open access

Vol 69, No 1 (2018)
Original article
Submitted: 2018-01-22
Accepted: 2018-02-26
Published online: 2018-03-28
Get Citation

Prevalence of skin diseases amongst Moroccan fishermen

Omar Laraqui12, Nadia Manar1, Salwa Laraqui1, Tarik Ghailan3, Frédéric Deschamps2, Reda Hammouda4, Chakib El Houssine Laraqui1
·
Pubmed: 29611610
·
IMH 2018;69(1):22-27.
Affiliations
  1. Graduate School of Health Engineering, 24 rue Lafontaine, Quartier Racine, 20100 Casablanca, Morocco
  2. University institute of occupational health and environmental medicine of Reims, Reims, Reims, France
  3. Moroccan Society of maritime health, Tangier,, Morocco
  4. Moroccan Society of occupational health research, 39 Lalla Yacout avenue, 20080 Casablanca, Morocco

open access

Vol 69, No 1 (2018)
MARITIME MEDICINE Original article
Submitted: 2018-01-22
Accepted: 2018-02-26
Published online: 2018-03-28

Abstract

Background: The main objective was to evaluate the prevalence of skin diseases amongst fishermen, to  specify the different clinical forms, associations and most frequent localisations, and to identify potential  aetiological factors. The secondary objectives were to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of  seafarers regarding occupational dermatoses to conduct information, awareness and education campaigns  on risk factors and behaviours and to propose adapted prevention. 

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional survey involved 1102 artisanal fishermen who attended the  annual legal medical consultation at the occupational health service. All participants were men and had  a regular activity for at least 2 years. It included an individual questionnaire, a clinical examination and  a technical visit to the workplace 

Results: The skin disorders were palmar hyperkeratosis in 67.1% of fishermen, plantar hyperkeratosis in  59.4%, scares in 52.2%, facial wrinkling in 32%, and marine stings in 11.2%. The skin infections were  fungal (44.4%), bacterial (8.3%), viral (5.5%) and scabies (1%). Only 192 (17.4%) fishermen did not have  any dermatologic disease, 43% had one type of dermatologic diseases, 27.2% two types, 9.5% three types  and 2.5% four types. Concerning personal protective equipment, only 87.4% wore protective clothing,  12.8% high visibility clothing, 52.6% safety shoes, 30.1% protective gloves, and 63.5% protective caps  or hats. Only, 12% knew that mycosis were infectious origin and were contagious. Eighty-two per cent  ignored the mode of contamination, 78% the means of prevention and 91% the existence of a medical  treatment. Ninety-five per cent thought that pityriasis versicolor was due to sunrays especially in summer  and not to fungus. 

Conclusions: The elaboration of the prevention approach needs a cooperative spirit; it will be more  accepted and applied by all fishermen, if their representatives are involved in its preparation. The realisation  of information and sensitization campaigns about the skin health must be based on the results  of prevalence surveys.   

Abstract

Background: The main objective was to evaluate the prevalence of skin diseases amongst fishermen, to  specify the different clinical forms, associations and most frequent localisations, and to identify potential  aetiological factors. The secondary objectives were to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of  seafarers regarding occupational dermatoses to conduct information, awareness and education campaigns  on risk factors and behaviours and to propose adapted prevention. 

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional survey involved 1102 artisanal fishermen who attended the  annual legal medical consultation at the occupational health service. All participants were men and had  a regular activity for at least 2 years. It included an individual questionnaire, a clinical examination and  a technical visit to the workplace 

Results: The skin disorders were palmar hyperkeratosis in 67.1% of fishermen, plantar hyperkeratosis in  59.4%, scares in 52.2%, facial wrinkling in 32%, and marine stings in 11.2%. The skin infections were  fungal (44.4%), bacterial (8.3%), viral (5.5%) and scabies (1%). Only 192 (17.4%) fishermen did not have  any dermatologic disease, 43% had one type of dermatologic diseases, 27.2% two types, 9.5% three types  and 2.5% four types. Concerning personal protective equipment, only 87.4% wore protective clothing,  12.8% high visibility clothing, 52.6% safety shoes, 30.1% protective gloves, and 63.5% protective caps  or hats. Only, 12% knew that mycosis were infectious origin and were contagious. Eighty-two per cent  ignored the mode of contamination, 78% the means of prevention and 91% the existence of a medical  treatment. Ninety-five per cent thought that pityriasis versicolor was due to sunrays especially in summer  and not to fungus. 

Conclusions: The elaboration of the prevention approach needs a cooperative spirit; it will be more  accepted and applied by all fishermen, if their representatives are involved in its preparation. The realisation  of information and sensitization campaigns about the skin health must be based on the results  of prevalence surveys.   

Get Citation

Keywords

skin diseases, fishermen, Morocco

About this article
Title

Prevalence of skin diseases amongst Moroccan fishermen

Journal

International Maritime Health

Issue

Vol 69, No 1 (2018)

Article type

Original article

Pages

22-27

Published online

2018-03-28

Page views

2346

Article views/downloads

1656

DOI

10.5603/IMH.2018.0004

Pubmed

29611610

Bibliographic record

IMH 2018;69(1):22-27.

Keywords

skin diseases
fishermen
Morocco

Authors

Omar Laraqui
Nadia Manar
Salwa Laraqui
Tarik Ghailan
Frédéric Deschamps
Reda Hammouda
Chakib El Houssine Laraqui

References (20)
  1. Burke WA, Griffith DC, Scott CM, et al. Skin problems related to the occupation of commercial fishing in North Carolina. N C Med J. 2006; 67(4): 260–265.
  2. Misery L. Maritime dermatology. Int Marit Health. 2008; 59(1-4): 113–115.
  3. Lucas R, Boniface K, Hite M, et al. Skin disorders at sea. Int Marit Health. 2010; 61(1): 9–12.
  4. Worker Health Chart book 2004. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.cdc.gov//niosh/docs/2004.146/pdfs/2004.146.pdf (Accessed December4, 2009).
  5. EU-OSHA – European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Skin diseases and dermal exposure in the European Union (EU-25): policy and practice overview 2008. 244 pp. ISBN 978-92-9191-161-5 2008.
  6. The ship captain's medical guide. Diseases of fishermen. Maritime and Coastguard Agency 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-ship-captains-medical-guide..
  7. Sauvage T, Lucas D. 18ème journées de médecine maritime. Paris 2016, Références en santé au travail, N° 149, INRS, France : 111-15 Paris, 2016.
  8. Arnault JP. Thèse de doctorat d’Etat de médecine : La pathologie dermatologique des marins. Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy 2008: 116.
  9. Loddé B, Jégaden D, Dewitte JD, Misery L. Les pathologies dermatologiques professionnelles maritimes. In: Traité de Médecine maritime. Lavoisier Médecine sciences 2015: 602.
  10. Loddé B, Dewitte JD, Eniafe B, et al. Les maladies professionnelles cutanées maritimes. Nouvel Dermatol. 2004; 23: 458–64.
  11. Bernardes Filho F, Towersey L, Cipriani Frade MA, et al. Educational actions to promote the skin health of fishermen in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Community Dermatol J. 2017; 13: 13–24.
  12. Al Hamdi KI, Al-Malikey MA. Frequency of skin diseases among sea fishermen in Basrah. The Internet Journal of Dermatology 2009; 7(1). http://www.ispub.com/journal/the_internet _journal_of_dermatology//volume_7_number_1_18/article/frequency_of_skin_diseases_among_sea_fishermen_in_basrah.html (accessed March 9, 2009).
  13. Susitaival P, Flyvholm MA, Meding B, et al. Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Dermatitis. 2003; 49(2): 70–76.
  14. Mahé C. Pathologies dermatologiques rencontrées chez les navigateurs : étude descriptive réalisée lors de la transat AG2R. Thèse de doctorat d’Etat de Médecine Université de Brest, Brest 2013: 89.
  15. Faergemann J. Pityrosporum infections. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994; 31(3 Pt 2): S18–S20.
  16. Other skin conditions that may affect seafarers in Disorder of skin (chapter 25) in Textbook of Maritime Medicine Norwegian center for maritime medicine & Carter, Tim - United Kingdom. http://textbook.ncmm.no/index.php/textbook-of-maritime-medicine (2014).
  17. The International Seafarers Welfare and Assistance Network. http://seafarerswelfare.org/about-iswan.
  18. Crépy MN. Dermatites de contact professionnelles aux produits de la mer. Fiche d’allergologie – dermatologie professionnelle, DMT N°129 INRS, France ; 107-18.
  19. Jeebhay MF, Robins TG, Lehrer SB, et al. Occupational seafood allergy: a review. Occup Environ Med. 2001; 58(9): 553–562.
  20. Dahl E. Wound infections on board ship--prevention, pathogens, and treatment. Int Marit Health. 2011; 62(3): 186–190.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

tel.: +48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl