open access

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
Original article
Published online: 2016-12-02
Get Citation

Evaluation of two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries

Robertas Pranevičius, Justas Keršulis, Kasparas Briedis, Ąžuolas Sirtautas, Norvydas Zapustas, Ramūnas Unikas
·
Medical Research Journal 2016;1(2):92-94.

open access

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2016-12-02

Abstract

Introduction. Stenting is a widespread procedure for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The use of drug-covered stents has improved stenting safety and treatment efficiency. Using second-generation Biolimus drug-covered A9 stents is associated with reduced risk of stent thrombosis compared with first-generation ones. The aim of the study was to evaluate two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries in patients who suffer from coronary artery disease.

Methods. The study included 216 patients who suffered from coronary artery disease and were treated using Biolimus A9 drug-covered stents, in order to eliminate all greater-than-50% stenoses. Patients’ data were collected from hospital case histories and e-Biomatrix PMR questionnaire. Decisions regarding whether to use Biolimus A9 stents during percutaneous coronary intervention were made by the respective operators. The rate of complication after stenting was evaluated when stenosis was eliminated or reduced to 30% or TIMI 3 flow was determined.

Results. Out of 216 patients included in the study, 151 were males (69.91%) and 30.09% (65) were females. Mean of age of patients was 60.2 ± 10.1 years; 19% of patients had diagnosed diabetes. The success rate of implanting Biolimus A9 stents was 100% with no complications during hospital stay.  

Abstract

Introduction. Stenting is a widespread procedure for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The use of drug-covered stents has improved stenting safety and treatment efficiency. Using second-generation Biolimus drug-covered A9 stents is associated with reduced risk of stent thrombosis compared with first-generation ones. The aim of the study was to evaluate two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries in patients who suffer from coronary artery disease.

Methods. The study included 216 patients who suffered from coronary artery disease and were treated using Biolimus A9 drug-covered stents, in order to eliminate all greater-than-50% stenoses. Patients’ data were collected from hospital case histories and e-Biomatrix PMR questionnaire. Decisions regarding whether to use Biolimus A9 stents during percutaneous coronary intervention were made by the respective operators. The rate of complication after stenting was evaluated when stenosis was eliminated or reduced to 30% or TIMI 3 flow was determined.

Results. Out of 216 patients included in the study, 151 were males (69.91%) and 30.09% (65) were females. Mean of age of patients was 60.2 ± 10.1 years; 19% of patients had diagnosed diabetes. The success rate of implanting Biolimus A9 stents was 100% with no complications during hospital stay.  

Get Citation

Keywords

Biolimus, stents, coronary artery disease

About this article
Title

Evaluation of two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries

Journal

Medical Research Journal

Issue

Vol 1, No 2 (2016)

Article type

Original article

Pages

92-94

Published online

2016-12-02

Page views

739

Article views/downloads

1000

DOI

10.5603/MRJ.2016.0015

Bibliographic record

Medical Research Journal 2016;1(2):92-94.

Keywords

Biolimus
stents
coronary artery disease

Authors

Robertas Pranevičius
Justas Keršulis
Kasparas Briedis
Ąžuolas Sirtautas
Norvydas Zapustas
Ramūnas Unikas

References (13)
  1. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 2501–2555.
  2. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 44–122.
  3. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(14): 1315–1323.
  4. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. TAXUS V Investigators, TAXUS-IV Investigators, TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(3): 221–231.
  5. Spaulding C, Henry P, Teiger E, et al. TYPHOON Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(11): 1093–1104.
  6. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 377(9784): 2193–2204.
  7. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, et al. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(7): 573–583.
  8. Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007; 369(9562): 667–678.
  9. Räber L, Windecker S. Current status of drug-eluting stents. Cardiovasc Ther. 2011; 29(3): 176–189.
  10. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, et al. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C13–C18.
  11. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17): 2344–2351.
  12. Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 2004; 109(6): 701–705.
  13. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(1): 193–202.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl