open access
The long-term outcomes in perimenopausal patients treated for cervical cancer
Affiliations- Department of Brachytherapy, Lukaszczyk Oncological Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Gynecological Oncology Lukaszczyk Oncological Center in Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Gynaecological Oncology, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer Endoscopy Lukaszczyk Oncological Centre in Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Otolaryngology, University Children’s Hospital of Cracow, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
open access
Abstract
Introduction. In the coming decades, the population of adults 65 years of age and older will increase significantly. Younger patients between 30 and 40 years of age, who are diagnosed with cervical cancer, have a better prognosis than the older group. The second peak of incidence, involving patients between 60 and 70 years of age, correlates with a poorer prognosis.
Material and methods. In our study, we included 360 patients between 40 and 60 years old operated on due to cervical cancer followed by radiochemotherapy. We divided these patients into two groups according to age. The first group was composed of premenopausal patients (aged between 40 and 50 years) and the second of postmenopausal patients (aged between 50 and 60 years), and long-term outcomes (overall survival rates OS) were analysed in both groups of patients.
Results. We observed statistically significant differences in the long-term outcomes between the subgroups of patients treated surgically for cervical cancer, and it was better in the premenopausal group of patients. No statistically significant relationship between these two groups of patients as far as clinical features was observed.
Conclusion. We found that postmenopausal patients may actually benefit more from having radical surgery. Proving this supports the case for distinguishing geriatric oncology from gynaecological oncology.
Abstract
Introduction. In the coming decades, the population of adults 65 years of age and older will increase significantly. Younger patients between 30 and 40 years of age, who are diagnosed with cervical cancer, have a better prognosis than the older group. The second peak of incidence, involving patients between 60 and 70 years of age, correlates with a poorer prognosis.
Material and methods. In our study, we included 360 patients between 40 and 60 years old operated on due to cervical cancer followed by radiochemotherapy. We divided these patients into two groups according to age. The first group was composed of premenopausal patients (aged between 40 and 50 years) and the second of postmenopausal patients (aged between 50 and 60 years), and long-term outcomes (overall survival rates OS) were analysed in both groups of patients.
Results. We observed statistically significant differences in the long-term outcomes between the subgroups of patients treated surgically for cervical cancer, and it was better in the premenopausal group of patients. No statistically significant relationship between these two groups of patients as far as clinical features was observed.
Conclusion. We found that postmenopausal patients may actually benefit more from having radical surgery. Proving this supports the case for distinguishing geriatric oncology from gynaecological oncology.
Keywords
cervical cancer, geriatric oncology
About this articleTitle
The long-term outcomes in perimenopausal patients treated for cervical cancer
Journal
Issue
Article type
Original article
Pages
111-114
Published online
2018-01-31
Page views
694
Article views/downloads
710
DOI
Bibliographic record
Medical Research Journal 2017;2(3):111-114.
Keywords
cervical cancer
geriatric oncology
Authors
Joanna Terlikiewicz
Konrad Dziobek
Marek Dziechciowski
Łukasz Wicherek
Magdalena Dutsch-Wicherek
References (9)- Tung EE, Chen CYY, Takahashi PY. Common curbsides and conundrums in geriatric medicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013; 88(6): 630–635.
- Ør Knudsen A, Schledermann D, Nyvang GB, et al. Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare). Trends in gynecologic cancer among elderly women in Denmark, 1980-2012. Acta Oncol. 2016; 55 Suppl 1: 65–73.
- Nogueira-Rodrigues A, de Melo AC, Garces AH, et al. Patterns of Care and Outcome of Elderly Women Diagnosed With Cervical Cancer in the Developing World. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016; 26(7): 1246–1251.
- Sharma C, Deutsch I, Horowitz DP, et al. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes for elderly women with cervical cancer. Cancer. 2012; 118(14): 3618–3626.
- Nosaka K, Shibata K, Utsumi F, et al. Feasibility and benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer. Tumori. 2016; 102(6): 600–605.
- Derks M, Biewenga P, van der Velden J, et al. Results of radical surgery in women with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95(2): 166–172.
- Lin MY, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Bernshaw D, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix in elderly patients treated with radiotherapy: patterns of care and treatment outcomes. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016; 27(6): e59.
- Cakmak B, Köseoğlu DR. Comparison of cervical cytological screening results between postmenopausal and elderly women. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2014; 30(1): 38–42.
- Wingfield SA, Heflin MT. Cancer Screening in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2016; 32(1): 17–33.