open access

Vol 71, No 1 (2021)
Review paper
Published online: 2021-02-05
Get Citation

Fundamentals of personalised medicine in colorectal cancer

Gabriela Janus-Szymańska12, Anna Doraczyńska-Kowalik12, Marek Bębenek2, Emilia Cisarz2, Justyna Gil1
·
Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2021;71(1):52-61.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Genetics, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  2. Lower Silesian Oncology Centre in Wroclaw, Poland

open access

Vol 71, No 1 (2021)
Genetics and oncology
Published online: 2021-02-05

Abstract

Personalised treatment which is a dynamically developing branch of medicine, is based on individualisation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Its aim is to optimise treatment by increasing therapy effectiveness, while minimising side effects. It is designed both for patients with a diagnosed hereditary cancer syndrome, as well as those with sporadic cancers. In the case of a diagnosed colorectal cancer, personalised treatment requires patient selection based on predictive factors. This involves determination of the genetic status within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway, including assessment of the cancer tissue genotype with respect to RAS gene mutations (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF gene mutations. In patients who do not respond to anti-EGFR targeted therapy, chemotherapy aimed at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is introduced. In personalised medicine it is also essential to introduce prophylactic and therapeutic measures, both in carriers of germline mutations, and members of their families who have not been diagnosed with this mutation, but who meet family history and clinical criteria of hereditary cancer syndrome.

Abstract

Personalised treatment which is a dynamically developing branch of medicine, is based on individualisation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Its aim is to optimise treatment by increasing therapy effectiveness, while minimising side effects. It is designed both for patients with a diagnosed hereditary cancer syndrome, as well as those with sporadic cancers. In the case of a diagnosed colorectal cancer, personalised treatment requires patient selection based on predictive factors. This involves determination of the genetic status within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway, including assessment of the cancer tissue genotype with respect to RAS gene mutations (KRAS, NRAS) and BRAF gene mutations. In patients who do not respond to anti-EGFR targeted therapy, chemotherapy aimed at vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is introduced. In personalised medicine it is also essential to introduce prophylactic and therapeutic measures, both in carriers of germline mutations, and members of their families who have not been diagnosed with this mutation, but who meet family history and clinical criteria of hereditary cancer syndrome.

Get Citation

Keywords

personalised medicine; colorectal cancer; hereditary cancer syndrome; germline mutation; somatic mutation; epidermal growth factor EGFR; RAS; BRAF

About this article
Title

Fundamentals of personalised medicine in colorectal cancer

Journal

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology

Issue

Vol 71, No 1 (2021)

Article type

Review paper

Pages

52-61

Published online

2021-02-05

Page views

679

Article views/downloads

802

DOI

10.5603/NJO.2021.0010

Bibliographic record

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2021;71(1):52-61.

Keywords

personalised medicine
colorectal cancer
hereditary cancer syndrome
germline mutation
somatic mutation
epidermal growth factor EGFR
RAS
BRAF

Authors

Gabriela Janus-Szymańska
Anna Doraczyńska-Kowalik
Marek Bębenek
Emilia Cisarz
Justyna Gil

References (28)
  1. Krajowy Rejestr Chorób Nowotworowych. http://onkologia.org.pl/nowotwory-zlosliwe-jelita-grubego-c18-21/.
  2. Gil J, Stembalska A, Łaczmańska I, et al. Sporadic colorectal cancer – factors modulating individual susceptibility to cancer. Współczesna Onkologia. 2010; 3: 123–128.
  3. Stembalska A, Pesz K, Sąsiadek M. Onkogenetyka. Teoria i praktyka kliniczna. Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Śląskich, Wrocław 2015: 36–45.
  4. Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM, et al. American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(2): 223–62; quiz 263.
  5. Hegde M, Ferber M, Mao R, et al. ACMG technical standards and guidelines for genetic testing for inherited colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis). Genet Med. 2014; 16(1): 101–116.
  6. Stjepanovic N, Moreira L, Carneiro F, et al. Hereditary gastrointestinal cancers: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019; 30(10): 1558–1571.
  7. Soravia C, Bapat B, Cohen Z. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hFamilial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a review of clinical, genetic and therapeutic aspects. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1997; 127(16): 682–690.
  8. Kohlmann W, Gruber SB. Lynch Syndrome. 2004 Feb 5 [Updated 2018 Apr 12]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA. ed. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle 1993–2020.
  9. Watson P, Vasen HFA, Mecklin JP, et al. The risk of extra-colonic, extra-endometrial cancer in the Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer. 2008; 123(2): 444–449.
  10. Firth H, Hurst J. Clinical Genetics and Genomics (Oxford Desk Reference). 2017.
  11. Hegde M, Ferber M, Mao R, et al. Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. ACMG technical standards and guidelines for genetic testing for inherited colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and MYH-associated polyposis). Genet Med. 2014; 16(1): 101–116.
  12. Vasen HFA, Blanco I, Aktan-Collan K, et al. Mallorca group. Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts. Gut. 2013; 62(6): 812–823.
  13. Bellizzi AM, Frankel WL. Colorectal cancer due to deficiency in DNA mismatch repair function: a review. Adv Anat Pathol. 2009; 16(6): 405–417.
  14. van der Klift H, Wijnen J, Wagner A, et al. Molecular characterization of the spectrum of genomic deletions in the mismatch repair genes MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 responsible for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005; 44(2): 123–138.
  15. Załącznik 2a. https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/modul-ii-wczesne-wykrywanie-i-prewencja-nowotworow-zlosliwych-w-rodzinach-wysokiego-dziedzicznie-uwarunkowanego-ryzyka-zachorowania-na-raka-jelita-grubego-i-blony-sluzowej-trzonu-macicy-na-lata-2019-2021.
  16. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines); Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal; 2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_colon.pdf.
  17. Jasperson KW, Patel SG, Ahnen DJ. APC-Associated Polyposis Conditions. 1998 Dec 18 [Updated 2017 Feb 2]. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA. ed. GeneReviews® [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle 1993–2020.
  18. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of pa-tients with dominantly inherited colorectal cancer (FAP and HNPCC). Available online. 2003. (08.06.2020).
  19. Lubiński J. et al. Genetyka kliniczna nowotworów. Print Group Sp. z o.o., Szczecin 2015: 135–154.
  20. Sąsiadek M, Łaczmańska I, Maciejczyk A, et al. Fundamentals of personalised medicine in genetic testing-based oncology. Nowotwory J Oncol. 2020; 70(4): 144–149.
  21. Łacko A, Ekiert M, Soter K. Czynniki predykcyjne u chorych na raka jelita grubego podda-wanych terapii ukierunkowanej na receptor czynnika wzrostu naskórka (EGFR). Onkol Prakt Klin. 2011; 7(4): 224–229.
  22. Cutsem EV, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(8): 1386–1422.
  23. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, et al. ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25 Suppl 3: iii1–iii9.
  24. Van Cutsem E, Lenz HJ, Köhne CH, et al. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(7): 692–700.
  25. Pietrantonio F, Petrelli F, Coinu A, et al. Predictive role of BRAF mutations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab and panitumumab: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(5): 587–594.
  26. Hamada T, Nowak JA, Ogino S. PIK3CA mutation and colorectal cancer precision medicine. Oncotarget. 2017; 8(14): 22305–22306.
  27. Krakowska M, Potemski P. New treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Poland. Oncol Clin Prakt. 2017; 13(4): 156–160.
  28. Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Syrigos K, et al. FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Br J Cancer. 2006; 94(6): 798–805.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Wydawcą serwisu jest VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl