Vol 74, No 4 (2024)
Research paper (original)
Published online: 2024-09-02

open access

Page views 259
Article views/downloads 104
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Cancer-dedicated infrastructures (CDIs) and associated risks for its user — the link between architecture and cancer

Rafael J. Salas Carretero12, Mariola W. Borowska2
Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology 2024;74(4):271-285.

Abstract

Introduction.In recent decades, significant advancements in oncological treatments, technology, survivorship rates, screening behaviors, and healthcare support services have occurred. Yet, there has been minimal research on the architectural design of spaces where these processes occur, their characteristics, evolution, and adaptation; this makes it difficult to understand how it impacts healthcare provision and reception. This systematic review aims to explore the impact of cancer-dedicated infrastructure (CDI) on user outcomes, identify key variables, and emphasize the importance of the care environment.

Material and methods.Our literature review on this association identified 13 relevant articles. However, increasing interest suggests opportunities for exploration.

Results.Findings indicate that architectural characteristics, spatial features, and physical elements influence patient health outcomes and users’ performance.

Conclusions.However, generalizability is constrained by the early stage of spatial analysis and sparse evidence. This review underscores the untapped potential of studying CDI architecture and integrating it as a variable to enhance the overall healthcare experience.  

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Goldberg K. Which cancer center was first? The answer depends on what you mean by “cancer center.” The cancer letter [Internet]. 2021 Jul 9; 47(27). https://cancerletter.com/in-the-archives/20210709_6/ (07.05.2024).
  2. IARC. Trends in Cancer Data Visualization [Internet]. Cancer over time; 2024. https://gco.iarc.fr/overtime/en/dataviz/trends?populations=12400_11200_20800_20300_19100_57800_61600_47000_44000_42800&sexes=1&cohort=period&cancers=0&multiple_populations=1.
  3. Evans J, Reyers E. Patient room considerations in the intensive care unit: caregiver, patient, family. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014; 37(1): 83–92.
  4. Rashid M. Two decades (1993-2012) of adult intensive care unit design: a comparative study of the physical design features of the best practice examples. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2014; 37(1): 3–32.
  5. Stichler JF. Is your hospital hospitable? How physical environment influences patient safety. Nurs Womens Health. 2007; 11(5): 506–511.
  6. Onishi H, Ishida M, Kawada S. [The importance of psycho-oncology]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2012; 39(3): 331–336.
  7. Wood H, Connors S, Dogan S, et al. Individual experiences and impacts of a physiotherapist-led, non-pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy: a qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2013; 27(6): 499–507.
  8. Ulrich RS. Effects of interior design on wellness: theory and recent scientific research. J Health Care Inter Des. 1991; 3: 97–109.
  9. Ulrich R, Simons R, Losito B, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1991; 11(3): 201–230.
  10. Ulrich RS, Zimring C, Zhu X, et al. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD. 2008; 1(3): 61–125.
  11. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021.
  12. ASReview LAB developers. ASReview LAB Software Documentation. 2023 Nov 2. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.4287119 (08.07.2024).
  13. Schoot Rv, Bruin Jde, Schram R, et al. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2021; 3(2): 125–133.
  14. Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel [Internet]. Redmon, WA; 2018. https://office.microsoft.com/excel.
  15. Wang Z, Pukszta M. Private Rooms, Semi-Open Areas, or Open Areas for Chemotherapy Care: Perspectives of Cancer Patients, Families, and Nursing Staff. HERD. 2018; 11(3): 94–108.
  16. Jalalianhosseini M, Freihoefer K, Doyle N, et al. The Impact of Infusion Center Layout on Workflow and Satisfactions in Two Cancer Infusion Centers: A Case Study on Staff and Patients. HERD. 2020; 13(3): 70–83.
  17. de Matos LB, Fumis RR, Nassar Junior AP, et al. Single-Bed or Multibed Room Designs Influence ICU Staff Stress and Family Satisfaction, But Do Not Influence ICU Staff Burnout. HERD. 2020; 13(2): 234–242.
  18. Caruso P, Guardian L, Tiengo T, et al. ICU architectural design affects the delirium prevalence: a comparison between single-bed and multibed rooms*. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42(10): 2204–2210.
  19. Rowlands J, Noble S. How does the environment impact on the quality of life of advanced cancer patients? A qualitative study with implications for ward design. Palliat Med. 2008; 22(6): 768–774.
  20. Blaschke S, O'Callaghan CC, Schofield P. "Artificial But Better Than Nothing". HERD. 2017; 10(3): 51–60.
  21. Cooper MC, Valente R. Healing gardens: design processes and realizations of beneficial environments. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment. 2015: 180–190.
  22. Tinner M, Crovella P, Rosenbaum PF. Perceived Importance of Wellness Features at a Cancer Center: Patient and Staff Perspectives. HERD. 2018; 11(3): 80–93.
  23. Gronostajska J, Czajka R. Architecture therapy: principles of designing and shaping space in centres for cancer patients, based on the architecture of Maggie's Centres. BUILDER. 2021; 284(3): 64–68.
  24. Guevara D. Specialty Space: Breast Care Centers. HERD. 2021; 14(3): 358–373.
  25. Jellema P, Annemans M, Heylighen A. Foregrounding the built environment in the experience of cancer care: A qualitative study of autobiographical cancer narratives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019; 28(6): e13156.
  26. Bloom M, Markovitz S, Silverman S, et al. Ten trends transforming cancer care and their effects on space planning for academic medical centers. HERD. 2015; 8(2): 85–94.
  27. English J, Wilson K, Keller-Olaman S. Health, healing and recovery: therapeutic landscapes and the everyday lives of breast cancer survivors. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(1): 68–78.
  28. Norouzi N, Martinez A, Rico Z. Architectural Design Qualities of an Adolescent Psychiatric Hospital to Benefit Patients and Staff. HERD. 2023; 16(4): 103–117.
  29. Przesmycka N, Strojny R. Architectural solutions of contemporary pediatric hospitals – a study of selected projects. BUILDER. 2021; 284(3): 88–91.
  30. Al-Shamsi HO. The State of Cancer Care in the United Arab Emirates in 2022. Clin Pract. 2022; 12(6): 955–985.
  31. Berns A, Ringborg U, Celis JE, et al. Towards a cancer mission in Horizon Europe: recommendations. Mol Oncol. 2020; 14(8): 1589–1615.
  32. Liu M, Yu Q, Liu Y. Developing quality indicators for cancer hospitals in China: a national modified Delphi process. BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4): e082930.
  33. National Cancer Institute. Global Oncology Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from 2021.