Vol 1, No 2 (2016)
Original article
Published online: 2016-12-02

open access

Page views 773
Article views/downloads 1024
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Evaluation of two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries

Robertas Pranevičius, Justas Keršulis, Kasparas Briedis, Ąžuolas Sirtautas, Norvydas Zapustas, Ramūnas Unikas
Medical Research Journal 2016;1(2):92-94.

Abstract

Introduction. Stenting is a widespread procedure for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. The use of drug-covered stents has improved stenting safety and treatment efficiency. Using second-generation Biolimus drug-covered A9 stents is associated with reduced risk of stent thrombosis compared with first-generation ones. The aim of the study was to evaluate two years’ treatment results after implantation of Biolimus A9 stents in coronary arteries in patients who suffer from coronary artery disease.

Methods. The study included 216 patients who suffered from coronary artery disease and were treated using Biolimus A9 drug-covered stents, in order to eliminate all greater-than-50% stenoses. Patients’ data were collected from hospital case histories and e-Biomatrix PMR questionnaire. Decisions regarding whether to use Biolimus A9 stents during percutaneous coronary intervention were made by the respective operators. The rate of complication after stenting was evaluated when stenosis was eliminated or reduced to 30% or TIMI 3 flow was determined.

Results. Out of 216 patients included in the study, 151 were males (69.91%) and 30.09% (65) were females. Mean of age of patients was 60.2 ± 10.1 years; 19% of patients had diagnosed diabetes. The success rate of implanting Biolimus A9 stents was 100% with no complications during hospital stay.  

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31: 2501–2555.
  2. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 44–122.
  3. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(14): 1315–1323.
  4. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al. TAXUS V Investigators, TAXUS-IV Investigators, TAXUS-IV Investigators. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(3): 221–231.
  5. Spaulding C, Henry P, Teiger E, et al. TYPHOON Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting versus uncoated stents in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(11): 1093–1104.
  6. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, et al. HORIZONS-AMI Trial Investigators. Heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor versus bivalirudin monotherapy and paclitaxel-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): final 3-year results from a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011; 377(9784): 2193–2204.
  7. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, et al. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(7): 573–583.
  8. Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007; 369(9562): 667–678.
  9. Räber L, Windecker S. Current status of drug-eluting stents. Cardiovasc Ther. 2011; 29(3): 176–189.
  10. Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, et al. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47(8 Suppl): C13–C18.
  11. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007; 115(17): 2344–2351.
  12. Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, et al. Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 2004; 109(6): 701–705.
  13. Joner M, Finn AV, Farb A, et al. Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(1): 193–202.