open access

Vol 72, No 4 (2021)
Original article
Submitted: 2020-03-22
Accepted: 2021-11-22
Published online: 2021-12-30
Get Citation

Effects of an on-board psychosocial programme on stress, resilience, and job satisfaction amongst a sample of merchant seafarers

Joanne McVeigh12, Malcolm MacLachlan1234, Henriette Cox5, Imogen R. Stilz6, Alistair Fraser6, Marie Galligan7, Shane Ó Meachair8
·
Pubmed: 35146741
·
IMH 2021;72(4):268-282.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
  2. Assisting Living & Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland
  3. Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
  4. Health Service Executive, Ireland
  5. Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited, London, United Kingdom
  6. Shell Health, London, United Kingdom
  7. School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  8. Accenture, Dublin, Ireland

open access

Vol 72, No 4 (2021)
MARITIME PSYCHOLOGY Original article
Submitted: 2020-03-22
Accepted: 2021-11-22
Published online: 2021-12-30

Abstract

Background: Seafarers are an occupational group amongst those at highest risk for stress, which may adversely affect their mental health. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of a psychosocial programme on perceived stress, resilience, and job satisfaction among a sample of merchant seafarers.
Materials and methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted using a work questionnaire administered by a large shipping company. The matched subjects technique and multivariate analysis of covariance were conducted using a theoretical model of the programme’s effects on job satisfaction, resilience, and perceived stress.
Results: A significant interaction between programme participation and weeks on board indicated that the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress differed significantly for the intervention group and matched control group. Weeks on board had a significant effect for perceived stress for the control group (p = 0.02), but not for the intervention group (p = 0.857).
Conclusions: These findings indicate that participation in the programme moderated the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress, suggesting that the programme may have safeguarded participants against the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress. Importantly, however, a work environment that is experienced as supportive, inclusive and just is necessary as a cornerstone for individually-focused psychosocial interventions to be optimally applied.

Abstract

Background: Seafarers are an occupational group amongst those at highest risk for stress, which may adversely affect their mental health. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of a psychosocial programme on perceived stress, resilience, and job satisfaction among a sample of merchant seafarers.
Materials and methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted using a work questionnaire administered by a large shipping company. The matched subjects technique and multivariate analysis of covariance were conducted using a theoretical model of the programme’s effects on job satisfaction, resilience, and perceived stress.
Results: A significant interaction between programme participation and weeks on board indicated that the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress differed significantly for the intervention group and matched control group. Weeks on board had a significant effect for perceived stress for the control group (p = 0.02), but not for the intervention group (p = 0.857).
Conclusions: These findings indicate that participation in the programme moderated the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress, suggesting that the programme may have safeguarded participants against the effects of weeks on board on perceived stress. Importantly, however, a work environment that is experienced as supportive, inclusive and just is necessary as a cornerstone for individually-focused psychosocial interventions to be optimally applied.

Get Citation

Keywords

merchant seafarers, psychosocial intervention, duration on board, stress, resilience, job satisfaction, MANCOVA

About this article
Title

Effects of an on-board psychosocial programme on stress, resilience, and job satisfaction amongst a sample of merchant seafarers

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 72, No 4 (2021)

Article type

Original article

Pages

268-282

Published online

2021-12-30

Page views

6978

Article views/downloads

968

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2021.0051

Pubmed

35146741

Bibliographic record

IMH 2021;72(4):268-282.

Keywords

merchant seafarers
psychosocial intervention
duration on board
stress
resilience
job satisfaction
MANCOVA

Authors

Joanne McVeigh
Malcolm MacLachlan
Henriette Cox
Imogen R. Stilz
Alistair Fraser
Marie Galligan
Shane Ó Meachair

References (117)
  1. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). Review of maritime transport 2017. UNCTAD, Geneva, Switzerland 2017. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2017_en.pdf.
  2. BIMCO (Baltic and International Maritime Council), International Chamber of Shipping. Manpower report: The global supply and demand for seafarers in 2015 (executive summary). BIMCO, International Chamber of Shipping. 2015. https://www.ics-shipping.org/publication/manpower-report-2015-executive-summary/.
  3. Oldenburg M, Baur X, Schlaich C. Occupational Risks and Challenges of Seafaring. J Occup Health. 2010; 52(5): 249–256.
  4. Slišković A, Penezić Z. Occupational stressors, risks and health in the seafaring population. Rev Psychology. 2015; 22(1-2): 29–39.
  5. BeşİkÇİ EB, Tavacıoğlu L, Arslan ö. The subjective measurement of seafarers’ fatigue levels and mental symptoms. Maritime Policy Management. 2015; 43(3): 329–343.
  6. Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, et al. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(4): 188–194.
  7. Jepsen JR, Zhao Z, van Leeuwen WMA. Seafarer fatigue: a review of risk factors, consequences for seafarers' health and safety and options for mitigation. Int Marit Health. 2015; 66(2): 106–117.
  8. Oldenburg M, Hogan B, Jensen HJ. Systematic review of maritime field studies about stress and strain in seafaring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013; 86(1): 1–15.
  9. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Merchant seafaring: a changing and hazardous occupation. Occup Environ Med. 2012; 69(9): 685–688.
  10. Oldenburg M, Jensen HJ. Stress and strain among merchant seafarers differs across the three voyage episodes of port stay, river passage and sea passage. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6): e0217904.
  11. Jensen HJ, Oldenburg M. Potentially traumatic experiences of seafarers. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2019; 14: 17.
  12. Hystad SW, Eid J. Sleep and fatigue among seafarers: the role of environmental stressors, duration at sea and psychological capital. Saf Health Work. 2016; 7(4): 363–371.
  13. Comperatore CA, Rivera PK, Kingsley L. Enduring the shipboard stressor complex: a systems approach. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005; 76(6 Suppl): B108–B118.
  14. Jensen OC, Sørensen JFL, Thomas M, et al. Working conditions in international seafaring. Occup Med (Lond). 2006; 56(6): 393–397.
  15. Tomaszunas S, Carter T. The development of maritime medicine. In: Carter T (ed.) Textbook of maritime medicine (2nd ed.). Norwegian Centre for Maritime Medicine,, Bergen, Norway 2014.
  16. Allen P, Wadsworth E, Smith A, et al. The prevention and management of seafarers' fatigue: a review. Int Marit Health. 2007; 58(1-4): 167–177.
  17. Borovnik M. Occupational health and safety of merchant seafarers from Kiribati and Tuvalu. Asia Pac Viewp. 2011; 52(3): 333–346.
  18. Dimitrova DN, Blanpain R. (Ed.) Seafarers' rights in the globalized maritime industry. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands 2010.
  19. ITF Seafarers’ Trust. Summary report from the ITF Seafarers’ Trust Autumn 2016 Workshop on Social Isolation, Depression and Suicide (SIDS). ITF Seafarers’ Trust, London, England 2017.
  20. Project MARTHA. Project MARTHA: The final report. 2016.
  21. Clare H. Down to the sea in ships: Of ageless oceans and modern men. Vintage, London, England 2015.
  22. Walters D, Bailey N. Lives in peril: Profit or safety in the global maritime industry? Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY 2013.
  23. Alderton T, Bloor M, Kahveci E, et al. The global seafarer: Living and working conditions in a globalized industry. International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland 2004.
  24. Carter T. Working at sea and psychosocial health problems Report of an International Maritime Health Association Workshop. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2005; 3(2): 61–65.
  25. ITF (International Transport Workers’ Federation). Out of sight, out of mind: Seafarers, fishers and human rights. ITF, London, England 2006.
  26. MacLachlan M. Maritime psychology: Definition, scope and conceptualization. In: MacLachlan M (ed.) Maritime psychology: Research in organizational and health behavior at sea. Springer, Cham, Switzerland 2017: 1–18.
  27. War on Want, ITF (International Transport Workers’ Federation). Sweatships. 2002. http://www.waronwant.org/resources/sweatships.
  28. Suphanchaimat R, Pudpong N, Tangcharoensathien V. Extreme exploitation in Southeast Asia waters: Challenges in progressing towards universal health coverage for migrant workers. PLoS Med. 2017; 14(11): e1002441.
  29. Human Rights at Sea. An introduction & commentary to the 2011 UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights & their implementation in the maritime environment. Human Rights at Sea, Havant, England 2016. https://www.humanrightsatsea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/HRAS-UNGP-Report-2016-low-res-sp.pdf.
  30. Lipowski M, Lipowska M, Peplińska A, et al. Personality determinants of health behaviours of merchant navy officers. Int Marit Health. 2014; 65(3): 158–165.
  31. Jeżewska M, Leszczyńska I, Jaremin B. Work-related stress at sea self estimation by maritime students and officers. Int Marit Health. 2006; 57(1-4): 66–75.
  32. MacLachlan M, Cromie S, Liston P. Psychosocial and organisational aspects. In: Carter T, editor. Textbook of maritime medicine (2nd ed. Norwegian Centre for Maritime Medicine, Bergen, Norway 2013.
  33. Carter T. Mapping the knowledge base for maritime health: 3 illness and injury in seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2011; 62(4): 224–240.
  34. Iversen RTB. The mental health of seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(2): 78–89.
  35. WHO (World Health Organization). Mental health: Suicide data. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland n.d. http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/suicideprevent/en/.
  36. Slišković A. Occupational stress in seafaring. In: MacLachlan M (ed.) Maritime psychology: Research in organizational and health behavior at sea. Springer, Cham, Switzerland 2017: 99–126.
  37. Velankar A. Mental health and wellbeing of a seafarer. Thome Group, Singapore 2017.
  38. Lefkowitz RY, Slade MD, Redlich CA. Rates and occupational characteristics of international seafarers with mental illness. Occup Med (Lond). 2019; 69(4): 279–282.
  39. Mellbye A, Carter T. Seafarers' depression and suicide. Int Marit Health. 2017; 68(2): 108–114.
  40. ISWAN (The International Seafarers’ Welfare and Assistance Network). Shipping companies need to support seafarers presenting with mental health issues. ISWAN, London, England 2019. https://www.seafarerswelfare.org/news/2019/shipping-companies-need-to-support-seafarers-presenting-with-mental-health-issues.
  41. Doyle N, MacLachlan M, Fraser A, et al. Resilience and well-being amongst seafarers: cross-sectional study of crew across 51 ships. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016; 89(2): 199–209.
  42. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Vallières F, et al. Identifying predictors of stress and job satisfaction in a sample of merchant seafarers using structural equation modeling. Front Psychol. 2019; 10: 70.
  43. Friborg O, Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, et al. Resilience as a moderator of pain and stress. J Psychosom Res. 2006; 61(2): 213–219.
  44. Hjemdal O, Friborg O, Stiles T, et al. Resilience predicting psychiatric symptoms: a prospective study of protective factors and their role in adjustment to stressful life events. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2006; 13(3): 194–201.
  45. Ong AD, Bergeman CS, Bisconti TL, et al. Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91(4): 730–749.
  46. Pietrzak RH, Johnson DC, Goldstein MB, et al. Psychosocial buffers of traumatic stress, depressive symptoms, and psychosocial difficulties in veterans of Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom: the role of resilience, unit support, and postdeployment social support. J Affect Disord. 2010; 120(1-3): 188–192.
  47. Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J Organ Behav. 2002; 23(6): 695–706.
  48. Norris FH, Tracy M, Galea S. Looking for resilience: understanding the longitudinal trajectories of responses to stress. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(12): 2190–2198.
  49. American Psychological Association. Building your resilience. 2012. https://www.apa.org/topics/resilience.
  50. Bartone P. Resilience under military operational stress: can leaders influence hardiness? Military Psychology. 2009; 18(sup1): S131–S148.
  51. Maddi SR. Hardiness: Turning stressful circumstances into resilient growth. Springer, New York, NY 2013.
  52. Ouellette SC. Hardiness. In: Stellman J (ed.) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety (4th ed., Vol. 2). International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland 1998: 1980–1981.
  53. Maddi SR, Khoshaba DM. Resilience at work: How to succeed no matter what life throws at you. Amacom, New York, NY 2005.
  54. Bartone P. Hardiness protects against war-related stress in Army Reserve forces. Consult Psychol J. 1999; 51(2): 72–82.
  55. Bartone PT, Hystad SW. Increasing mental hardiness for stress resilience in operational settings. In: Johnsen B, Eid J (ed.) Enhancing human performance in security operations: International and law enforcement perspectives. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL 2010: 257–272.
  56. Coutu D. How resilience works. Harvard Business Review. 2002. https://hbr.org/2002/05/how-resilience-works.
  57. Luthans F, Vogelgesang G, Lester P. Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review. 2016; 5(1): 25–44.
  58. Bartone PT. What is hardiness? 2017. http://www.hardiness-resilience.com/hello-world/.
  59. Turan O, Kurt R, Arslan V, et al. Can we learn from aviation: safety enhancements in transport by achieving human orientated resilient shipping environment. Transp Res Proc. 2016; 14: 1669–1678.
  60. Hystad S, Bye H. Safety behaviours at sea: The role of personal values and personality hardiness. Safety Science. 2013; 57: 19–26.
  61. March on Stress. March on Stress news: Supporting occupational mental health in the shipping industry. March on Stress, Dorset, England 2013. http://www.marchonstress.com/index.php/news/article/73.
  62. Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Sood A, et al. The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2014; 3: 20.
  63. Slišković A, Penezić Z. Descriptive study of job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction in a sample of Croatian seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2015; 66(2): 97–105.
  64. Li K, Yin J, Luo M, et al. Leading factors in job satisfaction of Chinese seafarers. Int J Shipping Transport Logistics. 2014; 6(6): 680–693.
  65. Bekru ET, Cherie A, Anjulo AA. Job satisfaction and determinant factors among midwives working at health facilities in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2017; 12(2): e0172397.
  66. Herzberg F. One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Rev. 1968; 46(1): 53–62.
  67. Herzberg F. Motivation-hygiene profiles: Pinpointing what ails the organization. Organizational Dynamics. 1974; 3(2): 18–29.
  68. Spector PE. Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA 1997.
  69. Bergheim K, Nielsen M, Mearns K, et al. The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science. 2015; 74: 27–36.
  70. Kim JM, Lee DH. The Determinants of Turnover Intentions of Korean Seafarers. J Korean Navigation Port Res. 2011; 35(3): 219–226.
  71. Nielsen MB, Bergheim K, Eid J. Relationships between work environment factors and workers' well-being in the maritime industry. Int Marit Health. 2013; 64(2): 80–88.
  72. Caesar L, Cahoon S, Fei J. Exploring the range of retention issues for seafarers in global shipping: opportunities for further research. WMU J Maritime Affairs. 2015; 14(1): 141–157.
  73. Nielsen MB, Mearns K, Matthiesen SB, et al. Using the Job Demands-Resources model to investigate risk perception, safety climate and job satisfaction in safety critical organizations. Scand J Psychol. 2011; 52(5): 465–475.
  74. Hyde G. Can you predict job satisfaction? HRZone. 2015. http://www.hrzone.com/talent/retention/can-you-predict-job-satisfaction?utm_content=buffer3db9b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.
  75. Hyde G, Knocker G. Made to measure: Research report. Psychological Consultancy, Tunbridge Wells, England n.d. http://www.profilematchassessments.com/PM2ResearchReport.pdf.
  76. Rahmawati SW. Employee resiliencies and job satisfaction. J Educational, Health Community Psychology. 2013; 2(1): 30–37.
  77. Robertson Cooper. Mental resilience is the strongest predictor of job satisfaction. Robertson Cooper, Manchester, England n.d.
  78. Youssef C, Luthans F. Positive organizational behavior in the workplace. J Management. 2016; 33(5): 774–800.
  79. Carotenuto A, Fasanaro AM, Molino I, et al. The Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) for assessing stress of seafarers on board merchant ships. Int Marit Health. 2013; 64(4): 215–220.
  80. MacLachlan M, Kavanagh B, Kay A. Maritime health: a review with suggestions for research. Int Marit Health. 2012; 63(1): 1–6.
  81. Carter T, Karlshoej K. The design of health promotion strategies for seafarers. Int Marit Health. 2017; 68(2): 102–107.
  82. Jagosh J, Pike K, Henderson S, et al. A realist review of merchant seafarers’ welfare (2006-2016): Examining the changing context for directing charitable innovations; A report prepared by Southampton Solent University for the Maritime Charities Group (MCG). 2017. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7a81/b2fdec13d2414dc1f1a92eb476d13f56276b.pdf.
  83. Jacobs K. Focus on 'resilience' to improve wellbeing, says Shell's health chief. HR Magazine (MA Business and Leisure), Dinton, England 2013. http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/article-details/focus-on-resilience-to-improve-wellbeing-says-shells-health-chief.
  84. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Stilz R. Positive psychology and well-being at sea. In: MacLachlan M (ed.) Maritime psychology: Research in organizational and health behaviour at sea. Springer, Cham, Switzerland 2017: 19–48.
  85. Bhattacharjee S. A guide to merchant navy officer ranks. Marine Insight, Bangladore, India 2021. http://www.marineinsight.com/careers-2/a-guide-to-merchant-navy-officer-ranks/.
  86. Pritchard B. Some lexical aspects of translating specialised texts. In: Gotti M, Sarcevic S (ed.) Insights into specialized translation (Volume 46 of Linguistic Insights: Studies in Language and Communication). Lang, Bern, Switzerland 2006: 261–288.
  87. Bartone PT. Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale. Psychol Rep. 2007; 101(3 Pt 1): 943–944.
  88. Bartone PT. A short hardiness scale. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York, NY 1995.
  89. Bartone PT, Hystad SW, Eid J, et al. Psychological hardiness and coping style as risk/resilience factors for alcohol abuse. Mil Med. 2012; 177(5): 517–524.
  90. Kelly D, Matthews M, Bartone P. Grit and hardiness as predictors of performance among west point cadets. Military Psychology. 2017; 26(4): 327–342.
  91. Hystad S. Exploring gender equivalence and bias in a measure of psychological hardiness. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2012; 4(4).
  92. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2: 53–55.
  93. Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed. Routledge, London, England 2000.
  94. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4): 385–396.
  95. Cohen S, Williamson GM. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S (ed.) The social psychology of health. SAGE, Newbury Park, CA 1988: 31–68.
  96. Warttig SL, Forshaw MJ, South J, et al. New, normative, English-sample data for the Short Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). J Health Psychol. 2013; 18(12): 1617–1628.
  97. Wu S, Amtmann D. Psychometric Evaluation of the Perceived Stress Scale in Multiple Sclerosis. ISRN Rehabilitation. 2013; 2013: 1–9.
  98. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning, Boston, MA 2016.
  99. Hatcher L. Step-by-step basic statistics using SAS: Student guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC 2003.
  100. Ray WJ. Methods: Toward a science of behavior and experience (10th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA 2012.
  101. Myers A, Hansen C. Experimental psychology (7th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA 2012.
  102. Brown CE. Applied multivariate statistics in geohydrology and related sciences. Springer, Berlin, Germany 1998.
  103. Coolidge FL. Statistics: A gentle introduction. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA 2013.
  104. Mertler CA, Vannatta Reinhart R. Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (6th ed.). Routledge, New York, NY 2016.
  105. Singh K. Quantitative social research methods. SAGE, New Delhi, India 2007.
  106. Miles J. General and generalised linear models. In: Miles J, Gilbert P (ed.) A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 2005: 217–236.
  107. Hahs-Vaughn DL. Applied multivariate statistical concepts. Routledge, New York, NY 2017.
  108. Seo T, Kanda T, Fujikoshi Y. The effects of nonnormality of tests for dimensionality in canonical correlation and MANOVA models. J Multivariate Analysis. 1995; 52(2): 325–337.
  109. Parkhe A. "Messy" research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures. Acad Manage Rev. 1993; 18(2): 227.
  110. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Coyle C, et al. Perceptions of well-being, resilience and stress amongst a sample of merchant seafarers and superintendents. Maritime Studies. 2018; 18(2): 139–158.
  111. Andersson G, Titov N. Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2014; 13(1): 4–11.
  112. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Gilmore B, et al. Promoting good policy for leadership and governance of health related rehabilitation: a realist synthesis. Global Health. 2016; 12(1): 49.
  113. Grove SK, Burns N, Gray JR. Collecting and managing data. In: Grove SK, Burns N, Gray JR, editors. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (7th ed.). Elsevier, St. Louis, MO 2013: 507–533.
  114. McBurney DH, White TL. Research methods (8th ed.). Wadsworth, Belmont, CA 2010.
  115. Lee EH. Review of the psychometric evidence of the perceived stress scale. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2012; 6(4): 121–127.
  116. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M, Kavanagh B. The positive psychology of maritime health. J Institute Remote Health Care. 2016; 7(2): 20–28.
  117. McVeigh J, MacLachlan M. A silver wave? Filipino shipmates’ experience of merchant seafaring. Marine Policy. 2019; 99: 283–297.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl