Vol 82, No 2 (2024)
Original article
Published online: 2024-02-02

open access

Page views 500
Article views/downloads 235
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

First-year follow-up costs of myocardial infarction management in Poland from the payer’s perspective

Anna Skowrońska1, Siamala Sinnadurai23, Paweł Teisseyre145, Patrycja Gryka1, Agnieszka Doryńska1, Magdalena Dzierwa1, Mariusz Gąsior6, Marcin Grabowski7, Karol Kamiński3, Jarosław D Kasprzak8, Jacek Kubica9, Maciej Lesiak10, Bartosz Szafran11, Mariusz Wójcik12, Jarosław Pinkas13, Radosław Sierpiński14, Ryszard Gellert15, Piotr Jankowski216
Pubmed: 38348614
Pol Heart J 2024;82(2):183-191.

Abstract

Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major burden for healthcare systems. Therefore, we intended to analyze the determinants of cost management of patients hospitalized for MI in Poland.
Methods: Data on patients hospitalized and discharged with the diagnosis of acute MI were derived from the public payer claims database. Adult patients, reported between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, were included. Costs of hospitalization for acute MI and cumulative one-year follow-up were analyzed.
Results: The median (IQR) of the total direct cost was €3804.7 (2674.1–5712.7) per patient and 29% (€1113.6 [380.5–2490.4]) of these were costs related to the use of post-hospitalization healthcare resources. The median cost of cardiovascular disease management was €3624.7 (2582.1–5258.5), and 26% of this sum were follow-up costs. The analysis of the total cost for individual years showed a slight increase in median costs in subsequent years: €3450.7 (2407.8–5205.2) in 2017, €3753.8 (2642.6–5681.9) in 2018, and €3944.9 (2794.8–5844.4) in 2019. Male sex, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of stroke in addition to hospitalization in a department other than cardiology or internal disease were independently related to the cost of MI patient management.
Conclusions: The high cost of management of MI patients was independently related to sex, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of stroke as well as hospitalization in other than cardiology or internal disease department.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

First-year follow-up costs of myocardial infarction management in Poland from the payer’s perspective

Anna Skowrońska1Siamala Sinnadurai27Paweł Teisseyre134Patrycja Gryka1Agnieszka Doryńska1Magdalena Dzierwa1Mariusz Gąsior5Marcin Grabowski6Karol Kamiński7Jarosław D. Kasprzak8Jacek Kubica9Maciej Lesiak10Bartosz Szafran11Mariusz Wójcik12Jarosław Pinkas13Radosław Sierpiński14Ryszard Gellert15Piotr Jankowski216
1Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System, Warsaw, Poland
2Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
3Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
4Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
53rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
61st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
7Department of Population Medicine and Lifestyle Diseases Prevention, Medical University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland
81st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
9Interventional Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Research, Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
10Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine II, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
11Cardiology Outpatient Pro Corde, Wroclaw and Cardiology Department, County Hospital Wroclaw, Wrocław, Poland
12Clinical Department of Cardiology with the Acute Coronary Syndromes Subdivision, Clinical Provincial Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszow, Rzeszów, Poland
13School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warszawa, Poland
14Faculty of Medicine, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, Warszawa, Poland
15Department of Nephrology and Internal Medicine, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warszawa, Poland
16Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatric Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warszawa, Poland

Correspondence to:

Assistant Prof. Siamala Sinnadurai MPH, PhD,

Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion,

School of Public Health,

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education,

Kleczewska 61/63, 01–826 Warszawa, Poland,

phone: + 48 513 768 710

e-mail: ssinnadurai@cmkp.edu.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.phj.99006

Received: August 10, 2023

Accepted: January 18, 2024

Early publication date: February 2, 2024

ABSTRACT
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major burden for healthcare systems. Therefore, we intended to analyze the determinants of cost management of patients hospitalized for MI in Poland.
Methods: Data on patients hospitalized and discharged with the diagnosis of acute MI were derived from the public payer claims database. Adult patients, reported between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, were included. Costs of hospitalization for acute MI and cumulative one-year follow-up were analyzed.
Results: The median (IQR) of the total direct cost was €3804.7 (2674.15712.7) per patient and 29% (€1113.6 [380.52490.4]) of these were costs related to the use of post-hospitalization healthcare resources. The median cost of cardiovascular disease management was €3624.7 (2582.15258.5), and 26% of this sum were follow-up costs. The analysis of the total cost for individual years showed a slight increase in median costs in subsequent years: €3450.7 (2407.85205.2) in 2017, €3753.8 (2642.65681.9) in 2018, and €3944.9 (2794.85844.4) in 2019. Male sex, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of stroke in addition to hospitalization in a department other than cardiology or internal disease were independently related to the cost of MI patient management.
Conclusions: The high cost of management of MI patients was independently related to sex, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of stroke as well as hospitalization in other than cardiology or internal disease department.
Key words: acute myocardial infarction, healthcare costs, invasive management

WHAT’S NEW?

We present a pioneering study that comprehensively captures and quantifies hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs of managing myocardial infarction (MI), which were not previously explored in Poland. The identification of cost predictors and sex disparities highlights the necessity for tailored and evidence-based approaches to confront economic challenges posed by MI. By focusing attention on optimal healthcare management programs, we can promote more sustainable outcomes and mitigate the financial burden on both the healthcare system and affected individuals.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major threat to public health worldwide [1]. Notably, ischemic heart disease, including its most important manifestation (i.e., myocardial infarction [MI]) is the main cause of mortality, contributing to 16% of the world’s total deaths [2]. In addition, patients with acute MI often incur high medical expenditures following the event. These expenditures include frequent rehospitalization, multiple drug prescriptions, and device-related therapies as well as cardiac rehabilitation [3]. MI is also related to substantial indirect costs, resulting from either premature mortality or MI-related disability limiting return to work. In addition, contemporary societies are under the pressure of increasing general health-related expenditures [4]. Therefore, identification of factors associated with the increased cost of management could help in planning a strategy for cost reduction and more affordable healthcare as well as save more lives.

Over 80 thousand patients suffer from acute MI in Poland yearly with one-year mortality exceeding 17% [5]. Moreover, almost half of all patients are rehospitalized for various reasons within one year following MI [5–7]. However, there are a few scientific reports available that have estimated costs related to CVD entities such as MI, heart failure (HF), hypertension, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Poland [6–9]. In addition, only a few reports have analyzed factors related to resource use in patients hospitalized for MI. Therefore, the present analysis aimed to explore the determinants of the management cost of patients hospitalized for MI in Poland.

METHODS

Study population

We included all adult (≥18 years of age) patients who had been discharged from the hospital with the diagnosis of acute MI between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 in Poland. We classified hospitalization for MI according to ICD-10 codes I21 or I22 as the main diagnosis at any hospital ward. The index hospitalization for MI was defined as a continuous hospital stay, including all possible transfers between wards or hospitals for any reason until a patient’s discharge home or death.

Patient histories were determined using claims data. A patient was coded as having a disease (e.g. hypertension or chronic kidney disease) if the disease was reported by any hospital or outpatient clinic. The follow-up period was defined as one year after discharge or the period from discharge to the patient’s death. Hospitalization was defined as admission to a healthcare facility lasting >24 hours unless the patient died within 24 hours.

Ethics committee approval was not needed as we analyzed a fully anonymous national database. Informed consent was not required.

Cost analysis

We focused on direct costs (including hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs) from the payer’s perspective. In addition, we only considered costs associated with management of cardiovascular diseases. The original costs are given in Polish zloty (PLN), and we converted them into Euro (EUR), by adopting the EUR to PLN exchange rate of 4.61, which is the value for the date of the last observation day (Dec 31, 2020). Resources used by healthcare providers and financed by the National Health Fund were identified. Total costs included costs of all services provided for the patient, which were calculated starting from the index hospitalization to the end of the follow-up period. Follow-up costs encompassed all expenses incurred after hospital discharge after MI and for one year or until the patient’s demise. Costs associated with CVD management included an additional restriction on the ICD-10 code.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were described as proportion and compared using the χ2 test. Continuous variables were expressed using mean and median values and compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Dispersion of variables was measured using the standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range (IQR). We used a multivariable linear regression model to examine the associations between related clinical factors and costs. Additionally, the Box-Cox method was employed to find the optimal transformation of the response variable. To report the most significant independent predictors, we ran a variable selection procedure using backward elimination and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The BIC criterion consists of two terms; the first one is related to the sum of squared residuals and measures the quality of model fit while the second one is related to the number of variables in the model and can be interpreted as a penalty for the complexity of the model. The method involves finding a subset of independent variables that minimizes the criterion. The coefficient of determination (R2) and F test were used to assess the goodness of fit of the model. We used the Spearman coefficient to measure the strength of correlations between single variables. We assumed a significance level of 0.05 in all statistical tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.0.3). In particular, we used R packages: stats and ggplot2.

RESULTS

Overall, 154 108 MI patients were included in the analysis, with 56 095 (36.4%) females and 98 013 (63.6%) males (Table 1). The mean (SD) age was 68.1 (11.9) years, whereas the median (IQR) age was 68.0 (60.676.8). The majority of patients had been hospitalized in cardiological departments (88.1%). Invasive management (at least coronary angiography) was performed in 90.4% of patients, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 74.3%, and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 4.0% (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the analyzed group

Variable

Number (%)

Age, years, mean (SD)

68.1 (11.9)

Sex, n (%)

Females

56 095 (36.4)

Males

98 013 (63.6)

Heart failure, n (%)

33 329 (21.6)

Hypertension, n (%)

115 757 (75.1)

Atrial fibrillation, n (%)

19 103 (12.4)

Diabetes, n (%)

47 956 (31.1)

History of myocardial infarction, n (%)

10 789 (7.0)

History of CABG, n (%)

1571 (1.0)

History of PCI, n (%)

17 623 (11.4)

History of stroke, n (%)

4977 (3.2)

Chronic kidney disease, n (%)

12401 (8.0)

History of dialysis, n (%)

1555 (1.0)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, n (%)

17 495 (11.4)

History of cancer, n (%)

38 569 (25.0)

Index hospitalisation, n (%)

Coronary angiography, n (%)

139 389 (90.4)

Percutaneous coronary intervention, n (%)

114 446 (74.3)

CABG, n (%)

6233 (4.0)

Department, n (%)

Cardiology

135 803 (88.1)

Internal medicine

13 467 (8.7)

Other

4838 (3.1)

Type of hospital, n (%)

District

50 664 (32.9)

Community

39 778 (25.8)

Teaching

24 792 (16.1)

Other

38 874 (22.2)

In-hospital mortality was 8.64%. Post-discharge one-year all-cause mortality was 8.7%. The mean number of hospital stays within one year following discharge was 1.20 (0.47). The median number of consultations with the cardiologist within one year following discharge was 1.09 (0.002.23). The median number of consultations with a primary healthcare physician within one year following discharge was 10.28 (6.6714.89). Patients with diabetes consulted a diabetologist 0.71 (1.29) times, on average, the median was 0.00 (0.001.14).

The median total cost was €3804.7 (2674.15712.7) per patient and 29% (€1113.6 [380.52490.4]) of this was cost related to using post-hospitalization resources. The median cost of CVD management was €3624.7 (2582.15258.5), of this sum, 26% of costs were related to post-hospitalization expenditures (Table 2). The analysis of the total cost for individual years shows a slight increase in median costs in subsequent years: €3450.7 (2407.85205.2) in 2017, €3753.8 (2642.65681.9) in 2018, and €3944.9 (2794.85844.4) in 2019 (Table 3).

Table 2. Summary of the costs (in Euros) per patient

Type of cost

Median (IQR)

Mean

Hospitalization costs

2290.7 (2082.4–3205.7)

2699.5

Post-hospitalization costs

1113.6 (380.5–2490.4)

2302.7

Hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs

3804.7 (2674.1–5712.7)

5002.2

Post-hospitalization costs associated with cardiovascular causes

929.2 (217.3–2027.3)

1828.1

Hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs associated with cardiovascular causes

3624.7 (2582.1–5258.5)

4536.8

Table 3. Summary of the costs by year of discharge from the hospital (in Euros)

Year of discharge from the hospital

Median (IQR)

Mean

Costs of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction

2017

2105.8 (1915.8–2659.8)

2336.4

2018

2290.7 (2082.4–2973.0)

2621.9

2019

2359.3 (2082.4–3310.4)

2791.0

2017–2019

2290.7 (2082.4–3205.7)

2699.5

Costs of the management in the post-discharge period

2017

997.3 (280.9–2377.6)

2176.3

2018

1116.9 (399.1–2524.6)

2318.5

2019

1131.1 (387.3–2480.1)

2318.0

2017–2019

1113.6 (380.5–2490.4)

2302.7

Total costs

2017

3450.7 (2407.8–5205.2)

4537.3

2018

3753.8 (2642.6–5681.9)

4975.7

2019

3944.9 (2794.8–5844.4)

5144.6

2017–2019

3804.7 (2674.1–5712.7)

5002.2

Table 4 presents the subgroup analysis of the total costs of medical care in patients hospitalized for MI. History of dialysis, CABG during the index hospitalization, chronic kidney disease, and HF were related to higher management costs.

Table 4. Variables related to the total costs (in Euros) in univariable and multivariable analyses

Variable

Total cost

Univariate,

median (IQR)

P-value

Mutivariable regression,

β (٩٥٪ CI)a

P-value

Variable

Total cost

Univariate,

median (IQR)

P-value

Mutivariable regression,

β (٩٥٪ CI)a

P-value

Age

<50 years

3290.6 (2487.4–4539.8)

<0.001

Reference

50–60 years

3724.3 (2746.5–5393.5)

60–70 years

3989.7 (2850.6–6085.6)

70–80 years

4072.3 (2770.3–6289.5)

≥80 years

3460.9 (2305–5151)

Sex

Male

3969 (2846.1–6037.5)

<0.001

0.023 (0.022, 0.025)

<0.001

Female

3531 (2388.5–5204.9)

Reference

Heart failure

Yes

3998.8 (2562.2–6575.9)

<0.001

0.023 (0.021, 0.025)

<0.001

No

3766.7 (2698.6–5519.3)

Reference

Hypertension

Yes

3855.5 (2668.6–5849.6)

<0.001

No

3678.9 (2689.9–5300.6)

Reference

Atrial fibrillation

Yes

3850.9 (2501.6–6192.3)

0.241

0.007 (0.005, 0.010)

<0.001

No

3798.8 (2698.1–5650.7)

Reference

Diabetes

Yes

4128.5 (2838–6440.6)

<0.001

0.020 (0.018, 0.021)

<0.001

No

3691.1 (2618.3–5410)

Reference

History of myocardial infarction

Yes

3641.9 (2443.6–5989.4)

<0.001

–0.013 (–0.017, –0.010)

<0.001

No

3813.4 (2695.2–5692.3)

Reference

History of PCI

Yes

3879 (2647.1–6384.1)

<0.001

0.009 (0.006, 0.012)

<0.001

No

3795.7 (2677.9–5638.1)

Reference

History of CABG

Yes

3666.3 (2448.1–6059.1)

0.198

No

3805.5 (2676.8–5709.7)

Reference

History of stroke

Yes

4124 (2681.2–6304.7)

<0.001

0.013 (0.008, 0.017)

<0.001

No

3796.4 (2673.8–5689.3)

Reference

Chronic kidney disease

Yes

4481.4 (2880–8240)

<0.001

0.025 (0.022, 0.028)

<0.001

No

3765.5 (2662.3–5569)

Reference

History of dialysis

Yes

17368.1 (9718.1–21201.8)

<0.001

0.280 (0.273, 0.287)

<0.001

No

3782.6 (2663.6–5629.7)

Reference

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Yes

3955.7 (2712.6–6091.5)

<0.001

0.008 (0.006, 0.011)

<0.001

No

3786.5 (2670.4–5664)

Reference

Cancer in the history

Yes

3896.6 (2689.8–5959.6)

<0.001

0.010 (0.008, 0.012)

<0.001

No

3774.1 (2669.2–5629.8)

Reference

Coronary angiography during the index hospitalization

Yes

3877.5 (2798.6–5779.2)

<0.001

0.032 (0.029, 0.035)

<0.001

No

2700.2 (1453.3–4863.6)

Reference

PCI during the index hospitalization

Yes

3961.8 (3028.9–5520.1)

<0.001

0.113 (0.111, 0.115)

<0.001

No

2546.7 (1301.2–6653.1)

Reference

CABG during the index hospitalization

Yes

8071.4 (6883.5–10,144.4)

<0.001

0.252 (0.248, 0.256)

<0.001

No

3707.5 (2621.8–5356)

Reference

Department of cardiology

Yes

3791.4 (2702.8–5627.2)

0.045

–0.050 (–0.055, –0.046)

<0.001

No

3951.4 (2430.4–6412.4)

Reference

Department of internal medicine

Yes

3710.5 (2260.9–5824.5)

<0.001

–0.027 (–0.032, –0.022)

<0.001

No

3810.5 (2708.2–5701.7)

Reference

Other department

Yes

4725.7 (2933.7–7964.9)

<0.001

No

3785.7 (2668.9–5644.4)

Reference

Teaching hospitals

Yes

4284 (2913.6–6912)

<0.001

No

3732.1 (2622.9–5492.6)

Reference

District hospitals

Yes

3667.3 (2598.2–5495.5)

<0.001

–0.017 (–0.019, –0.015)

<0.001

No

3874.6 (2714.7–5817.9)

Reference

Community hospitals

Yes

3587.9 (2457–5388.3)

<0.001

–0.018 (–0.02, –0.016)

<0.001

No

3875.6 (2761.8–5816.5)

Reference

Other hospitals

Yes

3960.3 (2871.4–5578)

<0.001

0.009 (0.007, 0.010)

<0.001

No

3754.7 (2612.9–5765.9)

Reference

Males incurred significantly larger total costs compared to female patients. Patients who were hospitalized in a cardiology department cost significantly less when compared with patients hospitalized in other departments. The Spearman correlation coefficient between age and the total cost was not statistically significant (r = –0.005; P = 0.12). Age remained not significantly related to the costs in multivariable analysis both when we used age as a continuous variable and when we constructed age categories (Table 4). The abovementioned relationships remained unchanged in multiple regression analysis using a Box-Cox transformation on dependent variables to correct cost data which had skewed distribution [10]. This allowed us to obtain a model that is better fitted to the data (R2 = 0.2232) when compared to the model based on the original response variable (R2 = 0.1316) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Distribution of the total cost (A) and distribution of the total cost after Box-Cox transformation (B). The optimal value of parameter λ = 0.1 in Box-Cox transformation

The subgroup analysis of the postdischarge costs of medical care is presented in Table 5. The high cost of management was related to dialysis, chronic kidney disease, and HF in the history. Male sex was also related to significantly higher costs. The multivariable analysis confirmed that kidney disease, sex, history of HF, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and stroke as well as invasive management in the acute phase of MI and type of department where the patient was hospitalized were independently related to management costs following discharge.

Table 5. Subgroup analysis of the costs (in Euros) of management in the post-discharge period

Variable

Post-hospitalization cost

Univariate,

median (IQR)

P-value

Multivariable regression,

β (٩٥٪ CI)a

P-value

Variable

Post-hospitalization cost

Univariate,

median (IQR)

P-value

Multivariable regression,

β (٩٥٪ CI)a

P-value

Age

<50 years

780.7 (245.8–1532.7)

<0.001

Reference

50–60 years

1024.5 (382.7–2143.5)

60–70 years

1154.3 (431.2–2618.9)

70–80 years

1250 (446.3–2887.5)

≥80 years

1072.8 (241.1–2420.8)

Sex

Males

1147 (422.1–2620.6)

<0.001

0.040 (0.036, 0.043)

<0.001

Female

1049.2 (292.4–2272)

Reference

Heart failure

Yes

1432.3 (521.4–3569.6)

<0.001

0.039 (0.035, 0.044)

<0.001

No

1054.9 (352.6–2249.7)

Reference

Hypertension

Yes

1160.6 (401–2634.2)

<0.001

0.014 (0.01, 0.018)

<0.001

No

974 (331.5–2049.2)

Reference

Atrial fibrillation

Yes

1357.9 (480.4–3276.2)

<0.001

0.019 (0.014, 0.024)

<0.001

No

1093.2 (369.2–2388.7)

Reference

Diabetes

Yes

1297 (485.2–3064.5)

<0.001

0.037 (0.033, 0.040)

<0.001

No

1036.7 (341–2252)

Reference

History of myocardial infarction

Yes

1256.6 (381.7–3272.3)

<0.001

–0.022 (–0.03, –0.015)

<0.001

No

1103.5 (380.3–2444.3)

Reference

History of PCI

Yes

1339.7 (440.1–3460)

<0.001

0.021 (0.014, 0.027)

<0.001

No

1095.1 (373.1–2390)

Reference

History of CABG

Yes

1234.8 (332.7–3534.1)

<0.001

No

1112.5 (380.9–2482.3)

Reference

History of stroke

Yes

1460 (525.6–3307)

<0.001

0.022 (0.013, 0.031)

<0.001

No

1103.4 (376.7–2463)

Reference

Chronic kidney disease

Yes

1835.3 (736.2–5122.1)

<0.001

0.052 (0.045, 0.058)

<0.001

No

1079.8 (359.1–2345)

Reference

History of dialysis

Yes

14695.1 (6500.3–17999.5)

<0.001

0.437 (0.421, 0.453)

<0.001

No

1103.4 (372.7–2425.4)

Reference

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Yes

1302.1 (514.9–2995)

<0.001

0.025 (0.020, 0.030)

<0.001

No

1095.7 (365.4–2429.4)

Reference

History of cancer

Yes

1246.1 (472.8–2859.2)

<0.001

0.040 (0.036, 0.043)

<0.001

No

1073.2 (346.3–2367.2)

Reference

Coronary angiography during the index hospitalization

Yes

1109.1 (380.2–2457.2)

<0.001

–0.014 (–0.02, –0.008)

<0.001

No

1168.2 (382.3–2829.4)

Reference

PCI during the index hospitalization

Yes

1149.6 (445.9–2434.1)

<0.001

0.041 (0.036, 0.045)

<0.001

No

944.1 (202.2–2760.8)

Reference

CABG during the index hospitalization

Yes

1013.6 (519.4–1719)

<0.001

No

1119.9 (375.6–2526.2)

Reference

Department of cardiology

Yes

1103 (376.1–2421.3)

<0.001

–0.044 (–0.053, –0.035)

<0.001

No

1254.9 (424.5–3071.2)

Reference

Department of internal medicine

Yes

1199.8 (410.4–2913)

<0.001

–0.022 (–0.033, –0.011)

<0.001

No

1104.3 (378.4–2454.5)

Reference

Other department

Yes

1413.5 (471–3620.3)

<0.001

No

1104.5 (378.1–2460.6)

Reference

Teaching hospitals

Yes

1116.6 (433.6–2606)

<0.001

No

1112.7 (365.2–2469.4)

Reference

District hospitals

Yes

1103.4 (374.7–2463.4)

0.003

–0.015 (–0.020, –0.011)

<0.001

No

1117.9 (383.3–2502.6)

Reference

Community hospitals

Yes

1136.7 (315–2580.6)

0.768

–0.019 (–0.023, –0.014)

<0.001

No

1105.5 (402.6–2456.2)

Reference

Other hospitals

Yes

1103.4 (408.4–2354.7)

0.098

No

1116.7 (373.1–2533.4)

Reference

The management cost of patients hospitalized for acute MI was correlated with the number of comorbidities (Figure 2). Both, the total cost as well as the post-hospitalization cost correlated with the number of comorbidities (Spearman correlation r = 0.20; P <0.001 and r = 0.16; P <0.001).

Figure 2. Total costs (A) and post-hospitalization costs (B) calculated in Euros in relation to several clinical factors (male sex, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cancer in the history, stroke in the history, myocardial infarction in the history, chronic kidney disease in the history, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of percutaneous coronary intervention, percutaneous coronary intervention during the index hospitalization, invasive management during the index hospitalization, previous dialysis, history of coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary artery bypass grafting) present simultaneously in the patient

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that captured and quantified the hospitalization and post-hospitalization costs related to MI in Poland. The number of hospital admissions and cost of hospitalization of acute MI patients put a substantial economic burden on the healthcare system. Our analysis focused on the country’s National Health Fund data and demonstrated that more than 90% of total hospitalization and post-hospitalization expenditure was related to cardiovascular healthcare. Importantly, the mean post-hospitalization cost, €2302.7, incurred in the first year following discharge was only slightly lower compared to the mean cost of acute MI patient hospitalization (€2669.5). Our findings align with the annual costs reported in the Soroka Acute Myocardial Infraction II (SAMI II) retrospective study from a tertiary medical center. In that study, annual per-patient costs throughout the first year following MI (€5592) were significantly higher compared with the preceding year (€3120) [11]. Additionally, we observed that the mean per-person annual cost of hospitalization in Poland was comparable to that incurred in Sweden in relation to CVD patients [12].

Analyzing clinical data, our results showed that co-morbidities rather than age were cost predictors. Specifically, the co-morbidities identified as predictors of increased hospitalization cost in studies of MI patients were diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease as well as HF, atrial fibrillation, and stroke. These comorbidities may affect the course of coronary artery disease and, as a result, may increase therapy-related costs, which stresses the need for optimal and coordinated care in the first year following MI [13, 14].

Our results demonstrated that men are more likely than women to generate high management costs. CVDs are highly prevalent in men compared to women, which may explain the underuse of clinical procedures in women and overuse in men. Another explanation can be a higher complication rate in men and, therefore, higher costs of usually expensive procedures tackling complications [15]. On the other hand, women are more willing than men to adapt their lifestyle and adhere to medications to avoid surgery [16].

The likelihood of incurring high management costs was associated with a number of co-morbidities. Similarly, a multi-country analysis of costs related to CVD in patients with atrial fibrillation reported that co-morbidities, such as diabetes and stroke, were identified as predictors of costs in the Polish population [17]. Pre-existing HF was related to significantly higher costs in our analysis. This finding is in line with other analyses showing high costs of management of HF patients [18].

Since the economic burden of acute MI is high, efforts to provide effective public health activities and effective medical management could result in significant health-related cost savings and increased productivity. It applies also to MI-related complications and post-acute MI hospitalization which can be substantially lowered with effective treatment coordination and prevention.

Limitations

Although our study focused on Polish residents, our findings remain relevant to other healthcare systems. However, the present analysis has some limitations. First, the design of the present study precludes any claims on cause-and-effect relations. Indeed, we can only confirm statistical associations between the analyzed variables and cost management, rather than a causal relationship. Second, we were not able to estimate the indirect costs of MI nor the socio-economic status of patients due to lack of available data. Moreover, we have no data on lifestyle habits of the analyzed patients. The inclusion of such additional information would possibly allow for a more effective analysis of the impact of the considered variables on costs. Third, we could not analyze costs of drugs utilized in the post-discharge period. Therefore, the presented cost estimates should be seen as understated. Finally, the results are based on the robustness of the public databases that generally suffer from reporting bias resulting from the specificity of financing claims. On the other hand, a major advantage of the present study is the analysis of a large, nationwide database including all patients hospitalized for MI between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 in Poland. Thus, the data regarding used resources provide an overview of current everyday practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex, HF, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of stroke as well as hospitalization in departments other than cardiology or internal disease are independently related to the cost of management of MI patients. Age was not independently related to the cost of management of MI patients.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Thompson SC, Nedkoff L, Katzenellenbogen J, et al. Challenges in managing acute cardiovascular diseases and follow up care in rural areas: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(24), doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245126, indexed in Pubmed: 31847490.
  2. Alipour V, Zandian H, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases before and after Iran’s health transformation plan: evidence from a referral hospital of Iran. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021; 19(1): 1, doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00250-8, indexed in Pubmed: 33390167.
  3. Kannel WB. Incidence, prevalence, and mortality of cardiovascular diseases. In: Hurst’s the heart. 1994.
  4. Kumar A, Siddharth V, Singh SI, et al. Cost analysis of treating cardiovascular diseases in a super-specialty hospital. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1): e0262190, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262190, indexed in Pubmed: 34986193.
  5. Jankowski P, Topór-Mądry R, Gąsior M, et al. Management and predictors of clinical events in 75 686 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(4): 468475, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0058, indexed in Pubmed: 35188220.
  6. Kupisz-Urbańska M, Jankowski P, Topór-Mądry R, et al. Survival in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction in 2014-2020: A nationwide analysis. Kardiol Pol. 2023; 81(10): 10151017, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0155, indexed in Pubmed: 37448218.
  7. Jankowski P, Topór-Mądry R, Gąsior M, et al. Innovative managed care may be related to improved prognosis for acute myocardial infarction survivors. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021; 14(8): e007800, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.007800, indexed in Pubmed: 34380330.
  8. Czech M, Opolski G, Zdrojewski T, et al. The costs of heart failure in Poland from the public payer’s perspective. Polish programme assessing diagnostic procedures, treatment and costs in patients with heart failure in randomly selected outpatient clinics and hospitals at different levels of care: POLKARD. Kardiol Pol. 2013; 71(3): 224232, doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0032, indexed in Pubmed: 23575775.
  9. Sović N, Pająk A, Jankowski P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a cardiovascular disease primary prevention programme in a primary health care setting. Results of the Polish part of the EUROACTION project. Kardiol Pol. 2013; 71(7): 702711, doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0157, indexed in Pubmed: 23907903.
  10. Suwalski P, Kowalewski M, Jasiński M, et al. KROK Investigators. Survival after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in mitral valve surgery: Analysis from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures (KROK). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157(3): 10071018.e4, doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.099, indexed in Pubmed: 30314688.
  11. Plakht Y, Gilutz H, Arbelle JE, et al. Healthcare-service utilization and direct costs throughout ten years following acute myocardial infarction: Soroka Acute Myocardial Infarction II (SAMI II) project. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019; 35(7): 12571263, doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1571298, indexed in Pubmed: 30649969.
  12. Steen Carlsson K, Nilsson K, Wolden ML, et al. Economic burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a matched case-control study in more than 450,000 Swedish individuals. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023; 23(1): 483, doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03518-y, indexed in Pubmed: 37773098.
  13. Cazzola M, Rogliani P, Ora J, et al. Asthma and comorbidities: recent advances. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022; 132(4), doi: 10.20452/pamw.16250, indexed in Pubmed: 35485651.
  14. Bonetto S, Fagoonee S, Battaglia E, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021; 131(78): 709715, doi: 10.20452/pamw.16067, indexed in Pubmed: 34463082.
  15. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(4): 221225, doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107253250401, indexed in Pubmed: 2057022.
  16. Sinnadurai S, Sowa P, Jankowski P, et al. Recollection of physician information about risk factor and lifestyle changes in chronic coronary syndrome patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(11), doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116416, indexed in Pubmed: 35682001.
  17. Holstenson E, Ringborg A, Lindgren P, et al. Predictors of costs related to cardiovascular disease among patients with atrial fibrillation in five European countries. Europace. 2011; 13(1): 2330, doi: 10.1093/europace/euq325, indexed in Pubmed: 20823043.
  18. Urbich M, Globe G, Pantiri K, et al. A systematic review of medical costs associated with heart failure in the USA (2014-2020). Pharmacoeconomics. 2020; 38(11): 12191236, doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0, indexed in Pubmed: 32812149.



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)