open access

Vol 66, No 6 (2016)
Research paper (original)
Published online: 2017-06-12
Get Citation

Comparison of 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques in radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy patients with a higher risk of nodal involvement

Maria Poncyljusz1, Paweł Kukołowicz1, Joanna Chorąży1, Beata Czyżew1, Anna Jankowska1, Anna Paciorkiewicz1, Piotr Pęczkowski1, Małgorzata Pilichowska1, Anna Zawadzka1
·
Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2016;66(6):440-444.
Affiliations
  1. Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland, Poland

open access

Vol 66, No 6 (2016)
Original article
Published online: 2017-06-12

Abstract

Background. Irradiation of a larger volume of the target may lead to an increase of the doses delivered to the surrounding organs at risk (OAR) for post-prostatectomy patients with a higher risk of nodal involvement. It was anticipated that IMRT significantly improved OAR sparing. The aim of this study was to provide a dosimetric comparison between conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans for patients with prostate cancer irradiated to the prostate bed and pelvic lymph-nodal area.

Materials and methods. The 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were created for ten patients after prostatectomy. The treatment plans were generated for the prostate bed (PTV1) and the pelvic lymph nodes (PTV2). The sum of PTV1 and PTV2 was irradiated to a mean dose of 46 Gy in 23 fractions, and additionally PTV1 was irradiated to a mean dose of 18 Gy in 9 fractions. Target coverage and the doses delivered to the pelvic bones, the rectum, the bladder, the bowel bag, and the femurs, were compared between techniques. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters.

Results. The dosimetric quality of 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were comparable for target coverage (the mean value of PTV1 V95%, the mean value of PTV2 V95% all > 99%). The IMRT plans resulted in significant reductions in the pelvic bones V30[%], V40[%], the rectum V40[%], V50[%], V60[%], the bladder V40[%], V50[%], V60[%], the bowel bag V45[cc] and the femurs V40[%].

Conclusions. The analysis presented in this paper demonstrates that the IMRT technique reduces the delivered dose to the OARs. Most interesting was the possibility of reducing the delivered dose to the pelvic bones and the bowel bag. This allowed us to expect a decreased risk of acute hematologic toxicity and acute gastrointestinal toxicity.

Abstract

Background. Irradiation of a larger volume of the target may lead to an increase of the doses delivered to the surrounding organs at risk (OAR) for post-prostatectomy patients with a higher risk of nodal involvement. It was anticipated that IMRT significantly improved OAR sparing. The aim of this study was to provide a dosimetric comparison between conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans for patients with prostate cancer irradiated to the prostate bed and pelvic lymph-nodal area.

Materials and methods. The 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were created for ten patients after prostatectomy. The treatment plans were generated for the prostate bed (PTV1) and the pelvic lymph nodes (PTV2). The sum of PTV1 and PTV2 was irradiated to a mean dose of 46 Gy in 23 fractions, and additionally PTV1 was irradiated to a mean dose of 18 Gy in 9 fractions. Target coverage and the doses delivered to the pelvic bones, the rectum, the bladder, the bowel bag, and the femurs, were compared between techniques. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the dosimetric parameters.

Results. The dosimetric quality of 3D-CRT and IMRT plans were comparable for target coverage (the mean value of PTV1 V95%, the mean value of PTV2 V95% all > 99%). The IMRT plans resulted in significant reductions in the pelvic bones V30[%], V40[%], the rectum V40[%], V50[%], V60[%], the bladder V40[%], V50[%], V60[%], the bowel bag V45[cc] and the femurs V40[%].

Conclusions. The analysis presented in this paper demonstrates that the IMRT technique reduces the delivered dose to the OARs. Most interesting was the possibility of reducing the delivered dose to the pelvic bones and the bowel bag. This allowed us to expect a decreased risk of acute hematologic toxicity and acute gastrointestinal toxicity.

Get Citation

Keywords

postoperative radiotherapy, prostate cancer, intensity modulated radiotherapy, hematologic toxicity

About this article
Title

Comparison of 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques in radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy patients with a higher risk of nodal involvement

Journal

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology

Issue

Vol 66, No 6 (2016)

Article type

Research paper (original)

Pages

440-444

Published online

2017-06-12

Page views

583

Article views/downloads

1367

DOI

10.5603/NJO.2016.0079

Bibliographic record

Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2016;66(6):440-444.

Keywords

postoperative radiotherapy
prostate cancer
intensity modulated radiotherapy
hematologic toxicity

Authors

Maria Poncyljusz
Paweł Kukołowicz
Joanna Chorąży
Beata Czyżew
Anna Jankowska
Anna Paciorkiewicz
Piotr Pęczkowski
Małgorzata Pilichowska
Anna Zawadzka

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Wydawcą serwisu jest VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl