open access

Vol 3, No 4 (2015)
Original article
Published online: 2016-01-29
Get Citation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. The impact of operator’s experience on the procedure course

Dorota Kolanowska, Piotr Łach, Marta Frąc, Agnieszka Nadolna, Tomasz Fabiszak, Iwona Świątkiewicz, Adam Sukiennik, Sławomir Sielski, Marek Woźnicki, Jacek Kubica
·
Folia Medica Copernicana 2015;3(4):160-164.

open access

Vol 3, No 4 (2015)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Published online: 2016-01-29

Abstract

Background. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulants in thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The LAA closure with the WATCHMAN™ device has been proved to be non-inferior to warfarin therapy. Nevertheless, this strategy is associated with numerous periprocedural complications. This study was conducted to determine whether the experience of the operating team affects the duration of the procedure and its complication rate.

Methods. This retrospective single-centre study examined LAA percutaneous closure procedures in 43 consecutive AF patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (13 female, 30 male; mean age 70.98 ± 10.69 years). All device implantations were performed by two operators using the WATCHMAN™ device and the result was assessed by two echocardiographers. We compared the first 22 (group A) with the subsequent 21 procedures (group B).

Results. For group B, a decrease in the overall procedure time (PT) by 28% (from 83.41 min ± 36.49 to 59.76 min ± 21.70; p = 0.006) was found, with a subsequent reduction in fluoroscopy time (FT) by 33% (from 16.59 min ± 7.25 to 11.2 min ± 7.21; p = 0.019) and the volume of contrast medium (CV) by 40% (from 129.14 mL ± 79.81 to 78.05 mL ± 33.82; p = 0.004). The incidence of periprocedural adverse events and complications was 55% (12 patients) in group A and 33% (7 patients) in group B.

Conclusions. The increasing operators’ and echocardiographers’ experience in LAA closure is associated with reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume.

Abstract

Background. Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulants in thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The LAA closure with the WATCHMAN™ device has been proved to be non-inferior to warfarin therapy. Nevertheless, this strategy is associated with numerous periprocedural complications. This study was conducted to determine whether the experience of the operating team affects the duration of the procedure and its complication rate.

Methods. This retrospective single-centre study examined LAA percutaneous closure procedures in 43 consecutive AF patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation (13 female, 30 male; mean age 70.98 ± 10.69 years). All device implantations were performed by two operators using the WATCHMAN™ device and the result was assessed by two echocardiographers. We compared the first 22 (group A) with the subsequent 21 procedures (group B).

Results. For group B, a decrease in the overall procedure time (PT) by 28% (from 83.41 min ± 36.49 to 59.76 min ± 21.70; p = 0.006) was found, with a subsequent reduction in fluoroscopy time (FT) by 33% (from 16.59 min ± 7.25 to 11.2 min ± 7.21; p = 0.019) and the volume of contrast medium (CV) by 40% (from 129.14 mL ± 79.81 to 78.05 mL ± 33.82; p = 0.004). The incidence of periprocedural adverse events and complications was 55% (12 patients) in group A and 33% (7 patients) in group B.

Conclusions. The increasing operators’ and echocardiographers’ experience in LAA closure is associated with reduction in procedure time, fluoroscopy time and contrast volume.

Get Citation

Keywords

left atrial appendage closure, WATCHMAN™ device, complications

About this article
Title

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation. The impact of operator’s experience on the procedure course

Journal

Medical Research Journal

Issue

Vol 3, No 4 (2015)

Article type

Original article

Pages

160-164

Published online

2016-01-29

Page views

682

Article views/downloads

1057

DOI

10.5603/FMC.2015.0011

Bibliographic record

Folia Medica Copernicana 2015;3(4):160-164.

Keywords

left atrial appendage closure
WATCHMAN™ device
complications

Authors

Dorota Kolanowska
Piotr Łach
Marta Frąc
Agnieszka Nadolna
Tomasz Fabiszak
Iwona Świątkiewicz
Adam Sukiennik
Sławomir Sielski
Marek Woźnicki
Jacek Kubica

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl