Online first
Original article
Published online: 2024-11-14

open access

Page views 44
Article views/downloads 25
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Identification of molecular mechanisms of association amongst comorbidities and COVID-19: An Interactome based Systems Biology Approach

Tammanna Ravee Sahrawat1
DOI: 10.5603/mrj.102212

Abstract

Background: Comorbidity has emerged as a major challenge in the last few decades that result from cascades of failures involving complex biochemical and physical interactions of genes, proteins, and metabolites responsible for cellular functions. Various epidemiological and demographic studies conducted since the emergence and global transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus have reported that patients having pre-existing medical conditions such as Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hepatitis, Lung Disease, and Kidney Disease are more prone to coronavirus infection. Objective: The present study was undertaken to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that are common amongst COVID-19 associated-comorbidities using an interactome based network biology approach so as to identify the shared genes/proteins and biological pathways. Methodology: Genes of COVID-19 associated-comorbidity diseases retrieved from disease databases were analyzed using in silico bioinformatics and systems network biology tools STRING and Cytoscape plug-ins CytoHubba and CytoCluster. Results: The shared hub proteins, namely IL1B, ACTB, IL6, MMP2, ALB, AKT1, MAPK3, FN1, TNF, CCL2, VEGFA and TP53, among various pre-existing comorbidities revealed their involvement in immunological pathways. All these proteins were also found to have significant associations with ACE2, TMPRSS2 and CD17/BSG, the entry receptors of COVID-19 virus. Conclusion: Higher risk factor for COVID-19 in patients with pre-existing comorbidities is due to immune dysfunction that results in their higher susceptibility to infection by SARS-CoV-2 via its entry receptors on the host cells. This study provides novel insights about the association between host genetics and consequences of viral infection that is responsible for severity of COVID-19 in patients suffering from pre-existing comorbidities.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223): 507–513.
  2. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, et al. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020; 323(14): 1406–1407.
  3. Wang D, Hu Bo, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020; 323(11): 1061–1069.
  4. Chen Yu, Liu Q, Guo D. Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol. 2020; 92(4): 418–423.
  5. Zhihong L, Bin Y, Kaipan G, et al. Clinical feature in patients of sever acute respiratory syndrome with type 2 diabetes and secondary hyperglycemia. Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2004; 20(1): 14–15.
  6. Gu J, Gong E, Zhang Bo, et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J Exp Med. 2005; 202(3): 415–424.
  7. Peiris JSM, Chu CM, Cheng VCC, et al. HKU/UCH SARS Study Group. Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet. 2003; 361(9371): 1767–1772.
  8. Li SSl, Cheng Cw, Fu Cl, et al. Left ventricular performance in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 30-day echocardiographic follow-up study. Circulation. 2003; 108(15): 1798–1803.
  9. Franks TJ, Chong PY, Chui P, et al. Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore. Hum Pathol. 2003; 34(8): 743–748.
  10. Xu L, Liu J, Lu M, et al. Liver injury during highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections. Liver Int. 2020; 40(5): 998–1004.
  11. YueHua H, ZhiLiang G. Study of the relationship SARS and hepatitis virus B. J Clin Hepatol. 2003; 19(6): 342–343.
  12. Hamming I, Timens W, Bulthuis MLC, et al. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J Pathol. 2004; 203(2): 631–637.
  13. Krishna N, Sijina KP, Rajanikant GK. Identifying diseases associated with Post-COVID syndrome through an integrated network biology approach. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024; 42(2): 652–671.
  14. Dolan ME, Hill DP, Mukherjee G, et al. Investigation of COVID-19 comorbidities reveals genes and pathways coincident with the SARS-CoV-2 viral disease. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1): 20848.
  15. Mujalli A, Alghamdi KS, Nasser KK, et al. Bioinformatics insights into the genes and pathways on severe COVID-19 pathology in patients with comorbidities. Front Physiol. 2022; 13: 1045469.
  16. Piñero J, Ramírez-Anguita JM, Saüch-Pitarch J, et al. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 48(D1): D845–D855.
  17. von Mering C, Huynen M, Jaeggi D, et al. STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(1): 258–261.
  18. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13(11): 2498–2504.
  19. Nepusz T, Yu H, Paccanaro A. Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(5): 471–472.
  20. Chin CH, Chen SH, Wu HH, et al. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014; 8 Suppl 4(Suppl 4): S11.
  21. Fabregat A, Sidiropoulos K, Viteri G, et al. Reactome diagram viewer: data structures and strategies to boost performance. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34(7): 1208–1214.
  22. Sahrawat T, Dwivedi J. Investigating the Relationship between Diabetes and Alzheimer’s Disease:. Journal of Science and Sustainable Development. 2020; 7(1): 1–11.
  23. He X, Zhang J. Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet. 2006; 2(6): e88.
  24. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020; 181(2): 271–280.e8.
  25. Bourgonje AR, Abdulle AE, Timens W, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Pathol. 2020; 251(3): 228–248.
  26. Wang Ke, Chen W, Zhang Z, et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020; 5(1): 283.
  27. Fuentes-Prior P. Priming of SARS-CoV-2 S protein by several membrane-bound serine proteinases could explain enhanced viral infectivity and systemic COVID-19 infection. J Biol Chem. 2021; 296: 100135.
  28. Duggal S, Jailkhani N, Midha MK, et al. Defining the Akt1 interactome and its role in regulating the cell cycle. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 1303.
  29. Zhang Y, Wang X, Yang H, et al. KinaseAKTcontrols innate immune cell development and function. Immunology. 2013; 140(2): 143–152.
  30. Hers I, Vincent EE, Tavaré JM. Akt signalling in health and disease. Cell Signal. 2011; 23(10): 1515–1527.
  31. Abeyrathna P, Su Y. The critical role of Akt in cardiovascular function. Vascul Pharmacol. 2015; 74: 38–48.
  32. Kim IlY, Park YK, Song SH, et al. Role of Akt1 in renal fibrosis and tubular dedifferentiation during the progression of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease. Korean J Intern Med. 2021; 36(4): 962–974.
  33. Khattar E, Mukherji A, Kumar V. Akt augments the oncogenic potential of the HBx protein of hepatitis B virus by phosphorylation. FEBS J. 2012; 279(7): 1220–1230.
  34. Abolfazli P, Aghajanzadeh T, Ghaderinasrabad M, et al. Bioinformatics analysis reveals molecular connections between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and COVID-19. J Cell Commun Signal. 2022; 16(4): 609–619.
  35. Xie YZ, Peng CW, Su ZQ, et al. A Practical Strategy for Exploring the Pharmacological Mechanism of Luteolin Against COVID-19/Asthma Comorbidity: Findings of System Pharmacology and Bioinformatics Analysis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 769011.
  36. Kempuraj D, Selvakumar GP, Ahmed ME, et al. COVID-19, Mast Cells, Cytokine Storm, Psychological Stress, and Neuroinflammation. Neuroscientist. 2020; 26(5-6): 402–414.
  37. Kovalchuk A, Wang Bo, Li D, et al. Fighting the storm: could novel anti-TNFα and anti-IL-6 cultivars tame cytokine storm in COVID-19? Aging (Albany NY). 2021; 13(2): 1571–1590.
  38. Blaser H, Dostert C, Mak TW, et al. TNF and ROS Crosstalk in Inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016; 26(4): 249–261.
  39. Zhang R, Xue T, Shao A, et al. Bclaf1 regulates c-FLIP expression and protects cells from TNF-induced apoptosis and tissue injury. EMBO Rep. 2022; 23(1): e52702.
  40. Saghazadeh A, Rezaei N. Immune-epidemiological parameters of the novel coronavirus - a perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020; 16(5): 465–470.
  41. Fricke-Galindo I, Falfán-Valencia R. Genetics Insight for COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: A Review. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 622176.
  42. Grimes JM, Grimes KV. p38 MAPK inhibition: A promising therapeutic approach for COVID-19. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2020; 144: 63–65.
  43. Burotto M, Chiou VL, Lee JM, et al. The MAPK pathway across different malignancies: a new perspective. Cancer. 2014; 120(22): 3446–3456.
  44. D Avila-Mesquita C, Couto AES, Campos LCB, et al. MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels in plasma are altered and associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021; 142: 112067.
  45. Lemańska-Perek A, Krzyżanowska-Gołąb D, Dragan B, et al. Fibronectin as a Marker of Disease Severity in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients. Cells. 2022; 11(9).
  46. Zhao Z, Zhou C, Zhang M, et al. Analysis of the potential relationship between COVID-19 and Behcet's disease using transcriptome data. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(20): e33821.