Comparing sural/radial amplitude ratio and minimal F-wave latency to Conventional Nerve Conduction Studies for the Evaluation of sensitive nerve conduction parameter in type 2 Diabetic patients with Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy
, 2, 3
Abstract
Background and Aims: Measurement instruments used to evaluate neuropathy include several questionnaires, Biothesiometry, monofilament testing, and nerve conduction studies (NCS), the gold standard test. The purpose of this research is to develop a straightforward diagnostic procedure for the early diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of minimum F wave latency and Sural Radial Amplitude Ratio (SRAR) to that of traditional NCS. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational research conducted in 82 patients. Every patient had type 2 diabetes, with an average of 5.95±4.85 years of diabetic control. The patients were then split into three groups: those with a HbA1c of less than 7.5%, those with a HbA1c of between 7.5 and 8.5%, and those with a HbA1c of more than 8.5%. Research on the nerve conduction of the tibial, Peroneal, Sural, superficial radial, median, and ulnar nerves was included. The nerves were stimulated with supramaximum intensity 0.1 ms electric pulses in order to produce the highest possible amplitude of sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) and CMAPs. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: In all four motor nerves, the Z-score for the amplitude of the CMAP was greater for the lowest F-wave latency than for the MCV of the ulnar, tibial, and median nerves (Table 2). In all four motor nerves, there was a significant relationship between MCV and the Z scores for low F-wave delay. Abnormal minimum F-wave latencies were seen in 69, 58, 18, and 22% of the nerves with normal MCV (the median, ulnar, tibial, and Peroneal nerves, respectively). Regular nerve conduction data showed that all groups showed a pattern of solely sensory involvement with a notable decrease in SNAP amplitudes but no change in nerve conduction velocities. Conclusion: Electrophysiologic investigations of diabetic polyneuropathy should take into account minimal F-wave delay and the ratio between the amplitudes of the Sural and superficial radial sensory nerve action potentials. These are sensitive markers for the diagnosis of nerve damage.
Keywords: Polyneuropathiestype 2 diabetesdiabetic peripheral neuropathyF wavesural radial amplitude rationerve conduction studies
References
- Dyck PJ, Karnes JL, O'Brien PC, et al. The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: reassessment of tests and criteria for diagnosis and staged severity. Neurology. 1992; 42(6): 1164–1170.
- Dyck PJ, Bushek W, Spring EM, et al. Vibratory and cooling detection thresholds compared with other tests in diagnosing and staging diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1987; 10(4): 432–440.
- Chalk C, Benstead TJ, Moore F. Aldose reductase inhibitors for the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; 2007(4): CD004572.
- Feldman EL, Callaghan BC, Pop-Busui R, et al. Diabetic neuropathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5(1): 42.
- Gomatos EL, Dulebohn SC, Rehman A. Sensory Neuropathy. StatPearls [Internet] 2022: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559020/.
- Santos DF, Mendonça MR, Antunes DE, et al. Revisiting primary neural leprosy: Clinical, serological, molecular, and neurophysiological aspects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017; 11(11): e0006086.
- Damasceno A, Jr MCF, Nucci A. Chronic acquired sensory neuron diseases. European Journal of Neurology. 2008; 15(12): 1400–1405.
- Creigh PD, Mountain J, Sowden JE, et al. Measuring peripheral nerve involvement in Friedreich's ataxia. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019; 6(9): 1718–1727.
- França Jr. MC, D'abreu A, Nucci A. Prospective study of peripheral neuropathy in Machado-Joseph disease. Muscle Nerve. 2009; 40(6): 1012–1018.
- Currò R, Salvalaggio A, Tozza S, et al. RFC1 expansions are a common cause of idiopathic sensory neuropathy. Brain. 2021; 144(5): 1542–1550.
- Burke D, Skuse NF, Lethlean AK. Sensory conduction of the sural nerve in polyneuropathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1974; 37(6): 647–652.
- Kimura J, Yamada T, Stevland NP. Distal slowing of motor nerve conduction velocity in diabetic polyneuropathy. J Neurol Sci. 1979; 42(2): 291–302.
- Albers JW. Clinical neurophysiology of generalized polyneuropathy. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1993; 10(2): 149–166.
- Kazamel M, Stino AM, Smith AG. Metabolic syndrome and peripheral neuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 2021; 63(3): 285–293.
- Mysiw WJ, Colachis SC, Vetter J. F response characteristics in type I diabetes mellitus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990; 69(3): 112–116.
- Lanza G, Kosac A, Trajkovic G, et al. Nerve Conduction Studies as a Measure of Disease Progression: Objectivity or Illusion? J Neuromuscul Dis. 2017; 4(3): 209–215.
- Miller RG, Anderson SJ, Costacou T, et al. Hemoglobin A1c Level and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Persons With Type 1 Diabetes: An Application of Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data in the Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2018; 187(7): 1520–1529.
- Azhar S, Khan FZ, Khan ST, et al. Raised Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic Patients: A Hospital-Based, Cross-Sectional Study in Peshawar. Cureus. 2022; 14(6): e25723.
- Liveson J, Ma D. Laboratory Reference for Clinical Neurophysiology. 1999.
- Falck B, Andreassen S, Groth T, et al. The development of a multicenter database for reference values in clinical neurophysiology--principles and examples. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1991; 34(2-3): 145–162.
- Troni W. Analysis of conduction velocity in the H pathway. Part 1. Methodology and results in normal subjects. J Neurol Sci. 1981; 51(2): 223–233.
- Fierro B, Modica A, D'Arpa A, et al. Analysis of F-wave in metabolic neuropathies: a comparative study in uremic and diabetic patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 1987; 75(3): 179–185.
- Fisher MA. AAEM Minimonograph #13: H reflexes and F waves: physiology and clinical indications. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15(11): 1223–1233.
- Weisman A, Bril V, Ngo M, et al. Identification and prediction of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy using individual and simple combinations of nerve conduction study parameters. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e58783.
- Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Lehman KA, et al. The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. Neurology. 1991; 41(6): 799–807.
- Hoogendijk JE, de Visser M, Bour LJ. Conduction block in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type I. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15(4): 520–521.
- Rutkove SB, Kothari MJ, Raynor EM. Sural/radial amplitude ratio in the diagnosis of mild axonal polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 1997; 20(10): 1236–1241, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199710)20:10<1236::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-d.
- Donofrio PD, Albers JW. AAEM minimonograph #34: polyneuropathy: classification by nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Muscle Nerve. 1990; 13(10): 889–903.
- Weber GA. Nerve conduction studies and their clinical applications. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1990; 7(1): 151–178.
- Tankisi H, Pugdahl K, Johnsen B, et al. Correlations of nerve conduction measures in axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(11): 2383–2392.
- Bromberg MB, Albers JW. Patterns of sensory nerve conduction abnormalities in demyelinating and axonal peripheral nerve disorders. Muscle Nerve. 1993; 16(3): 262–266.
- Tamura N, Kuwabara S, Misawa S, et al. Superficial radial sensory nerve potentials in immune-mediated and diabetic neuropathies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005; 116(10): 2330–2333.
- Rajabally YA, Narasimhan M. The value of sensory electrophysiology in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(9): 1999–2004.
- De Sousa EA, Chin RL, Sander HW, et al. Demyelinating findings in typical and atypical chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: sensitivity and specificity. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2009; 10(4): 163–169.