open access

Vol 69, No 2 (2018)
Original article
Submitted: 2018-03-15
Accepted: 2018-05-04
Published online: 2018-06-22
Get Citation

Cruise ship pathologies in remote regions

Mathieu Carron1, Nicolas Emeyriat1, Jacques Levraut1, Nicolas Blondeau1
·
Pubmed: 29939383
·
IMH 2018;69(2):75-83.
Affiliations
  1. Emergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, F-06001, France

open access

Vol 69, No 2 (2018)
MARITIME MEDICINE Original article
Submitted: 2018-03-15
Accepted: 2018-05-04
Published online: 2018-06-22

Abstract

Background: Navigations on cruise ships are rising and tend to spread to remote areas like polar regions. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of pathologies encountered on a cruise ship navigating in remote areas including Polar Seas.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted aboard a cruise ship with an overall capacity of 200–264 passengers and 140 crewmembers, sailing in remote areas as the Arctic Ocean and the Antarctic Peninsula over a period of 205 days. The database was built on all first consultations for passengers and crewmembers done by the onboard physician. Each symptom and diagnosis was coded according to the “International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition”. For statistical analysis, the quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and qualitative data as percentages. The percentages were compared using a c2 test corrected according to the Yates’ method or by a Fisher test when appropriate.

Results: A total of 446 diagnoses were studied on the 910 consultations originally included (13.7% of the people on board). The median age for the passengers and the crewmembers was respectively 68 (age ranging from 12 to 90) years and 31 (18–62) years. Likewise, the sex ratio (male/female) was 0.98 and 3.23. Infectious diseases were predominant (prevalence of 43.7%). Among them, respiratory infections were the most common and gastroenteritis seemed to be more frequent in passengers (prevalence of 11.5% vs. 5%, p = 0.10). Cutaneous pathologies were more frequent in crewmembers (prevalence of 26.6% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.04) and allergic dermatitis was the second most frequent in this group of patients (prevalence of 7.2%). Cardiovascular diseases, more common in passengers (p = 0.05), represented 4% of all diagnoses. Two cases of phlebitis, one stroke and one subacute heart failure were diagnosed. Among traumatic injuries, cutaneous traumas were the commonest (prevalence of 76.5%). Musculoskeletal traumas were more common in passengers (p = 0.04). An acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage required a medical evacuation from the Antarctic Peninsula.

Conclusions: The physician should be prepared to face emergency cases by developing personal expertise specific to maritime medicine in remote areas. Highlighting the particularity of cases handled in remote areas, our results should also pave the way of the development of medical protocols for ships lacking physician.

Abstract

Background: Navigations on cruise ships are rising and tend to spread to remote areas like polar regions. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of pathologies encountered on a cruise ship navigating in remote areas including Polar Seas.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted aboard a cruise ship with an overall capacity of 200–264 passengers and 140 crewmembers, sailing in remote areas as the Arctic Ocean and the Antarctic Peninsula over a period of 205 days. The database was built on all first consultations for passengers and crewmembers done by the onboard physician. Each symptom and diagnosis was coded according to the “International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition”. For statistical analysis, the quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and qualitative data as percentages. The percentages were compared using a c2 test corrected according to the Yates’ method or by a Fisher test when appropriate.

Results: A total of 446 diagnoses were studied on the 910 consultations originally included (13.7% of the people on board). The median age for the passengers and the crewmembers was respectively 68 (age ranging from 12 to 90) years and 31 (18–62) years. Likewise, the sex ratio (male/female) was 0.98 and 3.23. Infectious diseases were predominant (prevalence of 43.7%). Among them, respiratory infections were the most common and gastroenteritis seemed to be more frequent in passengers (prevalence of 11.5% vs. 5%, p = 0.10). Cutaneous pathologies were more frequent in crewmembers (prevalence of 26.6% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.04) and allergic dermatitis was the second most frequent in this group of patients (prevalence of 7.2%). Cardiovascular diseases, more common in passengers (p = 0.05), represented 4% of all diagnoses. Two cases of phlebitis, one stroke and one subacute heart failure were diagnosed. Among traumatic injuries, cutaneous traumas were the commonest (prevalence of 76.5%). Musculoskeletal traumas were more common in passengers (p = 0.04). An acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage required a medical evacuation from the Antarctic Peninsula.

Conclusions: The physician should be prepared to face emergency cases by developing personal expertise specific to maritime medicine in remote areas. Highlighting the particularity of cases handled in remote areas, our results should also pave the way of the development of medical protocols for ships lacking physician.

Get Citation

Keywords

cruise ship, illness, Antarctica, passengers, crewmembers, remote regions

About this article
Title

Cruise ship pathologies in remote regions

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 69, No 2 (2018)

Article type

Original article

Pages

75-83

Published online

2018-06-22

Page views

1662

Article views/downloads

1534

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2018.0012

Pubmed

29939383

Bibliographic record

IMH 2018;69(2):75-83.

Keywords

cruise ship
illness
Antarctica
passengers
crewmembers
remote regions

Authors

Mathieu Carron
Nicolas Emeyriat
Jacques Levraut
Nicolas Blondeau

References (35)
  1. Sobotta BAJ, John MT, Nitschke I. Dental practice during a world cruise: characterisation of oral health at sea. Int Marit Health. 2006; 57(1-4): 136–148.
  2. Prociv P. Health aspects of Antarctic tourism. J Travel Med. 1998; 5(4): 210–212.
  3. International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. Tourism Statistics . http://iaato.org/tourism-statistics (30/07/2017).
  4. Norum J. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the Norwegian Arctic. Air ambulance operations 1999-2009 and future challenges in the region. Int Marit Health. 2010; 62(3): 117–122.
  5. Turney C. This was no Antarctic pleasure cruise. Nature. 2014; 505(7482): 133.
  6. Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises. Présentation générale des TAAF . http://www.taaf.fr/Presentation-generale-des-TAAF (30/07/2017).
  7. Smith LC, Stephenson SR. New Trans-Arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(13): E1191–E1195.
  8. Peake DE, Gray CL, Ludwig MR, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of injury and illness among cruise ship passengers. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 33(1): 67–72.
  9. Dahl E. Anatomy of a world cruise. J Travel Med. 1999; 6(3): 168–171.
  10. Bledsoe GH, Brill JD, Zak D, et al. Injury and illness aboard an Antarctic cruise ship. Wilderness Environ Med. 2007; 18(1): 36–40.
  11. Pearson WS, Bhat-Schelbert K, Probst JC. Multiple chronic conditions and the aging of america: challenge for primary care physicians. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012; 3(1): 51–56.
  12. Schutz L, Zak D, Holmes JF. Pattern of passenger injury and illness on expedition cruise ships to Antarctica. J Travel Med. 2014; 21(4): 228–234.
  13. Dahl E. Medical practice during a world cruise: a descriptive epidemiological study of injury and illness among passengers and crew. Int Marit Health. 2005; 56(1-4): 115–128.
  14. World Health Organization. International Classification of Primary Care, Second Edition (ICPC-2). http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/adaptations/icpc2/en/ (30/07/2017).
  15. Ressiot E, Dolz M, Bonne L, et al. Étude prospective sur l’efficacité de la rééducation optocinétique dans le traitement des naupathies. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale. 2013; 130(5): 268–273.
  16. DiGiovanna T, Rosen T, Forsett R, et al. Shipboard medicine: a new niche for emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 1992; 21(12): 1476–1479.
  17. Carron M, Van Gy, Fuzibet JG, et al. ECOGEN RESPI: étude des résultats de consultation associés à un motif respiratoire en médecine générale. Exercer. 2015; 26(118): 61–7.
  18. Brotherton JML, Delpech VC, Gilbert GL, et al. Cruise Ship Outbreak Investigation Team. A large outbreak of influenza A and B on a cruise ship causing widespread morbidity. Epidemiol Infect. 2003; 130(2): 263–271.
  19. Cramer EH, Blanton CJ, Blanton LH, et al. Vessel Sanitation Program Environmental Health Inspection Team. Epidemiology of gastroenteritis on cruise ships, 2001-2004. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30(3): 252–257.
  20. White MB, Rajagopalan S, Yoshikawa TT. Infectious Diarrhea: Norovirus and Clostridium difficile in Older Adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2016; 32(3): 509–522.
  21. DuPont HL. Acute infectious diarrhea in immunocompetent adults. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(16): 1532–1540.
  22. Isakbaeva ET, Widdowson MA, Beard RS, et al. Norovirus transmission on cruise ship. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005; 11(1): 154–158.
  23. Freeland AL, Vaughan GH, Banerjee SN. Acute Gastroenteritis on Cruise Ships - United States, 2008-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016; 65(1): 1–5.
  24. Trivedi TK, DeSalvo T, Lee L, et al. Hospitalizations and mortality associated with norovirus outbreaks in nursing homes, 2009-2010. JAMA. 2012; 308(16): 1668–1675.
  25. Golding JF. Motion Sickness. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016; 137: 371–90.
  26. Madrigano J, Mittleman MA, Baccarelli A, et al. Temperature, myocardial infarction, and mortality: effect modification by individual- and area-level characteristics. Epidemiology. 2013; 24(3): 439–446.
  27. Medina-Ramón M, Zanobetti A, Cavanagh DP, et al. Extreme temperatures and mortality: assessing effect modification by personal characteristics and specific cause of death in a multi-city case-only analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(9): 1331–1336.
  28. Näyhä S. Environmental Temperature and Mortality. Int J Circumpolar health. 2005; 64(5): 4518.
  29. Schwartz J. Who is sensitive to extremes of temperature?: A case-only analysis. Epidemiology. 2005; 16(1): 67–72.
  30. Mills CN, Mills GH, Mills GH, et al. Challenges of air medical evacuation from Antarctica. Air Med J. 2008; 27(6): 281–285.
  31. Dahl E. Medical cruise challenges in Antarctica. J Travel Med. 2014; 21(4): 223–224.
  32. Carron M, Globokar P, Sicard BA. Acute gastrointestinal haemorrhage on board a cruise ship in the Antarctic Peninsula. Int Marit Health. 2016; 67(4): 223–226.
  33. Podkolinski MT, Semmens K. Intestinal haemorrhage in Antarctica. A multinational rescue operation. Med J Aust. 1979; 2(6): 275–277.
  34. Olsen I, van Winkelhoff AJ. Acute focal infections of dental origin. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 65(1): 178–189.
  35. Khow KSF, Visvanathan R. Falls in the aging population. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017; 33(3): 357–368.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl