Vol 81, No 1 (2023)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2022-09-22

open access

Page views 3157
Article views/downloads 565
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat superior vena cava syndrome

Paweł Zugaj1, Grzegorz Karpiński1, Fryderyk Daniluk1, Arkadiusz Pietrasik1, Krzysztof Lamparski2, Krzysztof Korzeniowski2, Łukasz Szarpak3, Krzysztof J Filipiak4, Aleksandra Gąsecka1
Pubmed: 36136035
Kardiol Pol 2023;81(1):72-74.

Abstract

Not available

Clinical vignette

Successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat superior vena cava syndrome

Paweł Zugaj1Grzegorz Karpiński1Fryderyk Daniluk1Arkadiusz Pietrasik1Krzysztof Lamparski2Krzysztof Korzeniowski2Łukasz Szarpak3Krzysztof J Filipiak4Aleksandra Gąsecka1
11st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
22nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
3Henry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
4Department of Clinical Sciences, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Medical Academy, Warszawa, Poland

Correspondence to:

Aleksandra Gąsecka, MD, PhD,

1st Chair and Department of Cardiology,

Medical University of Warsaw,

Banacha 1A, 02–097 Warszawa, Poland, phone: +48 22 599 19 51,

e-mail: aleksandra.gasecka@wum.edu.pl

Copyright by the Author(s), 2023

DOI: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0221

Received: August 17, 2022

Accepted: September 9, 2022

Early publication date: October 2, 2022

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by reduced blood flow through SVC, leading to facial and neck swelling, upper limb swelling, dyspnea and cough [1]. The most prevalent cause of SVCS is malignancy. The non-malignant causes include infection, thrombosis, and complications associated with intravascular devices. For example, 25% of patients with pacemakers have central venous obstruction, although only 1% of these patients are symptomatic, likely due to the development of collateral circulation [2]. Depending on the cause, the treatment of SVC includes radiotherapy or chemotherapy, systemic anticoagulation, or thrombolysis and endovascular techniques [2]. The latter include percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting [3], or thrombectomy [4]. Endovascular techniques have higher efficacy for symptom relief (80%–95%), compared to radiotherapy (56%–96%) and chemotherapy (59%–77%) [2], with a relatively low complication rate (0%–19%) [3]. We present a report on a patient with symptomatic SVCS, successfully treated with PTA.

A 34-year-old man with suspected arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, suspected Marfan syndrome, history of recurrent venous thromboembolism, triple sudden cardiac arrest, implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in secondary prevention, its triple removal and reimplantation (due to infection, end of battery life, and infective endocarditis) was admitted to the hospital due to stabbing chest pain and dyspnea. Upon physical examination, edema of the upper body and distended veins were observed, with no signs of peripheral congestion. Echocardiography showed normal dimensions and contractility of the left ventricle with ejection fraction of 50%, slightly dilated right ventricle, and moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Computed tomography angiography revealed an obstructed right brachiocephalic vein and subtotal occlusion of SVC with collateral circulation (Figure 1A; Supplementary material, Video S1). Symptomatic SVCS was diagnosed, and the patient was qualified for endovascular treatment.

Figure 1. A. Computed tomography angiography showing the obstructed right brachiocephalic vein and subtotal occlusion of the superior vena cava (SVC; red arrow) with visible collateral circulation (white arrow); B. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) showing critical stenosis of the SVC (red arrow) with visible collateral circulation (white arrows); C. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using the EverCross Balloon Catheter (8 × 60 mm, 10 atm, Medtronic); D. Control DSA showing normal outflow from the SVC, with no flow via collateral circulation (white arrows)

Following the puncture of the right common femoral vein, digital subtraction angiography was performed from the left subclavian vein, confirming critical SVC stenosis (Figure 1B). Next, PTA was conducted using the EverCross Balloon Catheter (8 × 60 mm, 10 atm, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, US) and Atlas Dilatation Catheter (12 × 80 mm, 10 atm, Beckton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, US) (Figure 1C). Control venography showed normal outflow of the SVC and no flow via the collateral circulation (Figure 1D; Supplementary material, Video S2). Following the procedure, SVC symptoms were alleviated within a few days. The ICD check confirmed correct device functioning. Considering the suspicion of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and Marfan syndrome, genetic tests were scheduled.

Although malignancy remains the most prevalent cause of SVCS, the non-malignancy causes are increasing, including thrombus or obstruction due to repeated implantable cardiac device implantation [3]. In the case of thrombosis caused by COVID-19, successful rheolytic thrombectomy with AngioJet (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, US) has recently been reported; the device is also used for endovascular treatment of acute pulmonary embolism [4, 5]. In the case of intravascular devices, stent implantation, usually followed by oral anticoagulation, is the treatment of choice. Regarding the presence of the ICD wire in the SVC, history of infective endocarditis, and complete SVC expansion following PTA, no stent was implanted in this case. Since our patient had recurrent venous thromboembolism, he was chronically treated with dabigatran, which was continued after hospital discharge.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/kardiologia_polska

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at kardiologiapolska@ptkardio.pl.

REFERENCES

  1. Seligson MT, Surowiec SM. Superior vena cava syndrome. StatPearls Publishing, , Treasure Island 2022.
  2. Locke AH, Shim DJ, Burr J, et al. Lead-associated superior vena cava syndrome. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021; 12(4): 44594465, doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120404, indexed in Pubmed: 33936861.
  3. Rachapalli V, Boucher LM. Superior vena cava syndrome: role of the interventionalist. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014; 65(2): 168176, doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2012.09.003, indexed in Pubmed: 23415716.
  4. Danışman N, Çeneli D, Kültürsay B, et al. Endovascular treatment of vena cava superior syndrome caused by COVID-19 infection using AngioJet thrombectomy. Kardio Pol. 2022; 80(5): 608609, doi: 10.33963/kp.a2022.0092, indexed in Pubmed: 35380009.
  5. Pietrasik A, Gąsecka A, Kurzyna P, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients consulted by a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team: 5-year experience. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13): 3812, doi: 10.3390/jcm11133812, indexed in Pubmed: 35807097.