open access

Vol 24, No 2 (2021)
Review paper
Submitted: 2021-04-15
Accepted: 2021-06-28
Published online: 2021-07-30
Get Citation

The role of [18F]FDG PET/CT for gastric cancer management

Ebru Salmanoglu1
·
Pubmed: 34382674
·
Nucl. Med. Rev 2021;24(2):99-103.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Medicine, Kahramanmaras, Turkey

open access

Vol 24, No 2 (2021)
Reviews
Submitted: 2021-04-15
Accepted: 2021-06-28
Published online: 2021-07-30

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. In addition to the patient’s clinical history and clinical examination, nuclear medicine tools are required for diagnosis. [18F]FDG PET/CT has been commonly used for cancer patients for staging, restaging, evaluation of treatment response. This study aimed to review the current literature on the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT for GC management.

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. In addition to the patient’s clinical history and clinical examination, nuclear medicine tools are required for diagnosis. [18F]FDG PET/CT has been commonly used for cancer patients for staging, restaging, evaluation of treatment response. This study aimed to review the current literature on the role of [18F]FDG PET/CT for GC management.

Get Citation

Keywords

gastric cancer; PET/CT; [18F]FDG

About this article
Title

The role of [18F]FDG PET/CT for gastric cancer management

Journal

Nuclear Medicine Review

Issue

Vol 24, No 2 (2021)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

99-103

Published online

2021-07-30

Page views

7266

Article views/downloads

1036

DOI

10.5603/NMR.2021.0021

Pubmed

34382674

Bibliographic record

Nucl. Med. Rev 2021;24(2):99-103.

Keywords

gastric cancer
PET/CT
[18F]FDG

Authors

Ebru Salmanoglu

References (35)
  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424.
  2. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016; 14(10): 1286–1312.
  3. Minamimoto R, Senda M, Jinnouchi S, et al. Performance profile of a FDG-PET cancer screening program for detecting gastric cancer: results from a nationwide Japanese survey. Jpn J Radiol. 2014; 32(5): 253–259.
  4. Cui J, Zhao P, Ren Z, et al. Evaluation of dual time point imaging 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating malignancy from benign gastric disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(33): e1356.
  5. Ma Q, Xin J, Zhao Z, et al. Value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of primary gastric cancer via stomach distension. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(6): e302–e306.
  6. Choi JY, Shim KN, Kim SE, et al. The clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting regional lymph node metastasis and non-curative surgery in primary gastric carcinoma. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2014; 64(6): 340–347.
  7. Kim HW, Won KS, Song BI, et al. Correlation of primary tumor FDG uptake with histopathologic features of advanced gastric cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 49(2): 135–142.
  8. Lee SJ, Lee WW, Yoon HJ, et al. Regional PET/CT after water gastric inflation for evaluating loco-regional disease of gastric cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(6): 935–942.
  9. Kim J, Lim ST, Na CJ, et al. Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters to evaluate progression-free survival in gastric cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014; 48(1): 33–40.
  10. Lee SY, Seo HJ, Kim S, et al. Prognostic significance of interim F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography volumetric parameters in metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018; 14(5): e302–e309.
  11. Song BI, Kim HW, Won KS, et al. Preoperative standardized uptake value of metastatic lymph nodes measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(26): e1037.
  12. Kwon HW, An L, Kwon HR, et al. Preoperative nodal F-FDG avidity rather than primary tumor avidity determines the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2018; 18(3): 218–229.
  13. Kudou M, Kosuga T, Kubota T, et al. Value of preoperative PET-CT in the prediction of pathological stage of gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(6): 1633–1639.
  14. Serrano OK, Love C, Goldman I, et al. The value of FDG-PET in the staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: A single institution retrospective review. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113(6): 640–646.
  15. Coupe NA, Karikios D, Chong S, et al. Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2014; 28(2): 128–135.
  16. Namikawa T, Okabayshi T, Nogami M, et al. Assessment of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography in the preoperative management of patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014; 19(4): 649–655.
  17. Findlay JM, Antonowicz S, Segaran A, et al. Routinely staging gastric cancer with F-FDG PET-CT detects additional metastases and predicts early recurrence and death after surgery. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(5): 2490–2498.
  18. Wang X, Wei Y, Xue Y, et al. Predictive role of the number of 18f-fdg-positive lymph nodes detected by PET/CT for pre-treatment evaluation of locally advanced gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12): e0166836.
  19. Altini C, Niccoli Asabella A, Di Palo A, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94(20): e864.
  20. Kaneko Y, Murray WK, Link E, et al. Improving patient selection for 18F-FDG PET scanning in the staging of gastric cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015; 56(4): 523–529.
  21. Kawanaka Y, Kitajima K, Fukushima K, et al. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2016; 85(5): 989–995.
  22. Chung HW, Kim JH, Sung IK, et al. FDG PET/CT to predict the curability of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019; 145(3): 759–764.
  23. Lee JW, Lee SM, Son MW, et al. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(5): 881–888.
  24. Lee DY, Lee CH, Seo MJ, et al. Performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as a postoperative surveillance imaging modality for asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2014; 28(8): 789–795.
  25. Kim JH, Heo SH, Kim JW, et al. Evaluation of recurrence in gastric carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23(35): 6448–6456.
  26. Kim SJ, Cho YS, Moon SH, et al. Primary tumor ¹⁸F-FDG avidity affects the performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for detecting gastric cancer recurrence. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(4): 544–550.
  27. Li P, Liu Q, Wang C, et al. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate recurrent gastric cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Nucl Med. 2016; 30(3): 179–187.
  28. Wang C, Guo W, Zhou M, et al. The predictive and prognostic value of early metabolic response assessed by positron emission tomography in advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(7): 1603–1610.
  29. Schneider PM, Eshmuminov D, Rordorf T, et al. FDG-PET-CT identifies histopathological non-responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric and cardia cancer: cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18(1): 548.
  30. Giganti F, De Cobelli F, Canevari C, et al. Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and (18) F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 40(5): 1147–1157.
  31. Park S, Ha S, Kwon HW, et al. Prospective evaluation of changes in tumor size and tumor metabolism in patients with advanced gastric cancer undergoing chemotherapy: association and clinical implication. J Nucl Med. 2017; 58(6): 899–904.
  32. Chen R, Zhou X, Liu J, et al. Relationship between 18F-FDG PET/CT findings and HER2 expression in gastric cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(7): 1040–1044.
  33. Laboissiere RS, Buzelin MA, Balabram D, et al. Association between HER2 status in gastric cancer and clinicopathological features: a retrospective study using whole-tissue sections. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15: 157.
  34. Park JS, Lee N, Beom SH, et al. The prognostic value of volume-based parameters using F-FDG PET/CT in gastric cancer according to HER2 status. Gastric Cancer. 2018; 21(2): 213–224.
  35. Celli R, Colunga M, Patel N, et al. Metabolic signature on 18F-FDG PET/CT, HER2 status, and survival in gastric adenocarcinomas. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016; 44(4): 234–238.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Świętokrzyska 73 street, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone: +48 58 320 94 94, fax: +48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl