Vol 7, No 3 (2022)
Original article
Published online: 2022-08-18

open access

Page views 3906
Article views/downloads 314
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The impact of knowledge on the functioning of patients with coronary artery disease

Piotr Michalski1, Michał Kasprzak2, Agata Kosobucka-Ozdoba1, Łukasz Pietrzykowski1, Magadalena Kieszkowska3, Anna Bączkowska4, Aldona Kubica1
Medical Research Journal 2022;7(3):223-227.


Introduction: The functioning of patients with chronic disease is inseparably connected with the understanding of the essence of the disease, acceptance of the disease, and taking measures leading to achieving the best possible treatment results.

Aim of the study: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of patients’ knowledge on their functioning in coronary artery disease, which was assessed with the aid of the tool ‘The Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale’ (FCIS).

Materials and methods: A single-centre prospective, observational study was conducted on 202 patients hospitalized due to coronary artery disease. In the study, patients’ knowledge was assessed (subjective method: self-assessment report; objective method: an APK questionnaire which assesses familiarity with symptoms, knowledge about the disease and disease prevention), as well as the functioning in a chronic illness (FCIS scale which checks the impact of a disease on the patient, the influence of the patient on the disease and the impact of a disease on attitudes).

Results: The distribution of FCIS results varied depending on self-assessment regarding the level of know- ledge (p = 0.04). High result was achieved by 27% respondents who declared a sufficient level of knowledge, and 38% of those respondents who declared insufficient knowledge. The analysis of the impact of knowledge on various areas of functioning in coronary artery disease has shown that patients with a higher level of knowledge about the disease and its prevention achieved better results in the subscale which evaluates patients’ opinion on the possibility of influencing the course of disease (p = 0.039). This observation was confirmed by a weak positive correlation (R = 0.193; p = 0.006).

Discussion and conclusions: Reliable information about a disease, available therapeutic plans and prevention procedures help patients understand their health condition and let them take decisions with full awareness. The correlation noticed in the study between patients’ knowledge resources regarding the disease and its prevention and their convictions about the possibilities of having influence on the course of the disease is a strong argument supporting the claim that conducting coordinated educational interventions for patients with coronary artery disease is a legitimate task.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Hawkes AL, Patrao TA, Ware R, et al. Predictors of physical and mental health-related quality of life outcomes among myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013; 13: 69.
  2. Assari S, Moghani Lankarani M, Ahmadi K. Comorbidity influences multiple aspects of well-being of patients with ischemic heart disease. Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2013; 7(4): 118–123.
  3. Hawkes AL, Patrao TA, Ware R, et al. Predictors of physical and mental health-related quality of life outcomes among myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013; 13: 69.
  4. Lalonde L, Clarke A, Joseph L, et al. Health-related quality of life with coronary heart disease prevention and treatment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2001; 54(10): 1011–1018.
  5. Schüssler G. Coping strategies and individual meanings of illness. Social Science & Medicine. 1992; 34(4): 427–432.
  6. Watkins KW, Connell CM, Fitzgerald JT, et al. Effect of adults' self-regulation of diabetes on quality-of-life outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(10): 1511–1515.
  7. Furmańska JJ, Rzepa T, Pietrzak-Nowacka M, et al. Psychospołeczne uwarunkowania oceny znaczenia własnej choroby przez osoby przewlekle chore. Człowiek i Społeczeństwo. 2018; 45: 245–262.
  8. Kubica A, Andruszkiewicz A, Grześk G, et al. Edukacja zdrowotna jako metoda poprawy programu terapeutycznego. Folia Cardiol 2010; 5. ; 2: 93–99.
  9. Kubica A, Bączkowska A. Rationale for motivational interventions as pivotal element of multilevel educational and motivational project MEDMOTION. Fola Cardiologica 2019; 15. ; 1: 6–10.
  10. Leksowska A, Jaworska I, Gorczyca P. Choroba somatyczna jako wyzwanie adaptacyjne dla człowieka. Folia Cardiologica Excerpta. 2011; 6(4): 244–248.
  11. Heszen I, Sęk H. Psychologia zdrowia PWN. Warszawa, 2008.
  12. Buszko K, Pietrzykowski Ł, Michalski P, et al. Validation of the Functioning in Chronic Illness Scale (FCIS). Medical Research Journal. 2018; 3(2): 63–69.
  13. Kubica A. Self-reported questionnaires for a comprehensive assessment of patients after acute coronary syndrome. Medical Research Journal. 2019; 4(2): 106–109.
  14. Piepoli M, Hoes A, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Kardiologia Polska. 2016; 74(9): 821–936.
  15. Therapeutic patient education. Continuing programmes for health care providers in the field of prevention of chronic disease. Raport of a WHO Working Group. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e63674.pdf (16.05.2019).
  16. Kubica A, Gruchała M, Jaguszewski M, et al. Adherence to treatment — a pivotal issue in long-term treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases. An expert standpoint. Medical Research Journal. 2018; 2(4): 123–127.
  17. Kubica A, Obońska K, Kasprzak M, et al. Prediction of high risk of non-adherence to antiplatelet treatment. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74(1): 61–67.
  18. Wiles R, Kinmonth A. Patients' understandings of heart attack: implications for prevention of recurrence. Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 44(2): 161–169.
  19. Michalski P, Kosobucka A, Pietrzykowski Ł, et al. Knowledge and learning preferences of patients with myocardial infarction. Medical Research Journal. 2017; 1(4): 120–124.
  20. Michalski P, Kosobucka A, Pietrzykowski Ł, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic education in patients with myocardial infarction. Medical Research Journal. 2018; 2(3): 89–96.
  21. Michalski P, Kasprzak M, Siedlaczek M, et al. The impact of knowledge and effectiveness of educational intervention on readiness for hospital discharge and adherence to therapeutic recommendations in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Medical Research Journal. 2020.
  22. Kubica A, Kochman W, Bogdan M, et al. The influence of undergone pecutaneous coronary interventions and earlier hospitalization with myocardial infarction on the level of knowledge and the effectiveness of health education in patients with myocardial infarction. Advances in Interventional Cardiology. 2009; 5: 25–30.
  23. Kosobucka A, Kasprzak M, Michalski P, et al. Relation of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge after Myocardial Infarction Scale to socio-demographic and clinical factors. An observational study. Medical Research Journal. 2018; 3(1): 32–37.
  24. Kosobucka A, Michalski P, Pietrzykowski Ł, et al. The impact of readiness to discharge from hospital on adherence to treatment in patients after myocardial infarction. Cardiol J. 2022; 29(4): 582–590.
  25. Ghisi GL, Abdallah F, Grace SL, et al. A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change? Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 95(2): 160–174.
  26. French D, Senior V, Weinman J, et al. Causal attributions for heart disease: A systematic review. Psychology & Health. 2007; 16(1): 77–98.
  27. Whitmarsh A, Koutantji M, Sidell K. Illness perceptions, mood and coping in predicting attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. Br J Health Psychol. 2003; 8(Pt 2): 209–221.
  28. Jones MC, Smith K, Herber O, et al. Intention, beliefs and mood assessed using electronic diaries predicts attendance at cardiac rehabilitation: An observational study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018; 88: 143–152.