Online first
Review paper
Published online: 2025-03-27

open access

Page views 50
Article views/downloads 42
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The actual approach of sentinel node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma

Maria Szymaniak1, Julia A. Janecka1, Wiktor Grabek1, Jan Radomski1, Kinga Flisiewicz-Wysocka1, Karolina Mizera1, Mateusz Wichtowski1

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a well-established standard of care in melanoma treatment, but its role is evolving. Before the advent of modern systemic therapies, SLNB was critical in identifying which patients would benefit from complementary lymphadenectomy and which would not require this procedure.

Currently, after a positive sentinel node biopsy, lymphadenectomy is no longer performed, altering the procedure's significance. The SLNB identifies patients who will benefit from adjuvant treatment. Additionally, it enhances control over locoregional lymphatic flow. As for now, there is no alternative to sentinel node biopsy.

The gold standard for marking sentinel nodes in melanoma remains the dual radioisotope-dye method, using lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT-CT.

There is ongoing research for new tracers that might replace this method, likely ferromagnetic tracers, which have shown non-inferiority in breast cancer, have not yet proven to be of comparable value in melanoma, due to unpredictable lymphatic drainage, which required preoperative imaging.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Rutkowski P, Wysocki P, Kozak K, et al. Expert recommendations on diagnostic-therapeutic management of melanoma patients. Oncol Clin Pract. 2022; 18(6): 357–392.
  2. Rutkowki P, Owczarek W. Biblioteka Chirurga Onkologa. Tom 16. Atlas zmian nowotworowych skóry. Wydanie II. Via Medica, Gdańsk 2023.
  3. Rahib L, Wehner MR, Matrisian LM, et al. Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(4): e214708.
  4. Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA. Melanoma Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition and Beyond. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(8): 2105–2110.
  5. Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 80(1): 208–250.
  6. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(36): 6199–6206.
  7. Nagore E, Moro R. Surgical procedures in melanoma: recommended deep and lateral margins, indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and complete lymph node dissection. Ital J Dermatol Venerol. 2021; 156(3): 331–343.
  8. Allard-Coutu A, Heller B, Francescutti V. Surgical Management of Lymph Nodes in Melanoma. Surg Clin North Am. 2020; 100(1): 71–90.
  9. Swetter SM, Thompson JA, Albertini MR, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(4): 364–376.
  10. Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, et al. German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG). Complete lymph node dissection versus no dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy positive melanoma (DeCOG-SLT): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(6): 757–767.
  11. Bello DM, Faries MB. The Landmark Series: MSLT-1, MSLT-2 and DeCOG (Management of Lymph Nodes). Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27(1): 15–21.
  12. Varey AHR, Thompson JF, Howle JR, et al. Has the advent of modern adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma rendered sentinel node biopsy unnecessary? Eur J Cancer. 2023; 186: 166–171.
  13. El-Maraghi RH, Kielar AZ. PET vs sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging melanoma: a patient intervention, comparison, outcome analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008; 5(8): 924–931.
  14. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992; 127(4): 392–399.
  15. Niebling MG, Pleijhuis RG, Bastiaannet E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analyses of sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer and melanoma, a plea for tracer mapping. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42(4): 466–473.
  16. Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005; 242(3): 302–11; discussion 311.
  17. Barthelmes L, Goyal A, Newcombe RG, et al. NEW START and ALMANAC study groups. Adverse reactions to patent blue V dye - The NEW START and ALMANAC experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010; 36(4): 399–403.
  18. Leong SP, Donegan E, Heffernon W, et al. Adverse reactions to isosulfan blue during selective sentinel lymph node dissection in melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000; 7(5): 361–366.
  19. Rychlik A, Zalewski K. Tracers and corresponding detection devices: technetium colloids, blue dyes & NIR fluorescence. Chin Clin Oncol. 2021; 10(2): 16.
  20. Mariani G, Erba P, Manca G, et al. Radioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma: the nuclear medicine contribution. J Surg Oncol. 2004; 85(3): 141–151.
  21. Wilhelm AJ, Mijnhout GS, Franssen EJ. Radiopharmaceuticals in sentinel lymph-node detection - an overview. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999; 26(4 Suppl): S36–S42.
  22. Maffioli L, Sturm E, Roselli M, et al. State of the art of sentinel node biopsy in oncology. Tumori. 2000; 86(4): 263–272.
  23. Thompson JF, London K, Uren RF, et al. Same-day or next-day sentinel node biopsy after lymphoscintigraphy for melanoma using Tc-labelled antimony sulphide colloid. Br J Surg. 2020; 107(13): 1773–1779.
  24. Sondak VK, King DW, Zager JS, et al. Combined analysis of phase III trials evaluating [⁹⁹mTc]tilmanocept and vital blue dye for identification of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(2): 680–688.
  25. Upadhyaya SN, Knackstedt RW, Ko JS, et al. The use and technique of sentinel node biopsy for skin cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149(5): 995e–9951008e.
  26. Doepker MP, Yamamoto M, Applebaum MA, et al. Comparison of single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and conventional planar lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node localization in patients with cutaneous malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 24(2): 355–361.
  27. Brănişteanu DE, Cozmin M, Porumb-Andrese E, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Melanoma, a Clinical Point of View. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(11).
  28. Piñero-Madrona A, Nicolás-Ruiz F, Rull-Ortuño R, et al. Correlation between ferromagnetic and isotopic tracers for sentinel lymph node detection in cutaneous melanoma: IMINEM study. J Surg Oncol. 2021; 123(2): 654–659.
  29. Health C for Dond R „Magtrace and sentimag magnetic localization system - P160053/S002” FDA published online December 22, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/recently-approved-devices/magtrace-and-sentimag-magnetic-localization-system-p160053s002 (March 28, 2024).
  30. Hersi AF, Eriksson S, Ramos J, et al. A combined, totally magnetic technique with a magnetic marker for non-palpable tumour localization and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019; 45(4): 544–549.
  31. Aldenhoven L, Frotscher C, Körver-Steeman R, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping with superparamagnetic iron oxide for melanoma: a pilot study in healthy participants to establish an optimal MRI workflow protocol. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1): 1062.
  32. Mirzaei N, Katsarelias D, Zaar P, et al. Sentinel lymph node localization and staging with a low-dose of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) enhanced MRI and magnetometer in patients with cutaneous melanoma of the extremity - The MAGMEN feasibility study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022; 48(2): 326–332.
  33. Piñero-Madrona A, Torró-Richart JA, de León-Carrillo JM, et al. Grupo de Estudios Senológicos de la Sociedad Española de Patologia Mamaria (SESPM). Superparamagnetic iron oxide as a tracer for sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer: A comparative non-inferiority study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015; 41(8): 991–997.
  34. Alvarado MD, Mittendorf EA, Teshome M, et al. SentimagIC: a non-inferiority trial comparing superparamagnetic iron oxide versus technetium-99m and blue dye in the detection of axillary sentinel nodes in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26(11): 3510–3516.
  35. Douek M, Klaase J, Monypenny I, et al. SentiMAG Trialists Group. Sentinel node biopsy using a magnetic tracer versus standard technique: the SentiMAG Multicentre Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(4): 1237–1245.
  36. Anninga B, White SH, Moncrieff M, et al. MELAMAG Multicentre Trialists Group. Magnetic technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma: the MELAMAG trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23(6): 2070–2078.
  37. Fadel MG, Rauf S, Mohamed HS, et al. The use of indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging versus blue dye in sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: a retrospective, cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(7): 4333–4340.
  38. Morrison S, Han D. Re-evaluation of sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2021; 22(3): 22.
  39. Kulbat A, Richter K, Krzysztofik M, et al. Melanoma incidence in 17,252 organ transplant recipients in Poland in 2010–2022. Nowotwory. J Oncol. 2024.
  40. Olivier F, Courtois A, Jossa V, et al. Sentinel lymph node mapping with patent blue dye in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective single institution study. Gland Surg. 2021; 10(9): 2600–2607.
  41. Luke JJ, Ascierto PA, Khattak MA, et al. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: final analysis of distant metastasis-free survival in the phase III KEYNOTE-716 study. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(14): 1619–1624.
  42. Kirkwood JM, Del Vecchio M, Weber J, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected stage IIB/C melanoma: primary results from the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 76K trial. Nat Med. 2023; 29(11): 2835–2843.
  43. Weber J, Mandala M, Vecchio MD, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III or IV Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(19): 1824–1835.
  44. Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, et al. EORTC Melanoma Group. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(5): 643–654.
  45. Thao V, Dholakia R, Moriarty JP, et al. Cost evaluation of the Merlin assay for predicting melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy metastasis. Int J Dermatol. 2023; 62(1): 56–61.