Vol 53, No 1 (2019)
Research Paper
Published online: 2019-01-04

open access

Page views 2068
Article views/downloads 1572
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Stroke and TIA mimics in patients referred to a neurological emergency department by non-ambulance physicians, ambulance physicians and paramedics

Dorota Kozera-Strzelińska1, Michał Karliński1, Grzegorz Rak2, Magdalena Wojdacz1, Halina Sienkiewicz-Jarosz3, Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzębska1
Pubmed: 30614515
Neurol Neurochir Pol 2019;53(1):83-89.

Abstract

Introduction. Our aim was to compare the structure and management of conditions mimicking acute cerebrovascular events (ACE) defined as stroke or transient ischaemic attack between patients referred directly to a neurological emergency department (ED) by non-ambulance physicians, ambulance physicians and paramedics.

Methods. This is a retrospective study of 802 consecutive patients referred to a Polish urban neurological ED with a prehospital suspicion of ACE between January and December 2014.

Results. After proper neurological assessment, ACE was excluded in 258 (32.2%) patients. The ratios of neurological to non--neurological ACE mimics were similar across all groups (35:93 for non-ambulance physicians, 22:39 for ambulance physicians, and 28:39 for paramedics). The most frequent conditions mimicking ACE were vertigo (14.0%), headache (9.7%), seizures (7.0%), blood hypertension (7.0%), electrolyte and metabolic disturbances (5.4%), infections (4.7%) and syncope (4.3%). There were no major differences between patients with ACE-mimics referred by ambulance physicians and referred by paramedics in terms of demographic, previous medical history, extent of diagnostic workup, final diagnosis or further management (neurological admission in 42.6% and 28.4% of cases). However, the characteristics and management of ACE mimics referred by non-ambulance physicians were slightly different, including a lower need for hospital admission (neurological admission in 21.5% of cases).

Conclusions. There seem to be no major differences in the structure, early diagnostic approach or management of ACE mimics between referrals from ambulance physicians and ambulance paramedics, which provides reassurance to healthcare systems that rely solely on paramedics. Mimics referred by non ambulance physicians appear different in structure and are less resource-consuming.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018; 49: e46–e110.
  2. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, et al. Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Mimics: Prospective 5-Year Study and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2015; 46(5): 1281–1287.
  3. Nguyen PL, Chang JJ. Stroke Mimics and Acute Stroke Evaluation: Clinical Differentiation and Complications after Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator. J Emerg Med. 2015; 49(2): 244–252.
  4. Mehta S, Vora N, Edgell RC, et al. Stroke mimics under the drip-and-ship paradigm. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014; 23(5): 844–849.
  5. Huff JS. Stroke mimics and chameleons. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2002; 20(3): 583–595.
  6. Karliński M, Gluszkiewicz M, Członkowska A. The accuracy of prehospital diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular accidents: an observational study. Arch Med Sci. 2015; 11(3): 530–535.
  7. Liberman AL, Prabhakaran S. Stroke Chameleons and Stroke Mimics in the Emergency Department. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017; 17(15): 1–11.
  8. Förster A, Griebe M, Wolf ME, et al. How to identify stroke mimics in patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis? J Neurol. 2012; 259(7): 1347–1353.
  9. Vilela P. Acute stroke differential diagnosis: Stroke mimics. Eur J Radiol. 2017; 96: 133–144.
  10. Harbison J, Hossain O, Jenkinson D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stroke referrals from primary care, emergency room physicians, and ambulance staff using the face arm speech test. Stroke. 2003; 34(1): 71–76.
  11. Rizos T, Ringleb PA, Huttner HB, et al. Evolution of stroke diagnosis in the emergency room--a prospective observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 28(5): 448–453.
  12. Kostulas N, Larsson M, Kall TB, et al. Safety of thrombolysis in stroke mimics: an observational cohort study from an urban teaching hospital in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(10): e016311.
  13. Elm Ev, Altman D, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. The Lancet. 2007; 370(9596): 1453–1457.
  14. Postępowanie w udarze mózgu – wytyczne grupy ekspertów sekcji chorób naczyniowych polskiego towarzystwa neurologicznego. Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska. 2012; 46(1): 16–19.
  15. Kernan W, Ovbiagele B, Black H, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke. 2014; 45(7): 2160–2236.
  16. Easton J, Saver J, Albers G, et al. Definition and Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke. 2009; 40(6): 2276–2293.
  17. Guillan M, Alonso-Canovas A, Gonzalez-Valcarcel J, et al. Stroke mimics treated with thrombolysis: further evidence on safety and distinctive clinical features. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 34(2): 115–120.
  18. Girot M, Marc JB, Wiel E, et al. Impact on patient management of the implementation of a magnetic resonance imaging dedicated to neurological emergencies. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017: 1–7.
  19. Nadarajan V, Perry RJ, Johnson J, et al. Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol. 2014; 14(1): 23–31.
  20. Piliszek A, Witkowski G, Sklinda K, et al. Comprehensive imaging of stroke - Looking for the gold standard. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2016; 50(4): 241–250.
  21. Danière F, Edjlali-Goujon M, Mellerio C, et al. MR screening of candidates for thrombolysis: How to identify stroke mimics? J Neuroradiol. 2014; 41(5): 283–295.
  22. Khan NI, Chaku S, Goehl C, et al. Novel Algorithm to Help Identify Stroke Mimics. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017: 3–8.
  23. Watts J, Wood B, Kelly A, et al. Stroke syndromes associated with DWI-negative MRI include ataxic hemiparesis and isolated internuclear ophthalmoplegia. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013; 3(3): 186–191.
  24. Morita S, Suzuki M, Iizuka K. False-negative diffusion-weighted MRI in acute cerebellar stroke. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011; 38(5): 577–582.
  25. Oppenheim C, Stanescu R, Dormont D, et al. False-negative diffusion-weighted MR findings in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000; 21(8): 1434–1440.
  26. Libman RB, Wirkowski E, Alvir J, et al. Conditions that mimic stroke in the emergency department. Implications for acute stroke trials. Arch Neurol. 1995; 52(11): 1119–1122.
  27. Hosseininezhad M, Sohrabnejad R. Stroke mimics in patients with clinical signs of stroke. Caspian J Intern Med. 2017; 8(3): 213–216.
  28. Anathhanam S, Hassan A. Mimics and chameleons in stroke. Clin Med (Lond). 2017; 17(2): 156–160.
  29. Uchino K, Massaro L, Hammer M. Transient Ischemic Attack after Tissue Plasminogen Activator: Aborted Stroke or Unnecessary Stroke Therapy? Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2009; 29(1): 57–61.
  30. Vargas M, Costa M, Melo TP, et al. Increase in the Admission of Stroke Mimics after Change in Emergency Shifts. Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2017; 44(1-2): 68–74.
  31. Gropen TI, Gokaldas R, Poleshuck R, et al. Factors related to the sensitivity of emergency medical service impression of stroke. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014; 18(3): 387–392.