Vol 4, No 2 (2001)
Brief communication
Published online: 2001-07-23
Pretest clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease and stress myocardial perfusion scintigram.
Nucl. Med. Rev 2001;4(2):89-92.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the probability of perfusion defects at exercise
stress myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigraphy from pretest clinical diagnosis
(medical personal history, previous ergometric investigation). To determine the
value of clinical facors for probability of scintigraphic defects with respect
to avoiding unnecessary investigation in subjects with low probability of abnormal
scintigrams.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 2143 subjects (1235 men, 908 women) were investigated by SPECT perfusion scintigraphy at stepwise increasing exercise stress. They were divided into three groups with regard to their medical history and exercise test at scintigraphy: subjects without any signs of coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with high likelihood of CAD (i.e., typical anginal pain, in particular at stress, positive stress ECG changes, angiographically documented important CAD) and patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Important risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, age and sex), as well as the role of revascularisation procedures, were taken into account for multiple logistic regression in order to express their importance for the odds of scintigraphic defect visualisation.
RESULTS: Perfusion scintigraphic defects (PSD) were found in 5.2% of subjects without signs of CAD, in contrast to patients with manifest CAD (68.8% with PSD) and in those after MI (90.2% with PSD). There were other important factors corroborating the likelihood of PSD (in decreasing order of importance): dia- betes, male, ECG changes at stress, increasing age. Successful revascularisation improved scintigraphic images.
CONCLUSION: The examination of CAD symptom-free subjects, in particular with atypical chest discomfort, is useless. SMPS in patients after documented MI is to be carried out for other intended purposes, not for CAD diagnosis only. SMPS is highly recommended in patients with CAD symptoms and high CAD probability in order to decide further treatment and prognosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 2143 subjects (1235 men, 908 women) were investigated by SPECT perfusion scintigraphy at stepwise increasing exercise stress. They were divided into three groups with regard to their medical history and exercise test at scintigraphy: subjects without any signs of coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with high likelihood of CAD (i.e., typical anginal pain, in particular at stress, positive stress ECG changes, angiographically documented important CAD) and patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Important risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, age and sex), as well as the role of revascularisation procedures, were taken into account for multiple logistic regression in order to express their importance for the odds of scintigraphic defect visualisation.
RESULTS: Perfusion scintigraphic defects (PSD) were found in 5.2% of subjects without signs of CAD, in contrast to patients with manifest CAD (68.8% with PSD) and in those after MI (90.2% with PSD). There were other important factors corroborating the likelihood of PSD (in decreasing order of importance): dia- betes, male, ECG changes at stress, increasing age. Successful revascularisation improved scintigraphic images.
CONCLUSION: The examination of CAD symptom-free subjects, in particular with atypical chest discomfort, is useless. SMPS in patients after documented MI is to be carried out for other intended purposes, not for CAD diagnosis only. SMPS is highly recommended in patients with CAD symptoms and high CAD probability in order to decide further treatment and prognosis.
Keywords: coronary artery diseaseSPECTperfusion scintigraphyprobability
