Diagnostic sensitivity of three tumour markers in non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study
Abstract
METHODS: In the 24 patients studied, the tumours were classified histologically as 15 squamous cell carcinomas and 9 adenocarcinomas. In 19 cases, the disease was confined to the lung (M0); 5 cases presented with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (M1).
RESULTS: CA125 displayed the best overall sensitivity (62%) and also when only localised disease was evaluated (63%). CA125 was the most sensitive marker for adenocarcinomas (89%), with values differing significantly with histological type (p < 0.005). CYFRA 21.1 was most sensitive in squamous cell carcinomas (53%); this was the only marker which was elevated in all cases involving metastatic disease, and exhibited a significant correlation with stage (p<0.02). CEA presented the poorest overall sensitivity (42%). The overall sensitivity of the three-tumour marker association was 79% and the best combination of two markers was CYFRA 21.1 + CA125 (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study allows recommendation of the associated use of these two markers as first choice of diagnostic aid in non-small cell lung cancer. Further measurements, including specificity studies in benign lung diseases, should be performed to confirm these results.
Abstract
METHODS: In the 24 patients studied, the tumours were classified histologically as 15 squamous cell carcinomas and 9 adenocarcinomas. In 19 cases, the disease was confined to the lung (M0); 5 cases presented with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (M1).
RESULTS: CA125 displayed the best overall sensitivity (62%) and also when only localised disease was evaluated (63%). CA125 was the most sensitive marker for adenocarcinomas (89%), with values differing significantly with histological type (p < 0.005). CYFRA 21.1 was most sensitive in squamous cell carcinomas (53%); this was the only marker which was elevated in all cases involving metastatic disease, and exhibited a significant correlation with stage (p<0.02). CEA presented the poorest overall sensitivity (42%). The overall sensitivity of the three-tumour marker association was 79% and the best combination of two markers was CYFRA 21.1 + CA125 (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study allows recommendation of the associated use of these two markers as first choice of diagnostic aid in non-small cell lung cancer. Further measurements, including specificity studies in benign lung diseases, should be performed to confirm these results.
Keywords
lung cancer; tumour markers; diagnosis; CEA; CA125; CYFRA 21.1
About this articleTitle
Diagnostic sensitivity of three tumour markers in non-small cell lung cancer: a pilot study
Journal
Issue
Pages
139-142
Published online
2003-05-27
Page views
785
Bibliographic record
Nucl. Med. Rev 2000;3(2):139-142.
Keywords
lung cancer
tumour markers
diagnosis
CEA
CA125
CYFRA 21.1
Authors
Ana Lagarde
Tibor Forgách
Dezso Nagy
Katalin Nagy
Szilvia Vasas
Gyozo A. Jánoki
