye Res. 2017; 42(8): 1085–1093.
  10. Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Glynn RJ, et al. Host factors, UV radiation, and risk of uveal melanoma. A case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990; 108(9): 1274–1280.
  11. Houtzagers LE, Wierenga APA, Ruys AAM, et al. Iris Colour and the Risk of Developing Uveal Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(19).
  12. Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhang K, et al. Validation of the Relationship Between Iris Color and Uveal Melanoma Using Artificial Intelligence With Multiple Paths in a Large Chinese Population. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9: 713209.
  13. Falcone LM, Zeidler-Erdely PC. Skin cancer and welding. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019; 44(2): 130–134.
  14. Bataille V, Pinney E, Hungerford JL, et al. Five cases of coexistent primary ocular and cutaneous melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 1993; 129(2): 198–201.
  15. van Hees CL, Jager MJ, Bleeker JC, et al. Occurrence of cutaneous and uveal melanoma in patients with uveal melanoma and their first degree relatives. Melanoma Res. 1998; 8(2): 175–180.
  16. Shors AR, Iwamoto S, Doody DR, et al. Relationship of uveal and cutaneous malignant melanoma in persons with multiple primary tumors. Int J Cancer. 2002; 102(3): 266–268.
  17. Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K. Association of first ocular melanoma with subsequent cutaneous melanoma: results from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database. Int J Cancer. 2003; 104(2): 257–258.
  18. Shields JA, Shields CL. Management of posterior uveal melanoma: past, present, and future: the 2014 Charles L. Schepens lecture. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(2): 414–428.
  19. Shields CL, Kaliki S, Furuta M, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer classification of posterior uveal melanoma (tumor size category) predicts prognosis in 7731 patients. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(10): 2066–2071.
  20. Berus T, Halon A, Markiewicz A, et al. Clinical, Histopathological and Cytogenetic Prognosticators in Uveal Melanoma - A Comprehensive Review. Anticancer Res. 2017; 37(12): 6541–6549.
  21. Shields CL, Furuta M, Thangappan A, et al. Metastasis of uveal melanoma millimeter-by-millimeter in 8033 consecutive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(8): 989–998.
  22. Dithmar S, Diaz CE, Grossniklaus HE. Intraocular melanoma spread to regional lymph nodes: report of two cases. Retina. 2000; 20(1): 76–79.
  23. Rietschel P, Panageas KS, Hanlon C, et al. Variates of survival in metastatic uveal melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(31): 8076–8080.
  24. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Melanoma: Uveal. Version 1.2024 – May 23, 2024. http://www.nccn.org (16.06.2024).
  25. Barker CA, Salama AK. New NCCN Guidelines for Uveal Melanoma and Treatment of Recurrent or Progressive Distant Metastatic Melanoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16(5S): 646–650.
  26. Khoja L, Atenafu EG, Suciu S, et al. Meta-analysis in metastatic uveal melanoma to determine progression free and overall survival benchmarks: an international rare cancers initiative (IRCI) ocular melanoma study. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(8): 1370–1380.
  27. Schmittel A, Schmidt-Hieber M, Martus P, et al. A randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan versus treosulfan alone in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2006; 17(12): 1826–1829.
  28. Schmittel A, Schuster R, Bechrakis NE, et al. A two-cohort phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine plus treosulfan in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2005; 15(5): 447–451.
  29. Corrie PG, Shaw J, Spanswick VJ, et al. Phase I trial combining gemcitabine and treosulfan in advanced cutaneous and uveal melanoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2005; 92(11): 1997–2003.
  30. Pföhler C, Cree IA, Ugurel S, et al. Treosulfan and gemcitabine in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study. Anticancer Drugs. 2003; 14(5): 337–340.
  31. Legha SS, Ring S, Papadopoulos N, et al. A prospective evaluation of a triple-drug regimen containing cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD) for metastatic melanoma. Cancer. 1989; 64(10): 2024–2029, doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19891115)64:10<2024::aid-cncr2820641010>3.0.co;2-v.
  32. Nathan FE, Berd D, Sato T, et al. BOLD+interferon in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: first report of active systemic therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 1997; 16(2): 201–208.
  33. Rantala ES, Hernberg M, Kivelä TT. Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res. 2019; 29(6): 561–568.
  34. Steeb T, Wessely A, Ruzicka T, et al. Immune checkpoint blockade for unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017; 60: 44–52.
  35. Pelster MS, Gruschkus SK, Bassett R, et al. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results From a Single-Arm Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(6): 599–607.
  36. Piulats JM, Espinosa E, de la Cruz Merino L, et al. Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase II Trial by the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM-1402). J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(6): 586–598.
  37. KIMMTRAK (tebentafusp) charakterystyka produktu leczniczego. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/kimmtrak-epar-product-information_en.pdf.
  38. Sacco JJ, Carvajal R, Butler MO, et al. 64MO A phase (ph) II, multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of tebentafusp (tebe) (IMCgp100) in patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). Ann Oncol. 2020; 31: S1442–S1443.
  39. Nathan P, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, et al. IMCgp100-202 Investigators. Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2021; 385(13): 1196–1206.
  40. Hassel JC, Piperno-Neumann S, Rutkowski P, et al. Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2023; 389(24): 2256–2266.
  41. Fu Y, Xiao W, Mao Y. Recent Advances and Challenges in Uveal Melanoma Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(13).