Vol 71, No 3 (2020)
Original article
Published online: 2020-09-28

open access

Page views 891
Article views/downloads 920
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Seasickness and its impact on researchers’ work on board French oceanographic vessels

David Lucas12, Myriam Mehaneze3, Brice Loddé12, dominique Jegaden2
Pubmed: 33001426
IMH 2020;71(3):160-165.

Abstract

Background: Seasickness (SS) is an often hidden pathology, but one that can significantly disrupt work on board. The aim of the study is to evaluate the influence of SS on the workability of workers on board vessels.
Materials and methods: We performed a cross-sectional questionnaire study conducted on 250 oceanographers in 2015 during 3 months. Based on the “Bos seasickness susceptibility questionnaire”, we created a specific questionnaire with 49 questions.
Results: 151 men and 72 women responded to the survey. 188 of them (91.7% of women and 80.8% of men) report being seasick, either occasionally (69%) or at each boarding where there is female predominance (23.6% vs. 11.3% for men). The major symptoms are nausea (82%) and vomiting (56%). 60% of the workers think that SS has an influence on the success of their mission, by first affecting their mood (50%), relationship (23%), and increased risk of accidents such as falls, accidents on machines or in laboratories (40%). Antinaupathic treatments also produce deleterious effects on their workstation. Women have higher risk of developing SS (odds ratio [OR] 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–6.6; p = 0.04), more frequently taking medicines when ill (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.27–13.2; p = 0.004) and coming with her own tablets (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3–4.1; p = 0.04).
Conclusions: Gender is a trending factor of SS. Information on SS clinical signs, impact and therapeutics could be prone to prevent sickness and impact of it on workability.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Bos JE, Bles W. Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions. Brain Res Bull. 1998; 47(5): 537–542.
  2. O'Hanlon JF, McCauley ME. Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency and acceleration of vertical sinusoidal motion. Aerosp Med. 1974; 45(4): 366–369.
  3. Lawther A, Griffin MA. survey of the occurrence of motionsickness amongst passengers at sea. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988; 59: 399–406.
  4. Davis MR, Holloway DS. The influence of hull form on the motions of high speed vessels in head seas. Ocean Eng. 2003; 30(16): 2091–2115.
  5. Reason JT, Brand JJ. Motion sickness. Academic Press, Oxford, England 1975.
  6. Bos JE, Damala D, Lewis C, et al. Susceptibility to seasickness. Ergonomics. 2007; 50(6): 890–901.
  7. Jégaden D, Dewitte JD, Loddé B. L’aptitude à la navigation maritime : une véritable évaluation des risques de maladie. Arch Mal Prof Environnement. 2005; 66(4): 318–325.
  8. Chan G, Moochhala C, Zhao B, et al. A comparison of motion sickness prevalence between seafarers and non-seafarers onboard naval platforms. Int Marit Health. 2006; 57(1-4): 56–65.
  9. Grovel A, Stevanovic J, Maruani M. Travailler à bord des navires de la marine marchande. Etude sociologique des risques et des violences physiques, psychologiques ou a caractere sexuel; 2017 [Document IRES].
  10. Turner M, Griffin MJ. Motion sickness incidence during a round-the-world yacht race. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1995; 66(9): 849–856.
  11. Graybiel A, Knepton J. Sopite syndrome: a sometimes sole manifestation of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976; 47(8): 873–882.
  12. Lawther A, Griffin MJ. The motion of a ship at sea and the consequent motion sickness amongst passengers. Ergonomics. 1986; 29(4): 535–552.
  13. Reschke MF, Cohen HS, Cerisano JM, et al. Effects of sex and gender on adaptation to space: neurosensory systems. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014; 23(11): 959–962.
  14. Matchock RL, Levine ME, Gianaros PJ, et al. Susceptibility to nausea and motion sickness as a function of the menstrual cycle. Womens Health Issues. 2008; 18(4): 328–335.
  15. Cuomo-Granston A, Drummond PD. Migraine and motion sickness: what is the link? Prog Neurobiol. 2010; 91(4): 300–312.
  16. Pisula PJ, Lewis CH, Bridger RS. Vessel motion thresholds for maintaining physical and cognitive performance: a study of naval personnel at sea. Ergonomics. 2012; 55(6): 636–649.
  17. Matsangas P, McCauley ME, Becker W. The effect of mild motion sickness and sopite syndrome on multitasking cognitive performance. Hum Factors. 2014; 56(6): 1124–1135.
  18. Valk P, Grech M, Bos JA. multi-factorial analysis of human performance during a 9-day sea trial. International Conference on Human Performance at Sea, Glasgow. 2010.
  19. Spatgens P. Seasickness amongst less experienced seafarers. Finlande: University of Turku, Finland; 2016 [Thesis].
  20. Gordon CR, Gonen A, Nachum Z, et al. The effects of dimenhydrinate, cinnarizine and transdermal scopolamine on performance. J Psychopharmacol. 2001; 15(3): 167–172.
  21. Trendel D, Haus-Cheymol R, Erauso T, et al. Optokinetic stimulation rehabilitation in preventing seasickness. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2010; 127(4): 125–129.
  22. Ressiot E, Dolz M, Bonne L, et al. Prospective study on the efficacy of optokinetic training in the treatment of seasickness. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013; 130(5): 263–268.