Vol 81, No 9 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2023-07-21

open access

Page views 1937
Article views/downloads 336
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion as a bridge to pulmonary vein isolation

Tomasz Podolecki12, Witold Streb12, Zbigniew Kalarus12
Pubmed: 37489826
Kardiol Pol 2023;81(9):930-931.

Abstract

Not available

Clinical vignette

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion as a bridge to pulmonary vein isolation

Tomasz Podolecki12Witold Streb12Zbigniew Kalarus12
1Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
2Silesian Center for Heart Diseases in Zabrze, Zabrze, Poland

Correspondence to:

Tomasz Podolecki, MD, PhD,

Department of Cardiology,

Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy,

Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze,

Medical University of Silesia,

Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases in Zabrze,

Curie-Skłodowskiej 9, 41–800 Zabrze,

phone: +48 373 36 48,

e-mail: tomekpod@interia.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2023.0148

Received: April 13, 2023

Accepted: July 2, 2023

Early publication date: July 21, 2023

A 36-year-old woman was admitted to our center for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III symptoms. The patient had a history of surgery for atrial septal defect type ostium secundum and mitral valve annuloplasty at the age of four and five, respectively. Echocardiography revealed severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 36%) with global hypokinesia and no significant valvular heart disease. Magnetic resonance imaging showed no signs of ischemic nor inflammatory cardiomyopathy, therefore, tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy was diagnosed, and the patient was qualified for pulmonary vein isolation. However, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed a massive thrombus located in the medial and distal part of the left atrial appendage (LAA) (Figure 1A). The strategy of rate control had to be chosen, as neither cardioversion nor cryoablation was permissible.

Figure 1. A. Visualization of the LAA thrombus on TEE. B. Sentinel cerebral protection system arrows indicate the deployed device filters fluoroscopy image. C. The LAA after closure with an Amplatzer Amulet occluder TEE. D. The disc of Amplatzer Amulet occluder closing the LAA ostium TEE 3D view
Abbreviations: LAA, left atrial appendage; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography

After four weeks, control TEE revealed a persistent LAA thrombus despite using the nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC). The antithrombotic therapy was changed NOAC was withdrawn and enoxaparin (1 mg per kg twice daily subcutaneously) with acetylsalicylic acid (75 mg/daily) were administered. Despite more aggressive antithrombotic treatment, the second control TEE, performed four weeks later, showed no thrombus resolution.

Given highly symptomatic AF and deterioration of heart failure symptoms to NYHA class III, the patient was qualified for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with a cerebral protection device to make possible cryoblation and electrical cardioversion. The procedure was performed using an Amplatzer Amulet 28 mm occluder with the SENTINEL cerebral protection system to minimize the risk of cerebral arterial embolization (Figure 1B). Despite neuroprotection, we also used the “no-touch technique”, with no contrast injection and restriction on guidewire or catheter manipulation within LAA. We achieved complete occlusion of the LAA (Figures 1C and 1D), with no periprocedural complications. The patient was discharged in good clinical state one day after the procedure. Cryoablation with subsequent effective electrical cardioversion were performed 3 weeks later. Control echocardiography showed a significant increase in LVEF (LVEF, 50%).

The incidence of left atrial thrombus (LAT) in AF patients receiving oral anticoagulants varies from 1.6 to 8.0%, and over 90% of all thrombi are located within the LAA [1–3]. Thanks to more aggressive anticoagulation therapy, about 60% of thrombi might be resolved; however, such a strategy is burdened with significantly higher bleeding risk [1–3]. The presence of a LAT is associated with a significant increase in the risk of ischemic stroke and other thromboembolic complications, especially during electrical/pharmacological cardioversion and in procedures involving catheterization of the left atrium (LA). Therefore, both cardioversion and invasive procedures within LA are strongly contraindicated in the case of LAT presence [4]. However, a recent study demonstrated, that LAAO in the presence of LAT is feasible and quite safe, and the use of a cerebral protection device might reduce the risk of procedure-related thromboembolic events [5].

To the best of our knowledge, we have reported the first case of LAAO performed to facilitate cryoablation in a patient with persistent thrombus within the LAA.

Article information

Conflict of interest: ZK and WS are proctors of Abbott company. TP declares no conflict of interest.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Zhan Y, Joza J, Al Rawahi M, et al. Assessment and management of the left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2018; 34(3): 252261, doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.008, indexed in Pubmed: 29395705.
  2. Frenkel D, D’Amato SA, Al-Kazaz M, et al. Prevalence of left atrial thrombus detection by transesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of continuous non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant versus warfarin therapy in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 2(3): 295303, doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.01.004, indexed in Pubmed: 29766887.
  3. Niku AD, Shiota T, Siegel RJ, et al. Prevalence and resolution of left atrial thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and flutter with oral anticoagulation. Am J Cardiol. 2019; 123(1): 6368, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.027, indexed in Pubmed: 30360887.
  4. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2021; 26(9): 4701, doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4701.
  5. Marroquin L, Tirado-Conte G, Pracoń R, et al. Management and outcomes of patients with left atrial appendage thrombus prior to percutaneous closure. Heart. 2022; 108(14): 10981106, doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319811, indexed in Pubmed: 34686564.