Vol 69, No 8 (2011)
Original articles
Published online: 2011-08-17

open access

Page views 302
Article views/downloads 574
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Gender−related differences in clinical course, therapeutic approach and prognosis in patients with non−ST segment elevation myocardial infarction

Agnieszka Janion-Sadowska, Janusz Sielski, Marek Gierlotka, Ewa Nowalany-Kozielska, Marianna Janion, Lech Poloński
DOI: 10.33963/v.kp.79204
Kardiol Pol 2011;69(8):784-792.

Abstract

Background: There is accumulated evidence that clinical course and prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI) may differ between genders.
Aim: To compare epidemiology, the clinical course, therapeutic approach and prognosis in men and women with non-ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI).
Methods: We analysed a total of 1219 consecutive patients with NSTEMI (43% women) treated between June 01, 2005 and May 31, 2006 in a hospital covering in a district with 1,300,000 inhabitants. The data were obtained from the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS).
Results: Women in the study group were on average 6 years older than men (72.6 ± 10.3 vs 66.7 ± 11.4 years; p < 0.0001). The incidence of arterial hypertension (83.4% vs 73.45%; p < 0.0001), diabetes mellitus (30.2% vs 20.1%; p < 0.0001) and obesity (17.9% vs 13.1%; p < 0.020) was higher in women, while cigarette smoking was more common in men (7.4% vs 32.9%; p < 0.0001). Clinical presentation was similar in both genders. Coronary angiography was performed in 360 patients, more frequently in men (32.8% vs 25.2%; p < 0.05). Less women than men underwent percutaneous coronary angioplasty (18.9% vs 12.6%; p < 0.0033). In-hospital, 30-day and 6-month mortality was similar in both genders (5.3% vs 4.9%; 6.9% vs 7.3%; and 13.2% vs 13.1%, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, female gender did not influence the prognosis.
Conclusions: Although women with NSTEMI had worse baseline characteristic and less frequently underwent revascularisation, their outcomes were comparable with those in men.
Kardiol Pol 2011; 69, 8: 784–792

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Polish Heart Journal (Kardiologia Polska)