open access

Vol 72, No 2 (2022)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2022-01-24
Get Citation

Does the culture of science publishing need to change from the status quo principle of “trust me”?

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva1
DOI: 10.5603/NJO.a2022.0001
·
Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2022;72(2):137-138.
Affiliations
  1. Independent researcher, Kagawa-ken, Japan

open access

Vol 72, No 2 (2022)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2022-01-24

Abstract

Not available

Abstract

Not available
Get Citation
About this article
Title

Does the culture of science publishing need to change from the status quo principle of “trust me”?

Journal

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology

Issue

Vol 72, No 2 (2022)

Article type

Letter to the Editor

Pages

137-138

Published online

2022-01-24

Page views

434

Article views/downloads

76

DOI

10.5603/NJO.a2022.0001

Bibliographic record

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2022;72(2):137-138.

Authors

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

References (14)
  1. Komorowski A. Reviewers just don’t care anymore. Nowotwory J Oncol. 2021; 71(5): 312–313.
  2. Ożegalska-Trybalska J. Prostate cancer in women – a rare medical event or a new disease of peer-reviewed science publications? Nowotwory J Oncol. 2021; 71(5): 314–315.
  3. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Al-Khatib A. Legends in science: from boom to bust. Publ Res Quart. 2016; 32(4): 313–318.
  4. Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P. The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6): e0127502.
  5. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J, Tsigaris P, et al. Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment. J Acad Libr. 2019; 45(6): 102071.
  6. Teixeira da Silva JA, Katavić V. Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry. Ethics & Bioethics. 2016; 6(3-4): 203–209.
  7. Gehlbach H, Robinson C. From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond. Educ Psychologist. 2021; 56(2): 79–89.
  8. Errington TM, Mathur M, Soderberg CK, et al. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. eLife. 2021; 10.
  9. Teixeira da Silva JA. Issues and challenges to reproducibility of cancer research: a commentary. Future Oncol. 2022 [Epub ahead of print].
  10. Hicks DJ. Open science, the replication crisis, and environmental public health. Account Res. 2021 [Epub ahead of print]: 1–29.
  11. Rivera H, Teixeira da Silva JA. Retractions, fake peer review, and paper mills. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(24): e165.
  12. Teixeira da Silva JA. A reality check on publishing integrity tools in biomedical science. Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 40(5): 2113–2114.
  13. Teixeira da Silva JA. A dangerous triangularization of conflicting values in academic publishing: ORCID, fake authors, and risks with the lack of criminalization of the creators of fake elements. Epistēmēs Metron Logos. 2021(7): 1.
  14. Teixeira da Silva JA, Al-Khatib A. Ending the retraction stigma: Encouraging the reporting of errors in the biomedical record. Res Ethics. 2019; 17(2): 251–259.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Wydawcą serwisu jest VM Media sp. z o.o. VM Group sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl