open access

Vol 25, No 2 (2022)
Research paper
Submitted: 2021-10-20
Accepted: 2022-06-22
Published online: 2022-07-20
Get Citation

Preoperative detection of sentinel lymph node in patients with endometrial cancer — comparison of planar lymphoscintigraphy, spect and SPECT/CT

Anamarija Jankulovska1, Bojana Stoilovska Rizova1, Nikolina Bozhinovska1, Aleksandra Peshevska1, Mile Tanturovski2, Igor Aluloski2, Sasho Stojcevski2, Nevena Manevska1, Sinisa Stojanoski1, Daniela Miladinova1
·
Pubmed: 35929122
·
Nucl. Med. Rev 2022;25(2):101-104.
Affiliations
  1. Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University “Ss Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, North Macedonia
  2. University Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skopje, North Macedonia

open access

Vol 25, No 2 (2022)
Original articles
Submitted: 2021-10-20
Accepted: 2022-06-22
Published online: 2022-07-20

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping allows minimal invasive assessment of lymph node status in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Intraoperative detection of SLNs is based on the results obtained from preoperative nuclear medical images. The purpose of this study was to compare the data obtained from planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and SPECT with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for preoperative SLN detection in patients with EC. Material and methods: A total of 44 images in 22 patients with early-stage EC (22 PL, 9 SPECT and 13 SPECT/CT) were analyzed. The scans were performed in the period 2018–2020 at the Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine in Skopje. Thirteen patients underwent PL and SPECT/CT and nine patients underwent PL and SPECT after cervical injection of 4 mCi 99mTc-SENTI-SCINT on the day of surgery. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test, and Spearman rank R coefficient were used for data analyses. Results: Twenty-two patients with mean age of 61.1 ± 7.5 and body mass index (BMI) 34.62 ± 6.4 kg/m2 were included in the study. In four patients (18.2%) SLN was not detected on PL. Detection rate on SPECT and SPECT/CT was 100%. The average number of detected SLN was 1.4 ± 1.05, 2.2 ± 1.1 и 2.15 ± 1.1 on PL, SPECT and SPECT/CT respectively. We found a statistically significant difference in the number of detected SLNs on PL vs SPECT/CT (p = 0.0077). The most common SLN location on SPECT/CT was the right internal iliac followed by the left common iliac region. Conclusions: The results of the presented study indicate a higher diagnostic value of SPECT/CT in terms of SLN detection and exact anatomic localization as compared to planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL).

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping allows minimal invasive assessment of lymph node status in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Intraoperative detection of SLNs is based on the results obtained from preoperative nuclear medical images. The purpose of this study was to compare the data obtained from planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and SPECT with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for preoperative SLN detection in patients with EC. Material and methods: A total of 44 images in 22 patients with early-stage EC (22 PL, 9 SPECT and 13 SPECT/CT) were analyzed. The scans were performed in the period 2018–2020 at the Institute of Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine in Skopje. Thirteen patients underwent PL and SPECT/CT and nine patients underwent PL and SPECT after cervical injection of 4 mCi 99mTc-SENTI-SCINT on the day of surgery. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test, and Spearman rank R coefficient were used for data analyses. Results: Twenty-two patients with mean age of 61.1 ± 7.5 and body mass index (BMI) 34.62 ± 6.4 kg/m2 were included in the study. In four patients (18.2%) SLN was not detected on PL. Detection rate on SPECT and SPECT/CT was 100%. The average number of detected SLN was 1.4 ± 1.05, 2.2 ± 1.1 и 2.15 ± 1.1 on PL, SPECT and SPECT/CT respectively. We found a statistically significant difference in the number of detected SLNs on PL vs SPECT/CT (p = 0.0077). The most common SLN location on SPECT/CT was the right internal iliac followed by the left common iliac region. Conclusions: The results of the presented study indicate a higher diagnostic value of SPECT/CT in terms of SLN detection and exact anatomic localization as compared to planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL).

Get Citation

Keywords

sentinel lymph node; lymphoscintigraphy; SPECT/CT; endometrial cancer

About this article
Title

Preoperative detection of sentinel lymph node in patients with endometrial cancer — comparison of planar lymphoscintigraphy, spect and SPECT/CT

Journal

Nuclear Medicine Review

Issue

Vol 25, No 2 (2022)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

101-104

Published online

2022-07-20

Page views

4326

Article views/downloads

427

DOI

10.5603/NMR.a2022.0022

Pubmed

35929122

Bibliographic record

Nucl. Med. Rev 2022;25(2):101-104.

Keywords

sentinel lymph node
lymphoscintigraphy
SPECT/CT
endometrial cancer

Authors

Anamarija Jankulovska
Bojana Stoilovska Rizova
Nikolina Bozhinovska
Aleksandra Peshevska
Mile Tanturovski
Igor Aluloski
Sasho Stojcevski
Nevena Manevska
Sinisa Stojanoski
Daniela Miladinova

References (23)
  1. Cabanas RM. The concept of the sentinel lymph node. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2000; 157: 109–120.
  2. Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(8): 1194–1220.
  3. Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 80(1): 208–250.
  4. Holloway RW, Abu-Rustum NR, Backes FJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping and staging in endometrial cancer: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology literature review with consensus recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146(2): 405–415.
  5. Owen C, Bendifallah S, Jayot A, et al. [Lymph node management in endometrial cancer]. Bull Cancer. 2020; 107(6): 686–695.
  6. Staley A, Sullivan SA, Rossi EC. Sentinel Lymph Node Technique in Endometrial Cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017; 72(5): 289–295.
  7. Giammarile F, Bozkurt MF, Cibula D, et al. The EANM clinical and technical guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in gynaecological cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 41(7): 1463–1477.
  8. Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lécuru F, et al. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(5): 469–476.
  9. Navalkissoor S, Wagner T, Gnanasegaran G, et al. SPECT/CT in imaging sentinel nodes. ClinTransl Imaging. 2015; 3(3): 203–215.
  10. Pandit-Taskar N, Gemignani ML, Lyall A, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography SPECT-CT improves sentinel node detection and localization in cervical and uterine malignancy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 117(1): 59–64.
  11. Valdés Olmos RA, Rietbergen DDD, Vidal-Sicart S. SPECT/CT and sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy. ClinTransl Imaging. 2014; 2(6): 491–504.
  12. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3): 209–249.
  13. Felix AS, Weissfeld JL, Stone RA, et al. Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 21(11): 1851–1856.
  14. Lajer H, Elnegaard S, Christensen RD, et al. Survival after stage IA endometrial cancer; can follow-up be altered? A prospective nationwide Danish survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(8): 976–982.
  15. Rajasooriyar C, Bernshaw D, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, et al. The survival outcome and patterns of failure in node positive endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy with curative intent. J Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 25(4): 313–319.
  16. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021; 31(1): 12–39.
  17. Collarino A, Vidal-Sicart S, Perotti G, et al. The sentinel node approach in gynaecological malignancies. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016; 4(5): 411–420.
  18. Naaman Y, Pinkas L, Roitman S, et al. The Added Value of SPECT/CT in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Mapping for Endometrial Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(2): 450–455.
  19. Sawicki S, Kobierski J, Łapińska-Szumczyk S, et al. Comparison of SPECT-CT results and intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2013; 34(6): 590–596.
  20. Kraft O, Havel M. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in gynecologic tumours by planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012; 21(2): 47–55.
  21. Togami S, Kawamura T, Yanazume S, et al. Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020; 30(5): 626–630.
  22. Kraft O, Havel M. Detection of sentinel lymph nodes by SPECT/CT and planar scintigraphy: The influence of age, gender and BMI. Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing. 2012; 2(2).
  23. Perissinotti A, Paredes P, Vidal-Sicart S, et al. Use of SPECT/CT for improved sentinel lymph node localization in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 129(1): 42–48.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Świętokrzyska 73 street, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone: +48 58 320 94 94, fax: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl