ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Medical Research Journal 2023;

Volume 8, Number 3, 234–241

10.5603/mrj.95927

Copyright © 2023 Via Medica

ISSN 2451-2591

e-ISSN 2451-4101

Expression of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF in the transplanted kidney as predictive factors of kidney allograft function

Tadeusz Sulikowski1Agnieszka Orłowska-Szafrańska2Jan Pawlus1Jarosław Lichota1Kazimierz Ciechanowski3Małgorzata Marchelek-Myśliwiec3Andrzej Brodkiewicz4Krzysztof Safranow5Leszek Domański3Andrzej Pawlik6
1Department of General, Minimally Invasive, and Gastroenterological Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
2Department of Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
3Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
4Clinic of Paediatrics, Nephrology, Dialysis and Treatment of Acute Poisonings, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
5Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
6Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

Corresponding author:

Andrzej Pawlik,

Department of Physiology,

Pomeranian Medical University,

72 Powstancow Wielkopolskich St.,

70–111 Szczecin, Poland;

e-mail: pawand@poczta.onet.pl

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Transplantation is now a common treatment for kidney failure. However, it is associated with numerous complications, among which is rejection. Currently, factors that can predict the function of the transplanted kidney are being sought. This study aimed to investigate whether the expression of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) assessed in the transplanted kidney before transplantation can be a predictive marker of the later function of the transplanted kidney and the occurrence of complications such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR).

Material and methods: The study group included 44 kidney allograft recipients who underwent kidney transplantation.

Results: There were no statistically significant correlations between KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF gene expression in transplanted kidney biopsies and the occurrence of DGF and AR. The expression of the bFGF gene correlated significantly with the creatinine levels before and on the first day after transplantation. There were no statistically significant correlations between creatinine levels and expression of the KIM-1 and VEGF genes. There was also no statistically significant correlation between bFGF, KIM-1 and VEGF gene expression in the transplanted kidney and later eGFR and diuresis values. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between bFGF and serum potassium levels before transplantation and up to one month after transplantation. KIM-1 expression correlated significantly negatively with pre-transplant serum potassium levels. VEGF expression correlated significantly negatively with potassium levels 2 and 24 months after transplantation.

Conclusions: The present results suggest that the expression of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF assessed in the transplanted kidney before transplantation is not a significant predictor of the later function of the transplanted kidney. The expression of the bFGF gene correlates with the creatinine levels before and on the first day after transplantation. The expression of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF may correlate with potassium serum levels.

Keywords: KIM-1, VEGF, bFGF, kidney, allograft

Med Res J 2023; 8 (3): 234–241

Introduction

Kidney transplantation is an established treatment for end-stage renal failure. However, many complications occur after transplantation that reduce the survival time of the transplanted kidney. Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after kidney transplantation. It is defined as transient failure of the transplanted kidney, requiring dialysis therapy during the first 7 days after transplantation [1]. DGF is an independent risk factor for acute rejection (AR) and impaired renal function in the first year after transplantation. It also contributes to reduced graft survival [2–4]. One of the main causes of loss of the transplanted kidney is the rejection process [5]. Acute rejection of the graft usually develops during the first few weeks after the transplantation procedure. The incidence of asymptomatic episodes of AR detected by biopsies ranges from 6 to 22% [6]. During the first year after transplantation, AR is the cause of a graft loss incidence of 11 to 16%, and in the following years 7 to 11% [6]. Factors affecting the long-term function of the transplanted kidney include immunological factors, such as episodes of AR, HLA mismatch between recipient and transplant donor, presence of lymphocytotoxic antibodies (PRA), and non-immunologic factors: older donor/recipient age, DGF.

Currently, the diagnosis of transplanted kidney injury is based on traditional parameters evaluating renal function, including creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urea levels, the presence of proteinuria, and ultrasonographic evaluation [7]. In order to diagnose changes in the transplanted kidney, biopsy is increasingly used as a method of detecting and identifying key factors contributing to renal damage.

Currently, new methods are being sought to monitor normal graft function. These methods should make it possible to detect the risk of graft rejection early, optimize the immunosuppressive treatment regimen and distinguish the rejection reaction from other pathological conditions of the organ. The most common monitoring method after kidney transplantation is monitoring serum creatinine levels. This method is relatively simple and inexpensive but has low specificity and sensitivity. This is due to the fact that there are many factors that cause a decrease in glomerular filtration rate and an increase in serum creatinine concentration.

The search for markers of transplanted kidney function is of particular importance, as early recognition of kidney dysfunction may allow the implementation of appropriate therapy to prevent the process of graft rejection. This may allow a significant increase in the survival rate of the transplanted organ.

In the present study, it was decided to investigate whether the expression of molecules with known effects on kidney function in transplanted kidney biopsies could be a predictor of renal graft function.

This study aimed to investigate whether the expression of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) assessed in the transplanted kidney before transplantation can be a predictive marker of the later function of the transplanted kidney and the occurrence of complications such as DGF and AR.

Material and methods

Patients

The study group included 44 kidney allograft recipients (23 females and 21 males, aged 21 to 72 years, mean 49.95 ± 14.01), who underwent kidney transplantation at the Department of General and Transplant Surgery of Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin. The clinical characteristics and biochemical parameters of the patients are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The study material consisted of peripheral blood obtained during routine examinations. During hospitalisation and in the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months after renal transplantation, parameters of transplanted kidney function were determined from peripheral blood, i.e., creatinine concentration, eGFR, potassium level and diuresis.

Each subject was informed about the nature and purpose of the study and gave informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee at Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Forty-four biopsies before transplantation were performed, followed by biopsies in the post-transplant period (n = 23, 52.27%). Diagnostic biopsies were performed in five patients (11.36%) due to clinical indications. From the study group, 17 patients (38.63%) with DGF were identified, with a diagnosis of AR in 5 patients (11.36%). DGF was defined as the need to start haemodialysis therapy within the first 7 days after transplantation. Acute rejection of the transplanted kidney was diagnosed based on classical clinical criteria: time after organ transplantation up to 3 months, soreness and/or swelling of the graft, increase in body temperature above 38°C, elevation of serum creatinine concentration by 1025% over 12 days without any other detectable cause, or no expected decrease in serum creatinine concentration in patients during the first two weeks after transplantation. All patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy according to a protocol: tacrolimus + mofetil mycophenolate + cyclosporine. In addition, some patients were taking additional medications due to comorbidities such as ischaemic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anaemia and calcium-phosphate disorders. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland (KB-0012/40/14). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Expression analysis of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF genes at the mRNA level using qPCR

Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., USA). Then, 1 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas Inc., USA). Expression analysis of KIM-1, VEGF, bFGF and the BMG constitutive gene was performed by qPCR using the CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, USA). Amplification on a cDNA array was performed using iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, USA) with specific primers for the studied genes designed using the Primer3 program. The relative quantitative mRNA expression of the tested genes was calculated using the comparative Ct method.

Serum creatinine was determined using a kinetic colourimetric assay according to the Jasffe method.

Serum potassium concentration was determined by an ion-selective method using selective membranes.

The glomerular filtration rate was calculated according to the formula:

eGFR = 170 × Creatinine 0,999 × age 0.176 × BUN 0.17 × Albumin 0.318 × C

C constant: for men 1, for women 0.762; BUN blood urea nitrogen

Table 1. The clinical characteristics of patients

Parameter

Mean ± SD

Age (years)

49.95 ± 14.01

Sex:

Female

23

Male

21

BMI (kg/m2)

25.15 ± 2.85

PRA

Final

2.15 ± ٥.72

Max

6.17 ± 11.11

IGF (n)

27

DGF (n)

17

AR (n)

5

Statistical analysis

The distribution of quantitative parameters differed significantly from the normal distribution (ShapiroWilk test), so they were compared between groups using the non-parametric MannWhitney test and presented as the median and interquartile range (IQR). Correlations between selected quantitative parameters were investigated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Table 2. Biochemical parameters of patients before transplantation and 1, 7 days and 1, 3, 6 12 months after transplantation

Parameter

Mean ± SD

Creatinine (mg/dL)

Before transplantation

8.16 ± 3.28

1 day

7.59 ± 2.92

7 days

4.67 ± 3.85

1 month

1.84 ± 1.34

3 months

1.54 ± 0.56

6 months

1.48 ± 0.46

12 months

1.27 ± 0.35

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

Before transplantation

7.77 ± 4.08

1 day

8.00 ± 3.05

7 days

26.22 ± 22.31

1 month

48.74 ± 19.64

3 months

53.37 ± 21.51

6 months

51.26 ± 15.73

12 months

71.18 ± 25.05

Potassium plasma level (mmol/L)

Before transplantation

4.77 ± 0.77

1 day

5.23 ± 0.93

7 days

4.48 ± 0.77

1 month

4.76 ± 0.70

3 months

4.60 ± 0.59

6 months

4.30 ± 0.46

12 months

4.17 ± 0.41

Diuresis (mL)

1 day

811.90 ± 1101.27

7 days

2580.95 ± 1653.97

1 month

2900.00 ± 882.014

3 months

2878.94 ± 587.32

6 months

2652.7778 ± 427.943

12 months

2625.00 ± 595.683

Results

This study evaluated the correlation of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF gene expression in transplanted kidney biopsies with the occurrence of DGF and AR, alongside creatinine levels, eGFR and diuresis.

As shown in Table 3, there were no statistically significant correlations between KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF gene expression in transplanted kidney biopsies with the occurrence of DGF and AR.

Tables 47 show the correlations between KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF gene expression and creatinine levels, eGFR, diuresis and potassium serum levels.

Table 3. VEGF, KIM-1 and bFGF expression in patients with and without DGF and with and without AR

Patients with DGF

Patients without DGF

P-value

Patients with AR

Patients without AR

P-value

Median value (IQR)

Median value (IQR)

Median value (IQR)

Median value (IQR)

bFGF

87.28

(59.61–189.71)

89.12

(41.00–183.25)

0.70

94.20

(18.47–172.17)

87.89

(59.20–187.10)

0.58

KIM-1

1707.55(890.03–1988.84)

1199.08(451.22–1792.444)

0.38

1707.55(1560.41–1804.91)

1199.08(607.90–1947.91)

0.67

VEGF

283.59(120.06–316.86)

216.50(139.84–295.64)

0.69

299.77(144.77–445.01)

223.28(120.06–306.06)

0.57

Table 4. Spearman’s correlations between bFGF, KIM-1, VEGF and serum creatinine levels

Creatinine

R

P-value

bFGF

Before transplantation

–0.2984

0.0491

1 day

–0.3269

0.0303

7 days

–0.1419

0.3583

1 month

0.0203

0.8971

2 months

–0.1330

0.4073

6 months

–0.0691

0.6844

12 months

–0.1160

0.5271

KIM-1

Before transplantation

–0.2644

0.0829

1 day

–0.2005

0.1919

7 days

–0.1000

0.5183

1 month

–0.0506

0.7473

2 months

–0.1602

0.3169

6 months

–0.0207

0.903

12 months

–0.1355

0.4595

VEGF

Before transplantation

–0.1819

0.243

1 day

–0.2855

0.0635

7 days

–0.1102

0.4816

1 month

–0.1101

0.4878

2 months

–0.1707

0.2923

6 months

–0.0646

0.7083

12 months

–0.2743

0.1354

Table 5. Spearman’s correlations between bFGF, KIM-1, VEGF and eGFR values

eGFR

R

P-value

bFGF

Before transplantation

0.166

0.2814

1 day

0.2232

0.1453

7 days

0.0771

0.6189

1 month

–0.0821

0.61

2 months

0.0261

0.8782

6 months

–0.0816

0.6799

12 months

0.0938

0.6095

KIM-1

Before transplantation

0.1753

0.255

1 day

0.145

0.3478

7 days

0.0653

0.6739

1 month

0.032

0.8427

2 months

0.0974

0.5661

6 months

–0.0175

0.9295

12 months

0.0671

0.7153

VEGF

Before transplantation

0.0779

0.6197

1 day

0.1738

0.2649

7 days

0.0601

0.7018

1 month

0.0627

0.7009

2 months

0.1547

0.3676

6 months

0.0812

0.6872

12 months

0.2397

0.1939

Table 6. Spearman’s correlations between bFGF, KIM-1, VEGF and diuresis

Diuresis

R

P-value

bFGF

Before transplantation

0.3133

0.0434

1 day

0.0027

0.9865

2 days

0.0578

0.7161

3 days

0.0416

0.7936

4 days

0.0251

0.8748

5 days

–0.0596

0.7075

7 days

–0.2719

0.0816

1 month

–0.3960

0.0114

3 months

–0.1930

0.2458

6 months

–0.0782

0.6505

12 months

–0.0706

0.7009

24 months

–0.2696

0.3513

KIM-1

Before transplantation

0.2435

0.1202

1 day

0.2244

0.1531

2 days

0.0701

0.6591

3 days

0.0261

0.8698

4 days

0.1002

0.5277

5 days

0.1675

0.2889

7 days

0.1559

0.3243

1 month

0.0314

0.8475

3 months

–0.0129

0.9387

6 months

0.1577

0.3584

12 months

0.2865

0.1119

24 months

–0.2262

0.4368

VEGF

Before transplantation

0.0837

0.603

1 day

–0.0678

0.6737

2 days

0.064

0.691

3 days

0.0259

0.8723

4 days

0.0507

0.7528

5 days

0.0064

0.9683

7 days

–0.1915

0.2303

1 month

–0.2581

0.1126

3 months

–0.0769

0.651

6 months

–0.1808

0.2987

12 months

–0.1922

0.3004

24 months

–0.0574

0.8521

Table 7. Spearman’s correlations between bFGF, KIM-1, VEGF and potassium serum level

Potassium

R

P-value

bFGF

Before transplantation

–0.4922

0.0007

1 day

–0.1740

0.2587

7 days

–0.3664

0.0144

1 month

–0.3534

0.0201

2 months

–0.2912

0.0647

6 months

–0.0062

0.9710

12 months

0.1186

0.5179

24 months

–0.1770

0.5450

KIM-1

Before transplantation

–0.3288

0.0293

1 day

–0.1652

0.2838

7 days

–0.1021

0.5095

1 month

0.0045

0.9773

2 months

0.0296

0.8543

6 months

–0.1289

0.4472

12 months

–0.1022

0.5778

24 months

–0.4580

0.0996

VEGF

Before transplantation

–0.1736

0.2656

1 day

–0.2385

0.1235

7 days

0.1284

0.4118

1 month

–0.1743

0.2696

2 months

–0.3724

0.0180

6 months

–0.0371

0.8300

12 months

–0.2282

0.2169

24 months

–0.8138

0.0007

The expression of the bFGF gene correlated statistically significantly with the creatinine levels before and on the first day after transplantation. There were no statistically significant correlations between creatinine levels and expression of the KIM-1 and VEGF genes.

There was also no statistically significant correlation between bFGF, KIM-1 and VEGF gene expression in the transplanted kidney and later eGFR and diuresis values.

There was a statistically significant negative correlation between bFGF and potassium serum levels before transplantation and 1, 7 days and 1 month after transplantation. KIM-1 expression correlated significantly negatively with potassium serum levels before transplantation. The expression of VEGF correlated significantly negatively with potassium levels 2 and 24 months after transplantation.

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate whether the expression of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF in the transplanted kidney could be used as a marker to predict its future function and the occurrence of complications such as DGF and AR. It was observed that bFGF gene expression correlated statistically significantly with creatinine levels before and on the first day after transplantation. However, no statistically significant correlations were found between creatinine levels and expression of KIM-1 and VEGF. There was also no statistically significant correlation between the expression of bFGF, KIM-1 and VEGF in the transplanted kidney and later values of eGFR and diuresis. Similarly, there was no statistically significant correlation between the expression of the studied markers and the occurrence of DGF and AR. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between bFGF and serum potassium levels before transplantation and up to one month after transplantation. KIM-1 expression correlated significantly negatively with pre-transplant serum potassium levels. VEGF expression correlated significantly negatively with potassium levels 2 and 24 months after transplantation.

Kidney injury molecule-1 is a transmembrane glycoprotein of tubular origin containing a characteristic ectodomain (six cysteine immunoglobulin-like domains, two N-glycosylation domains and a Thr/Ser-Pro-rich O-glycosylated domain) [8]. The first study on the role of KIM-1 in transplantation was published in 2002, where Han et al. demonstrated that patients with acute renal tubular necrosis have significantly increased KIM-1 expression in renal biopsy specimens [8]. KIM-1 expression was significantly correlated with serum creatinine level and negatively correlated with glomerular filtration rate. The authors suggest that KIM-1 is a more specific marker of early kidney damage than many other parameters used to assess kidney function to date, such as creatinine or eGFR [9].

Van Timmeren et al. demonstrated the presence of KIM-1 protein in renal tissue from patients with tubulointerstitial fibrosis and inflammation. Urinary KIM-1 levels correlated with the expression of this protein in renal tissue. High levels of KIM-1 were associated with low creatinine clearance, proteinuria and older donor age. The presence of KIM-1 protein in urine is highly specific for kidney damage [10]. It has been shown that KIM-1 can be a biomarker of nephrotoxic kidney injury associated with calcineurin inhibitor toxicity [11]. Studies indicate that KIM-1 protein expression in proximal tubules is significantly correlated with renal dysfunction [12]. KIM-1 is a more specific marker of kidney damage than serum creatinine blood or blood urea nitrogen [13]. Vaidya et al. observed that the KIM-1 glycoprotein is a biomarker of renal tubular injury in various models of renal injury and is a superior marker to serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen [13].

The second biomarker analysed in this study is VEGF, known to date mainly for its involvement in the process of angiogenesis [14]. Liu et al. report that VEGF is a key mediator of angiogenesis and vascular permeability, stimulating endothelial cell proliferation and preventing endothelial cell apoptosis [15]. Sharma et al. present that, in addition to its role in the vascular development of the kidney and maintenance of glomerular endothelial integrity, VEGF also has a cytoprotective effect and is responsible for the induction of cellular immunity [16]. It has been shown that a key regulator of VEGF gene expression is oxygen pressure in both in vitro and in vivo studies. Hypoxia increases the expression of VEGF mRNA. Recent studies emphasise the role of VEGF in preventing apoptosis and vascular regression of endothelial cells and its great influence on renal homeostasis of the kidney. This may provide new therapeutic opportunities in the future [17]. It has been shown that both increased and decreased expression of VEGF within podocytes causes severe renal dysfunction [18]. Overexpression of the VEGF gene causes glomerular hypertrophy and increased proliferation of both endothelial and mesangial cells. These data support the hypothesis that VEGF is involved in maintaining the glomerular barrier and the pathogenesis of proteinuria, suggesting that local activation of VEGF may play a role in glomerulopathies and proteinuria. Inhibition of VEGF secretion in the glomeruli may become a potential target for the treatment of renal diseases, such as diabetic nephropathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. In the long term, VEGF has a negative effect on kidney transplantation, with its expression being negatively correlated with graft survival [19].

The bFGF stimulates the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells in angiogenesis. It plays an important role in maintaining the proper structure of the newly formed vessel through the synthesis of fibronectin, collagen and proteoglycan [20, 21]. It has also been shown that bFGF may accelerate the regeneration process after ischaemic kidney injury [22]. FGF plays an important role in healing and regeneration processes [23]. It supports angiogenesis, chemotaxis and mitogenesis, and stimulates the growth of fibroblasts, myoblasts, osteoblasts, endothelial cells and neuronal cells. Animal studies have shown that direct administration of FGF to the site of a fracture plays a significant role in the efficacy of therapy [24]. FGF has also been shown to induce extracellular proteolysis as well as the proliferation of micro- and macroangiopathic endothelial cells [25]. In addition, a synergistic effect of bFGF and VEGF on microvascular endothelial cells has been documented [26]. FGF and VEGF are potent inducers of angiogenesis in vivo and in vitro [27]. However, bFGF does not increase vascular permeability. The cytokine bFGF in angiogenesis stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. It plays an important role in maintaining the proper structure of the newly formed vessel through the synthesis of fibronectin, collagen and proteoglycan. In the period after organ transplantation, there may be increased expression of bFGF, which enhances vascular wall cell proliferation and fibrosis in the transplanted kidney [18].

Conclusions

The study results suggest that the expression of KIM-1, VEGF and bFGF assessed in the transplanted kidney before transplantation is not a significant predictor of the later function of the transplanted kidney. The expression of the bFGF gene correlates with the creatinine levels before and on the first day after transplantation. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between bFGF and serum potassium levels before transplantation and up to one month after transplantation. KIM-1 expression correlated significantly negatively with pre-transplant serum potassium levels. VEGF expression correlated significantly negatively with potassium levels 2 and 24 months after transplantation.

Article information

Ethics statement: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland (KB-0012/40/14).
Author contributions: TS, AOS, JP, JL, AB investigation; KS, software; KC, MMM, AB, LD formal analysis; TS, AP, conceptualization and manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding: The project is financed by the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education under the name “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in 2019––2022 project number 002/RID/2018-19.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

References

  1. Bahl D, Haddad Z, Datoo A, et al. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2019; 24(1): 82––86, doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000604, indexed in Pubmed: 30540574.
  2. Hu XJ, Zheng J, Li Y, et al. Prediction of kidney transplant outcome based on different DGF definitions in Chinese deceased donation. BMC Nephrol. 2019; 20: 409.
  3. Parajuli S, Muth BL, Astor BC, et al. Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure. Am J Transplant. 2020; 20(10): 28222831, doi: 10.1111/ajt.15923, indexed in Pubmed: 32306520.
  4. Rolak S, Djamali A, Mandelbrot DA, et al. Outcomes of delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients stratified by histologic biopsy findings. Transplant Proc. 2021; 53(5): 14621469, doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.01.012, indexed in Pubmed: 33579551.
  5. Li M, Dai Y, Lei J, et al. Acute rejection after kidney transplantation promotes graft fibrosis with elevated adenosine level in rat. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6): e0180211, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180211, indexed in Pubmed: 28651015.
  6. Rodríguez Castellanos FE, Domínguez Quintana F, Soto Abraham V, et al. Classification of acute rejection episodes in transplantation: a proposal based on factor analysis. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2018; 12(2): 123131, indexed in Pubmed: 29507276.
  7. Dharnidharka VR, Malone A. Biomarkers to detect rejection after kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2018; 33(7): 11131122, doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3712-6, indexed in Pubmed: 28631040.
  8. Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, et al. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2002; 62(1): 237244, doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00433.x, indexed in Pubmed: 12081583.
  9. Vaidya VS, Ramirez V, Ichimura T, et al. Urinary kidney injury molecule-1: a sensitive quantitative biomarker for early detection of kidney tubular injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006; 290(2): F517F529, doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00291.2005, indexed in Pubmed: 16174863.
  10. van Timmeren MM, van den Heuvel MC, Bailly V, et al. Tubular kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in human renal disease. J Pathol. 2007; 212(2): 209217, doi: 10.1002/path.2175, indexed in Pubmed: 17471468.
  11. Nogare AL, Joelsons G, Pedroso JAR, et al. Quantitative analyses of kidney injury molecule-1 messenger RNA in kidney transplant recipients with graft dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42(2): 473474, doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.042, indexed in Pubmed: 20304168.
  12. Zhang PL, Rothblum LI, Han WK, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 expression in transplant biopsies is a sensitive measure of cell injury. Kidney Int. 2008; 73(5): 608614, doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002697, indexed in Pubmed: 18160964.
  13. Vaidya VS, Waikar SS, Ferguson MA, et al. Urinary biomarkers for sensitive and specific detection of acute kidney injury in humans. Clin Transl Sci. 2008; 1(3): 200208, doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00053.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19212447.
  14. Ferrara N, Henzel WJ, Ferrara N, et al. Pituitary follicular cells secrete a novel heparin-binding growth factor specific for vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989; 161(2): 851858, doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)92678-8, indexed in Pubmed: 2735925.
  15. Liu E, Morimoto M, Kitajima S, et al. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in kidney leads to progressive impairment of glomerular functions. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18(7): 20942104, doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010075, indexed in Pubmed: 17554151.
  16. Sharma A, Jain S, Gupta R, et al. Ultrastructural alterations in endothelial mitochondria are associated with enhanced nitrotyrosine accumulation and progressive reduction of VEGF expression in sequential protocol renal allograft biopsies with calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Transpl Int. 2010; 23(4): 407416, doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.00988.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19912591.
  17. Minchenko A, Bauer T, Salceda S, et al. Hypoxic stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in vitro and in vivo. Lab Invest. 1994; 71(3): 374379, indexed in Pubmed: 7933988.
  18. Kim NH, Oh JH, Seo JiA, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptor FLT-1 in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2005; 67(1): 167177, doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00067.x, indexed in Pubmed: 15610240.
  19. Pilmore HL, Eris JM, Painter DM, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human chronic renal allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1999; 67(6): 929933, doi: 10.1097/00007890-199903270-00024, indexed in Pubmed: 10199746.
  20. Poon RT, Fan ST, Wong J. Clinical implications of circulating angiogenic factors in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(4): 12071225, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.4.1207, indexed in Pubmed: 11181687.
  21. Pałgan I, Czerwionka-Szaflarska M, Pałgan K, et al. [Assessment of serum levels of some angiogenic factors in healthy children]. Wiad Lek. 2004; 57(78): 343346, indexed in Pubmed: 15631189.
  22. Villanueva S, Cespedes C, Gonzalez AA, et al. bFGF induces an earlier expression of nephrogenic proteins after ischemic acute renal failure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006; 291(6): R1677R1687, doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00023.2006, indexed in Pubmed: 16873559.
  23. Sugimoto H, Hamano Y, Charytan D, et al. Neutralization of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by anti-VEGF antibodies and soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sFlt-1) induces proteinuria. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278(15): 1260512608, doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300012200, indexed in Pubmed: 12538598.
  24. Radomsky ML, Thompson AY, Spiro RC, et al. Potential role of fibroblast growth factor in enhancement of fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998(355 Suppl): S283S293, doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00029, indexed in Pubmed: 9917648.
  25. Yafai Y, Iandiev I, Lange J, et al. Basic fibroblast growth factor contributes to a shift in the angioregulatory activity of retinal glial (Müller) cells. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e68773, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068773, indexed in Pubmed: 23861940.
  26. Li Y, Hendrickson A, et al. Regulation of retinal capillary cells by basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and hypoxia. In Vitro Cell Dev Biology Anim. 2001; 37(1): 4549, doi: 10.1290/1071-2690(2001)037<0045:rorccb>2.0.co;2, indexed in Pubmed: 11249204.
  27. Seghezzi G, Patel S, Ren CJ, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) induces vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expre-ssion in the endothelial cells of forming capillaries: an autocrine mechanism contributing to angiogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1998; 141(7): 16591673, doi: 10.1083/jcb.141.7.1659, indexed in Pubmed: 9647657.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl